SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número2Especies de hongos liquenizados asociadas a diferentes usos de suelo en el partido de Luján (provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina)Primeros registros de Myxine affinis Günther, 1870 y Myxine knappi Wisner & McMillan, 1995 en el golfo San Jorge, Patagonia central, Atlántico Sudoccidental índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales

versão On-line ISSN 1853-0400

Rev. Mus. Argent. Cienc. Nat. vol.25 no.2 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires  2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.22179/revmacn.25.792 

ZOOLOGÍA

Formicidae (Hymenoptera) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion: inventory of species, new records, and pictorial keys for subfamilies and genera identification

Dario D. Larrea1  * 

Matías I. Dufek1  2 

1 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura, Grupo de Investigación en Biología de los Artrópodos (GIBA), Libertad St. 5470, Corrientes, Argentina.

2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral (CECOAL), Provincial Route N° 5, Corrientes, Argentina.

Abstract

This is the first study that analyzes the ant fauna of the Humid Chaco ecoregion. We produced an inventory based on a) sampling at different locations in the provinces of Chaco and Corrientes, Argentina, and b) bibliographic records. This inventory comprises 10 subfamilies, 77 genera, and 462 species. Eight of these species are new records for the Humid Chaco ecoregion, and six species are registered for the first time in Argentina. Acanthostichus longinodis, Camponotus fiebrigi, Crematogaster thalia, Eciton mexicanum argenti num, Mycetomoellerius fiebrigi, Strumigenys insolita and Strumigenys siagodens are registered as endemic spe cies of the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Pictorial keys are provided for the 10 subfamilies and 77 genera that inhabit this ecoregion.

Keywords: Ants; Check list; Neotropical region; New records

Resumen

Este es el primer estudio que analiza la fauna de hormigas exclusivamente en la ecorregión del Chaco Húmedo. Elaboramos un inventario basado en a) muestreo en diferentes localidades de las provincias de Chaco y Corrientes, Argentina, y b) registros bibliográficos. Este inventario comprende 10 subfamilias, 77 géneros y 462 especies. Ocho de estas especies son nuevos registros para la ecorregión del Chaco Húmedo y seis especies son registradas por primera vez en Argentina. Acanthostichus longinodis, Camponotus fiebrigi, Crematogaster thalia, Eciton mexicanum argentinum, Mycetomoellerius fiebrigi, Strumigenys insolita y Strumigenys siagodens están registradas como especies endémicas de la ecorregión del Chaco Húmedo. Se proporcionan claves pictóricas para las 10 subfamilias y los 77 géneros que habitan en esta ecorregión.

Palabras clave: Hormigas; Lista de especies; Región Neotropical; Nuevos registros

INTRODUCTION

Formicidae (Hymenoptera) is one of the most abundant groups of insects in terrestrial eco systems (Mason et al., 2006; Schultheiss et al., 2022). They are distributed in practically all environments, from arid deserts to riverside forests subjected to long periods of flooding (Fernández, 2003) and from sea level to an altitude that ex ceeds 4,000 meters (Beutel et al., 2013).

The Neotropical region is recognized for har boring high species richness of ants, with around 3,400 taxa (Fernández et al., 2021), representing about 23% of the total number of current species registered worldwide. In addition to their biolog ical diversity, ants exhibit a wide variety of be haviors, food habits, and interactions with other organisms, intervening in important processes such as seed dispersal and soil dynamics (Arcila & Lozano-Zambrano, 2003; Kaspari, 2003).

Due to its geographical location, longitudi nal extension, and topography, Argentina has a great variety of ecoregions, from the extensive Patagonian Steppes to the high rain forests of the Yungas (Matteucci, 2007; Arana et al., 2017, 2021). These conditions favor the establishment of rich ant fauna, with a total of 697 species dis tributed among 82 genera and 10 subfamilies recognized in the country, many of which are en demic (Cuezzo & Larrea, 2022). The richness of ant species in Argentina has intermediate values if compared with those of other countries in the region, such as Chile (84 species), Uruguay (104 species), Bolivia (441 species), Paraguay (445 species), Colombia (1,200 species), and Brazil (1,521 species) (Fernández & Sendoya, 2004; Wild, 2007a; Baccaro et al., 2015; Fernández et al., 2019, 2021). However, several areas, such as the Chaco Region, are poorly inventoried.

The Humid Chaco is one of the three ecore gions into which the Chaco region is divided (Arana et al., 2021). This ecoregion comprises central Paraguay, northeast Argentina, and a small area of Brazil (Morrone 2014). The vegeta tion unit of this ecoregion is characterized by a mosaic composed of various plant communities, namely mesophyte forest, semi-open xerophyte forest, riverside forest, Copernicia alba palm sa vanna, tall hygrophyte grassland, and marshy herbaceous formations (Oyarzabal et al., 2018). Argentina is one of the ten countries in the world with the highest loss of forest extensions (FAO, 2016), the Humid Chaco being one of the most de forested ecoregions in the last three decades (Zak et al., 2008; Hoyos et al., 2012). The ecosystems of this ecoregion are threatened by conversion pro cesses caused by anthropic activities (Dinerstein et al., 1995; Volante & Seghezzo, 2018). These processes reduce the recovery capacity of the en vironments and cause irreversible effects on the biodiversity of the flora and fauna, affecting the provision of ecosystem services (Sanderson et al., 2002; Pavlacky et al., 2012; Correa Ayram et al., 2017). There is no accurate data on the diversity of ants in this ecoregion because many species inventories are made using political divisions (i.e., country/province/state) that lack biological meaning (Whittaker et al., 2005; Diniz-Filho et al., 2010). Therefore, the distribution range of most insect species in the tropical and subtropi cal ecoregions of Asia, America, and Africa is un known (Diniz-Filho et al., 2010).

Given the limited knowledge of ant assem blages in many ecosystems of the Humid Chaco ecoregion, it is essential to conduct studies that make it possible to inventory and map the biodiversity in this area and evaluate the crucial role that these insects play in the structure and function of these terrestrial ecosystems (Cuezzo, 1998; Calcaterra et al., 2021). Inventories pro vide valuable information on the biodiversity, structure, and function of the different hierar chical levels of species in different environments, and such information is essential for decision-making in ecosystem management and conser vation programs (Villarreal et al., 2006). This study aimed to inventory the ants inhabiting the Humid Chaco ecoregion and update the species distribution for this area given new records. In addition, pictorial keys are included to aid in the taxonomic identification of subfamilies and gen era of Formicidae occurring in this ecoregion of South America.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Inventory and data sources

This inventory was created based on a) cen suses carried out in gallery forests in the prov inces of Chaco and Corrientes (Argentina) and b) bibliographic records corresponding to speci mens collected in different environments of the Humid Chaco ecoregion. All localities providing a reference are included and detailed in Figure 1 and Table 1.

Fig. 1 Map of the Humid Chaco ecoregion and localities where Formicidae species are registered (for references see Table 1). 

Table 1 Localities in the Humid Chaco ecoregion where species of Formicidae were registered. Abbreviations: a, censuses; b, bibliographic record. 

The bibliographic information was obtained and georeferenced using the antmaps.org page (Janicki et al., 2016), which displays the infor mation from the GABI database (Guénard et al., 2017). This database is an important tool and represents a starting point for characterizing and understanding the geographic distribution of a species or group of ants. The georeferenced data in this system were verified by searching for the scientific articles referenced in the database for each point and species and by corroborating the coordinates provided by the antmap website.

Study área

New material was collected from gallery forests located in the following departments of the province of Chaco, Argentina: Primero de Mayo (Antequera, Los Chaguares), Bermejo (El Bagual, San Carlos, Vedia), General San Martín (Pampa del Indio Provincial Park) and Sargento Cabral (Quintana, and Chaco National Park). In addition, new material was collected from gallery forests, grasslands (Larrea et al., 2022), and palm forests located in the following depart ments of the province of Corrientes, Argentina: Mburucuyá (Mburucuyá National Park), San Miguel (San Miguel, San Nicolás), Santo Tome (Galarza), and Ituzaingó (Cambyreta).

Trapping methodology

Ant censuses were taken by following the rec ommendations of the ALL protocol, developed as a proposal for a rapid and standardized survey of ants in a humid and wooded environment (Agosti et al., 2000). Censuses in Chaco were carried out from October to March in 2017 and 2018, whereas in Corrientes they were conducted from October to March in 2013, 2014, and 2017. At each site, two transects (200 m long) were drawn, 100 m apart from each other. In each transect, 20 points separated by 10 m were selected. The following census methods were used: a) collection of 1 m2 of litter, b) foliage pattering, c) manual catch, and d) pitfall.

All the captured specimens were kept in plas tic containers with 70% alcohol, labeled with information on the locality, date, collector, and capture technique, until their subsequent puri fication and taxonomic identification.

Inventory format

To organize the inventory, the classification of subfamilies and genera proposed in AntCat (www.antcat.org) was followed. This website compiles all the changes in the relationships between the different groups of Formicidae (Bolton, 2022). The subfamilies, genera, and species were placed in alphabetical order, with their valid name, author, and year of publication.

For new records in the Humid Chaco ecore gion and Argentina, the inventory was prepared according to this structure: family, subfamily, valid species name with author and year of publi cation, country, province, department, locality in brackets, date of collection, collector, number and caste of specimens, and depository with collection number in brackets of the pinned specimens and/or glass vials (for specimens of the same species from the same locality). For departments in the same province, information is separated by semi colons. General species distribution at the coun try level for the Neotropical region is presented according to Cuezzo (1998), Lattke (2003), De Andrade (2004), Fernández & Sendoya (2004), Wild (2007b), Vittar & Cuezzo (2008), Lattke (2012), and Longino (2013). Detailed informa tion for species distribution in the Humid Chaco ecoregion is also provided as follows: country and province, department, and locality in brackets. Localities in the same province are separated by a comma.

Pictorial keys for subfamily and genera of ants inhabiting the Humid Chaco ecore gion

The pictorial keys presented are based on Bolton (1994), Palacio & Fernández (2003), and Baccaro et al. (2015). We followed the classifica tion proposed by Ward (2005, 2007), Brady et al. (2014), Schmidt & Shattuck (2014), Ward et al. (2014), Camacho et al. (2022), and Hanisch et al. (2022). Illustrations were made on a Wacom Intuos Art tablet and Adobe Photoshop editing software.

RESULTS

Herein we present the inventory of Formicidae species recorded in the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Ten subfamilies distributed among 77 genera and 462 species are listed (supp. Table 1). Eight species have been recorded for the first time in this ecoregion. In addition, and six species have been recorded for the first time in Argentina. We highlight out seven species that could be endemic species of Humid Chaco (Table S1).

New records for the Humid Chaco ecore gion

Family Formicidae (Latreille, 1809)

Subfamily Ectatomminae Emery, 1895

Acanthoponera mucronata (Roger, 1860)

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Sargento Cabral (Estancia El Bagual), 20-III-2018, Larrea leg, 15 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9603); Primero de Mayo (Reserva Los Chaguares), 21-X-2017, Larrea leg, 4 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9604).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Argentina (Chaco: Sargento Cabral, Primero de Mayo).

Comments. Workers were collected in galler ies forests. These ants were found nesting in the trees with nocturnal habits.

Subfamily Myrmicinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835

Pheidole capillataEmery, 1906

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Primero de Mayo (Reserva Los Chaguares), 21-X-2017, Larrea leg, 8 Workers (CARTROUNNE 9684).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil and Peru.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecore gion. Argentina (Chaco: Primero de Mayo).

Comments. Wilson (2003) mentions that this species forage on cloudy days at dawn or dusk.

Pheidole synarmataWilson, 2003

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Bermejo (Estancia San Carlos), 20-III-2018, Larrea leg, 5 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9654).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, French Guiana, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecore gion. Argentina (Chaco: Bermejo).

Comments. This species was reported as asso ciated with pig carcasses (Andrade-Silva et al. 2015).

Procryptocerus goeldiiForel 1899.

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Bermejo (Estancia San Carlos), 15-XI-2013, Larrea leg, 11 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9656); Sargento Cabral (Chaco National Park 1), 10-II-2018, Larrea leg, 7 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9684).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil, French Guiana, Guyana and Paraguay.Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, n. s. 25(2), 2023 182

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Argentina (Chaco: Bermejo, Capitán Solari).

Procryptocerus hylaeusKempf 1951.

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Primero de Mayo (Puerto Antequera), 30-X-2017, Larrea leg, 3 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9685).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, French Guiana, Guyana, Panama, Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecore gion. Argentina (Chaco: Primero de Mayo).

Comments. Longino & Snelling (2002) reported to P. goeldii and P. hylaeus as species with sym patric distribution.

Strumigenys dyseides Bolton, 2000.

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Sargento Cabral (Estancia El Bagual), 20-III-2018, Larrea leg, 19 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9686); Sargento Cabral (Chaco National Park 1), 14-II-2018, Larrea leg, 7 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9687).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, French Guiana and Guyana.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecore gion. Argentina (Chaco: Sargento Cabral, Capitán Solario).

Strumigenys lilloana (Brown, 1950)

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Sargento Cabral (Estancia El Bagual), 20-III-2018, Larrea leg, 2 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9661).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecore gion. Argentina (Chaco: Sargento Cabral).

Subfamily Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835

Leptogenys pusilla (Emery, 1890)

Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Sargento Cabral (Estancia El Bagual), 20-III-2018, Larrea leg, 6 Workers, (CARTROUNNE 9675).

Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Lesser Antilles, Mexico, Panama.

Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecore gion. Argentina (Chaco: Sargento Cabral).

Pictorial keys for Formicidae ants from the Humid Chaco ecoregion

To assist researchers who wish to perform the taxonomic identification of ants, we prepared rel atively simple pictorial keys for identification to the subfamilies (Fig. 2, see Fig. S1 for the Spanish version) and genera for each subfamily inhabit ing the Humid Chaco ecoregion: Amblyoponinae (Fig. 3), Dolichoderinae (Fig. 4), Dorylinae (Fig. 5), Ectatomminae (Fig. 6), Formicinae (Fig. 7), Myrmicinae (Figs. 8-11), Paraponerinae (Fig. 2), Ponerinae (Figs. 12-13), Proceratiinae (Fig. 2), and Pseudomyrmecinae (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Pictorial key to the subfamilies of Formicidae (Hymenoptera) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 3 Pictorial key to the genera of Amblyoponinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 4 Pictorial key to the genera of Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 5 Pictorial key to the genera of Dorylinae (Hymenoptera) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 6 Pictorial key to the genera of Ectatomminae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 7 Pictorial key to the genera of Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 8 First part of the pictorial key to the genera of Myrmicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 9 Second part of the pictorial key to the genera of Myrmicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 10 Third part of the pictorial key to the genera of Myrmicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 11 Fourth part of the pictorial key to the genera of Myrmicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 12 First part of the pictorial key to the genera of Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

Fig. 13 Second part of the pictorial key to the genera of Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. 

DISCUSSION

This inventory provides valuable information for understanding the distribution of one of the most conspicuous groups of arthropods in the Humid Chaco. This information, added to previ ous studies on other invertebrate taxa (Laffont et al., 2007; Rubio et al., 2008; Dufek et al., 2020), will allow the evaluation of patterns of endemism of arthropods in the region.

Ten subfamilies of ants were re corded for the Humid Chaco ecoregion: Amblyoponinae, Dolichoderinae, Dorylinae, Ectatomminae, Formicinae, Myrmicinae, Paraponerinae, Ponerinae, Proceratiinae, and Pseudomyrmecinae. This represents 77% (10/13) of the total subfamilies registered in the Neotropical region (Fernández & Sendoya, 2004; Guénard et al., 2017; Fernández et al., 2021).

Of the 462 species included in this inventory, 56 were obtained from censuses whereas 398 were only recorded from bibliographical sources. Eight species are new records for the Humid Chaco ecoregion. These species were exclusively obtained from census events carried out in the provinces of Chaco and Corrientes, Argentina.

The most diverse genera recorded in the Humid Chaco ecoregion were Camponotus Mayr, 1961 (46 species) and PheidoleWestwood, 1839 (38 species). These ants represent the most com mon groups in the Neotropical region and are the most hyperdiverse genera of ants worldwide (Wilson, 2003; Pérez-Sánchez et al., 2018).

The species with the most widespread distribution (five or more localities) were Crematogaster crinosaMayr, 1862, Dorymyrmex thoracicusGallardo 1916, Ectatomma brunneumSmith 1858, Linepithema humile (Mayr, 1868), Nesomyrmex spininodis (Mayr, 1887), Nylanderia fulva (Mayr, 1862), Octostruma balzani (Emery, 1894), Pseudomyrmex gracilis (Fabricius, 1804), Solenopsis invictaBuren, 1972, Strumigenys eggersi Emery, 1890, and Wasmannia auro punctata (Roger, 1863). Many of these species (e.g., Solenopsis invicta, Linepithema humile, Nylanderia fulva and Wasmannia auropunctata) are organisms with great adaptation capacity, considered exotic (introduced) species of eco nomic importance in other regions of the planet (Della, 2003).

Several species of this inventory collected in censuses stand out in a forensic and eco nomic context. The species Camponotus blandus (Smith, 1858), Camponotus punctulatusMayr, 1868, Camponotus rufipes (Fabricius, 1775), Ectatomma brunneum, Pheidole radoszkowskii Mayr, 1884, Pheidole synarmata, Pseudomyrmex gracilis, and Solenopsis saevissi were collected associated with pig carcasses in Brazil (Andrade-Silva et al., 2015; Viana et al., 2022). Regarding its economic importance, the genera Acromyrmex spp. Mayr, 1863 and Atta Fabricius, 1804 include several species which are pest for a variety of crops (Nickele et al., 2012; Montoya-Lerma et al., 2012; Diaz Napal et al., 2015). In addition, species like Linepithema humile, Wasmannia auropunc tata, Nylanderia fulva are recognized as house hold pest (Ness & Bronstein, 2004).The follow ing seven taxa were recorded as endemic species for the Humid Chaco ecoregion: Acanthostichus longinodisMackay, 2004, Camponotus fiebrigiForel, 1906, Crematogaster thalia Forel, 1911, Eciton mexicanum argentinumBorgmeier, 1955, Mycetomoellerius fiebrigi (Santschi, 1916), Strumigenys insolita Bolton, 2000 and Strumigenys siagodens (Bolton, 2000). This con tribution provides new groups of useful insects to characterize the biographical ecoregion of the Humid Chaco, which to date has no reported en demic ant species (Morrone, 2000; Arana et al., 2021). It is important to mention that there are few records available for many of these species. This implies that future studies could extend the distribution area of these organisms beyond the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Therefore, new surveys may help to better understand the distribution of some of these species.

CONCLUSIONS

Species inventory, new records, endemic spe cies, and taxonomic keys presented herein repre sent a significant contribution to the knowledge of Formicidae from the Humid Chaco ecoregion. This will allow for a better understanding of the biological value of this ecoregion of South America which is being greatly transformed by human activity. Furthermore, the inventory approach with a biogeographical perspective is essential because it presents true biologi cal implications on organisms, unlike the tra ditional approaches using political boundaries (i.e., countries, states/provinces, departments).

Supplementary information online. http://revista.macn.gob.ar/ojs/index.php/RevMus/rt/suppFiles/792/0

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank the Editor (Luciano D. Patitucci) and two anonymous reviewers for their careful corrections of the text and their useful comments and suggestions, which improved this work. We are grateful to Dr. Miryam P. Damborsky and our colleagues at GIBA (Grupo Investigación Biología de los Artrópodos) for their assistance in the field and logistics. This work was supported by Secretaría General de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (SGCyT-UNNE, PI 20F008) .

REFERENCES

Agosti, D., J. D. Majer, L. Alonso & T. R. Schultz. 2000. Standard methods for measuring and monito ring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, United States, 269 pp. [ Links ]

Andrade-Silva, J., E. K. Pereira, O. Silva, C. L. Santos, J. H. Delabie & J. M. Rebêlo. 2015. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with pig carcasses in an Urban Area. Sociobiology 62: 527-532. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v62i4.795 [ Links ]

Arana, M. D., G. A. Martinez, A. J. Oggero, E.S. Natale & J. J. Morrone. 2017. Map and shapefile of the bio geographic provinces of Argentina. Zootaxa 4341: 420-422. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4341.3.6 [ Links ]

Arana, M. D., E. Natale, N. Ferretti, G. Romano, A. Oggero, G. Martínez, P. Posadas & J. J. Morrone. 2021. Esquema Biogeográfico de la República Argentina. T. Opera lilloana 56, Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina, 238 pp. [ Links ]

Arcila, A. M. C. & F. H. Lozano-Zambrano. 2003. Hormigas como herramienta para la bioindicación y el monitoreo. In: F. Fernández (ed), Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical, p. 159-166. Instituto de investigación de recursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia. [ Links ]

Baccaro, F. B., R. M. Feitosa, F. Fernández, I. O. Fernandes, T. J. Izzo, J. D. Souza & R. Solar. 2015. Guia para os gêneros de formigas do Brasil. M. E. INPA, Manaus. Brasil, 388 pp. [ Links ]

Beutel, R. G., F. Friedrich, S. Q. Ge & X. K. Yang 2013. Insect Morphology and Phylogeny: A Textbook for Students of Entomology. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 531 pp. [ Links ]

Bolton, B. 1994. Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,United States, 222 pp. [ Links ]

Bolton, B. 2022. AntCat - An online catalog of the ants of the world. Available from http://antcat.org. Available from: Available from http://antcat.org Accessed on 2022-06-23. [ Links ]

Borgmeier, T. 1955. Die Wanderameisen der neotro pischen Region. Studia Entomologica 3: 1-720. [ Links ]

Brady, S. G., B. L. Fisher, T. R. Schultz & P. S. Ward. 2014. The rise of army ants and their relatives: Diversification of specialized predatory doryline ants. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-93 [ Links ]

Brown, W. L. 1950. Revision of the ant tribe Dacetini: II. Glamyromyrmex Wheeler and closely relat ed small genera. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 76: 27-36. [ Links ]

Buren, W. F. 1972. Revisionary studies on the taxonomy of the imported fire ants. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 7: 1-26. [ Links ]

Calcaterra, L. A., L. Chifflet, F. Cuezzo & A. F. Sánchez-Restrepo. 2021. Diversity of ground-dwelling ants across three severely threatened South American subtropical forests: are diversity patterns influenced by spatial or climatic variables? Insect Conservation and Diversity 15(1): 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12537 [ Links ]

Camacho, G. P. W. Franco, M. G. Branstetter, M. R. Pie, J. T. Longino, T. R. Schultz & R. M. Feitosa. 2022. UCE Phylogenomics Resolves Major Relationships Among Ectaheteromorph Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ectatomminae, Heteroponerinae): A New Classification For the Subfamilies and the Description of a New Genus. Insect Systematics and Diversity 6(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixab026 [ Links ]

Correa Ayram, C. A., M. E. Mendoza, A. Etter & D. R. Pérez Salicrup. 2017. Anthropogenic impact on habitat connectivity: A multidimensional human footprint index evaluated in a highly biodiverse landscape of Mexico. Ecological Indicators 72: 895-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.007 [ Links ]

Cuezzo, F. 1998. Formicidae. In: J. J. Morrone & S. Coscarón (eds), Diversidad de Artrópodos Argentinos. Una perspectiva biotaxonómica. p. 452-462. Ediciones Sur. La Plata, Argentina. [ Links ]

Cuezzo, F. & D. D. Larrea. 2022. Formicidae (Hymenoptera) species from Argentina and Uruguay. BIODAR. Available from: Available from: https://biodar.unlp.edu.ar/formicidae/index.html Accessed on 2022-05-10. [ Links ]

De Andrade, M. L. 2004. A new species of Platythyrea from Dominican amber and description of a new extant species from Honduras (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revue suisse de zoologie 111: 643-655. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.80258 [ Links ]

Della, L. T. 2003. Hormigas de importancia económica en la región Neotropical. In: F. Fernández (ed), Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropi cal, p. 337-349. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, Bogotá. Colombia. [ Links ]

Diaz Napal, G. N., L. M. Buffa, L. C. Nolli, M. T. Defagó, G. R. Valladares, M. C. Carpinella, G. Ruiz & S. M. Palacios. 2015. Screening of native plants from central Argentina against the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lundi (Guérin) and its symbiotic fungus. Industrial Crops and Products 76: 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.001 [ Links ]

Dinerstein, E., D. M. Olson, D. J. Graham, A. L. Webster, S. A. Primm, M. P. Bookbinder & G. Ledec. 1995. A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank, Washington DC, United States, 174 pp. [ Links ]

Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. P. de Marco & B. A. Hawkins. 2010. Defying the curse of ignorance: Perspectives in insect macroecology and conservation biogeography. Insect Conservation and Diversity 3: 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00091.x [ Links ]

Dufek, M. I., C. A. Mello-Patiu & P. R. Mulieri. 2020. Inventory of Sarcophaginae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) for the Humid Chaco, a poorly surveyed ecoregion of South America. Journal of Natural History 54: 367-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1764646 [ Links ]

Emery, C. 1890. Studii sulle formiche della fauna neo tropica. Bullettino della Societá Entomologica Italiana 22: 38-80. [ Links ]

Emery, C. 1894. Studi sulle formiche della fauna neotro pica. VI-XVI. Bullettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 26: 137-241. [ Links ]

Emery, C. 1895. Die Gattung Dorylus Fab. und die systematische Eintheilung der Formiciden. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere 8: 685-778. [ Links ]

Emery, C. 1906. Studi sulle formiche della fauna Neotropica. XXXVII. Bullettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 37: 107-194. [ Links ]

Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema entomologiae, sistens in sectorum classes, ordines, genera, species adiectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. Korte, Flensburgi et Lipsiae [= Flensburg and Leipzig], 832 pp. [ Links ]

Fabricius, J. C. 1804. Systema Piezatorum secundum ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonymis, lo cis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Brunsvigae, Reichard. 439 p. [ Links ]

FAO. 2016. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 How are the world’s forests changing? Second Edition, Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 54 pp. [ Links ]

Fernández, F. 2003. Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, Bogotá. Colombia, XXVI + 398 pp. [ Links ]

Fernández, F. & S. Sendoya. 2004. Special issue: list of neotropical ants. Número monográfico: Lista de las hormigas neotropicales. Biota Colombiana 5(1): 3-93. [ Links ]

Fernández, F., R. J. Guerrero & T. Delsinne. 2019. Hormigas de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia, 1200 pp. [ Links ]

Fernández, F., R. J. Guerrero & A. F. Sánchez-Restrepo. 2021. Systematics and diversity of neotropical ants. Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 47(1): e11082. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v47i1.11082 [ Links ]

Forel, A. 1899. Formicidae. [part I]. Biologia Centrali-Americana Hymenoptera 3: 25-56. [ Links ]

Forel, A. 1906. Fourmis néotropiques nouvelles ou peu connues. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 50: 225-249. [ Links ]

Forel, A. 1911. Die Ameisen des K. Zoologischen Museums in München. Sitzungsberichte der Mathematischen-Physikalischen Klasse der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München 11: 249-303. [ Links ]

Gallardo, A. 1916. Las hormigas de la República Argentina. Subfamilia Dolicoderinas. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires 28: 1-130. [ Links ]

Guénard, B., M. D. Weiser, K. Gómez, N. Narula & E. P. Economo. 2017. The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: Synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 24: 83-89. [ Links ]

Hanisch, P. E., J. Sosa-Calvo & T.R. Schultz. 2022. The last piece of the puzzle? phylogenetic position and natural history of the monotypic fungus-farming ant genus Paramycetophylax (Formicidae: Attini). Insect Systematics and Diversity 6 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixab029 [ Links ]

Hoyos, L. E., A. M. Cingolani, M. Zak, M. V. Vaieretti, D. E. Gorla & M. Cabido. 2012. Deforestation and precipitation patterns in the arid Chaco forests of central Argentina. Applied Vegetation Science 16: 260-271. [ Links ]

Janicki, J., N. Narula, M. Ziegler, B. Guénard & E. P. Economo. 2016. Visualizing and interacting with large-volume biodiversity data using client-server web-mapping applications: The design and implementation of antmaps.org. Ecological Informatics 32: 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.02.006 [ Links ]

Kaspari, M. 2003. Introducción a la ecología de las hormigas. In: F. Fernández (ed.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical, p. 97-112. Instituto de investigación de recursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia . [ Links ]

Kempf, W. W. 1951. A taxonomic study on the ant tribe Cephalotini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista de Entomologia 22: 1-244. [ Links ]

Kusnezov, N. 1956. Claves para la identificación de las hormigas de la fauna argentina. Idia 104: 1-56. [ Links ]

Laffont, E. R., J. M. Coronel, M. C. Godoy & G. J. Torales. 2007. Entomofauna de bosques nativos del Chaco Húmedo (Provincias de Chaco y Formosa, Argentina): Aportes al conocimiento de su diversi dad. Quebracho 14: 57-64. [ Links ]

Larrea, D. D., M. I. Dufek & M. P. Damborsky. 2022. Terrestrial ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in protected forests and grasslands in three ecoregions of Corrientes province, Argentina. Environmental Entomology 51: 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvac008 [ Links ]

Latreille, P. A. 1809. Genera crustaceorum et insecto rum secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurimus explicata. Tomus 4. Koenig, Parisiis et Argentorati [= Paris and Strasbourg], 399 pp. [ Links ]

Lattke, J. E. 2003. The genus Platythyrea Roger, 1863 in Dominican amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Entomotropica 18(2): 107-111. [ Links ]

Lattke, J. E. 2012. Revision of the new world species of the genus Leptogenys Roger insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 69(3): 127-264. [ Links ]

Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, A. 1835. Histoire naturel le des insectes. Hyménoptères. Tome I. Roret (ed). Paris, 547 pp. [ Links ]

Longing, J. T. & R. R. Snelling. 2002. A taxonomic revision of the Procryptocerus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Central America. Contributions in science 495: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.214384 [ Links ]

Longino, J. T. 2013. A revision of the ant genus Octostruma Forel 1912 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zootaxa 3699(1): 1-61. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3699.1.1 [ Links ]

Mackay, W. P. 2004. A new species of the ant genus Acanthostichus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Paraguay, and a description of the gyne of A. brevicornis Emery. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 106: 97-101. [ Links ]

Mason, R. N., J. H. C. Delabie & F. Fernández. 2006. El orden Hymenoptera. In: F. Fernández y M. J. Sharkey (eds), Introducción a los hymenoptera de la región Neotropical, p. 1-6. Instituto de in vestigación de recursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia. [ Links ]

Matteucci, S. D. 2007. Panorama de la ecología de paisajes en Argentina y países Sudamenricanos. Grupo de ecología del paisaje y medio Ambiente (GEPAMA), INTA-UNESCO, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 496 pp. [ Links ]

Mayr, G. 1861. Die europäischen Formiciden. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Wien, Republic of Austria, 80 pp. [ Links ]

Mayr, G. 1862. Myrmecologische Studien. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 12: 649-776. [ Links ]

Mayr, G. 1865. Formicidae. In: K. G. Sohn (ed), Novara Expedition, p. 119-120. Wien, Republic of Austria. [ Links ]

Mayr, G. 1868. Formicidae novae Americanae collectae a Prof. P. de Strobel. Annuario della Società dei Naturalisti e Matematici, Modena 3: 161-178. [ Links ]

Mayr, G. 1884. [Untitled. Descriptions of eight new species.]. Fourmis de Cayenne Française. Trudy Russkago Entomologicheskago Obshchestva 18: 31-38. [ Links ]

Mayr, G. 1887. Südamerikanische Formiciden. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 37: 511-632. [ Links ]

Montoya-Lerma, J., C. Giraldo-Echeverri, I. Armbrecht, A. G. Farji-Brener & Z. Calle. 2012. Leaf-cutting ants revisited: Towards rational management and control. International Journal of Pest Management 58: 225-247. [ Links ]

Morrone, J. J. 2000. What is the Chacoan subregion?. Neotropica 46: 51-68. [ Links ]

Morrone, J. J. 2014. Biogeographical regionalisation of the neotropical region. Zootaxa 3782: 1-110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1 [ Links ]

Nickele, M. A., W. R. Filho, E. B. de Oliveira, E. T. Iede, N. Caldato & P. Strapasson. 2012. Leaf-cutting ant attack in initial pine plantations and growth of defoliated plants. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 47: 892-899. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012000700003 [ Links ]

Oyarzabal, M., J. Clavijo, L. Oakley, F. Biganzoli, P. Tognetti, I. Barberis, H. M. Maturo, R. Aragón, P. I. Campanello, D. Prado, M. Oesterheld & R. J. C. León. 2018. Unidades de vegetación de la Argentina. Ecología Austral 28: 40-63. https://doi.org/10.25260/ea.18.28.1.0.399 [ Links ]

Palacio, E. E. & F. Fernández . 2003. Claves para las subfamilias y géneros. In: F. Fernández (ed.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical, pp. 233-260. Instituto de investigación de re cursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia. [ Links ]

Pavlacky, D. C., H. P. Possingham, A. J. Lowe, P. J. Prentis, D. J. Green, & A. W. Goldizen. 2012. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 940-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01975.x [ Links ]

Pérez-Sánchez, A. J., W. P. Mackay & F. Otálora-Luna. 2018. Historia Natural de Camponotus simillimus indianus Forel, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): una hormiga domiciliaria en los andes venezolanos. Saber 30: 539-556. [ Links ]

Roger, J. 1860. Die Ponera-artigen Ameisen. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 4: 278-312. [ Links ]

Roger, J. 1863. Die neu aufgeführten Gattungen und Arten meines Formiciden-Verzeichnisses nebst Ergänzung einiger früher gegebenen Beschreibungen. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift 7: 131-214. [ Links ]

Rubio, G. D., J. A. Corronca & M. P. Damborsky. 2008. Do spider diversity and assemblages change in di fferent contiguous habitats? A case study in the protected habitats of the Humid Chaco ecoregion, Northeast Argentina. Environmental Entomology 37: 419-430. [ Links ]

Sanderson, E. W., M. Jaiteh, M. A. Levy, K. H. Redford, A. V. Wannebo & G. Woolmer. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52: 891-904. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568 (2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2 [ Links ]

Santschi, F. 1916. Formicides sudaméricains nouveaux ou peu connus. Physis 2: 365-399. [ Links ]

Schmidt, C. A. & S. O. Shattuck. 2014. The hig her classification of the ant subfamily poneri nae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of ponerine ecology and behavior. Zootaxa 3817, 1-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3817.1.1 [ Links ]

Schultheiss, P., S. S. Nooten, R. Wang, M. K. L. Wong, F. Brassard & B. Guénard. 2022. The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201550119 [ Links ]

Smith, F. 1858. Catalogue of hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part VI. Formicidae. British Museum, London, United Kingdom, 216 pp. [ Links ]

Viana, G. S., M. C. de Paula, A. D. de Moura Eulalio, P. G. dos Santos, S. E. Lima-Junior & W. F. Antonialli-Junior. 2022. Formicidae fauna in pig carcasses con taminated by insecticide: Implications for forensic entomology. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 66: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2021-0085 [ Links ]

Villarreal, H., M. Álvarez, S. Córdoba, F. Escobar, G. Fagua, F. Gast, H. Mendoza, M. Ospina & A. M. Umaña. 2006. Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad. Programa de Inventarios de Biodiversidad. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia, 236 pp. Available from: http://cdam.minam.gob.pe:8080/handle/123456789/764Links ]

Vittar, F. & F. Cuezzo. 2008. Hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Santa Fe province, Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 67: 175-178. [ Links ]

Volante, J. N. & L. Seghezzo. 2018. Can’t see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the argentinian Chaco region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?. Ecological Economics 146: 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.007 [ Links ]

Ward, D. F. 2005. Changes to the classification of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). The Weta 30: 16-18. [ Links ]

Ward, P. S. 2007. Phylogeny, classification, and species-level taxonomy of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 563: 549-563. [ Links ]

Ward, P. S., S. G. Brady, B. L. Fisher & T. R. Schultz. 2014. The evolution of myrmicine ants: Phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Systematic Entomology 40: 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12090 [ Links ]

Westwood, J. O. 1839. An introduction to the modern classification of insects; founded on the natural habits and corresponding organisation of the diffe rent families. Volume 2. Part XI. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans, London, United Kingdom, 224 pp. [ Links ]

Whittaker, R. J., M. B. Araújo, P. Jepson, R. J. Ladle, J. E. M. Watson & K. J. Willis. 2005. Conservation biogeography: Assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions 11: 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x [ Links ]

Wild, A. 2007a. A catalogue of the ants of Paraguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 1622: 1-55. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1622.1.1 [ Links ]

Wild, A. 2007b. Taxonomic revision of the ant ge nus Linepithema (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). University of California, Oakland, United States, 161 pp. [ Links ]

Wilson, E. O. 2003. Pheidole in the New World: A Dominant, Hyperdiverse Ant Genus. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 794 pp. [ Links ]

Zak, M. R., M. Cabido, D. Caceres & S. Díaz. 2008. What Drives Accelerated Land Cover Change in Central Argentina? Synergistic Consequences of Climatic, Socioeconomic, and Technological Factors. Environmental Management 42: 181-189. [ Links ]

Received: August 23, 2022; Accepted: March 27, 2023

*Corresponding author: dariolarrea@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License