SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.87 número2Mecanismos de la disfunción y marcadores pronósticos en la válvula aórtica bicúspideImplante de stent en tracto de salida de ventrículo derecho en tetrología de Fallot grave: alternativa a la anastomosis de Blalock-Taussig índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista argentina de cardiología

versión On-line ISSN 1850-3748

Resumen

BURGOS, LUCRECIA M. et al. Validation and Comparison of Two Risk Stratification Models in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2019, vol.87, n.2, pp.118-124.  Epub 01-Mar-2019. ISSN 1850-3748.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v87.i2.13339.

Background:

Risk scores are recommended to stratify and predict mortality in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The ProACS and Simple Risk Index (SRI) models are simple scores that have demonstrated adequate predictive capacity of in-hospital mortality in other countries.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to validate and compare the ProACS and SRI scores as predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI.

Methods:

This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort composed of consecutive patients from the CONAREC XVII registry hospitalized with STEMI diagnosis. The predictive value for in-hospital mortality was estimated and validity was assessed by discrimination and calibration.

Results:

The study analyzed 694 patients. In-hospital mortality was 8.78%. The median ProACS score was 4 (IQR 25-75, 2.5-5) in patients who presented the event, and 2 (IQR 25-75 1-3) in those without the event (p<0.001) and the median SRI score was 41.3 (IQR 25-75, 29.8-62.5) and 20.8 (IQR 25-75 15.4-30) in those who died and those who did not, respectively (p<0.001). The SRI score showed excellent discrimination (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.88, p=0.001) and the ProACS score evidenced good discrimination (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.86, p= 0.001) for the outcome. The HL test applied to the ProACS score presented χ2=8.6 (p=0.3), and the SRI score χ2=5.4 (p=0.7).

Conclusions:

The ProACS and SRI risk scores for the prediction of in-hospital mortality were adequately validated in patients with STEMI in Argentina. This suggests their suitability for clinical use in this population.

Palabras clave : Myocardial infarction; ST elevation myocardial infarction; Acute coronary síndrome; Prognosis.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )