SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.117 issue3Infant mortality due to congenital malformations in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (1998-2015): Spatial, temporal analysis and relation to the socioeconomic statusShort stature among children undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart defects author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Archivos argentinos de pediatría

Print version ISSN 0325-0075On-line version ISSN 1668-3501

Abstract

ROSANOVA, M. Teresa; SBERNA, Norma  and  LEDE, Roberto. Safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline fosamil in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. argent. pediatr. [online]. 2019, vol.117, n.3, pp.e205-e210. ISSN 0325-0075.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5546/aap.2019.e205.

Introduction. Antibiotic resistance is an increasingly growing health problem worldwide, so it is imperative to look for new, more effective antibiotics. Ceftaroline has a broad spectrum of activity against clinically relevant Grampositive strains, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, as well as Gram-negative pathogens implicated in skin and soft tissue infections or community-acquired pneumonia; it is therefore a potential therapeutic option. We conducted a systematic review to assess whether ceftaroline was safer and more effective than comparators. Material and methods. A comprehensive bibliographic search was done to identify experimental clinical trials that compared the safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline to a comparator in the pediatric population. The rate of therapeutic failure was used to determine the effectiveness, while the presence of any adverse event was considered for safety. Results. Three studies were identified: two in community-acquired pneumonia and one in skin and soft tissue infections. No study showed a difference in the risk for therapeutic failure, relative risk (RR): 0.97 (0.54-1.73), or safety criterion, RR: 0.79 (0.51-1.23). Conclusions. The available evidence suggests that ceftaroline may be a valid therapeutic option for the management of skin and soft tissue infections or community-acquired pneumonia in pediatric patients. No studies with a high-quality of evidence were observed in other types of infections or in patients admitted to the critical care unit.

Keywords : Ceftaroline; Systematic review; Effectiveness; Safety.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License