SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue2Precision of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) or cobalt-chrome implant bar fit to implants after mechanical cyclingEffect of chemical or mechanical finishing/polishing and immersion in staining solutions on the roughness, microhardness, and color stability of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana

Print version ISSN 0326-4815On-line version ISSN 1852-4834

Abstract

DUBOIS, Verónica A; SALGADO, Pablo A; GLIOSCA, Laura A  and  MOLGATINI, Susana L. gDNA extraction from Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis in subgingival samples in Argentina. Evaluation of different methods. Acta odontol. latinoam. [online]. 2023, vol.36, n.2, pp.78-85.  Epub Aug 31, 2023. ISSN 0326-4815.  http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.36/2/78.

The oral cavity constitutes a unique ecosystem with highly variable ecological niches that harbor a great variety of microorganisms, including yeasts. Molecular methods are currently considered the gold standard for identifying species, although they involve limitations associated with the disruption of yeast cell walls to release the genomic DNA (gDNA) for amplification. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of different methods for extracting gDNA from Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis, subsequently amplifying DNA by PCR. Materials and Method: Fifty-two isolates (16 C. albicans and 36 C. dubliniensis) were obtained from subgingival biofilm of HIV+ patients with clinical signs of periodontal disease. The study evaluated 6 gDNA extraction methods and two PCR amplification methods. Furthermore, the presence of alleles of HWP1 gene was determined in C. albicans. Results: Comparisons of six methods show statistically significant differences (p<0.001) except for C. albicans in two of them. For C. dubliniensis, statistical differences were observed in all comparisons. Commercial methods were more efficient for concentrating gDNA than in-house methods, and both PCRs were effective. Ten heterozygous C. albicans isolates for this allele were positive for the HWP1-1 / HWP1-2 allele, one was homozygous for Wild Type HWP1-1 allele, and 5 were homozygous for novel/rare HWP1-2 allele. Conclusions: This study aims to provide simple, inexpensive strategies for phenotypic identification and molecular confirmation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis for non-reference laboratories with low complexity and/or low budgets.

Keywords : Candida albicans; Candida dubliniensis; gDNA; PCR; qPCR; subgingival samples.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )