SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número1El concepto de crítica de arte en la obra temprana de Walter Benjamín¿Es factible expresar la durée bergsoniana? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista latinoamericana de filosofía

versão On-line ISSN 1852-7353

Resumo

CASTELLI, P. Lo que Descartes le podría haber dicho a Jaegwon Kim: Causalidad y dualismo sustancial. Rev. latinoam. filos. [online]. 2009, vol.35, n.1, pp.145-162. ISSN 1852-7353.

In the present paper I consider an argument of Jaegwon Kim's, presented in the third chapter of his Physicalism or Something Near Enough, which purports to show the inadequacy of substance dualism as a solution to the problem about the nature of mind. I intend to show that Cartesian dualism is beyond the reach of Kim's attack, provided that all the implications of Descartes use of the theory of natural institution and of the notion of a psychophysical union are taken into account. Moreover, Kim's arguments directed towards the question of mind's nonspatiality, and its derived impossibility to enter into causal relations, seem to vanish, once we take into account, on the one hand, the fact that the Cartesian man involves a union of mind and body which is such that they may be regarded as co-extensive and, on the other hand, the particular way, very near to Occassionalism, in which Descartes explains interaction.

Palavras-chave : Cartesian dualism; Causation; Ocasionalism; Mind-body union.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons