versión On-line ISSN 1851-8249
Rev. Asoc. Geol. Argent. v.63 n.4 Buenos Aires oct./dic. 2008
Late Triassic - Early Jurassic successions of the Atuel depocenter: sequence stratigraphy and tectonic controls
1 Ernesto Malda 408, 3er. Piso. dto. 14, Colonia J.N. Rovirosa, Villahermosa, Tabasco, 86050, México. E-mail: email@example.com
2 Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales IANIGLA CCT-CONICET-Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
3 Laboratorio de Tectónica Andina, Universidad de Buenos Aires y CONICET-CIMAR - Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Neuquén. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Biostratigraphic correlations of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic successions of the Atuel depocenter allowed determining the accommodation changes and the possible tectonic controls on sedimentation. The Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian deposits contain facies of slope-type fan deltas, braided fluvial systems and low sinuosity rivers with alternate bars deposited during a synrift phase. The late Early Sinemurian - Toarcian series host facies of intermediate (Gilbert to shelf) type fan deltas, braided and low sinuosity fluvial systems, wave-dominated estuaries, transgressive storm-dominated and turbidite-influenced marine shelves which record the sag phase. According to different criteria two stratigraphic schemes are proposed, the first one considering tectosedimentary units (TSU) and the second one using "Exxon-like" sequences. In the first scheme the synrift TSU matches the actual Precuyo Mesosequence and the sag TSU is partly equivalent to the Cuyo Mesosequence, mainly keeping the current mesosequence scheme for the Neuquén basin but assigning the fandeltaic deposits to the Precuyo Mesosequence. The second sequence scheme considers the whole Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession as a part of the Cuyo Mesosequence, where the synrift deposits composes the detached lowstand system tract (LST) and most of the sag deposits makes the transgressive system tract (TST). The basal sequence boundary does not crop out, the flooding surface at the TST base and the maximum flooding surface at the TST top are respectively marked by the lowest estuarine levels and by black shales with suboxic-compatible bivalves (Bositra sp.).
Keywords: Neuquén Basin; Precuyano; Cuyo; Sequences; Tectosedimentary units.
RESUMEN: Sucesiones del Triásico Tardío - Jurásico Temprano del depocentro Atuel: estratigrafía secuencial y controles tectónicos. La correlación bioestratigráfica de las sucesiones del Triásico Tardío - Jurásico Temprano del depocentro Atuel permitió determinar los cambios del espacio de acomodación y los posibles controles tectónicos de la sedimentación. La sección del Retiano - Sinemuriano Temprano tardío contiene facies de abanicos deltaicos de talud, ríos entrelazados y ríos de baja sinuosidad con desarrollo de barras alternas, depositados durante una fase de sinrift. La sucesión del Sinemuriano Temprano tardío - Toarciano alberga facies de abanicos deltaicos intermedios (entre los de tipo Gilbert y los de plataforma), ríos entrelazados, ríos de baja sinuosidad, estuarios dominados por oleaje y plataformas marinas transgresivas (desde plataformas dominadas por tormentas hasta otras influídas por corrientes de turbidez), todos los cuales registran la fase de sag. Se proponen dos esquemas estratigráficos según diferentes criterios: el primero considerando unidades tectosedimentarias (TSU) y el segundo usando secuencias depositacionales (o de tipo "Exxon"). En el primer esquema la TSU de sinrift se corresponde con la Mesosecuencia Precuyo y la TSU de sag equivale parcialmente a la Mesosecuencia Cuyo, manteniendo en gran parte el esquema de mesosecuencias vigente para la cuenca Neuquina aunque asignando los depósitos de abanicos deltaicos a la Mesosecuencia Precuyo. En el segundo esquema se considera a toda la sucesión del Triásico Tardío - Jurásico Temprano como parte de la Mesosecuencia Cuyo, donde los depósitos de sinrift componen el cortejo de mar bajo (LST) y la mayoría de los depósitos de sag forman parte del cortejo transgresivo (TST). El límite de secuencia basal no aflora, la superficie de inundación en la base del TST y la superficie de máxima inundación en el tope del TST están marcados, respectivamente, por los niveles estuáricos más bajos y por las lutitas negras con bivalvos subóxicos (Bositra sp.).
Palabras clave: Cuenca Neuquina; Precuyano; Cuyo; Secuencias; Unidades tectosedimentarias.
The Neuquén basin is a Mesozoic rifted back-arc basin placed on the western convergent margin of the South American plate (Uliana and Biddle 1988, Legarreta and Uliana 1991) and attributed to the extension during the fragmentation of Gondwana and the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean (Uliana and Biddle 1988).
The basin evolution began with a series of unconnected depocenters (Manceda and Figueroa 1993, 1995, Tankard et al. 1995) resulting from the first rifting episode in the Middle Triassic - Sinemurian (Ramos 1992, Manceda and Figueroa 1995) and finally connected in the Early Pliensbachian (Legarreta and Gulisano 1989) when most of the basin was transgressed. The unrelated depocenters were initially filled with the non-marine, mainly non-fossiliferous, siliciclastics and volcanics of the Precuyo Mesosequence (Gulisano 1981, Gulisano et al. 1984, Legarreta and Gulisano 1989), which were interpreted as synrift deposits (Gulisano et al. 1984, Legarreta and Gulisano 1989). At the same time, the deepest zone of the basin was rapidly transgressed by nearshore sandstones and offshore shales of the Cuyo Mesosequence (Legarreta and Gulisano 1989) partly due to the Sinemurian to Toarcian regional sag phase (Vergani et al. 1995). Features, areal distribution and basal age of the sag deposits depended on the marked basement topography, controlled by the main faults and footwall uplift. The rough paleotopography also governed the partial synchronism between continental and marine units of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic age (Gulisano 1981, Gulisano and Gutiérrez Pleimling 1994).
One of the initial unconnected sub-basins above was the Atuel depocenter (Fig.1), which had a different evolution because it contains the only presently known marine synrift deposit and the oldest transgressive record (Rhaetian, Riccardi et al. 1997, Riccardi and Iglesia Llanos 1999). In this depocenter, several detailed structural and sedimentary studies of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic interval have been carried out during the last decade (Lanés 2002, 2005, Giambiagi et al. 2005a, 2005b, 2008 in press and 2008 this issue, Bechis et al. 2005, Spalletti et al. 2007).
a) Location of the Neuquén basin and its northern depocenters (modified from Giambiagi et al. 2005a). b) Geological map of the study area (modified from Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue). Section localities: a) Arroyo Malo, b) Arroyo El Pedrero, c) Arroyo El Freno, d) Arroyo Las Chilcas, e) Puesto Araya, f) Quebrada de Los Caballos, g) Codo del Blanco
The purpose of the present paper is to describe the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic sequences of the Atuel depocenter and their relationship to the current sequence scheme of the Neuquén basin. Identifying sequences in rifts is difficult due to the combination of eustatic sea-level changes, fault movements, changes on the sedimentary supply and the local fault-derived paleotopography on the control of the sedimentary record.
Facies, paleocurrents and thickness variations of vertical sections were analyzed to determine the depositional systems and probable paleogeographical features (Lanés 2002, 2005). Sections were correlated along two roughly orthogonal eastwest and north-south transects orientation, based on local ammonite, bivalve and brachiopod biostratigraphy (Riccardi et al. 2000). We used two selected datums for this correlation: the Epophioceras Zone at most of the sections and the Tropidoceras Zone to correlate Puesto Araya, Arroyo Las Chilcas and Quebrada de los Caballos sections (Figs. 1b and 2). The underlying fluvial unit lacks fossils of biostratigraphic value, being dated due to its field position. The age uncertainty of these fluvial successions obstructs the determination of hiatus inside them and between the marine and non-marine formations.
Biostratigraphic correlation of the studied vertical sections. Stage divisions are shown except for the Hettangian whose ammonite standard zones are present. Datums are based on the ammonite zonation for the Neuquén basin (Riccardi et al. 2000). Block diagram shows the inferred section sites and the ancient main faults (modified from Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue).
In order to identify the sequences and any tectonic or eustatic control on the Rhaetian - Toarcian successions of the Atuel depocenter, the evolution of the accommodation was evaluated and the relative sea-level changes were contrasted with the global eustatic sea-level chart (Haq et al. 1987, 1988) and with the tectonic evolution of the Neuquén basin (Vergani et al. 1995).
Late Triassic - Early Jurassic interval of the Atuel depocenter includes mixed, marine and non-marine deposits of the Arroyo Malo, El Freno, Puesto Araya and Tres Esquinas Formations (Figs. 1b and 3). Though a discussion on the lithostratigraphy of the study area is beyond the scope of the paper, we consider the Puesto Araya Formation divided into an upper and a lower section, as in Giambiagi et al. (2005a).
Stratigraphy of the study area showing the major tectonic processes, keeping the criteria by Giambiagi et al. 2008 (this issue). Western sector refers to the Atuel depocenter, located west of La Manga Fault (after Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue).
Analysis of these successions allowed determining a synrift phase during the Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian followed by a sag phase in the late Early Sinemurian - Toarcian (Lanés 2002, 2005, Giambiagi et al. 2005b). Detailed descriptions of facies associations, depositional systems and their evolution can be found in Lanés (2002, 2005), Giambiagi et al. (2005b) and Spalletti et al. (2007), though a brief account is given below.
The oldest deposits are the fan delta successions assigned to the Arroyo Malo Formation (Rhaetian - Middle Hettangian, Riccardi et al. 1997, Riccardi and Iglesia Llanos 1999) and the lower section of the Puesto Araya Formation (Middle Hettangian - late Early Sinemurian). They crop out only in the Arroyo Malo halfgraben (Giambiagi et al. 2008, this issue), in the western part of the Atuel depocenter (Figs. 1b, 2 and 4), being well bedded, coarsening and thickening-upward turbiditic sections, with usual slump folds and synsedimentary faults, alternating with breccia and lensoidal cross-bedded sandstones and conglomerates (Fig. 4, Tables 1 and 2). Tabular beds of tangential cross-bedded sandstones, cut by lenses of trough cross-bedded sandstones exclusively occur at the top of the Arroyo Malo section (D9 in Table 2, Fig. 4). Fan delta successions were interpreted as three stacked shallowing-upward fluviodominated, transverse and normal-fault controlled, slope-type (sensu Ethridge and Wescott 1984 and Postma 1990) and intermediate (Gilbert to shelf) type fan deltas (Lanés 2005). Sandbodies atop the Arroyo Malo section were interpreted as deposits of mouth bars and distributary channels of an intermediate (Gilbert to shelf) type fan delta. Before Middle Hettangian, the active controlling fault was located east of the present arroyo Alumbre (Arroyo Malo Fault, Giambiagi et al. this issue) and later, before late Early Sinemurian, it was placed farther east (Alumbre Fault, Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue).
Simplified fan delta successions at the Arroyo Malo and Arroyo Pedrero sections. Note the fan deltaic mouth bar deposits at the top of the Arroyo Malo section recording the beginning of the sag phase. Block diagram shows the inferred section sites and the ancient main faults by the late Early Sinemurian (modified from Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue, and Lanés 2005).
Rhaetian - Middle Hettangian fandeltaic facies associations of Arroyo Malo Formation.
Middle Hettangian - late Early Sinemurian fandeltaic facies Associations of lower section of the Puesto Araya Formation.
Fluvial deposits of the El Freno Formation are partly correlative to the lower section of the Puesto Araya Formation (Fig. 2). They are finning- to coarseningupward or slightly finning- and thinningupward successions of lenses filled with clast-supported imbricated, trough or planar cross-bedded conglomerates, trough or planar cross-bedded or plane laminated sandstones, and minor massive or plane laminated mudstones (Fig. 5, Table 3). Fines occur as mud clasts or thin lenses at the sandstone tops. Locally muddy facies increase from 10 % up to 36 % - 40 % of the whole thickness showing paleosoils, mud cracks or alternating with trough cross-bedded sandstones with lateral accretion surfaces. Considering the width/depth ratio of the conglomerate and sandstone bodies (Friend 1983), ribbon (width thickness, w/th <15, Gibling 2006) and belt (width≈ thickness, w/th >15) types were observed. At the Arroyo El Freno section, located immediately westward of the Arroyo Las Chilcas section, these conglomerate and sandstone bodies are vertically stacked in a definite pattern (Spalletti et al. 2007, their Fig. 5). Ribbons dominate the basal fluvial sections with a decreasing-upward connectivity which is minimal at the middle section where fine facies dominate (i.e. the middle part of the Arroyo El Freno section, Fig. 5). Towards the top, the channel connectivity increases again, from isolated ribbons to belts and eventually wider mobile-channel belts (sensu Friend 1983). Fluvial successions resulted from the nucleation and migration of mid-channel longitudinal and transverse bars in a braided fluvial system (Giambiagi et al. 2005b, Spalletti et al. 2005, 2007), which locally evolved to a low sinuosity fluvial system with alternate bars (sensu Miall 1996), fine floodplains, crevasse channels and splays.
Simplified fluvial successions tentatively attributed to the synrift and sag phases at Arroyo El Freno and Puesto Araya section respectively. Block diagram show the inferred section sites and the ancient main faults by the late Early Sinemurian (modified from Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue and Lanés 2005).
Late Triassic-Early Jurassic fluvial facies associations of El Freno Formation.
The upper section of the Puesto Araya Formation (late Early Sinemurian-Toarcian) is a tabular, well-bedded, finingand thinning-upward sandy succession cropping out in the eastern Atuel depocenter, in the Rio Blanco halfgraben (Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue) (Fig. 6, Table 4). It hosts trough cross-, swash cross-, and herringbone cross-bedded sandstones, amalgamated swaley and hummocky cross-bedded or normally graded and wave-rippled sandstones. Discrete beds of hummocky cross-bedded or normally graded, plane laminated sandstones appear towards the top, alternating with massive fine sandstones, massive mudstones and plane laminated shales. This succession records a transgressive storm-dominated shelf, from wave-dominated estuaries (Dalrymple et al. 1992) to inner shelf settings.
Simplified sag marine succession in the Codo del Blanco section. Block diagram shows the inferred section site and the ancient main faults by the late Early Sinemurian (modified from Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue and Lanés 2005).
Sag marine facies associations of late Early Sinemurian - Toarcian age.
The upper section of the Puesto Araya Formation gradually evolves upwards to the shales of the Tres Esquinas Formation (late Late Pliensbachian - Bajocian), which comprise massive mudstones, and unbioturbated plane laminated black shales interfingering with Tce, Tbe and Tae turbidites (Fig. 6, Table 4). These deposits were interpreted as a turbidite-influenced anaerobic inner and outer marine shelf. Occasionally the black shales contain monoespecific pavements of Bositra sp., a bivalve able to live during short events of dysaerobic (O2<0,6 ml O2/l of H2O, Brett and Baird 1986, Savrda et al. 1991) waters in usually anaerobic (O2< 0,1 ml O2/l of H2O, Brett and Baird 1986) bottom waters. In the Codo del Blanco section the pavements of Bositra sp. occur together with ammonites of the Spinatum Zone (late Late Pliensbachian).
PALEOENVIRONMENTAL AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION
The evaluation of the eustatic-related changes in accommodation needs a previous identification of the tectonic controlling factors. In the Atuel depocenter the synrift phase showed a great accommodation while the sag phase evidenced a variable accommodation (Fig. 7).
Late Triassic - Early Jurassic evolution of the accommodation (A) vs. sediment supply (S) proposed in this paper. A part of a hypothetical eustatic curve is given to show the eustasycontrolled changes of accommodation. Fluvial incision of the shelf refers to the erosion of the bases of the estuaries. Blocks illustrate the different depositional systems related to definite portions of the curve (from base to top: slope-type fan delta, intermediate fan delta with prograding mouth bars, wave-dominated estuary, storm-dominated shelf).
The great accommodation during the synrift phase (Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian) allowed the deposition of slopetype fan deltas, braided fluvial systems and low sinuosity fluvial systems with alternate side bars (Fig. 2). The progressive unconformities placed at the base of fining-upwards fan deltaic sequences (Fig. 2, and Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue, their Fig. 8) evidence the consecutive movements of the Alumbre fault and its control on synrift sedimentation segregating the marine synrift deposits westwards from the fluvial synrift deposits eastwards, on the footwall (Figs. 2, 8, Giambiagi et al. 2008 this issue). Besides, the upward changes of the fluvial channel style and connectivity in the Arroyo El Freno section (Figs 1 and 5) reported by Spalletti et al. (2007), express an increase and a following decrease in accommodation (Emery and Myers 1996, Miall 1996, Gibling and Bird 1994, Wright and Marriott 1993 and Martinsen et al. 1999) probably controled by the synrift subsidence (Leeder and Gawthorpe 1987, Prosser 1993, Gawthorpe and Leeder 2000, Withjack et al. 2002).
Tectosedimentary units (TSU) of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession of the Atuel depocenter. Note the uncertain attribution of fluvial deposits at the Puesto Araya section to the synrift phase. Block diagram shows the inferred section sites and the ancient main faults.
The similar age of the overlaying marine deposits and similar sedimentary trends of accommodation (Spalletti et al. 2007) of the fluvial portions in the Codo del Blanco, Quebrada de los Caballos and Arroyo Las Chilcas sections allow assigning these deposits to the synrift phase. Besides, there are independent evidences to support the synrift origin of the fluvial strata, based on structural analysis of the architecture of the depocenter (Giambiagi et al. 2008, this issue), kinematic analysis of small-scale normal faults (Bechis and Giambiagi 2008), and provenance studies (Tunik et al. 2008, this issue). The lack of biostratigraphic valuable fossils in the fluvial deposits inhibits the evaluation of hiatus inside the fluvial succession or between the fluvial and the marine units. However, the local facies variations, and the convergence and amalgamation of the fluvial deposits towards the Puesto Araya section (Fig. 2) obstruct the segregation of the synrift fluvial deposits from the sag fluvial deposits in this section at the moment. Future studies considering the local effect of the faulted block topography on the fluvial accommodation and sediment supply, will allow improving such identification.
By the late Early Sinemurian a change in accommodation occurred. According to the biostratigraphic correlation (Fig. 2) the slope-type fan delta deposits at the top of the Arroyo Pedrero section, the intermediate fan delta mouth bars and the estuarine deposits are contemporaneous and belong to the Epophioceras Zone. However those deposits require different accommodations to be formed. Slopetype fan deltas require a great accommodation (accommodation >> supply), the intermediate fandelta mouth bars are strongly prograding and need a greater supply (accommodation << supply), and the estuarine deposits require a transgressive event and increasing accommodation to be formed. This paradox can be explained considering the duration of 3 My of the Epophiceras Zone, long enough to allow a sea level fall and a consequent sea level rise to occur (Fig. 7). These sea level changes coincide with a lowstand and a sea level rise of the short term eustatic curve by Haq et al. (1987, 1988). We propose that the late Early Sinemurian sea level fall led to fluvial incision on the shelf and fan deltaic conglomerate deposition at the top of the Arroyo Pedrero section. A subsequent slow sea level rise increased the accommodation on the Alumbre fault hangingwall, allowing the fan deltaic mouth bars to prograde. The change from a fault-controlled subsidence to a thermal regime by the late Early Sinemurian explains the restricted accommodation needed to the progradation of the intermediate fan delta mouth bars. Later, a faster sea level rise led the flooding of the incised valleys and estuarine deposition in the Arroyo Blanco halfgraben. Global eustatic cycles suggest the late Early Sinemurian sea-level rise in the Atuel depocenter probably resulted from the combination of an eustatic sea-level rise with a regional sag (Lanés 2005). Afterwards an accommodation exceeding the supply, the widespread marine depositional area and a slower creation of accommodation led to the development of the estuaries and transgressive marine shelf. The accommodation on the marine shelf reached its maximum by the latest Pliensbachian (Spinatum Zone from the ammonite standard zones) in the Codo del Blanco section, when anoxic bottom waters and short dysaerobic events were recorded in laminated black shales with monoespecific pavements of Bositra sp.
SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC SCHEMES
In tectonically active basins, the classical sequence-stratigraphic model (Vail et al. 1977, Van Wagoner et al. 1988, 1990), originally developed in passive margins, is difficult to apply due to the continuous interplay between eustasy and tectonics (Howell and Flint 1996). Tectonic movements may occur over shorter time scales than eustatic changes and may cause local unconformities which are more evident than unconformities related to eustatic sea-level changes (Mutti 1990, Bruhn and Walker 1995, Gawthorpe et al. 1994, 2000 a, 2000b, Burns et al. 1997). Then the superposition of tectonically controlled cycles may locally obscure the eustatic signal.
Therefore two different approaches were used to analyze the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession of the Atuel depocenter: a) the tectonosedimentary units and b) the sequences (sensu Mitchum et al. 1977).
a) Tectonosedimentary units
Tectosedimentary units (TSU, sensu Garrido-Megias 1982) are stratigraphic units composed by a succession of strata, not necessarily conformable, deposited within a concrete interval of geological time and under a tectonic and sedimentary dynamic of definite polarity, bounded by sedimentary breaks of basinal extent. Such sedimentary breaks were later defined as surfaces which can be conformable everywhere, or conformable in the basin center and correlative to an unconformity of any type at the basin margins (González et al. 1988, Pardo et al. 1989). Their conformable or unconformable boundaries allow relating the TSU with the depositional sequences (sensu Mitchum et al. 1977) though the last ones are conformable stakings of strata. On the other hand, the unconformable boundaries of some TSU make them comparable to the sequences (sensu Sloss 1963) and the unconformity-bounded units, including the subsynthems (Chang 1975, Salvador 1994). Finally the TSU are similar to the pre-rift, syn-rift and post-rift megasequences defined by Hubbard (1988) to analyze the stratigraphy of riftrelated basins and passive margins.
In the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic of the Atuel depocenter, a synrift TSU and a sag TSU were identified (Fig. 8). The synrift TSU includes the fan deltaic and fluvial synrift deposits of Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian age. As it was mentioned above, the local facies variations and the convergence and amalgamation of the fluvial deposits towards the Puesto Araya section (Fig. 2) obstruct the segregation of the synrift fluvial deposits from the sag fluvial deposits in this section at the moment. However, there are independent evidences to support the synrift origin of the fluvial strata, based on structural analysis of the architecture of the depocenter (Giambiagi et al. 2008, this issue), kinematic analysis of small-scale normal faults (Bechis and Giambiagi 2008), and provenance studies (Tunik et al. 2008, this issue). Future studies considering the local effect of the faulted block topography on the fluvial accommodation and sediment supply, together with the age of the basal nearshore successions would allow the extrapolation of the synrift TSU to other localities.
Due to its tectonic origin and despite of the fandeltaic origin of part of its deposits, the synrift TSU is comparable to the Precuyo Mesosequence (Legarreta and Gulisano 1989), Precuyano Cycle (Gulisano 1981) and Sañicó Subsynthem (Riccardi and Gulisano 1990). The three units were defined as including occasional siliciclastics of non-marine (alluvial fan, fluvial, playa lake) origin, which crop out without a definite position inside the sequence (Gulisano et al. 1984). However the authors emphasized that the Precuyano Cycle, Precuyo Mesosequence or Sañicó Subsynthem include the initial infilling of extensional depocenters in the basement of the Neuquén basin, which were later covered non-marine and marine sedimentary rocks of the Cuyo Mesosequence.
As the sag TSU recognized in the Atuel Depocenter is partly equivalent to the Cuyo Mesosequence, the TSU scheme mainly keeps the current mesosequence scheme for the Neuquén basin but assigning the fandeltaic deposits to the Precuyo Mesosequence.
b) Depositional sequences
Sequence stratigraphy of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession of the Atuel depocenter and its relationship with the current sequence scheme of the Neuquén basin (Legarreta et al. 1993, Legarreta and Gulisano 1989) were determined, considering the current "Mesosequences" as second order sequences (9-10 My, Haq et al. 1987, Mitchum and Van Wagoner 1991).
The whole Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession is part of the Cuyo Mesosequence (Legarreta and Gulisano 1989) showing a lowstand system tract (LST), transgressive system tract (TST) and highstand system tract (HST) (Fig. 9). Each system tract reflects a definite portion of the hypothetical eustatic curve on Fig. 7.
Second order sequence stratigraphy of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession of the Atuel depocenter. Block diagram shows the inferred section site and the ancient main faults.
The lowstand system tract (LST) includes deposits of fan deltas and of their feeding fluvial systems, of Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian age, which crop out in the Arroyo Malo halfgraben. Aggrading slope-type fan delta deposits located on the Arroyo Malo and Alumbre fault hangingwalls, at the base of the fault slope, are comparable to the slope fans of the LST (SF, Fig. 9), while the prograding fan deltaic mouth bars at the Arroyo Malo section represent the prograding lowstand wedge (PLW, Fig. 9). The second order sequence boundary, placed at the base of the LST, does not crop out. However, the detachment between the LST and TST deposits, which occurs outcropping in the hangingwall and in the footwall of the Alumbre fault respectively, allow considering a type 1-sequence boundary.
The TST includes estuarine, nearshore and minor offshore deposits of Late Sinemurian - Late Pliensbachian age. It begins with a flooding surface (FS) at the base of the estuarine deposits, marked by a shell lags at the base of tidal inlets (Lanés 2002). The ravinement surface (RS) at the base of the nearshore deposits coincides with the base of bioclastic massive storm deposits, dividing the nearshore and the estuarine deposits. The age of the basal marine deposits decrease eastwards, due to the paleotopographic control (Fig. 8), emphasizing the onlap of the marine deposits and the varying age of the flooding surface, estuarine beds and ravinement surface. The maximum flooding surface (MFS) at the top of the TST is clearly identifiable in the Codo del Blanco section, where it is represented by the laminated black shales containing pavements of Bositra sp. together with ammonites from the Spinatum Zone (Late Pliensbachian, Fig. 8). The pavements of Bositra sp. confirm the occurrence of short events of dysaerobic bottom waters in an usually anaerobic marine shelf, and of rapid burial processes at the end of the transgression and the beginning of the highstand (Brett 1995) mainly in highly subsiding basins (Kidwell 1993). Finally the HST includes fine deposits of a turbidite-influenced inner and outer shelf, belonging to the Tres Esquinas Formation (late Late Pliensbachian - late Early Bajocian) (Lanés 2002).
Biostratigraphic correlations of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession of the Atuel depocenter allowed segregating the synrift deposits (Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian) from the sag deposits (late Early Sinemurian - Toarcian).
As the study area show evidences of synsedimentary extensional tectonics, two different approaches were used to analyze such succession The first one considering tectosedimentary units (TSU) and the second one applying sequences (sensu Mitchum et al. 1977).
In the first scheme the synrift TSU of Rhaetian - late Early Sinemurian age matches the actual Precuyo Mesosequence and the sag TSU (late Early Sinemurian - Toarcian) is partly equivalent to the Cuyo Mesosequence, mainly keeping the current mesosequence scheme for the Neuquén basin but assigning the fandeltaic deposits to the Precuyo Mesosequence. The second sequence scheme considers the whole Late Triassic - Early Jurassic succession as a part of the Cuyo Mesosequence, a second order sequence, where the synrift deposits composes the lowstand system tract (LST) and most of the sag deposits makes the transgressive system tract (TST). The basal sequence boundary does not crop out, the flooding surface at the TST base and the maximum flooding surface at the TST top are respectively marked by the lowest estuarine levels and black shales with suboxic-compatible bivalves (Bositra sp.). The HST begins with the turbidite-influenced shelf deposits of the black Tres Esquinas Formation (late Late Pliensbachian - late Early Bajocian).
S. Lanés is deeply grateful to Lic. G. Robles for continuous orientation and support and his help with an earlier paper version, to Drs A. Riccardi, S. Damborenea and M. Manceñido for the determinations of ammonites, bivalves and brachiopods. To Dr. J. Paredes and Dr. P. Álvarez, whose comments improved the final version, and to the editors of the special issue of the Revista (Dr. A. M. Zavattieri and Dr. L. Giambiagi) for the continuous effort and support.
1. Bechis, F. and Giambiagi, L. 2008. Kinematic analysis of data from small scale faults and its application to the study of an extensional depocenter, Neuquén basin, west-central Argentina. International Meeting of Young Researchers in Structural Geology and Tectonics (YORSGET), Extended abstracts: 575-580, Oviedo. [ Links ]
2. Bechis, F., Giambiagi, L. and García, V.H. 2005. Extensión multifásica en el Depocentro Atuel de la Cuenca Neuquina, evidenciada en estructuras de pequeña escala. 16° Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas 2: 87-94, La Plata. [ Links ]
3. Brett, C.E. 1995. Sequence stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and taphonomy in shallow marine environments. Palaios 10: 597-616. [ Links ]
4. Brett, C.E. and Baird, G.C. 1986. Comparative taphonomy: a key to paleoenvironmental interpretation on fossil preservation. Palaios 1(3): 207-227. [ Links ]
5. Bruhn, C.H.L. and Walker, R.G. 1995. High-resolution stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of coarse-grained canyon-filling turbidites from the Upper Cretaceous transgressive megasequence, Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research B 65(4): 426-442. [ Links ]
6. Burns, B.A., Heller, P.L., Marzo, M. and Paola, C. 1997. Fluvial response in a sequence stratigraphic framework: example from the Montserrat fan delta, Spain. Journal of Sedimentary Research 67(2): 311-321. [ Links ]
7. Chang, K.H. 1975. Unconformity-bounded stratigraphic units. Geological Society of America Bulletin 86: 1544-1552. [ Links ]
8. Dalrymple, R.W., Zaitlin, B.A. and Boyd, R. 1992. Estuarine facies models, conceptual basis and stratigraphic implications. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62: 1130-1146. [ Links ]
9. Emery, D. and Myers, K. 1996. Sequence Stratigraphy. Blackwell Science, 304 p., Oxford. [ Links ]
10. Ethridge, F.G., Wescott, W.A. 1984. Tectonic setting, recognition and hydrocarbon reservoir potential of fan-delta deposits. In Koster, E.H., Steel, R.J. (eds.) Sedimentology of gravels and conglomerates. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 10: 217-235, Calgary. [ Links ]
11. Friend, P.F. 1983. Towards the field classification of alluvial architecture or sequence. In Collinson, J.D. and Lewin, J. (eds.) Modern and ancient fluvial systems. International Association of Sedimentologists, Special Publication 6: 345-354, Oxford. [ Links ]
12. Garrido-Megias, A. 1982. Introducción al análisis tectosedimentario: aplicación al estudio dinámico de las cuencas. 5° Congreso Latinoamericano de Geología, Actas: 385-402, Buenos Aires. [ Links ]
13. Gawthorpe, R.L. and Leeder, M.R. 2000. Tectono-sedimentary evolution of active extensional basins. Basin Research 12: 195-218. [ Links ]
14. Gawthorpe, R.L., Fraser, A.J. and Collier, R.E.L. 1994. Sequence stratigraphy in active extensional basins: implications for the interpretation of ancient basin-fills. Marine and Petroleum Geology 11: 642-658. [ Links ]
15. Gawthorpe, R.L., Hall, M., Sharp, I. and Dreyer, T. 2000. Tectonically enhanced forced regressions: examples from growth folds in extensional and compressional settings, the Miocene of the Suez rifts and the Eocene of the Pyrenees. In Hunt, D. and Gawthorpe, R.L. (eds.) Sedimentary Responses to Forced Regressions, Geological Society, Special Publication 172: 177-191, London. [ Links ]
16. Giambiagi, L., Bechis, F., Lanés, S. and García, V.H. 2005a. Evolución cinemática del Depocentro Atuel, Triásico Tardío-Jurásico Temprano. 16° Congreso Geológico Argentino, Simposio de Tectónica Andina, Actas en CDROM, La Plata. [ Links ]
17. Giambiagi, L., Suriano, J. and Mescua, J. 2005b. Extensión multiepisódica durante el Jurásico Temprano en el depocentro Atuel de la cuenca neuquina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 60(3): 524-534. [ Links ]
18. Giambiagi, L., Bechis, F., García, V. and Clark, A. 2008. Temporal and spatial relationship between thick- and thin-skinned deformation in the thrust front of the Malargüe fold and thrust belt, Southern Central Antes. Tectonophysics, in press (available online). [ Links ]
19. Giambiagi, L., Bechis, F. Lanés, S., Tunik, M., García, V., Suriano, J. and Mescua, J. 2008. Formación y evolución triásica-jurásica del depocentro Atuel, cuenca Neuquina, provincia de Mendoza, Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 63(4): this issue. [ Links ]
20. Gibling, M.R. 2006. Width and thickness of fluvial channel bodies and valley fills in the geological record: a literature compilation and classification. Journal of Sedimentary Research 76(5): 731-770. [ Links ]
21. Gibling, M.R. and Bird, D.J. 1994. Late Carboniferous cyclothems and alluvial paleovalleys in the Sydney Basin, Nova Scotia. Geological Society of America Bulletin 106: 105-117. [ Links ]
22. González, A., Pardo, G. and Villena, J. 1988. El análisis tectosedimentario como instrumento de correlación entre cuencas. 2° Congreso Geológico de España, Simposios, Actas: 175-184, Granada. [ Links ]
23. Gulisano, C.A. 1981. El ciclo Cuyano en el norte de Neuquén y sur de Mendoza. 8° Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas 3: 579-592, San Luis. [ Links ]
24. Gulisano, C.A. and Gutiérrez Pleimling, A.R. 1994. The Jurassic of the Neuquén Basin, b) Mendoza Province - Field Guide. Asociación Geológica Argentina, Serie E 3: 1-103, Buenos Aires. [ Links ]
25. Gulisano, C.A., Gutiérrez Pleimling, A.R. and Digregorio, R.E. 1984. Esquema estratigráfico de la secuencia Jurásica del oeste de la provincia de Neuquén. 9° Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas 1: 236-259, San Carlos de Bariloche. [ Links ]
26. Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J. and Vail, P.R. 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science 235: 1156-1167. [ Links ]
27. Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J. and Vail, P.R. 1988. Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and cycles of sea-level change. In Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S., St. Kendall, C.G., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A. and Van Wagoner, J.C. (eds.) Sea level changes, an integrated approach, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (SEPM), Special Publication 42: 71-108. [ Links ]
28. Howell, J.A. and Flint, S.S. 1996. A model for high resolution sequence stratigraphy within extensional basins. In Howell, J.A. and Aitken, J.F. (eds.) High resolution sequence stratigraphy: innovations and applications, Geological Society, Special Publication 104: 129-137, London. [ Links ]
29. Hubbard, R.J. 1988. Age and significance of sequence boundaries on Jurassic and early Cretaceous rifted continental margins. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin 72(1): 49-72. [ Links ]
30. Kidwell, S. 1993. Taphonomic expressions of sedimentary hiatuses: field observations on bioclastic concentrations and sequence anatomy in low, moderate and high subsidence settings. Geologisches Rundschau 82: 189-202. [ Links ]
31. Lanés, S. 2002. Paleoambientes y paleogeografía de la primera transgresión en Cuenca Neuquina. Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires (unpublished), 403 p., Buenos Aires. [ Links ]
32. Lanés, S. 2005. Late Triassic to Early Jurassic sedimentation in northern Neuquén Basin, Argentina: Tectosedimentary Evolution of the First Transgression. Geologica Acta 3(2): 81-106. [ Links ]
33. Leeder, M.R. and Gawthorpe, R.L. 1987. Sedimentary models for extensional tilt block/ half-graben basins. In Coward, M.P., Dewey, J.F. and Hancock, P.L. (eds.) Continental extensional tectonics, Geological Society, Special Publication 28: 139-152, London. [ Links ]
34. Legarreta, L. and Gulisano, C.A. 1989. Análisis estratigráfico de la cuenca Neuquina (Triásico superior-Terciario inferior). In: Chebli, G.A. and Spalletti, L.A. (Eds.): Cuencas Sedimentarias Argentinas, Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Serie de Correlación Geológica 6: 221-244, San Miguel de Tucumán. [ Links ]
35. Legarreta, L. and Uliana, M.A. 1991. Jurassic-Cretaceous marine oscillations and geometry of back-arc basin fill, central Argentine Andes. International Association of Sedimentologists, Special Publication 12: 429-450, Oxford. [ Links ]
36. Legarreta, L., Gulisano, C.A. and Uliana, M.A. 1993. Las secuencias sedimentarias Jurásico-Cretácicas. In Ramos, V.A. (ed.) Geología y Recursos naturales de Mendoza, 12° Congreso Geológico Argentino y 2° Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos, Relatorio: 87- 114, Mendoza. [ Links ]
37. Manceda, R. and Figueroa, D. 1993. La inversión del rift mesozoico en la Faja Fallada y Plegada de Malargüe, provincia de Mendoza. 12° Congreso Geológico Argentino y 2° Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos, Actas 3: 219-232, Mendoza. [ Links ]
38. Manceda, R. and Figueroa, D. 1995. Inversion of the Mesozoic Neuquén Rift in the Malargüe Fold and Thrust Belt, Mendoza. Argentina. In Tankard, A.J., Suárez Soruco, R. and Welsink, H.J. (eds.) Petroleum Basins of South America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 62: 369-382. [ Links ]
39. Martinsen O., Ryseth, A., Helland-Hansen, W., Flesche, H., Torkildsen, G and Idil, S. 1999. Stratigraphic base level and fluvial architecture: Ericson Sandstone (Campanian), Rock Springs Uplift, SW Wyoming, USA. Sedimentology 46: 235-259. [ Links ]
40. Miall, A.D. 1978. Lithofacies types and vertical profile models in braided river deposits: a summary. In Miall, A.D. (ed.) Fluvial sedimentology. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 5: 597-604, Calgary. [ Links ]
41. Miall, A.D. 1996. The geology of fluvial deposits. Springer-Verlag, 582 p., Berlin. [ Links ]
42. Mitchum, R.M. and Van Wagoner, J.C. 1991. High-frecuency sequences and their stacking patterns: sequence-stratigraphic evidence of high-frecuency eustatic cycles. In Biddle, K.T. and Schlager, W. (eds.) The record of sea-level fluctuations. Sedimentary Geology 70: 131-160. [ Links ]
43. Mitchum Jr., P.R., Vail, T. and Thompson, S. 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, Part 2: The depositional sequences as a basic unit for stratigraphic analisys. In Clayton, C.E. (ed.) Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to hydrocarbon exploration. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 26: 53-62. [ Links ]
44. Mutti, E. 1990. Relazioni tra stratigrafia sequenziale e tettonica. Memorie della Societa Geologica Italiana 45: 627-655. [ Links ]
45. Pardo, G., Villena, J., and González, A. 1989. Contribución a los conceptos y a la aplicación del análisis tectosedimentario. Rupturas y unidades tectosedimentarias como fundamento de correlaciones estratigráficas. Revista Sociedad Geológica de España 2(3-4): 199-219. [ Links ]
46. Postma, G. 1990. An analysis of the variation in delta architecture. Terra Nova 2: 124-130. [ Links ]
47. Prosser, S. 1993. Rift-related linked depositional systems and their seismic expression. In Williams, G.D. and Dobb, A. (eds.) Tectonics and seismic sequence stratigraphy. Geological Society, Special Publication 71: 35-66, London. [ Links ]
48. Ramos, V.A. 1992. Geología de la Alta Cordillera de San Juan. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 47: 268-269. [ Links ]
49. Riccardi, A.C. and Gulisano, C.A. 1990. Unidades limitadas por discontinuidades. Su aplicación al Jurásico Andino. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 45(3-4): 346-364. [ Links ]
50. Riccardi, A.C. and Iglesia Llanos, M.P. 1999. Primer hallazgo de amonites en el Triásico de la Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 54: 298-300. [ Links ]
51. Riccardi, A., Damborenea, S.E., Manceñido, M.O., Scasso, R., Lanés, S., Iglesia Llanos, P. and Stipanicic, P.N. 1997. Primer registro de Triásico marino fosilífero de la Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 52: 228-234. [ Links ]
52. Riccardi, A.C., Leanza, H.A., Damborenea, S., Manceñido, M.O., Ballent, S.C. and Zeiss, A. 2000. Marine Mesozoic Biostratigraphy of the Neuquén Basin. In Miller, H. and Hervé, F. (eds.): Zeitschrift für Angewandte Geologie SH1, 31st. International Geological Congress: 103-108, Rio de Janeiro. [ Links ]
53. Salvador, A. 1994. International Stratigraphic Guide. International Union of Geological Sciences, Geological Society of America. 214 p., Trondheim- Boulder. [ Links ]
54. Savrda, C.E., Bottjer, D.J. and Seilacher, A. 1991. Redox-related benthic events. In Einsele, G., Ricken, W. and Seilacher, A. (eds.) Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy. Springer-Verlag: 324-341, Berlin. [ Links ]
55. Sloss, L.L. 1963. Sequences in the Cratonic Interior of North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin 74(2): 93-114. [ Links ]
56. Spalletti, L.A., Franzese, J.R., Morel, E.M. and Artabe, A.E. 2005. Nuevo enfoque estratigráfico del Triásico-Jurásico Temprano en la región del río Atuel, Provincia de Mendoza. 14° Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas 3: 77-82, La Plata. [ Links ]
57. Spalletti, L.A., Morel, E.M, Franzese, J.R, Artabe, A.E., Ganuza, D.G. and Zúñiga, A. 2007. Contribución al conocimiento sedimentológico y paleobotánico de la Formación El Freno (Jurásico Temprano) en el valle superior del río Atuel, Mendoza, República Argentina. Ameghiniana 44: 367-386. [ Links ]
58. Tankard, A.J., Uliana, M.A., Welsink, H.J., Ramos, V.A., Turic, M., França, A.B., Milani, E.J., Brito Neves, B.B., Eyles, N., Skarmeta, J., Santa Ana, H., Wiens, F., Cirbián, M., López Paulsen, O., Germs, G.J.B., De Wit, M.J., Machacha, T. and Miller, R. 1995. Structural and tectonic controls of basin evolution in southwestern Gondwana during the Phanerozoic. In Tankard, A.J., Suárez Soruco, R. and Welsink, H.J. (eds.) Petroleum Basins of South America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 62: 5-52. [ Links ]
59. Tunik, M., Lanés, S., Bechis, F. and Giambiagi, L. 2008. Análisis petrográfico de las areniscas jurásicas tempranas en el depocentro Atuel de la cuenca Neuquina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 53 (4): this issue. [ Links ]
60. Uliana, M.A. and Biddle, K.T. 1988. Mesozoic- Cenozoic paleogeographical and geodynamic evolution of southern South America. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 18: 172-190. [ Links ]
61. Vail, P.R., Mitchum, R.M., Todd, R.G., Widmier, J.M., Thompson, S., Sangree, J.B., Bubb, J.N. and Hatleid, W.G. 1977. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level. In Payton, C.E. (ed.) Seismic stratigraphy - Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 26: 63-82. [ Links ]
62. Van Wagoner, J.C., Posamentier, H.W., Mitchum, R.M., Vail, P.R., Sarg, J.F., Loutit, T.S. y Hardenbol, J. 1988. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definitions. In Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S., St. C. Kendall, C.G., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A. and Van Wagoner, J.C. (eds.) Sea-level changes-an integrated approach, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (SEPM), Special Publication 42: 39-45. [ Links ]
63. Van Wagoner, J.C., Mitchum Jr, R.M., Campion, R.M. and Rahmanian, V.D. 1990. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores and outcrops: concepts for high-resolution correlation on time and facies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Methods in Exploration Series 7, 55 p., Tulsa. [ Links ]
64. Vergani, G.D., Tankard, A.J., Belotti, H.J. and Welsink, H.J. 1995. Tectonic evolution and paleogeography of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. In Tankard, A.J., Suárez Soruco, R. and Welsink, H.J. (eds.) Petroleum Basins of South America, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 62: 383-402. [ Links ]
65. Withjack, M.O., Schlische, R.W., and Olsen, P.A. 2002. Rift-basin structure and its influence on sedimentary systems. In Renaut, R.W. and Ashley, G.M. (eds.) Sedimentation in Continental Rifts, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (SEPM), Special Publication 73: 57-81, Tulsa. [ Links ]
66. Wright, V.P. and Marriott, S.B. 1993. The sequence stratigraphy of fluvial depositional systems: the role of floodplain sediment storage. Sedimentary Geology 86: 203-210. [ Links ]
Recibido: 31 de marzo, 2008.
Aceptado: 21 de julio, 2008.