SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número2Requerimientos de calidad en hemostasia: Variabilidad biológica versus estado actual de la metodologíaTromboelastometría y tromboelastografía índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartir


Acta bioquímica clínica latinoamericana

versión impresa ISSN 0325-2957versión On-line ISSN 1851-6114

Resumen

LOPEZ, Marina Sol et al. Thromboelastometry ROTEM® delta vs.Thromboelastography and classical hemostasis tests. Acta bioquím. clín. latinoam. [online]. 2016, vol.50, n.2, pp.309-318. ISSN 0325-2957.

Thromboelastometry (TEM) and thromboelastography (TEG) describe the interaction between coagulation factors, fibrinogen, platelets and fibrinolytic system in real time by the evaluation of the kinetic and viscoelastic characteristics of the clot. The objectives of the study were to correlate TEM with TEG parameters, and with prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen and platelet count. A comparative population of 27 TEM-TEG samples was studied and of TEM-classical coagulation tests of 141 samples from patients with different pathologies, under anticoagulant treatments and surgical procedures. The TEMograms were: Tromboelastometry ROTEM® delta (Tem International GmbH) with INTEM reactants (ellagic acid + Ca2+), EXTEM (tissue factor + Ca2+) and FIBTEM (EXTEM with platelet inhibitor); reactant TEG: Cl2Ca, Tromboelastograph (D Hellige). PT were performed (% activity), APTT (sec) and Fibrinogen (mg/dL) with HemosIL (Instrumentation Laboratory) and ACL TOP coagulometers. The Pearson Test was used (IBM,SPSS 22). The following correlations were obtained: Very good: a) TEM and TEG amplitudes, r=0.879 and 0.843, p<0.001, for EXTEM and INTEM, b) FIBTEM amplitudes with Fibrinogen r=0.912, p<0.001, c) coagulation times (reaction) and clot formation (20 mm amplitude), INTEM and TEG r=0.918 and 0.919, p<0.001, d) Maximum Lysis EXTEM and TEG r=0.937, p<0.001; and Moderate: a) clot formation EXTEM and TEG r=0.782 p<0.001; b) fibrinogen and platelet amplitudes, r=0.718 and 0.611, p<0.001 for EXTEM, 0.680 and 0.545, p<0.001 for INTEM; c) coagulation time INTEM and APTT r=0.693, p<0.001. TEM and TEG parameters correlate very well, except for the coagulation time with EXTEM and TEG, given they use a different principle to activate coagulation. The analysis of the classic tests confirmed the high correlation between FIBTEM amplitudes and the levels of fibrinogen and a better correlation between INTEM coagulation times with APTT than those of EXTEM with TP.

Palabras clave : Hemostasis; Thromboelastometry; Thromboelastography; Classical coagulation tests.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons