SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número37Revisão comparativa de instrumentos para avaliar a internacionalização da ciência no sistema universitário índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad

versão On-line ISSN 1850-0013

Resumo

BEKERMAN, Fabiana. Distribución desigual de las capacidades de investigación en las ciencias sociales argentinas: una mirada relacionalDistribuição desigual das capacidades de pesquisa nas ciências sociais argentinas: A Relational Perspectiveum olhar relacionalUnequal Distribution of Research Capacities in Argentine Social Sciences. Rev. iberoam. cienc. tecnol. soc. [online]. 2018, vol.13, n.37, pp.257-288. ISSN 1850-0013.

We propose to analyze the distribution of resources available for research in the particular case of the social sciences and humanities and describe the place that these disciplines occupy in the structure of the Argentine scientific-university field. We will center our analysis on the two institutions that have historically supported research: the National Council of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET, due to its acronym in Spanish) and national universities. In order to do this, we have built several databases about the institutes and researchers that make up the abovementioned institutions. In the first part, we review some of the theoretical guidelines on which we base our perspective and look at some of the scientific policy measures that modified the disciplinary structure of the Argentine scientific field from the 1950s until now. We then analyze the institutional, regional and disciplinary distribution of research capacities, and present a comparison between the two central supports of these fields, the University of Buenos Aires (UBA, due to its initials in Spanish) and CONICET. The main results indicate that there are marked institutional and disciplinary asymmetries. The social sciences are concentrated in the universities, while CONICET favors other areas, and UBA has a fundamental role in these fields due to the marked concentration of resources for the research under its aegis.

Palavras-chave : University scientific field; Research capacities; Social sciences and humanities.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons