SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número41Privatizacion y desmantelamiento ferroviario en Jujuy. Una aproximacion a sus efectos en base al enfoque contrafáctico (1)PERONISMO Y "SOCIALISMO NACIONAL": La Política de expropiaciones durante el gobierno de Miguel Ragone: El Caso de -Minas de Unchime/Altos Hornos Güemes y frigorífico arenales. Salta, 1973-1974. índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cuadernos de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy

versión On-line ISSN 1668-8104

Resumen

SALOMONE, Mariano. (Territory and politics: social dispute and historical memory. The defense of the train station as a public space, Mendoza 2006-2008). Cuad. Fac. Humanid. Cienc. Soc., Univ. Nac. Jujuy [online]. 2012, n.41, pp.145-175. ISSN 1668-8104.

This work tries to contribute to the analysis of the process of spatialization in class struggle, i.e., the marks left in physical space by the now hegemonic tendency to privatize public spaces and the symbolic constructions produced to signify said process.             To that effect I intend to analyze the ongoing conflict regarding the grounds of the former General San Martín train station in Mendoza, from 2006 to 2008. Having been closed during the 90s as part of the neoliberal policies implemented in our country, new privatization projects are currently appearing, among which a real estate business belonging to Corporación Antiguo Puerto Madero stands out. Faced with this new privatization attempt, three social organizations began a process of resistance and struggle in defense of these domains as public space. Specifically, the article focuses on the dispute that arises between the different significations that are built upon the image of the station and the city.             The article shows that, firstly, this semantic dispute between opposing significations speaks of their historical roots -the articulations of meaning produced between past, present, and future-; and secondly, that the dispute highlights that what is at play is not a problem of pure "signification", but something which refers to the density of the experience and to the importance attained in the individuals' subjectivity by the magnitude of their actions.             The methodology that was used is a qualitative analysis strategy: participant observation, in-depth interviews and secondary sources.

Palabras clave : Public/Private Conflict; Experience; Symbolic Struggle; Past/Present; Territory.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons