Background:

reperfusion treatment is the most effective therapy in reducing mortality from acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and its effectiveness is inversely proportional to the total time of ischemia. The greatest challenge is to implement its application in real life and continuously correct the deviations or barriers that arise in daily practice.

Objectives:

to evaluate mortality with the different reperfusion modalities, its relationship with treatment time and to evaluate its effectiveness.

Methods:

a prospective, multicenter national study, including patients with STEMI up to 36 h after symptoms began (ARGENAMI-ST continuous registry).

Results:

2464 patients were included from 2015 to 2019 in 78 centers. 88.5% received reperfusion treatment. Mortality was 8.68%. The patients treated with reperfusion had a mortality of 7.81% versus 15.38% without treatment (p <0.001). Mortality with primary angioplasty was 7.51%, thrombolytics 9.03%, pharmacoinvasive strategy 2.99%, and rescue angioplasty 9.40%, with no statistically significant difference between primary angioplasty and thrombolytics (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.56-1.18, p = ns).

The deceased patients were older, a higher proportion of women, and heart failure. Reperfusion treatment and admission to the institution within 3 hours of starting symptoms were associated with lower mortality. Patients who died with primary angioplasty had a longer total ischemia time (378 minutes versus 285 minutes, p <0.001).

Conclusions:

mortality from STEMI was related to access to reperfusion and its earliness. It was much higher in non-reperfused patients, and lower when reperfusion was carried out early within the first three hours of the onset of symptoms. In patients treated with primary angioplasty, mortality increased with a longer total ischemia time. This record of the actual practice of the treatment of infarction reinforces the need for a better articulation of the care system to reduce times and use the best timely strategy.