ISSN 0327-5744 |
|
Scope and policy
Section Policy Each issue of the magazine consists of a first section of scientific articles related to the purpose of the publication and a final section of book reviews. Occasionally, the first section may contain a subsection of thematic articles and another miscellany to publish articles on general topics, always referring to issues related to the purpose of the publication. The magazine receives, throughout the year, scientific articles on different topics within the field of labor studies. Additionally, calls are made for articles on specific topics for the thematic subsection. Reviews of recently published books are also accepted. Appropriately, it is planned to publish reports of national and regional academic meetings (conferences, conferences, etc.). Arbitration system The submitted works will be subject to evaluation by the Editorial Committee and anonymous referees. The first evaluation will be carried out by the Editorial Committee, which may directly reject the works received, without resorting to an external consultation process, if it considers them inappropriate for the journal because they lack the required level of quality, due to lack of adaptation to the scientific objectives of the journal. the magazine, or for presenting evidence of scientific fraud. In the second instance, the Editorial Committee will send the contribution to two anonymous external evaluators, specialists in the field, who begin the double-blind arbitration process (anonymity of those who have carried out the work and the evaluators). If the article is approved by the evaluators, who may accept the article with or without modifications, the decision will be communicated to the authors. When one of the two evaluations is negative, a third report will be requested. If modifications are required, the authors must resubmit the works with the suggested reformulations. In the case of major changes, the works will be sent again to the referees for review. When the works are rejected by both evaluators, the decision is communicated to the authors. The final responsibility for accepting or rejecting a work for publication falls on the Editorial Committee, which must base this on the reports received about it. These reports must base their opinion on the quality of the works on their relevance, originality, academic quality and clarity of presentation. In all cases the evaluations are final. Processing Fee Policies (APC) The magazine does not charge any type of Article Processing Charges (APCs), whether for refereeing, style correction, editing or translation tasks. On the other hand, the authors will not receive any type of monetary compensation from the journal. Code of ethics Estudios del Trabajo adheres to the international standards and codes of ethics established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which are available in the document "Code of Conduct and Best Practices Guidelines for Journals Editors, COPE". Plagiarism detection Estudios del Trabajo will publish only original works. The texts must be unpublished, they must not have been published in any printed or electronic media. 1. When submitting an article, the authors are asked to declare that the article has not been previously published or sent to other journals for evaluation. In addition, they are asked to declare that they are following the Guidelines for Authors, which establishes that the articles to be nominated must be original. 2. Prior to the evaluation process, checks are carried out in different web search engines of paragraphs of the randomly selected articles. In addition , the iThenticate software is used to detect coincidences and similarities between the texts submitted to evaluation. 3. When sending it to peer reviewers for evaluation, they are asked to pay attention to possible indicators of plagiarism, since they are the ones who know the sources and literature on the topic. Historical archives and preservation The complete historical files are available through the link. Estudios del Trabajo has daily data and file backup procedures. These operations aim to protect information against possible failures that may occur and, at the same time, facilitate service recovery in the shortest possible time, minimizing data loss as much as possible. It also uses the LOCKSS system to create an archive distributed among participating libraries, allowing these libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for preservation and restoration purposes. To amplify information... Codes of good practice Powers of the Editorial Committee Impartiality Confidentiality Review of works |
Form and preparation of manuscripts
Submission Preparation Checklist As part of the submission process, authors are required to verify that their submission meets all of the elements shown below. Submissions that do not comply with these guidelines will be returned to the authors.
Guidelines for authors By sending a contribution to the journal, the authors accept the rules and conditions of publication and evaluation detailed below:
4.Summary and keywords: the works must be accompanied by a summary of the content, in English (including the title) and in Spanish, with a maximum length of 25 lines of text and 4 keywords in Spanish and English.
Example: (Coriat, 1979, p. 40). If different works are cited, they will be separated using a semicolon. Example: (Coriat, 1979; Singer, 1950). When it comes to references in footnotes, the same criteria will be followed. The bibliography will be included at the end of the work, arranged alphabetically by author and observing the following criteria:
Author, AA (year). Title of the book. Publication city: Publisher. Example: Coriat, B. (1979). The workshop and the chronometer. Madrid: 21st century.
Author, AA (year). Book chapter title. In Author, AA (ed. or coord.). Title of the book (pp. xx-xx). Publication city: Publisher. Example: Coriat, B. (2006). Movestowardsfinance-led capitalism: the French case. EnCoriat, B., Petit, P., and Schméder, Geneviève (eds.). The Hardship of Nations: Exploring the Paths of Modern Capitalism. New Horizons in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics (pp. 69-96). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Author, AA (year). Article title. Magazine title, xx(x), pp-pp. Example: Singer, H. W. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. The American Economic Review, 40(2), 473-485
Author, AA (year). Title of the presentation. Work presented in Name of the event organized by, Place. Example: Salvia, A. and Vera, J. (2011). Structural Heterogeneity and Economic Inequality: The pattern of income distribution and underlying factors under different macroeconomic phases. Work presented at the 10th National Congress of Labor Studies “Thinking a better job. Agreements, Controversies and Proposals” organized by the Argentine Association of Specialists in Labor Studies (ASET), Buenos Aires.
Author, A. (year). Title of the thesis (academic degree and work area of study). Name of the institution in which she was presented. Example: Beltrán, G. (2007). Business action in the context of the structural reforms of the eighties and nineties in Argentina (Doctoral thesis in Social Sciences). Buenos Aires' University
|
Sending of manuscripts
Articles must be sent to the following address: revista.aset.edt@gmail.com. Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of recent submissions. Go to Sign in to an existing account or Register a new account. |
[Home] [About the journal] [Editorial Board] [Subscription]
2024 Asociación Argentina de Especialistas en Estudios del Trabajo
Aráoz 2838 C1425DGT
Capital Federal
Argentina
Tel. (54-11) 4804 4949
https://aset.org.ar/
asetargentina@gmail.com
SciELO Argentina URL: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2545-7756&lng=es&nrm=iso