versión impresa ISSN 0002-7014
Ameghiniana vol.46 no.3 Buenos Aires jul./set. 2009
First record of Malayaspira Kobayashi, 1958 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in the Lower-Middle Ordovician San Juan Formation, Argentine Precordillera
CICTERRA-CONICET, Centro de Investigaciones Paleobiológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Velez Sarsfield 299, X5000JJC Córdoba, Argentina. CONICET. email@example.com
The San Juan Formation is a passive margin carbonate succession that crops out extensively in the Precordillera fold belt of Western Argentina. Its age ranges from latest Tremadocian to Darriwilian. This unit contains diverse and well preserved megafossils, mainly brachiopods, sponges, bryozoans and trilobites, which have been the focus of several papers (see Benedetto, 2003 for a review). Despite their relative abundance throughout the San Juan Formation, gastropods have never been studied in detail. The first description of Ordovician Precordilleran gastropods is that of Kayser (1876), who figured and described species of Ophyleta, Maclurites and Murchisonia from the San Juan Formation limestones. Subsequently, these taxa were revised by Kobayashi (1935, 1937). More recently, Carrera (1999) described the opercula of Teiichispira argentina (Kayser) and an unidentified macluritacean from the same formation in several localities of the San Juan province, and Rohr et al. (2001) gave a list of genera and families of gastropods from the same unit.
Some natural casts of gastropod protoconchs were recovered from acid-etched residues from the upper San Juan Formation limestones at the Cerro Viejo locality and around twenty-six species described in several localities (Bertero, 2006, 2007). These preliminary reports are part of the author´s PhD project that involves the taxonomy, diversification patterns and biogeography of the Ordovician gastropods of the Argentine Precordillera.
One of the reasons why the study of San Juan Formation gastropods has been neglected is their preservation almost exclusively as internal molds. As it is known, shell ornament and external features are critical for taxonomic identification at familial, generic and specific levels. In the past few years, intensive sampling of the San Juan Formation at different localities yielded well preserved material, opening promissory perspectives for the knowledge of the Ordovician gastropods from Argentina. The purpose of this paper is to describe and illustrate for the first time the genus Malayaspira Kobayashi, 1958 from the Precordillera terrane and to assess its biogeographic significance.
Locality and stratigraphy
The samples were collected from exposures of the San Juan Formation along the Talacasto River, approximately 3 km west of the Baños de Talacasto locality (figure 1). Fossiliferous beds are located on the western flank of the Talacasto anticline. The Malayaspira material described herein is restricted to some beds of skeletal wackestones within the Niquivilia extensa brachiopod Zone (figure 2), which according to the associated conodonts can be confidently referred to the late Floian O. intermedius Zone and the early Dapingian T. laevis Zone (Benedetto, 2001). Fossil assemblages are dominated by brachiopods (mainly orthides and leptellinids), sponges, trilobites, encrusting receptaculitids, bryozoans and gastropods. This association was referred by Carrera et al. (1999) to the leptellinid-dominated biofacies, which flourished in a middle ramp setting (Cañas, 1999; Carrera, 2001, Cañas and Aguirre, 2005; Benedetto, 2007).
Figure 1. Location map of the studied stratigraphic section in the Ancha creek, Talacasto range (San Juan Formation outcrops in grey) / mapa de ubicación de la sección estudiada en la quebrada Ancha, sierra de Talacasto (afloramientos de la Formación San Juan en gris).
Figure 2. Generalized stratigraphic column of the San Juan Formation showing the ocurrence of Malayaspira aff. rugosa (modified from Carrera, 2001) / columna generalizada de la formación San Juan señalando la ubicación de Malayaspira aff. rugosa (modificado de Carrera, 2001).
The collection is held at the Centro de Investigaciones Paleobiológicas (CIPAL), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (prefix CEGH-UNC).
Order EUOMPHALINA de Koninck, 1881
Superfamily OPHILETOIDEA Knight, 1956
Family OPHILETIDAE Knight, 1956
Genus Malayaspira Kobayashi, 1958
Type species. Malayaspira rugosa Kobayashi, 1958
Malayaspira aff. rugosa Kobayashi, 1958
Material. Thirteen incomplete individuals, CEGH-UNC 23189- 23194 and 23594- 23600 from the San Juan Formation, Talacasto river, Niquivilia extensa Zone, upper Floian.- lower Dapingian.
Figure 3. Malayaspira aff. rugosa. 1, CEGH-UNC 23189 Basal view x 1.5. / 2, CEGH-UNC 23190 apical view x 1.5. 3, CEGH-UNC 23190 lateral view x 2.2. 4, CEGH-UNC 23190 apical view showing details of ornamentation x 2. 5, CEGH-UNC 23190 detail of selenizone x 5. 6, CEGH-UNC 23194 cross section x3./ Malayaspira aff. rugosa. 1, CEGH-UNC 23189 vista basal x 1.5. 2, CEGH-UNC 23190 vista apical x 1.5. 3, CEGH-UNC 23190 vista lateral x 2.2. 4, CEGH-UNC 23190 detalle de la ornamentación x 2. 5, CEGH-UNC 23190 detalle de la selenizona x 5. 6, CEGH-UNC 23194 corte transversal x 3.
Description. Moderately large (3.2 cm wide, 1.1 cm high on average), discoidal, widely umbilicate shell with depressed spire and flat base. Three whorls preserved, but impressions on the rock indicates up to five whorls. The rate of whorl expansion is about two times per whorl. Mean pleural angle of 130°. Shell ornamentation consists of strong growth lines which are opistocline at the base, prosocline on the lateral sides and opistocline on the upper side. Collabral growth lines becoming more closely spaced with growth, on the last whorl the space between ribs is about 1 mm. Whorl bases rounded, internal and external sides flattened or slightly concave which converge toward a prominent, flat topped carina bearing the selenizone. Transversal section of the whorls subquadrate to suboval. Aperture shape and character of apex unknown.
Discussion. The San Juan Formation material is referred to Malayaspira on the basis of its nearly flat base, depressed spire, moderate rate of whorl expansion, subquadrate whorl profile, carinate upper side of whorls, and ornament features, among other characters (Kobayashi, 1958, 1959). The Precordilleran specimens are very close to the material of M. rugosa illustrated by Rohr (1994, fig. 7) from the Middle Ordovician of Malaysia, except that the profile of the Argentinean material is less angular than in the Malaysian specimens. However, the lack of complete specimens precludes a more conclusive specific assignment. The species M. hintzei, Rohr, 1994 and M. speciosa (Billings, 1865) differ from the studied specimens in that the whorl is higher than wide, whereas in M. rugosa and the Argentinean form this proportion is reversed. Moreover, in the Argentinean Malayaspira the outer whorl surface curving uniformly downwards, whereas in both M. hintzei and M. speciosa is nearly planar, sloping at an acute angle to lower-outer angulation. M. canningense (Yu, 1993) clearly differs in its cancellate sculpture formed by the intersection of the crossed spiral threads with the growth lines.
Internal molds of Macluritaceans are very common in the San Juan Formation. Rohr (1994) noted some affinities between Malayaspira hintzei and small specimens of Maclurites. However, the internal molds of Maclurites are quite different from those of Malayaspira in having a more elevated spire and a deeper umbilicus. Maclurites avellanadae has a higher shell and consequently a deeper umbilicus. In section, the whorls of the spire are oval. M. sarmienti looks similar to Lesueurilla or Ecculiomphalus, in having a crest on the external margin (Rohr, 1980; Rohr et al., 2001) and the internal side of the spire fall abruptly forming an angle of approximately 45º. M. stelzneri has a larger size in relation to the number of whorls; however its original description is too limited and should be revised.
