SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.115 número2Técnica de la incisión y cierre de piel en “punto de mira” para la reversión de estoma. Experiencia en el Centro Médico Nacional “La Raza”, MéxicoLiderazgo pospandemia. ¿Qué aprendimos? ¿Qué debemos modificar? Post-pandemic leadership. índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista argentina de cirugía

versão impressa ISSN 2250-639Xversão On-line ISSN 2250-639X

Rev. argent. cir. vol.115 no.2 Cap. Fed. abr. 2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.25132/raac.v115.n2.1713 

Articles

18-fluoro-deoxyglucose uptake on PET-CT in hepatocellular adenoma. A mini review with a new case Report

Gustavo A. Nari1  3  * 

Alesio López1 

Alina Corrado2 

Eugenia De Elias1 

Flavia López1 

Estefano Díaz Witschel1 

1 Servicio de Cirugía General. Hospital Tránsito Cáceres de Allende. Córdoba. Argentina.

2 Servicio de Patología. Hospital Tránsito Cáceres de Allende. Córdoba. Argentina.

3 Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica. Sanatorio La Cañada. Córdoba. Argentina.

Introduction

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are rare benign hepatic tumors1,2, while hepatic adenomatosis (HA) is a clinical entity characterized by 10 or more HCAs1. They are more common in women and are associated with oral contraceptive use1,4-7. The differential diagnosis should be made with other benign tumors as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), angiomas, etc., and with malignant tumors, mainly hepatocellular carcinoma8. Hepatocellular adenomas are associated with bleeding events and their malignant transformation is nonnegligible9. An updated guideline for the management of this tumor has been published10. Positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) using 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose (18FDG) is an imaging modality based on increased glucose uptake, a hallmark feature of cancer cells, and is mainly used as part of the workup or surveillance for other cancers8. Hepatocellular adenomas are benign tumors and 18FDG uptake on PET-CT is rare. In a large study conducted between 1984 and 2014 which screened patients with HCA and 18FDG uptake on PET-CT, only 19 cases were found8. Only one of these cases corresponded to a male patient9,11-17. The aim of this paper was to continue the review initiated by these authors9, based on a very rare case of male patient with 18FDG avid HA on PET-CT.

Material and methods

Taking the work published by Lee et al.9 as a reference, we conducted a literature search from July 2014 to December 31, 2021, completing up to that date the cases of 18FDG-avid HCA initiated by them in 1984. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed) of articles published in English using the same medical subgroup headings (MeSH) terms combined with Boolean operators used by those authors: (Positron Emission Tomography [PET], [18 F] Fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG], Hepatic adenomas, Hepatocellular adenomas, false positive, inflammatory, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1Alpha mutated [HNF1- alpha] and Beta-catenin mutated). As our patient had FDG-avid HCA in a setting of HA, we also included the latter term among the search criteria in the period from 2014 to 2021. The articles identified during the search period were analyzed by one of the authors (GN) to detect the new cases and any other relevant information. The cases previously described, along with those found during the search period, were entered in a database where the following individual data were included: sex and age, how the diagnosis was made, use of hormone therapy, tumor location according to Couinaud classification of hepatic segments, maximum SUV uptake (SUVmax), treatments used and the pathology report of the different variants of the disease.

Finally, we describe a brief presentation of the case managed by our work group. The HCA subtype was classified according to the classification proposed by Bioulac-Sage et al.18.

Results

During the search period, 155 articles were identified with the criteria used by the Lee at al., and other 42 additional articles dealt with HA. Of the 155 articles reviewed, only 5 reported FGD-avid HCA and of the 42 that reported HA, only 2 had avid adenomas, which - added to our case and to one from the previous series - would represent a total of 4 (Table 1). The sum of the cases found until 2014 plus those reviewed by us from that date onwards results in 38 cases in 37 years, almost one case per year (Table 2).

Table 1 Literature review with epidemiological data, treatment and pathology of FDG-avid HCA and HA 

Table 2 Summary of epidemiologic data, treatment and pathology of FDGavid HCA and HA 

Case report: a 23-year-old man, underwent surgery for glioblastoma multiforme. On a PET-CT performed as part of cancer surveillance, 4 avid lesions were observed in the liver, the largest one in segment III with a diameter of 6 cm, another one in segment VI and two in segment VIII. Open resection of the lesions was decided. During the procedure, other lesions were found in the other liver segments in addition to those mentioned in the PET-CT. The avid lesions were resected and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. The pathology report described hepatic adenomas with different morphologic and architectural patterns (with inflammatory, steatotic and telangiectatic changes), HNF1-α mutated and β-catenin negative. Figure 1 shows the computed tomography (CT) scan, PET-CT and the largest surgical specimen. The different microscopic types are seen in Figure 2.

Figure 1 CT scan (A) and PET-CT showing the largest lesion (B), a smaller lesion (C), and a cross-section of the surgical specimen (D). 

Figure 2 A: Mixed pattern in preserved liver parenchyma. B and C: esteatotic architecture. Section stained with haematoxylin and eosin (x20). 

Discussion

Most HCAs occur in women of childbearing age with a male to female ratio of 1:8. The use of oral contraceptives is associated with higher incidence, as evidenced in the series analyzed9,16. Pregnancy does not seem to play any role in the size or complications of HCAs6,7.

Although the pathology classification most used is the one described by Bioulac-Sage et al.18, other authors mention some other subtypes19. The inflammatory subtype is the most common variant (40-50%) with a large inflammatory pattern associated with hypervascularization and is due to activation of by STAT3 pathway. This subtype is more frequent in obese patients and is associated with alcohol use. HNF1α HCA (30-40%) is characterized by lipid accumulation within the hepatocytes due to activation of lipogenesis, resulting in a steatotic phenotype without inflammatory infiltrate. The β-catenin subtype, which presents a mutation in CTNNB1 exon 3, shows patterns of cholestasis, atypia and dysplasia and is the one most likely to develop malignant transformation. The Sonic-Hedgehog activated subtype occurs in 5% due to activation of the transcriptor factor GLI1 (family zinc finger 1) which leads to overexpression of prostaglandin D2 synthase; this subtype is most often seen in obese patients. Mixed beta-catenininflammatory subtype occurs in about 10% of cases and, finally, those considered unclassified account for 7% of HCAs19. Hemorrhage is the most common complication, most often intratumoral, and occurs in about 27% of patients; the risk of bleeding for each adenoma is about 15%20. Increasing tumor size, oral contraceptives and use percutaneous needle biopsy have been associated with higher risk of bleeding20. Malignant transformation is another possible complication, which is reported in about 4-8%; risk factors are β-catenin subtype, a tumor size > 5 cm, and use of oral contraceptives20. Only 3 cases of adenomas < 5 cm have been reported with malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); men have higher risk than women (47% vs. 4%)20,21.

18FDG avidity in PET-CT is rare. In our search, we identified 19 additional cases in 192 articles (155 HCAs, 42 HA) reviewed2-5,22-25; this raises the case series initiated by Lee et al.9 to 38 cases of 18FDG-avid HCAs on PET-CT over the 37 years reviewed. The differential diagnosis with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and well or moderately differentiated HCC is important. Cancer cells in well or moderately differentiated HCC are very similar to those of normal hepatocytes and have the same metabolic profile of normal tissue. This differentiation is basically important because of the therapeutic implications8,12,26,27. Multiple diagnostic methods have been proposed to make the differential diagnosis with other conditions, and to differentiate the different subtypes of HA3,8,12,19,20,26-29. Of these, the literature agrees that MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent has the highest sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis and differentiation of subtypes3,20, mainly in the H-HCA type. The use of contrast-enhanced ultra sonography (CEUS) associated with microbubbles with the inert gas sulfur hexafluoride and a palmitic acid shell has demonstrated similar results to MRI. The diagnostic criteria for FNH are a hyperenhancing lesion in the arterial phase with rapid centrifugal filling from a central vessel and radial vascular branches (the “spoke and wheel” sign) while in HCAs the enhancement pattern commences peripherally and exhibits rapid centripetal filling. As these filling patterns, centrifugal and centripetal, of both lesions occur in 86-90% of the cases, computerassisted methods have been suggested to evaluate the microbubble transport patterns27,28. CEUS has proved to be useful in differentiating between H-HCA and I-HCA types, as I-HCA is characterized by delayed washout. The use of elastography26 has been proposed, as it has demonstrated important differences between HCA and FNH (12.08 Kpa and 46.99 Kpa, respectively). However, as it has showed difficulties in cases of telangiectatic pattern, its association with CEUS is recommended26.

The use of 18 FDG PET-CT is mainly indicated for the surveillance of malignant diseases already diagnosed due to the avidity of neoplastic cells for 18FDG. Most of the cases of avid HA have been detected during cancer surveillance: they are benign lesions without 18FDG uptake. H-HCA is the most avid subtype for 18FDG followed by I-HCA, but there are no reports on 18FDG avidity in the β-catenin subtype4,8,9.

The H-HCA type favors excessive accumulation of intratumoral lipids23. High 18FDG uptake may be due to some reasons other than enhanced glucose metabolism, as degree of differentiation, inflammatory cell infiltration, increased cellular density and a response to fat accumulation23. Metabolic abnormalities including activation of glycolysis, citrate and fatty acid synthesis have been suggested, resulting in increased lipogenesis and suppressed gluconeogenesis23. Cells express low levels of glucose-6-phosphatase, trapping FDG-6-phosphate inside the cell and causing increased 18FDG accumulation in the tumor. In addition, several isoforms/isozymes of glucose transporter and hexokinases have been identified favoring FDG avidity23. The high uptake mainly in the H-HCA subtype would be due to inactivation of glucose-6-phospate transporter 1 (G6PT1), which is regulated by HNF1-α23. Uptake is lower in FNH than in HCA for the simple reason that FNH cells are polyclonal and represent the reactive hyperplastic response of hepatocytes to local vascular abnormality, whereas HCA has a neoplastic nature that is demonstrated by the monoclonal mutations of both oncogenes and oncosuppressor genes12.

The addition of C-11 acetate to 18FDG PET-CT has not provided any benefit for differentiating FNH from HCA12.

If the imaging tests do not help to reach a definitive diagnosis, some authors perform percutaneous needle biopsy30; yet these authors admitted that the results were not useful, negative, and that the definitive diagnosis was made with the surgical specimen. Other authors recommend percutaneous needle biopsy only in patients with lesions of diagnostic uncertainty to identify the HA subtype, mainly the mutated β-catenin type or I-HCA, which have higher risk of malignant transformation19,20. Percutaneous needle biopsy increases the risk of hemorrhage20. We believe that, if the lesion is resectable, resection rather than biopsy should be performed, as in our case. We believe that biopsy would only be useful if it is positive, and one can ensure that there are no HCC cells remain in the rest of the lesion. Surgical resection is recommended for lesions with a diameter > 5 cm, if there are signs of hepatocellular carcinoma or focal dysplasia, activated β-catenin mutation, elevated serum values of alpha-fetoprotein, adenomas in male patients and HCA occurring in patients with glycogen storage diseases10. In the study by Dokmak et al.21 none of the 122 patients undergoing surgical resection of HA died after 90 days and major morbidity was 15%, indicating that liver resection is safe in when performed by groups dedicated to liver surgery. Cessation of oral contraception has also been reported to be efficient31.

In HCA with 18FDG avidity in the context of HA, as in our case, the therapeutic decision is usually more difficult. HA has been classified in two forms, multifocal and massive, according to its morphologic pattern32,33. Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed 0.03% of patients in Europe32; perhaps the best indication for this treatment is massive HA with bleeding complications or when HCC is strongly suspected. Other authors33 recommend conservative management in lesions < 3 cm, use of TACE for bleeding complications, several sessions of radiofrequency and liver transplantation when HCC is suspected or has been confirmed33.

In conclusion, and in agreement with Lee et al.9, the main weakness of this study is the small number of cases collected in an uncontrolled fashion. Avidity of HCA for 18FDG on PET -CT is unusual and is associated with several factors as inflammation and increased lipid accumulation. Avidity does not at all represent malignant transformation, which is demonstrated by the absence of uptake in β-catenin mutation. The criteria for indicating surgery include tumor diameter, male sex, risk of bleeding, risk for malignant transformation, β-catenin subtype mutation, and patients with glycogen storage diseases. 18FDG PET-CT is not a standard for surveillance of HCAs or HA.

Referencias bibliográficas /References

1. Barthelmes L, Tait IS. Liver celladenoma and liver cell adenomatosis. HPB (Oxford) 2005;7:186-96. [ Links ]

2. Liu W, Delwaide J, Bletard N, Delvenne P, Meunier P, et al. 18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose uptake in inflammatory Hepatic adenoma: A case report. World J Hepatol 2017; 9:562-6. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i11.562 [ Links ]

3. Oz A, Koyuncu Sokmen B, Inan N, Balci NC, Takat Y. Incidentally detected PET-avid liver adenomatosis: MRI and 18F-FDG PETCT findings. Turk J Gastroenterol 2018;29:623-4. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17783 [ Links ]

4. Sureka B, Rastogi A, Mukund A, Sarin SK. False-positive 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission Tomography-avid benign Hepatic tumor: Previously unreported in a male. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2018;28:200-4. DOI: 10.4103/ijri:IJRI_170_17 [ Links ]

5. Young J, Graham R, Venkatesh S, Kendi A. 18F- FDG PET/CT of hepatocellular adenoma subtypes and review of literatura. Abdom Radiol 2021;46(4):2604-9. https//doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02968-2 [ Links ]

6. Gaspersz M, Klompenhouwer A, Broker M, Thomeer M, van Aalten S, et al. Growth of hepatocellular adenoma during pregnancy: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2019. https//doi.org/10.1016/j,jhep.2019.09.011 [ Links ]

7. Haring M, Spijkerboer Ch, Cuperus F, Duiker E, de Jong K, et al. Behavior and complications of hepatocellular adenoma during pregnancy and puerperium: a retrospective study and systematic review. HPB 2021;23(8):1152-63. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.019 [ Links ]

8. Sarikaya I, Schierz JH, Sarikaya A. Liver: glucose metabolism and 18F-deoxyglucose PET finding in normal parenchyma and diseases. Am J Nul Med Mol Imaging 2021; 11:233-49. [ Links ]

9. Lee SY, Kinham P, LaGratta M, Jessurum J, Cherqui D, et al. PETavid hepatocellular adenomas:incidental findings with HNF1- α mutated lesions. HPB 2016;18:42-8. https//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.001 [ Links ]

10. Vijay A, Elaffandi A. Hepatocellular adenoma: un update. World J Hepatol 2015, 7(25):2603-9. [ Links ]

11. Patel PM, Alibazoglu H, Ali A et al. False-positive uptake of FDG i a Hepatic adenoma. Clin Nucl Med 1997;22:490-1. [ Links ]

12. Magini G, Farsad M, Frigerio M, et al. C-11 acetate does not enhance setuiness ct F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating between focal nodular hiperplasia and hepatic adenoma. Clin Nucl Med 2009;34:659-65. [ Links ]

13. Buc E, Dupre A, Golffier C, et al. Positive PET-CTScan in hepatocellular adenoma with concomitant benign liver tumors. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2010;34:338-41. [ Links ]

14. Stephenson J, Kapasi T, Al-Taan O, Dennison A. Uptake of 18FDG by a Hepatic adenoma on positron emission Tomography. Case Rep Hepatol 2011; 2011:276402. doi: 10.1155/2011/276402 [ Links ]

15. Sanli Y, Bakir B, Kuyumcu S, et al. Hepatic adenomatosis may mimic metatstatic lesions of liver with 18F-FDG PET-CT. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37:697-8. [ Links ]

16. Sumiyoshi T, Moriguchi M, Kanemoto H, et al. Liverspecific cantratt agent -enganced magnetic resonance and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission Tomography findings of hepatocelular adenoma: report of a case. Surg Today 2012;42:200-4. [ Links ]

17. Fosse P, Girault S, Hoareau J, et al. Unusual uptake of 18 FDG by a Hepatic adenoma. Clin Nucl Med 2013;38:135-6. [ Links ]

18. Bioulac-Sage P, Sempoux Ch, Balabaud Ch. Hepatocellular adenoma: Classification, variants and clinical relevance. Semin Diagn Pathol 2017;34:112-25. http//dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2016.12.007 [ Links ]

19. Klompenhouwer A, de Man R, Dioguardi Burgio M, Vilgrain V, Zucman-Rossi J, et al. New insights in the management of hepatocellular adenoma. Liver Int 2020;40:1529-37. [ Links ]

20. Krause K, Tanabe K. A shifting paradigm in diagnosis and management of Hepatic adenoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020. 27(9):3330-8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08580-w [ Links ]

21. Dokmak S, Paradis V, Vilgrain V, Sauvanet A, Farges O, et al. A singlecenter surgical experience of122 patients with single and multiple hepatocellular adenoma. Gastroenterology 2009;137:1698-705. Doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.061 [ Links ]

22. Lim D, Lee SY, Lim KH, Chan CY. Hepatic adenoma mimicking a metastatic lesión on computed tomography-positron emission tomography scan. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:4432-6. [ Links ]

23. Ozaki K, Harada K, Terayama N, Matsui O, Saitoh S, et al. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alfa_inactivated hepatocellular adenomas exhibit hgh (18) F. fludesoxyglucose uptake asociated with glucose-6-phosphate transporter inactivation. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:1063. doi:10.1259/bjr.20160265. [ Links ]

24. García García-Esquinas M, Ortega-Candil A, Méndez R, Díaz del Arco C, Arrazola García J, et al. Multiple liver adenomatosis with (18) F-FCG uptake: a rare manifestation of an infrequent entity. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2016,35:279-80. [ Links ]

25. Prabhu M, Passah A, Kansoti V, Singh S. 18-F fluorodoxyglucose Positron emission tomograph/computed Tomography of a large onflammatory-hepatocellular adenoma. Indian J Nucl Med 2021;36:95-6. [ Links ]

26. Brunel T, Guibal A, Boularan C, Ducerf Ch, Mabrut JY, et al. Focal nodular hiperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma: the value of shear wave elastography for differential diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 2015;84(11):2059-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.029 [ Links ]

27. Broker M, Taimr P, de Vries M, Braun L, de Man R, et al. Performance of contraste-enhanced sonography versus MRI with a liver specific contrast agent for diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hiperplasia. AJR 2020;214:1-9. [ Links ]

28. Senneville BD, Frulio N, Laumonier H, Salut C, Lafitte L, et al. Liver contrasted-enhanced sonography: computerassisted differentiation between focal nodular hiperplasia and inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma by reference to microbubble transport patterns. Eur Radiol 2020;30:2995-3003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06566-1 [ Links ]

29. Laumonier H, Cailliez H, Balabaus Ch, Possenti L, Zucman-Rossi J, et al. Role of contrast-enhanced sonography in differentiation of subtypes of hepatocelular adenoma: correlation with MRI findings. AJR 2012;199(2):341-8. DOI:10.2214/AJR.11.7046 [ Links ]

30. Tomihara H, Hashimoto K, Ishikawa H, Terashita D, Gakuhara A, et al. Succeful ressection of a huge hepatocelular adenoma. Clin J Gastroenterol 2021;14(5):1544-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-021-01486-4 [ Links ]

31. Sinclair M, Schelleman A, Sandhu D, Angus P. Regression of hepatoccellular adenoma and systemic inflammatory syndrome after cessation of estrogen therapy. Hepatology 2017;66(3):989- 91. doi:10.1002/hep.29151. [ Links ]

32. Chiche L, David A, Adam R, Oliverius M, Klempnauer J, et al. Liver transplantation for adenomatosis: European experience. Liver Transplant 2016; 22:516-26. DOI 10.1002/lt.24417. [ Links ]

33. Meyer C, Lisker-Melman M. Treatment of Hepatic adenomatosis. Curr Hepatol Rep 2015;14:139-43. Doi:10.1007/s11901-015-0265-7. [ Links ]

Received: June 23, 2022; Accepted: January 18, 2023

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons