Resumen

CHAVES, Hernán et al. Hippocampal Volumetry: Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Methods in Alzheimer's Disease. Rev. argent. radiol. [online]. 2018, vol.82, n.2, pp.57-63. ISSN 1852-9992.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656522.

Objective Hippocampal atrophy is one of the most sensible radiological biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. There are different methods to evaluate atrophy: visual subjective analysis (VSA), manual objective analysis (MOA) and automatic objective analysis (AOA). We will compare these methods and evaluate if AOA has a confidence similar to MOA (gold standard), and better than VSA. Materials and Methods We retrospectively selected 3D FSPGR MRI from 28 subjects of whom 14 had mild cognitive impairment, 7 Alzheimer's disease and 7 controls. VSA was performed by 10 radiologists who classified hippocampal atrophy in none, mild, moderate and severe. ForMOA, two operatorsmanually segmented both hippocampus from all subjects. AOA was performed by FreeSurfer 5.3. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was calculated for discrete variables and intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for continuous variables. Results Correlation coefficients between the operators that performed MOA was 0.88 (p < 0.0001) for left hippocampi and 0.86 (p < 0,0001) for right hippocampi. Correlation coefficients between mean VSA and MOA was-0,81 (95% CI-0,96- -0,66). Correlation coefficients between AOA and AOM was 0.54 (p < 0.0001) for left hippocampi and 0.61 (p < 0.0001) for right hippocampi. Conclusion Even though AOA has moderate correlation with the gold standard it is not superior to average VSA and should be implemented with care in clinical practice.

Palabras clave : Alzheimer disease; Biomarkers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Hippocampus.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )