SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.87 número1Fracturas graves del cuello del astrágalo. Análisis del tratamiento en 20 casosVariantes anatómicas del tubérculo de Lister. Presentación de una clasificación imagenológica y su utilidad clínica índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología

versão On-line ISSN 1852-7434

Resumo

JORGE, Fernando D.; VARAONA, José María  e  BASSO, Mariela. Uso de aloinjerto estructural e infecciones posquirúrgicas. Rev. Asoc. Argent. Ortop. Traumatol. [online]. 2022, vol.87, n.1, pp.23-33. ISSN 1852-7434.  http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.1.1138.

Introduction: The use of allografts carries the risk of various complications. Among the most frequent is infection. An important risk factor for infection with the use of bone grafts is the transmission of germs through the graft itself. Our objectives are to determine if there is a relationship between possible contamination of the grafts from this bank and postoperative infections; demonstrate how the proper donor selection, procurement, and processing of the graft decrease the rate of contamination; and report other complications related to the quality of the graft. Materials and Methods: We selected patients who received structural bone grafts from our bank. All grafts were microbiologically studied. A review of the health records, anamnesis, physical examination, and radiographs was performed to evaluate infection and other complications. The ISOLS Osseointegration Scale was used to assess the consolidation of the grafts. Results: No graft contamination was detected. One case (7.7%) of infection by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC) and 3 cases (23%) of nonunion were identified. Consolidation was good to excellent in 77% of cases, satisfactory in 8%, and poor in 15%. No other complications were found. Conclusion: There is a risk for infection transmission with structural allograft. Regulated donor selection criteria and control of bone bank procedures reduce the risk of infection due to graft contamination and other complications related to graft quality.

Palavras-chave : Structural allograft; bone bank; infection; complications.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )