SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14COSTO DE ATENCIÓN DE RECIÉN NACIDOS CON PESO DE HASTA 1500 GRAMOS EN EL HOSPITAL PENNA, BAHÍA BLANCA, ARGENTINAÍNDICE DE MASA CORPORAL PRECONCEPCIONAL EN 1 079 171 MUJERES ATENDIDAS EN HOSPITALES PÚBLICOS DE LAS 24 PROVINCIAS ARGENTINAS índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Argentina de Salud Pública

versión impresa ISSN 1852-8724versión On-line ISSN 1853-810X

Resumen

TORALES, Santiago Blas; LAGO, Manuel  y  IANOVSKY, Oscar Gabriel. Survey of applicant´s opinion and satisfaction regarding the evaluation process of research proposals for “Salud Investiga” grants call. Rev. argent. salud pública [online]. 2022, vol.14, pp.73-73.  Epub 12-Abr-2022. ISSN 1852-8724.

INTRODUCTION

Peer review of research proposals is the “gold standard” used by most agencies that fund health research to judge its quality. However, this process has received much criticism from the international research community. The “Dirección de Investigación en Salud” funds research proposals through calls for “Salud Investiga” grants, using the peer review procedure for the assignment of merit. In line with other public funding agencies, the process has received informal objections from the local research community. To date, the opinion regarding the evaluation process has not been formally evaluated. The objective was to evaluate the opinion of applicants for 2020 call about the experience with reviewers, the constructiveness, clarity and language of the comments, the overall satisfaction with the review and the reliability of the scores

METHODS

Self-administered voluntary electronic survey

RESULTS

The response rate was 39%. A majority of agreement was observed with those items that reflected positive perceptions/opinions regarding the peer review process, as well as a majority of disagreement with items that reflected negative perceptions/opinions

DISCUSSION

Overall, satisfaction with the process prevailed, although the degree varied significantly between those who obtained the scholarship and those who did not.

Palabras clave : Surveys and Questionnaires; Peer Review; Research Projects; Public Health; Government Financing; Argentina.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )