SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número50Politizar en contextos “poco politizados”: paradojas y tensiones en torno al desarrollo del poder de actuar en centros sociales francesesUn policía preparado para todo. Trazando nexos entre formación y práctica policial en la provincia de Santa Fe índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cuadernos de antropología social

versión On-line ISSN 1850-275X

Resumen

RAMOS, Alcida Rita. Methodologies. Neither for nor against, much to the contrary. Cuad. antropol. soc. [online]. 2019, n.50, pp.21-31.  Epub 19-Dic-2019. ISSN 1850-275X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.34096/cas.i50.7018.

The thorny issue of methodology has haunted many a social scientist, among them, anthropologists. Hard to define, method is often confused with research techniques; students and professionals alike very frequently propose, for instance, participant observation as their privileged “method”. However, there are striking differences between method and technique. Method is a guide, an organizer of research procedures. At the same time, it reveals the researchers’ inclinations towards their objects. This paper comments on the use of methodology, presents outstanding cases of its appropriate use, and gives examples of indigenous methodologies as counter examples, stressing the indigenous way of doing research, usually permeated with histories of subjugation, humiliation, generalized violence, and dehumanization inflicted on nonwestern peoples who happen to be in the way of western expansion and conquest.

Palabras clave : Anthropological research; Ethnography; Indigenous methodologies; Serendipity; Epistemology.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Portugués     · Portugués ( pdf )