SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.89 issue6Prevalence, Predictors and Clinical Impact of Readmission in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Evaluated by a Heart Team author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista argentina de cardiología

On-line version ISSN 1850-3748

Abstract

VACCARINO, GUILLERMO N. et al. Old Age Alone is not a Limitation for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2021, vol.89, n.6, pp.494-500.  Epub Dec 01, 2021. ISSN 1850-3748.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v89.i6.20457.

Background:

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the reference treatment in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve disease. However, according to international scores, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently an alternative in different risk patients, and some guidelines consider TAVI as a preferable procedure in elderly patients.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess SAVR morbidity and mortality risk and results in adult patients, classified according to age as >75 years or ≤75 years.

Methods:

A retrospective study was performed on 228 consecutive patients undergoing SAVR between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020 for symptomatic severe aortic valve disease. Among the total number of patients operated on, 46 (16%) were >75 years (Group 1, G1) and 182 (84%) were ≤75 years (Group 2, G2). Patients with concomitant coronary heart disease, bacterial endocarditis or other associated valve diseases were excluded from the analysis.

Results:

Group 1 patients had greater risk of surgical morbidity and mortality analyzed by validated risk scores: ArgenSCORE 1.55 (IQR 0.99-3.33) vs 1.08 (IQR 0.68-2.23), p = 0.02 and STS score 2.33 (IQR 1.57-3.23) vs. 0.94 (IQR 0.72-1.44), p = 0.0001, with respect to G2, while no significant differences were found for EuroSCORE II: 2.37 (IQR 1.19-3.61) vs. 1.83 (IQR 1.163.04), p = 0.2. Overall mortality was 1.7% (G1: 2.1% vs. G2: 1.6%, p=NS), with no perioperative stroke or acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Conclusions:

The low number of deaths, stroke and AMI observed suggests that the selected treatment for these patients was adequate, with excellent results and without significant differences between these two age groups.

Keywords : Aortic valve stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Symptomatic aortic valve disease.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )