SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue1Analysis of genotoxicity in erithrocytes of turtles (Phrynops hilarii) from anthropized and natural sites of Entre Ríos, ArgentinaIdentification of molecular alterations in Venezuelan patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

Share


BAG. Journal of basic and applied genetics

On-line version ISSN 1852-6233

Abstract

RUEDA CALDERON, M. A; BALZARINI, M  and  BRUNO, C. Meta-análisis para evaluar eficiencia de selección genómica en cereales: Meta-analysis for evaluating the efficiency of genomic selection in cereals. BAG, J. basic appl. genet. [online]. 2020, vol.31, n.1, pp.23-32. ISSN 1852-6233.

Genomic selection (GS) is used to predict the merit of a genotype with respect to a quantitative trait from molecular or genomic data. Statistically, GS requires fitting a regression model with multiple predictors associated with the molecular markers (MM) states. The model is calibrated in a population with phenotypic and genomic data. The abundance and correlation of MM information make model estimation challenging. For that reason there are diverse strategies to adjust the model: based on best linear unbiased predictors (BLUP), Bayesian regressions and machine learning methods. The correlation between the observed phenotype and the predicted genetic merit by the fitted model provides a measure of the efficiency (predictive ability) of the GS. The objective of this work was to perform a metaanalysis on the efficiency of GS in cereals. A systematic review of related GS studies and a meta-analysis, in wheat and maize, was carried out to obtain a global measure of GS efficiency under different scenarios (MM quantity and statistical models used in GS). The meta-analysis indicated an average correlation coefficient of 0.61 between observed and predicted genetic merits. There were no significant differences in the efficiency of the GS based on BLUP (RR-BLUP and GBLUP), the most common statistical approach. The increase of MM data, make GS efficiency do not vary widely.

Keywords : Systematic review; Random effects model; Forest plot; Predictive accuracy.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License