SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.88 issue5Results of the First SAC Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry (RENCARE)Systematic Application of an Algorithm for Lipid Management in Cardiovascular High-Risk Patients. Impact on Lipid Goals author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista argentina de cardiología

On-line version ISSN 1850-3748

Abstract

GAMBOA, PAUL et al. Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms with Minimalistic Approach. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2020, vol.88, n.5, pp.434-439. ISSN 1850-3748.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v88.i5.18478.

Background:

Aortic aneurysms, particularly of the abdominal aorta, are still common. Since 1990, conventional surgery is no longer the only treatment option due to advances in endovascular devices and techniques. We present our results in the management of aortic aneurysms with a minimally invasive endovascular technique.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to analyze the 30-day outcomes of endograft implantation in the thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta using a minimally invasive approach.

Methods:

Between March 2012 and April 2019, 395 consecutive endografts were implanted in the aorta, and 264 (67%) were performed using a minimally invasive approach (MIN-A). Among this group, 240 (90.9%) corresponded to abdominal endo-vascular aortic repair (EVAR) and 24 (9.1%) to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Results:

Technical success (TS) of the implant was achieved in 99.6% of the 264 patients and clinical success (CS) in 97.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% due to pneumonia, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were no cases of myocardial infarction, stroke or need for conversion to urgent surgical repair. Mean duration of the procedure was 62 minutes (SD ± 17). Some patients required conversion to surgical closure of the access site [20 (7%) during the first 100 cases and 7 (3%) in the final 164 patients, p = 0.05]. Three (1.1%) patients presented major bleeding requiring transfusion. Mean time to ambulation was 18 hours (SD ± 10) that significantly decreased to 13 hours after the first 100 patients (SD ± 2.9; p= 0.05). Mean length of hospital stay was 1.4 days (SD ± 1.14) with 5 patients discharged on the same day of the procedure.

Conclusions:

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using a minimally invasive strategy was feasible and safe, turning this procedure into a percutaneous approach, with low access site-related complications, shorter operative time, rapid ambulation and shorter length of hospital stay, without modifying overall safety of the procedure. The learning curve resulted in reduced rate of conversion to surgery and earlier ambulation.

Keywords : Aortic Aneurysm; Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal; Endovascular Procedures/Methods; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Conscious Sedation; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )