SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.106 número3Mortalidad infantil y desigualdad socioeconómica en la Argentina: Tendencia temporalAnálisis de registros de tensión arterial en pacientes de 3-20 años por pediatras en la historia clínica electrónica índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos argentinos de pediatría

versión impresa ISSN 0325-0075versión On-line ISSN 1668-3501

Resumen

GRANDI, Carlos  y  DIPIERRI, José E. Secular trend of birth weight in Argentina (1992-2002): a population based study. Arch. argent. pediatr. [online]. 2008, vol.106, n.3, pp.219-225. ISSN 0325-0075.

Introduction. Birth weight (BW) is considered an important measure of the health status of a population. Objectives. 1) to assess secular trends in average BW, low birth weight (LBW,<2.500 g), very low birth weight (VLBW, < 1.500 g) and BW ≥ 3.000 g of liveborn infants in Argentina; 2) calculate risks of LBW, VLBW and ≥ 3.000 g; 3) influence of underreported birth weight. Material and methods. In this national-based study 7.113.931 liveborn infants born in Argentina from 1992 to 2002 were included. BW was assessed from the National Ministry of Public Health. Annuals mean BW and residual distribution (RD) following the Wilcox-Russell approach were calculated, and also LBW, VLBW and ≥3.000 g proportions. Results. A decrease of 32 g in average BW (p= 0.577) and 24 g between 2000 and 2002 (p <0.001) was observed. RD reached 4%. The significant increase in LBW (12%, p= 0.034) and VLBW (26%, p= 0.002) proportions was paralleled by a reduction of 3.6% in BW ≥3.000 g (p= 0.011, average 75.2%). Risks of being LBW and VLBW were 1.13 (95% CI 1.12-1.15) and 1.30 (1.25-1.35), respectively; for BW ≥3.000 g was 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87). No significant correlations between underreported BW and proportions of LBW (r= 0.10) or VLBW (r= 0.01) were observed. Conclusion. A negative secular trends of BW was observed, all categories of LBW and VLBW were increased, BW > 3.000 g was diminished and under-reported BW did not influenced these results.

Palabras clave : Birth weight; Low birth weight; Very low birth weight; Secular trend; Population study.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons