SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue2Some apparent obstacles to developing a kantian virtue theoryAristotle's double solution to Zeno's 'dichotomy', Sign of a radical revision? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

VILANOVA ARIAS, Javier. El argumento modal de Moore contra el escepticismo. Anal. filos. [online]. 2010, vol.30, n.2, pp.221-244. ISSN 1851-9636.

We describe four arguments from George E. Moore against the sceptic: self-reference, common sense, rational choice and modal arguments. The modal argument accuses the sceptic of committing a fallacy of ambiguity. By analysing this argument, we extract an important lesson from Moore for contemporary epistemology.

Keywords : George E. Moore; Scepticism; Modalities.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License