SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue1Dialogue and judicial activism: A critical view of impartiality from The Federalist Papers author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Estudios de filosofía práctica e historia de las ideas

On-line version ISSN 1851-9490

Abstract

NOSETTO, Luciano. We, the Solicitors of the People: Judicialization of Politics and Democratic Representation in XXIst. century’s Argentina. Estud. filos. práct. hist. ideas [online]. 2018, vol.20, n.1, pp.1-24. ISSN 1851-9490.

The judicialization of Argentine politics opens a gap between the activism in political matters developed by the judges and the legitimacy traditionally attributed to the judiciary, as the power in charge of the conservation of the constitution. Recent efforts to supersede this deficit in terms of legitimacy pointed to participatory processes, inspired by the model of deliberative democracy. In this sense, the Argentine supreme court has developed a series of institutional innovations, such as the admission of amici curiae and the holding of public hearings. The evaluation of these experiences allows nonetheless to identify an underlying conception of citizen participation focused on the intervention of specialists and the intermediation of lawyers and legal scholars.

Keywords : Judicialization of Politics; Public Hearings; Citizen Participation; Argentina; 21st. Century.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License