SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 número3Caracterización palinológica de la miel de un sector de la región chaqueña de la provincia de Tucumán (Argentina)Uso de hospedadores por el muérdago argentino Ligaría cuneifolia (Loranthaceae) a lo largo de su distribución geográfica índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartir


Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica

versión On-line ISSN 1851-2372

Resumen

DIETA, Victorio J.  y  BIGANZOLI, Fernando. Preliminary evaluation of the conservation status of plants: comparison of two methods applied to the genus Gavilea (Orchidaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. [online]. 2019, vol.54, n.3, pp.1-15. ISSN 1851-2372.

Background and aims: It is essential to know the conservation status of the species, in order to prioritize intervention and management of the most threatened species populations. Usually available information is not enough for a definitive evaluation; therefore, it is important to develop rapid assessment methods of conservation status. In this work we performed a preliminary assessment of the conservation status for the Patagonian orchid genus Gavilea (Orchidaceae, Chloraeinae), and we compared our results with that obtained by experts. M&M: We compiled a database with location and collection date of herbarium specimens of the 17 species of Gavilea. We apply an adaptation of the criteria proposed by Krupnik et al., (2009) related to the geographical and temporal distribution of the collections. We compare the classification obtained with those published by experts. Results: We categorize the 17 species, with 1 Potentially Extinct species, 6 Potentially Threatened species and the remaining 10 Potentially Not Threatened species. In addition, we found that 15 of the 17 species coincide in their classification with the evaluation of experts; only for G. platyantha, our categorization was more optimistic than that of experts. Conclusions: The method allowed to categorize all the species and determine the priorities for future studies or interventions. In most cases, the categorization coincided with that carried out by experts. In general, we consider that the method is a good tool to generate an assessment of the preliminary conservation status of plant species.

Palabras clave : Conservation status, expert evaluation, Gavilea, herbarium records, IUCN..

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons