SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.82 número3Registro Nacional de Ablación con Catéter 2010Complicaciones eléctricas posimplante de válvula aórtica percutáneo: evolución clínica y eléctrica índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista argentina de cardiología

versión On-line ISSN 1850-3748

Resumen

BERTOLOTTI, Alejandro M. et al. Experience with Magnetically-Levitated Centrifugal Flow Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock (INTERMACS 1). Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2014, vol.82, n.3, pp.205-210. ISSN 1850-3748.

Introduction Short term use of magnetically-levitated ventricular assist devices offers hemodynamic stabilization of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock in INTERMACS stage 1, enabling a therapeutic strategy. Objective The aira of this study was to assess in a single centre the results with second generation centrifugal flow pumps in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Methods Fifteen patients with Levitronix CentriMag® ventricular assist device implantation were retrospectively analyzed from 2006 to 2011. All patients presented refractory cardiogenic shock under two inotropic agents and 13 patients were also assisted with intra aortic balloon pump. The indications were: end stage cardiomyopathy in 8 patients, viral myocarditis in 1 patient, postpartum cardiomyopathy in 1 patient, post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 3 patients and post heart transplantation graft failure in 2 patients. Results Mean age was 49 ± 13 years, and 66% (10/15) were men. Only 1 patient underwent left ventricular assist device implantation (LVA) and 14 patients underwent biventricular assistance (BVA). Mean support duration was 6 ± 4 days (2-19). Final post-implant therapeutic decisión was bridge to heart transplantation in 12 patients (80%), bridge to reoovery in 1 patient (7%) and bridge to decisión in 2 patients (13%). One patient was successfully weaned from BVA due to ventricular function recovery and 8 patients were transplanted, with a survival rate of 60% (9/15). Reoperation due to bleeding was performed in 6 patients (40%) and 1 patient presented cannulae thrombosis. None of the patients had stroke or technical system failures. Six patients died while receiving circulatory assistance (40%) (5 BVA and 1 LVA), 1 patient due to sepsis, 1 patient due to coagulopathy and 4 patients due to múltiple system organ failure. Out of the 6 deaths, 2 patients were in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and 4 were on heart transplantation waiting list. Conclusions In this series, circulatory support with Levitronix CentriMag® centrifugal flow pump was effective in critical patients with a survival rate of 60%. Reoperation for bleeding was the most frequent complication.

Palabras clave : Heart Faüure; Shock-Cardiogenic; Heart-Assist Devices; Heart Transplantation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons