SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2LAS CONMEMORACIONES DE LA BATALLA DE SALTA ENTRE LA FUNDACIÓN DEL CLUB 20 DE FEBRERO Y EL “PRIMER PERONISMO”. APROPIACIONES, RESIGNIFICACIONES Y DISPUTAS.¿UNA PROVINCIA SIN CAUDILLO? TUCUMÁN FRENTE A LA IMAGEN DE BERNABÉ ARÁOZ índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Andes

versión On-line ISSN 1668-8090

Resumen

FERNANDEZ, Hernán. ¿QUÉ ENTENDIÓ SARMIENTO POR CAUDILLO Y CAUDILLISMO? REPENSAR LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DEL FENÓMENO DESDE LA ÚLTIMA EDICIÓN DEL FACUNDO (1874). Andes [online]. 2022, vol.33, n.2, pp.214-244. ISSN 1668-8090.

Facundo (1845) by Sarmiento is acknowledged as one of the most meaningful pieces of literature related to the concepts of “caudillo” / “caudillismo”. That text, among other issues, allowed tracing the origin of the “caudillos” in the campaigns as well as defining their habits and behavior by means of the syntagm “civilization/ barbarity”. Nevertheless, the following editions produced by the author of that literature piece enabled to soften, or even disagree with, that perspective. This is evident because the additions of the biographies of Aldao and “Chacho” Peñaloza in the editions of Facundo (1851) and Facundo (1868) include dissimilar features and characteristics inherent to other models of “caudillos”.

Facundo (1845) by Sarmiento is acknowledged as one of the most meaningful pieces of literature related to the concepts of “caudillo” / “caudillismo”. That text, among other issues, allowed tracing the origin of the “caudillos” in the campaigns as well as defining their habits and behavior by means of the syntagm “civilization/ barbarity”. Nevertheless, the following editions produced by the author of that literature piece enabled to soften, or even disagree with, that perspective. This is evident because the additions of the biographies of Aldao and “Chacho” Peñaloza in the editions of Facundo (1851) and Facundo (1868) include dissimilar features and characteristics inherent to other models of “caudillos”.

Taking into consideration that situation, this paper explores Facundo from the three biographical notes the author articulated -Quiroga, Aldao and Peñaloza- with the aim of questioning the reading interested in defining, unequivocally, the topic of “caudillo”/“caudillismo”. This paper is outlined by two conjectures: first, according to Sarmiento, the “caudillo” was a multiform phenomenon. Second, Sarmiento´s interest in describing “caudillismo” finally consisted in the search for diagraming a specific political context he considered necessary for his model of republic.

Palabras clave : Sarmiento; Facundo; “caudillos”; “caudillismo”; development.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )