SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número1La cánula de alto flujo mejora la capacidad de ejercicio en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: ensayo clínico aleatorizado cruzadoInterrelación entre enfisema y disfunción diastólica ventricular izquierda: nuestra experiencia en el Hospital Privado Centro Médico de Córdoba índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista americana de medicina respiratoria

versión On-line ISSN 1852-236X

Resumen

DELL’ERA, Silvina; ROUX, Nicolás; GIMENO-SANTOS, Elena  y  TERRASA, Sergio. The High Flow Nasal Cannula Improves the Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial. Rev. am. med. respir. [online]. 2019, vol.19, n.1, pp.16-26. ISSN 1852-236X.

Introduction: The effects of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) such as reducing of work of breathing could improve exercise tolerance in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, however there is a great lack of evidence supporting its use. Aims: To compare the maximum speed (MS) reached on an Incremental Exercise Test (IET) and Limit Time (Tlim) on a Constant Work Rate Exercise Test (CWRET) using High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) vs Venturi Mask (VM). Methods Subjects: 28 COPD patients (56% male, age mean 69 yr and FEV1 44% predicted) who require oxygen during exercise. Design: randomized crossover trial. Variables: MS, Tlim, symptoms, oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and comfort. Procedure: Each patient performed two IET and two CWRET, one time using HFNC and the other with VM. Statistic analysis: we carried out a hypothesis contrast of paired data comparing MS, Tlim and physiological variables. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: HFNC vs MV increased MS (5,9 vs 5,7 km/h; p = 0.0002) and Tlim (450 vs 315 sec; p = 0.004), with higher SpO2 and less dyspnea (p < 0.05) at both isowork and isotime, with no statistically significant differences on confort. Conclusions: HFNC improved exercise capacity in COPD patients increasing MS during IET and Tlim on CWRET with higher SpO2 and reduced dyspnea in comparison to VM. HFNC and VM were equally comfortable.

Palabras clave : High flow nasal cannula; Oxygen inhalation therapies; Exercise training; Rehabilitation; COPD.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons