SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número1ENTRE LO RECIENTE Y LO CONTEMPORÁNEO. APUNTES PARA UNA HISTORIA PROVINCIAL DE LA DEMOCRACIALA COMUNICACIÓN POLÍTICA EN INSTAGRAM: EL CASO DE LAS DIPUTADAS SOROR@S EN LA ARGENTINA índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Postdata

versión On-line ISSN 1851-9601

Resumen

ABDULHADI, Augusto. DE JUECES PERONISTAS, RADICALES Y CONCURSADOS: EL SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LA PROVINCIA DE CHACO (1983-2011). Postdata [online]. 2021, vol.26, n.1, pp.202-231. ISSN 1851-9601.

Supreme Courts are collegiate organs of conduction of the Judicial Power, and they have decision-making power over issues that affect government projects or public policies, which makes them relevant actors for both national and subnational politics. The literature on comparative judicial politics indicates that in Argentina Supreme Court judges turnover is frequent, and partisan incentives are a great predictor of changes in Courts, but there is no clear relationship between these changes and the control of legislative majorities. This article presents a case study analysis from the political changes of Supreme Court judges of the province of Chaco between 1983 and 2011. The causal mechanisms which are proposed here are based on a strategic argument that explains political changes at Supreme Courts of argentinean provinces.

Palabras clave : subnational politics; supremecourts; democracy; judicial power; argentineprovinces.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )