SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número1Diálogo y activismo judicial: Una mirada crítica de la imparcialidad a partir de El Federalista índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Estudios de filosofía práctica e historia de las ideas

versión On-line ISSN 1851-9490

Resumen

NOSETTO, Luciano. We, the Solicitors of the People: Judicialization of Politics and Democratic Representation in XXIst. century’s Argentina. Estud. filos. práct. hist. ideas [online]. 2018, vol.20, n.1, pp.1-24. ISSN 1851-9490.

The judicialization of Argentine politics opens a gap between the activism in political matters developed by the judges and the legitimacy traditionally attributed to the judiciary, as the power in charge of the conservation of the constitution. Recent efforts to supersede this deficit in terms of legitimacy pointed to participatory processes, inspired by the model of deliberative democracy. In this sense, the Argentine supreme court has developed a series of institutional innovations, such as the admission of amici curiae and the holding of public hearings. The evaluation of these experiences allows nonetheless to identify an underlying conception of citizen participation focused on the intervention of specialists and the intermediation of lawyers and legal scholars.

Palabras clave : Judicialization of Politics; Public Hearings; Citizen Participation; Argentina; 21st. Century.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons