SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2HEAVY METAL BACKGROUND LEVELS IN RURAL SOILS: A CASE STUDY IN PAMPEAN SOILS (ARGENTINA)GEODISPONIBILIDAD DE ARSÉNICO, HIERRO Y SODIO EN SUELOS DE LA CUENCA "EL DIVISORIO'' (BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencia del suelo

versión On-line ISSN 1850-2067

Resumen

BECERRA, MIGUEL ALEJANDRO; HANG, SUSANA  y  DIAZ-ZORITA, MARTÍN. ANÁLISIS GEOESPACIAL DEL ÍNDICE DE ADSORCIÓN (Kd) DE ATRAZINA CALCULADO SEGÚN CARTAS DE SUELOS Y MUESTREO EN GRILLA. Cienc. suelo [online]. 2015, vol.33, n.2. ISSN 1850-2067.

Soil surveys provide information, sometimes under-used, about distribution and variability of soil characteristics at a regional scale. Pedotransfer functions generate information on new soil attributes. The purpose of this study was to characterize the spatial variability of the atrazine (6-chloro-N2-ethyl-N4-isopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) retention index, Kd, calculated from two data sources: soil surveys (estimated Kd) and a recent regional soil sampling (Kdm); and to assess different methods to estimate Kd at the regional scale from soil surveys data. To obtain the estimated Kd, five methods were assessed: one using the data of the predominant soil series of the cartographic unit, another using the weighted arithmetic mean of the data of the soil series within the cartographic unit, and the remaining three from different interpolation methods. Two hydrological units with contrasting soil characteristics were studied: Morteros (SHM) and Río Quinto (SHRQ). Kdm corresponding to SHM oscillated from low to high with an average of 2.03 ± 0.87 L kg-1 while Kdm values of the SHRQ were mostly low, with an average of 0.79 ± 0.71 L kg-1. Linear regression analysis between Kdm and the estimated Kds fitted better with the interpolated Kds than with the soil surveys Kds. Lower estimation errors (< 1 L kg-1) corresponded with the Kdm range between 0.06 and 2.84 L kg-1. Higher estimation errors (> 1 L kg-1) were less common for the interpolations than for cartographic unit maps, representing 20.6% and 34.1% of the cases, respectively. This study showed that the information from soil surveys was consistent with the data obtained from a recent sampling.

Palabras clave : Spatial variability, interpolation criteria, GIS, environmental risk.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons