SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue4The Eye: A Diagnostic Puzzle: Descriptive observational study and review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista argentina de reumatología

Print version ISSN 0327-4411On-line version ISSN 2362-3675

Abstract

SCUBLINSKY, D et al. Use and prescription of medical cannabis by rheumatologists in Argentina. Rev. argent. reumatolg. [online]. 2020, vol.31, n.4, pp.8-12. ISSN 0327-4411.

The use and prescription of cannabis and its derivatives in Rheumatology is still under discussion. The cannabis law was enacted near 3 years ago, although the regulation is just beginning. The objective of this study was to know how rheumatologists positions themselves about the use of cannabis in the framework of his medical practice. Through a survey conducted during the 2019 Argentine Congress of Rheumatology, 314 doctors answered questions about the use, recommendations and opinions regarding the indication and use of cannabinoids in their daily practice. 78.3% (246) knew of the existence of a national law. 51.6% (162) disagreed with the use of cannabinoids by their patients, while 36.6% (115) agreed, 3.2% (10) reported to strongly agree, and 8.6% (27) strongly disagreed. For patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, 94.6% (297) reported that they never prescribed cannabinoids, 4.1% (13) prescribed them rarely, and 1.3% (4) sometimes. For degenerative rheumatic diseases, 90.4% (284) never prescribed cannabinoids, 6.7% (21) did it rarely, and 2.9% (9) did so sometimes. For fibromyalgia, 84.4% (265) never prescribed cannabinoids, 8.3% (26) prescribed them rarely, 6.4% (20) sometimes. The main obstacle to prescribing (more than one answer allowed) was not having enough scientific information (50.3%, 158), 47.5% (149) were uncertain about the cannabis preparation, 47.1% (148) had no knowledge about doses or posology, 41.4% (130) didn´t trust the producers, 38.9% (122) were no convince by the trials in the field. There were no significant differences between the variables age, gender, years in the specialty or workplace and the responses described. Conclusion: According to specialists in Argentina, the use of cannabis in rheumatology requires more scientific and pharmaceutical data to prescribe cannabinoids in a safer framework.

Keywords : prescription; use; cannabis; Rheumatology.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License