SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Modules for all seasons? Domain-specificity, ecological plasticity and cultureHablar para pensar: sobre el uso del lenguaje en el pensamiento author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

MILKOWSKI, Marcin. When weak modularity is robust enough?. Anal. filos. [online]. 2008, vol.28, n.1, pp.77-89. ISSN 1851-9636.

In this paper, I suggest that the notion of module explicitly defined by Peter Carruthers in The Architecture of The Mind (Carruthers 2006) is not really In use in the book. Instead, a more robust notion seems to be actually in play. The more robust notion, albeit implicitly assumed, seems to be far more useful for making claims about the modularity of mind. Otherwise, the claims would become trivial. This robust notion will be reconstructed and improved upon by putting it into a more general framework of mental architecture. I defend the view that modules are the outcome of structural rather than functional decomposition and that they should be conceived as near decomposable systems.

Keywords : Modularity; Carruthers; Decomposition.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License