SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.82 suppl.1Revisión escéptica del estado de la neuroimagen en el trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividadGénero femenino y autismo: infra detección y mis diagnósticos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Medicina (Buenos Aires)

versão impressa ISSN 0025-7680versão On-line ISSN 1669-9106

Medicina (B. Aires) vol.82  supl.1 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires mar. 2022

 

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Frontiers in the research of autism pathogenesis

Fronteras en la investigación de la patogenia del autismo

Ami Klin1  * 

1 Marcus Autism Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4010, USA, Division of Autism & Related Disorders, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4010, USA, Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4252, USA.

Abstract

This review focuses on four interrelated teams and research lines that form the basis for new research on the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) at the Marcus Autism Center, in Atlanta (US). These themes probe typical social behavior and brain development from birth, and disruptions thereof in babies later diagnosed with ASD. These four themes are: to leverage lifetime maximal neuroplasticity; to test the hypothesis that developmental disruption of early-emerging mechanisms of socialization drives pathogenesis and results in autistic social disability; the focus on the infant-caregiver dyad, and the iterative context associated with mutually reinforcing and adapted social and communitive inter-action, or emerging cycles of social contingency, from the first days and weeks of life; and the study of time-varying neurodevelopmental transitions in social behavior from experience-expectant (reflexive, endogenous) and subcortically-guided to experience-dependent (caregiver- and reward-driven) and cortically-guided, a transition that our work suggests is uniquely disrupted in babies later diagnosed with ASD. This science is opening a world of opportunities to optimize children’s outcomes despite the genetic liabilities that they are born with. It provides the scientific grounding for new community-viable solutions for increasing access to early interventions using treatments that scaffold and strengthen infant-caregiver interactions, which is the platform for early brain development.

Key words: Autism spectrum disorder; Pathogenesis; Neurodevelopment; Neuroplasticity; Socialization

Resumen

Esta revisión se centra en cuatro equipos y líneas de investigación interrelacionados que forman la b ase de nuevas investigaciones sobre la patogenia del Trastorno del Espectro Autista (TEA) en el Marcus Autism Center, en Atlanta (EE.UU.). Estos temas investigan el comportamiento social típico y el desarrollo del cerebro desde el nacimiento, y las altera ciones del mismo en los bebés a los que luego se les diagnostica TEA. Estos cuatro temas son: aprovechar la neuroplasticidad máxima en la vida; probar la hipótesis de que la interrupción del desarrollo de los mecanismos de socialización emergentes impulsa la patogénesis y da como resultado una discapacidad social autista; el enfoque en la díada bebé-cuidador, y el contexto iterativo asoc iado con la mutua interacción de refuerzo social y comunitario, o ciclos emergentes de contingencia social, desde los primeros días y semanas de vida; y el estudio de las transiciones del comportamiento social variable en el tiempo del neurodesarrollo desde la experiencia-expectante (reflexiva, endógena) y guiada subcorticalmente, a la experiencia-dependiente (cuidador e impulsado por la recompensa) y guiada corticalmente, una transición que nuestro trabajo sugiere que se interrumpe única mente en bebés diagnosticados posteriormente con TEA.

Palabras clave: Trastorno del espectro autista; Patogenia; Neurodesarrollo; Neuroplasticidad; Socialización

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is one of the most common forms of neurodevelopmental disability, with a prevalence of 1 in 44 reported in the most recent surveil lance report by the (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1. ASD is also one of the most strongly genetic and heritable of all complex neuropsychiatric conditions2. Little is known on how this genetic liability leads to the emergence of ASD in the first two years of a child’s life. And yet, prospective and longitudinal studies from birth of younger siblings of children with ASD -who have a 20-fold increase in likelihood of also having ASD relative to the general population- are beginning to shed light on early pathogenesis, foreshadowing a future in which early treatment might be deployed to considerably optimize these children’s outcomes, mitigating symptoms and augmenting social-communication and cognitive skills. This review covers the general themes and advances in the emerging developmental social neuroscience of ASD pathogenesis at the Marcus Autism Center in Atlanta, US, one of the five National Institutes of Health Autism Centers of Excellence.

Four inter-related themes

We begin with the criticality of early diagnosis and inter vention3, and the need for much greater understanding of early ASD pathogenesis in social brain and social behavior in both typical and atypical development4. The American Academy of Pediatrics3 strongly recommends universal early screening for ASD in the second year of life because early intervention significantly improves outcomes and may even normalize aspects of brain function in children with ASD. However, early intervention typically requires the diagnosis of ASD, which in turn awaits the emergence of symptoms that can only be identified as early as in the second or third year of life4. In the US, the median age of ASD diagnosis still hovers around 4½ years of age1. ASD is also a lifetime condition associated with economic burdens of over $2.4M per child/family and over $130B per year in the US alone, most of which is related to supports in adult life5. These facts have prompted the (US) National Institutes of Health Interagency Autism Coordinating Com mittee, which establishes the ASD research agenda in the US, to repeatedly prioritize this domain of research, in order to accelerate progress. At the Marcus Autism Center, several research themes have been pursued in the past five years to address these recognized challenges:

First, we aim to capitalize on maximal neuroplasticity. The first two years of human life represent the period of greatest brain transformation: a newborn’s brain doubles in size in the first year of life, and will increase again by another 35% by year three; synaptic density, a marker of experience-dependent brain specialization, quadruples within year one alone, and will reach levels 200-300% greater than that of an adult by the end of the third year (with concurrent and subsequent pruning and strengthen ing)6. Of importance, longitudinal gene expression associ ated with synaptogenesis over the first two years of life, over a wide range of brain structures, is characterized by maximal values across the 6- to 12-month window, then decreases drastically after 15 months, or much before the time at which ASD symptoms emerge and the condition can be reliably diagnosed6. Therefore, treatment that is conditional on ASD diagnoses misses important windows of opportunity, and identified prodromal risks need to be addressed7.

Second, our overarching hypothesis is that the de velopmental disruption of early-emerging mechanisms of socialization drive pathogenesis and results in autism symptoms6. For the past 15 years we have quantitatively characterized social visual engagement in ASD: this term captures what and when a child looks at, and learns about, in their surrounding social environment. Initially, we focused on preferential fixation to the eyes of others because the eyes and gaze are critical for extraction of socially adaptive information, and are potent enhancers of social information neural processing throughout the lifes pan. Using eye-tracking methodology, we found increasing decline in eye fixation in babies later diagnosed with ASD, beginning at 2 months of age8; this declining curve in the first six months of life, were strong predictors of ASD and level of social disability at the age of 24 and 36 months. We also found that this skill, already present from the first days and weeks of life6, is under strong genetic influence9 in typically developing children and is considerable altered in toddlers with ASD. Given this starting point, our work has probed the hypothesis that both symptomatology and outcome levels result from these early disruptions, and as such, can be significantly attenuated and optimized4. Most cases of ASD are tied to highly complex polygenic profiles of vulnerability; already hundreds of common genetic variants having been implicated in ASD etiology2. In only a small minority of cases can single gene mutations be considered causal in ASD. We have thus hypothesized that the (vastly heterogeneous) nature of ASD is nevertheless well-captured by a syndrome-wide entity, reliably diagnosed by expert clinicians, not because of commonalities across the hundreds of initial causes (the so called “autisms”) but because of commonalities in what these causes disrupt: infant-caregiver reciprocal social engagement, or social contingency, which is the universal platform for social and communication brain-behavior development6. In fact, disruptions in patterns of recipro cal social engagement may occur in children with other conditions, such as very early prematurity and congenital heart disease, who then develop ASD-related outcomes at higher-than-expected levels. Supporting this hypothesis of ASD etiology is recent work demonstrating that gaze aversion -a pathognomonic symptom of ASD included in the original description of autism- is not present in 2-year-olds, but is l learned over time as a result of insensitivity to the adaptive value of eye gaze10 (as noted, a skill that is present in newborns). Additionally, using a measure of moment-by-moment social visual entrainment, in which we measure a child’s ability to fixate on space-time “hot spots of socialization’ (something of social importance at an exact moment in time) (Jones W. & Klin A. Entrainment to social context in typically-developing two-year-olds and absence thereof in autism. Under Revision), we showed that in 2-year-olds, cumulative divergences from normative benchmark (what typically developing children look at in typical social situations and when), is strongly predictive of levels of ASD symptomatology, verbal and nonverbal function one and a half years later. Children with ASD missed these momentary opportunities for social learn ing at rates of hundreds of times within a period of only 6 minutes of viewing videos of children interacting. The more they diverged from the way typically developing children watched these videos, the more social disabled and cognitively impaired they eventually became. Collectively, these insights form the basis for our choice of early treatment approach: if levels of symptomatology and functional outcome can be predicted by deviations from normative socialization, then interventions aimed at normalizing social and communication engagement hold the promise of attenuating symptoms and optimizing out comes4. Consequently, there should be no reason to await for clear symptoms of ASD as detected and diagnosed by clinicians for early treatment to begin, a consensus that is now shared by many investigators working on prodromal interventions for ASD7.

The third theme is that the unit of scientific focus and of treatment target is the infant-caregiver dyad, and the iterative context associated with mutually reinforcing and adapted social and communicative inter-action11. Innate predispositions to orient to social stimuli serve as strong engaging signals to caregivers, who at once constrain the world around the child and strengthen the infant-caregiver context (by their reciprocal engagement); upon this foundation, ever increasing and more complex cycles of contingency evolve, from birth over the course of the first two years of life6. As noted, in the domain of social visual engagement, genetic control is exercised over macroscales - e.g., patterns of visual fixation over minutes of social visual experiences; and over microscales - e.g., moment-by-moment predispositions to react to and seek social information in the surrounding social world, such as when to shift one’s visual attention, in which direction, and onto which targets, measured in milliseconds9. In essence, via these predispositions, infants and toddlers create their own individual niches, which both constrain the environmental realm within which they will learn, and intensify inter-actions with these preferred aspects of the world4. Genetic influence, however, is limited to predisposi tions to engage, or not, with the social world, from birth. We, therefore, can alter the environment which the infant experiences: the social world with which infants engage, and which transforms infants, can be deliberately altered via social and communication transactional supports ef fected by the caregiver. This principle is fundamental to several lines of early intervention research, which prioritize caregiver-mediated treatments12. In these approaches, parents are trained to compensate for a child’s attenu ated social sensitivities by scaffolding social engagement through interventions that promote shared attention, reciprocal communication, and social-emotional reciprocity13. Such transactional supports, when deployed sufficiently early in development, can achieve higher levels of mutual social-communication engagement and reduce prolonged deviations from normative social experiences, thus at tenuating the formation of symptoms and subsequent burdens of autism, which, as noted, evolve with time. The importance of early social contingency to the development of social behavior and social brain provides the scientific rationale for caregiver-mediated treatments, which is a community-viable solution for increased access to early intervention for children and families affected by ASD and related developmental disabilities, including among traditionally under-served communities4.

The fourth theme relates to an important neurodevelop mental shift in which experience-expectant, reflex-like, and subcortically-guided social behavior, transitions, within the first 4 to 16 weeks of life, into experience-dependent, voluntary, and cortically-guided social behavior14. The relevance of this hypothesis to research of ASD relates to a surprising finding from our earlier work: eye fixation in babies later diagnosed with ASD is not immediately reduced at birth, but in fact begins at levels that are even higher than those observed in typically developing babies, with mean decline beginning at 2 months of age8. This observation contradicted prior hypotheses (including our own) of congenital absence of social adaptive orientation11, and suggested, instead, that some social adaptive behav iors may initially be intact in newborns later diagnosed with ASD. If confirmed, this finding would offer a remarkable opportunity for treatment: innate predispositions that are initially intact suggest a neural foundation that may be built upon, offering far more positive possibilities than if that foundation were absent from the outset. Equally exciting, these data fit well within the framework of long-studied animal models of the neural systems subserving filial orientation and attachment14: they highlight a nar row period for investigation spanning the transition from experience-expectant to experience-dependent mecha nisms originally proposed in the context of accumulating findings in research on face processing in human infants6 and cross-species analogs14.

For the past four years, we have probed the hypothesis that filial predispositions may initially be intact in newborns later diagnosed with ASD, but that a second phase of neurodevelopment, in which initial perceptual predisposi tions are superseded by interaction-based learning, fails. With remarkable consistency across domains of adapta tion, including social adaptive action, reflex-like actions transition to voluntary actions within the first few weeks of life6. In our data on social visual engagement8 and on social vocal behavior in infancy (precursors of speech)15, unfolding reflexive behaviors in general and human smil ing and infant vocalizations in particular, together with the remarkable analogy of these processes in infant monkeys16, all serve to outline a resolvable hypothesis of ASD pathogenesis positing disruption of transitions from primarily subcortically- to primarily cortically-guided behavior within a delimited time window in the first 16 weeks of a child’s life. Our data suggest syndrome- and time-specific hypotheses of pathogenesis, which may highlight the role of proteins critical in anchoring, sta bilizing and maintaining synaptic communication17,18, a common thread in genetic findings in ASD. Armed with strong preliminary data, and studying multiple domains of social and other functions across species, this research is moving forward via mapping and quantification transitions in brain connectivity and tractography over the period of birth through 6 months in human infants, and from birth through 2 months in infant monkeys. Its goal is to advance understanding of the brain-behavior reciprocal transitions occurring this early in life, a period which, as discussed, predicts ASD diagnostic classification and levels of disability 2 ½ years later8.

Early brain science meets public health challenge

The national priority in the US to advance early detec tion and intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has not reduced the late age of ASD diagnosis over several consecutive (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance cohorts, with traditionally under-served populations accessing diagnosis later still. The science of social behavior and brain development, from birth, and its disruptions in babies later diagnosed with ASD, is transforming our understanding of ASD pathogenesis. This sci ence is opening a world of opportunities to optimize children’s outcomes despite the genetic liabilities that they are born with. This view is countering out dated notions that potentially devastating disability is determined the moment a child is born, and that these burdens are inevitable, with opportunities for improvement being constrained to only alleviation of symptoms or limited improvements in adaptive skills. Instead, this new developmental social neuro science is already providing the grounding for new community-viable solutions for increasing access to early interventions, which hold the potential of improving children’s lifetime outcomes. Based on quantitative, prospective and longitudinal measure ments of social development, and discoveries of early disruptions in babies later diagnosed with autism, the emergence of social contingency between infants and their caregivers is viewed as not only the platform within which the development of social brain takes places, but also as the focus of treatment intended to scaffold infant-caregiver interaction, and in this way, attenuate symptoms and promote higher-level social-communication and cognitive skills.

References

1. Maenner MJ, Shaw KA, Baio J, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 Years-Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill. Summ 2020; 69: 1-12. [ Links ]

2. Manoli DS, State MW. Autism spectrum disorder genet ics and the search for pathological mechanisms. Am J Psychiatry 2021; 178: 30-38. [ Links ]

3. Hyman SL, Levy SE, Myers SM. Identification, evaluation, and management of children with autism spectrum dis order. Pediatrics 2020;145(1):e20193447. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3447. [ Links ]

4. Klin A, Micheletti M, Klaiman C, Shultz S, Constantino JN, Jones W. Affording autism an early brain development re-definition. Dev Psychopathol 2020; 32:1175-89. [ Links ]

5. Buescher AVS, Cidav Z, Knapp M, Mandell DS. Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States. JAMA Pediatr 2014; 168, 721-8. [ Links ]

6. Shultz S, Klin A, Jones W. Neonatal Transitions in Social Behavior and Their Implications for Autism. Trends Cogn Sci 2018; 22: 452-69. [ Links ]

7. Grzadzinski, R, Amso D, Landa R. Pre-symptomatic inter vention for autism spectrum disorder (ASD): defining a research agenda. J Neurodevelop Disord 2021; 13: 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-021-09393-y [ Links ]

8. Jones W, Klin A. Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2-6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism. Nature 2013; 504(7480):427-31. [ Links ]

9. Constantino JN, Kennon-McGill S, Weichselbaum C, et al. Infant viewing of social scenes is under genetic control and indexes risk for autism. Nature 2013; 504(7480):427-31. [ Links ]

10. Moriuchi JM, Klin A, Jones W. Mechanisms of diminished attention to eyes in autism. Am J Psychiatry 2017; 174: 26-35. [ Links ]

11. Klin A, Jones W, Schultz R, Volkmar F. The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 2003; 358 (1430): 345-60. [ Links ]

12. Wetherby AM, Guthrie W, Woods J, et al. Parent-imple mented social intervention for toddlers with autism: an RCT. Pediatrics 2014; 134: 1084-93. [ Links ]

13. Schreibman L, Dawson G, Stahmer AC, et al. Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically Vali dated Treatments for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2015; 45, 2411-28. [ Links ]

14. Klin A, Shultz S, Jones W. Social visual engagement in infants and toddlers with autism: early developmental transitions and a model of pathogenesis. Neurosci Biobe hav Rev 2015; 50: 189-203. [ Links ]

15. Oller DK, Ramsay G, Bene E, Long HL, Griebel U. Pro tophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the hu man infant vocal landscape. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021; 376 (1836): 20200255. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2020.0255 [ Links ]

16. Wang A, Payne C, Moss S, Jones W R, Bachevalier J. Early developmental changes in visual social engage ment in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2020; 100778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100778 [ Links ]

17. Südhof TC. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 2008; 455: 903-11. [ Links ]

18. Horn G, Nicol AU, Brown MW. Tracking memory’s trace. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2001; 98, 5282-7. [ Links ]

*Postal address: Ami Klin. Center for Translational Social Neuros cience, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4252, USA e-mail: ami.klin@emory.edu

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License