SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.74 número3Doce años de extracciones de catéteres endocavitarios de marcapasos y desfibriladores en la ArgentinaValor clínico del análisis de la fase sistólica de la contracción ventricular con Doppler tisular en la discriminación de hipertrofia fisiológica de formas patológicas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Bookmark


Revista argentina de cardiología

versión On-line ISSN 1850-3748

Resumen

VOLBERG, Verónica I. et al. Efficacy of the Peak to Mean Pressure Decrease Ratio for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2006, vol.74, n.3, pp. 123-128. ISSN 1850-3748.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the statistical efficacy of peak to mean pressure decrease ratio (GMAX/ GMED) for the assessment of aortic stenosis severity. We studied the echocardiograms of 212 consecutive patients (mean age: 74 years; range: 19-98 years; 100 males [47%]) with an aortic area calculated by the continuity equation (AAo) of 2 cm2. We considered severe aortic stenosis: a maximal aortic velocity (VMAX) 4 m/s, a mean gradient (GMED) 40 mmHg or an AAo of 1 cm2. We also performed the analysis taking an AAo 0.75 cm2 as severe aortic stenosis. We conclude that: 1) GMAX/ GMED ratio is directly but weakly correlated; 2) There is a great overlap among GMAX/ GMED ratio values corresponding to patients with different aortic stenosis severity; 3) The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of GMAX/ GMED ratio for the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis are of average magnitude; 4) The positive and negative predictive values of GMAX/ GMED ratio are modest, in the studied population; 5) The analysis of likelihood ratios demonstrated that GMAX/ GMED ratio has only a small clinical impact for the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis; 6) More studies are needed before accepting GMAX/ GMED ratio as a useful clinical parameter for the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis. The GMAX/ GMED ratio could be a surrogate criterion for AAo when it is not possible to assess all the variables needed for its calculation.

Palabras llave : Aortic stenosis; Echocardiography; Doppler.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español