The genus Malayaspira (type species M. rugosa) was erected by Kobayashi in 1958 on material from the Lower Ordovician Setul Formation, Langkawi Islands, Malaysian peninsula. After that, at least four other species of Malayaspira have been recognized: M. hintzei Rohr, 1994, from the Whiterockian of Nevada, and M. speciosa (Billings, 1865), from Whiterockian of Newfoundland (Canada). Wagner (2002) also referred to Malayaspira the euomphaloidan Oriostoma cannigense Yü, 1993 from the Darriwilian Gap Creek Formation of Australia. One unpublished species of Malayaspira also occurs in the Upper Ordovician of the Taimyr Peninsula (Siberia) (A. Gubanov, pers. comm., 2008). As figure 4 shows, Malayaspira has been recovered from shallow-water carbonate platforms developed on low-latitude plate margins. Such a widespread, almost pan-Tropical geographic range suggests that Malayaspira had planctotrophyc larvae. According to Nützel and Fryda (2003) and Nützel et al. (2006) free-swimming and plankton-feeding larvae evolved near the Cambrian- Ordovician boundary, during the initial stages of the Ordovician radiation. Dispersion of modern gastropod larvae largely depends on the length of pelagic existence and oceanic current velocity and direction (Scheltema, 1977). Evidence from warm-temperate and tropical gastropod species indicates that planctotrophic forms can be dispersed over long distances, and many species can be transported across the Atlantic Ocean by North and South Equatorial currents, attaining a peri-Equatorial distribution. Another very common Lower Ordovician Precordilleran gastropod is Teiichispira (represented only by opercula), which has been recorded also from coeval beds of Australia (Yü, 1993). In addition, Carrera and Rigby (1999) recognized a similar pan-Tropical pattern (Laurentia, South China, Precordillera) in several Precordilleran sponges. It is also noteworthy the similitude between the pattern of distribution of some Precordilleran rhynchonelliform brachiopods and that of Malayaspira. For example, Aporthophyla is a widespread pan-Equatorial genus recorded in Laurentia, Kazakhstan, Baltica, North China, Malaysia and Thailand. Of the numerous species described, the Precordilleran species A. neumani Benedetto, 1998 is closely related to A. tianjingshanensis Fu, 1982 from the Setul Formation, Langkawi Islands, Malaysia and Thailand (Laurie and Burrett, 1992), the same beds yielding the type material of Malayaspira rugosa. This widespread low-latitudinal dispersion is consistent with the fact that many Lower Paleozoic rhynchonelliform brachiopods have large protegula, indicating a planktotrophic larval stage (Freeman and Lundelius, 2005, 2008). During such a relatively long planktonic period, larvae can be dispersed by ocean currents over long distances. The species M. rugosa was restricted to an oceanic corridor between the eastern Gondwana (and peri-Gondwanan plates) and the Iapetus Ocean. Trilobite evidence indicates that this pattern was established before the Middle Ordovician. During the Upper Cambrian-Tremadocian active larval dispersion into the Andean platforms from Australia, New Zealand and South China is well documented upon the occurrence in the western South American basins of Onychopyge, Amzasskiella, and Australoharpes, among others (Vaccari et al., 2006). According to the paleogeographic model by Benedetto et al. (1999), at that time the Precordillera was not adjacent to Gondwana, but probably it was not far from its margin and received some selected taxa capable of long-term dispersion. In fact, typical peri-Gondwanan brachiopods and trilobites attain the Precordillera during the Middle Ordovician (Benedetto et al., 1999; Benedetto, 1998, 2004). The Lower Ordovician acritarchs display a comparable pattern of geographic dispersion. Similar temperate to warm-water Tremadocian acritarch assemblages have been recorded in Laurentia, North China and Baltica, and their absence in Siberia and Australia is probably due to the lack of detailed studies (Servais et al., 2005). This supports the hypothesis that dispersion of Malayaspira was essentially controlled by oceanic currents.
Figure 4. Early Ordovician paleogeograpic reconstruction showing the distribution of the genus Malayaspira (modified from Benedetto, 2003) / mapa de reconstrucción paleobiogeográfica mostrando la distribución del género Malayaspira (modificado de Benedetto, 2003).
I wish to thank T. Sánchez, J.L. Benedetto and M. Carrera (CIPAL, Córdoba University) for many fruitful discussions. Careful reviews by J. Peel and A. Gubanov greatly improved this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Ténicas (CONICET, PIP 5599) and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 16-21857).
1. Benedetto, J.L. 1998. Early Palaeozoic brachiopods and associated shelly faunas from western Gondwana: its bearing on the geodynamic history of the pre-Andean margin. pp. 57-83. In: R. Pankhurst and C. Rapela (eds), The proto-Andean margin of Gondwana. Geological Society, London, Special Publication 142 pp. [ Links ]
2. Benedetto, J.L. 2001. Silicified early Ordovician (Arenig) brachiopods from the San Juan Limestone (Argentine Precordillera). Geologica et Palaeontologica 35: 1-29. [ Links ]
3. Benedetto, J.L. (ed.) 2003. Ordovician fossils of Argentina. Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. 560 pp. [ Links ]
4. Benedetto, J.L. 2004. The allochthony of the Precordillera ten years later (1993-2003): A new paleobiogeographic test of the microcontinental model. Gondwana Research 7: 1027-1039. [ Links ]
5. Benedetto, J.L. 2007. Brachiopod sucession in the Lower-Middle Ordovician carbonate platform of the Precordillera terrane, Western Argentina: an example of interplay between environmental, biogeographic and evolutionary processes. In: J. Li, J. Fan and I. Percival (eds.), The global Ordovician and Silurian. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 46: 28-36. [ Links ]
6. Benedetto, J.L., Sánchez, T.M., Carrera, M.G., Brussa, E.D. and Salas, M.J. 1999. Paleontological constraints on successive paleogeographic positions of Precordillera terrane during the early Paleozoic. In: V.A. Ramos and D. Keppie (eds.), Gondwana-Laurentia connections before Pangea. Geological Society of America, Special Papers 336: 21-42. [ Links ]
7. Bertero, V. 2006. Primer registro de estadíos tempranos de conchillas de gastrópodos ordovícicos en la Formación San Juan (Precordillera Argentina). 9° Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía (Córdoba), Resúmenes: pp. 59. [ Links ]
8. Bertero,V. 2007. [Moluscos gastrópodos de la formación San Juan (Ordovícico inferior): Su taxonomía y rol en las comunidades de invertebrados marinos. Tesis de Grado, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 59 pp. Inédito. [ Links ]].
9. Billings, E. 1865. Palaeozoic fossils, volume 1. Geological Survey of Canada, 426 pp. [ Links ]
10. Cañas, F.L. 1999. Facies sequences of the Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician carbonates of the Argentine Precordillera: A physical stratigraphic comparison with Laurentian platforms. In: D. Keppie and V. Ramos (eds.), Laurentia-Gondwana connections before Pangea. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 336: 43-62. [ Links ]
11. Cañas, F.L. and Aguirre, H.D. 2005. Estratigrafía de alta resolución de la Formación San Juan (Ordovícico Inferior de la Precordillera de Cuyo, San Juan, Argentina): Resultados preliminares. 16º Congreso Geológico Argentino (La Plata), Actas 3: 365-370. [ Links ]
12. Carrera, M.G. 1999. Opérculos de gastrópodos en el Ordovícico Inferior de la Precordillera argentina. Ameghiniana 36: 91-94. [ Links ]
13. Carrera, M.G. 2001. Análisis de la distribución y composición de las biofacies de la Formación San Juan (Ordovícico Temprano), Precordillera Argentina. Ameghiniana 38: 169-184. [ Links ]
14. Carrera, M.G. and Rigby, J.K., 1999. Biogeography of the Ordovician sponges. Journal of Paleontology 73: 26-37. [ Links ]
15. Carrera, M.G., Sánchez, T.M. and Benedetto, J.L. 1999. Paleoenvironmental controls on biofacies in the early Ordovician limestones of the Argentine Precordillera. In: P. Kraft and O. Fatka (eds.), Quo vadis Ordovician? Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica 43: 475-478. [ Links ]
16. Freeman, G. and Lundelius, J.W. 2005: The transition from planktotrophy to lecithotrophy in larvae of Lower Palaeozoic Rhynchonelliform brachiopods. Lethaia 38: 219-254. [ Links ]
17. Freeman, G. and Lundelius, J.W. 2008. Brachiopod larvae through time. In: D.A.T. Harper, S.L. Long and C. Nielsen (eds.), Brachiopods: Fossil and Recent. Fossils and Strata 54: 251-258. [ Links ]
18. Fu Li -Pu, 1982. Brachiopoda. In: Xi'An Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources (ed.), Paleontological atlas of north-west China. Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia 1. pp. 95-178. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 480 pp. [ Links ]
19. Kayser, E. 1876. Ueber primordiale und unterische Fossilien aus der Argentinischen Republik. Palaeontographica suppl. 3: 1-33. [ Links ]
20. Knight, J.B. 1956. New families of Gastropoda. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 46: 41-42. [ Links ]
21. Kobayashi, T. 1935. On the Kainella Fauna of the basal Ordovician age found in Argentina. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 12: 59-67. [ Links ]
22. Kobayashi, T. 1937. The Cambro-Ordovician shelly faunas of South America. Journal Faculty of Sciences, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section 2, 4: 309-522. [ Links ]
23. Kobayashi, T. 1958. Some Ordovician Fossils from the Thailand- Malayan Borderland. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 29: 223-231. [ Links ]
24. Kobayashi, T. 1959. On some Ordovician fossils from northern Malaya and her adjacence. Journal Faculty of Sciences, University of Tokyo 2: 387-407. [ Links ]
25. Laurie, J.R. and Burrett, C. 1992. Biogeographic significance of Ordovician brachiopods from Thailand and Malaysia. Journal of Paleontology 66: 16-23. [ Links ]
26. Nützel, A. and Frýda, J. 2003. Paleozoic plankton revolution: evidence from early gastropod ontogeny. Geology 31: 829-831. [ Links ]
27. Nützel, A., Lehnert, O. and Frýda, J. 2006. Origin of planktotrophy - evidence from early molluscs. Evolution & Development 8: 325-330. [ Links ]
28. Rohr, D.M. 1980. Ordovician-Devonian Gastropoda from the Klamath Mountains, California. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 171: 141-199. [ Links ]
29. Rohr, D.M. 1994. Ordovician (Whiterockian) gastropods of Nevada: Bellerophontoidea, Macluritoidea, Euomphaloidea. Journal of Paleontology 68: 473-486. [ Links ]
30. Rohr, D.M., Beresi, M.S. and Yochelson, E.L. 2001. Ordovician gastropods from Argentina. Journal of the Czech Geological Society 46: 3-4. [ Links ]
31. Scheltema, R.S. 1977. Dispersal of marine invertebrate organisms: paleobiogeographlc and biostratigraphic implications. In: E. G. Kauffman, J.E. Hazel (eds.), Concepts and methods of biostratigraphy. Hutchinson and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, pp. 73-120. [ Links ]
32. Servais, T., Blieck, A., Caridroit, M., Chen, X., Paris, F. and Tortello, M.F. 2005. The importance of plankton and nekton distributions in Ordovician palaeogeogra-phical reconstructions. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 176: 531-543. [ Links ]
33. Vaccari, N.E., Waisfeld, B.G., Chatterton, B.D., Edgecombe, G.D. 2006. New raphiophorid trilobites from the Ordovician of Argentina and their biogeographic implications. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Paleontologists 32: 353-374. [ Links ]
34. Wagner, P.J. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the earliest anisostrophically coiled gastropods. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 88: 152 p. [ Links ]
35. Yu, W. 1993. Early Ordovician gastropods from the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 16: 437-458 . [ Links ]
Recibido: 23 de octubre de 2008.
Aceptado: 13 de mayo de 2009.