Background:

Some authors suggest that aortic dilatation is part of the athlete’s heart. The recent guidelines recommend indexing aortic diameters by body surface area (BSA). This variable can be greater in athletes due to increased muscle mass, and indexing for this parameter might underestimate the measurements.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to compare aortic dimensions between elite rugby athletes and controls, evaluating different methods of quantification.

Methods:

Maximum aortic diameter (MAD) and maximum diameter indexed by BSA (MAD-BSA) were quantified by echocardiography. The expected ideal weight was calculated for each individual and MAD was indexed by the expected body surface area (eBSA). Aortic dilatation was defined as MAD >40 mm or MAD-BSA to MAD-eBSA ratio >21 mm/m2.

Results:

Maximum aortic diameter was greater in athletes (34.9±2.6 mm vs.32.4±2.9 mm; p <0.01). Body surface area was significantly increased in athletes and, in this setting, MAD-BSA was lower (15.6±1.2 mm/m2 vs. 16.2±1.6 mm/m2; p=0.02). After estimating the ideal weight, MAD-eBSA was not significantly different in both populations (16.3±1.3 mm/m2 vs. 16.6±1.3 mm/m2; p=0.2)

The percentage of patients with MAD >40 mm was similar in controls and athletes (2.3% vs. 1.7%, respectively; p=NS). None of the patients presented indexed diameters above the normal ranges.

Conclusions:

Elite rugby players present larger maximum aortic diameters in absolute values in the context of greater BSA. Due to increased muscle mass, indexing by BSA could underestimate the measurements. The MAD-eBSA ratio could be a useful parameter. Aortic diameters above reference values should be considered abnormal.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )