SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número1Análisis de genotoxicidad en eritrocitos de tortugas (Phrynops hilarii) de sitios antropizados y naturales de Entre Ríos, ArgentinaIdentificación de alteraciones moleculares en pacientes Venezolanos con diagnóstico de leucemia linfoblástica aguda índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartir


BAG. Journal of basic and applied genetics

versión On-line ISSN 1852-6233

Resumen

RUEDA CALDERON, M. A; BALZARINI, M  y  BRUNO, C. Meta-análisis para evaluar eficiencia de selección genómica en cereales: Meta-analysis for evaluating the efficiency of genomic selection in cereals. BAG, J. basic appl. genet. [online]. 2020, vol.31, n.1, pp.23-32. ISSN 1852-6233.

Genomic selection (GS) is used to predict the merit of a genotype with respect to a quantitative trait from molecular or genomic data. Statistically, GS requires fitting a regression model with multiple predictors associated with the molecular markers (MM) states. The model is calibrated in a population with phenotypic and genomic data. The abundance and correlation of MM information make model estimation challenging. For that reason there are diverse strategies to adjust the model: based on best linear unbiased predictors (BLUP), Bayesian regressions and machine learning methods. The correlation between the observed phenotype and the predicted genetic merit by the fitted model provides a measure of the efficiency (predictive ability) of the GS. The objective of this work was to perform a metaanalysis on the efficiency of GS in cereals. A systematic review of related GS studies and a meta-analysis, in wheat and maize, was carried out to obtain a global measure of GS efficiency under different scenarios (MM quantity and statistical models used in GS). The meta-analysis indicated an average correlation coefficient of 0.61 between observed and predicted genetic merits. There were no significant differences in the efficiency of the GS based on BLUP (RR-BLUP and GBLUP), the most common statistical approach. The increase of MM data, make GS efficiency do not vary widely.

Palabras clave : Systematic review; Random effects model; Forest plot; Predictive accuracy.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons