SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.82 issue3Use of benzodiazepines and related drugs in social security for older adults in ArgentinaProMover mobility scale. A unified language for the evaluation of hospitalized patients author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Medicina (Buenos Aires)

Print version ISSN 0025-7680On-line version ISSN 1669-9106

Medicina (B. Aires) vol.82 no.3 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Aug. 2022

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical features, diagnostic evaluation and responses to treatment in Paget’s disease of bone in a center specialized in bone metabolism

Características clínicas, evaluación diagnóstica y respuestas al tratamiento de la enfermedad de Paget ósea en un centro especializado en metabolismo óseo

Marcelo Sarli1  2 

María D. Collaceli2 

Fernando Jerkovich1 

Paula Rey1  2 

Rodolfo Spivacow1  2 

María B. Zanchetta1  2  * 

1 Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas (IDIM)

2 Maestría en Osteología, Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract

The epidemiology of Paget’s disease of bone (PDB) has changed in the last years but there is no update data on its clinical presentation, diagnosis and management in Latin America. Our aim was to describe its clinical features, diagnostic evaluation and responses to treatment in a group of PDB patients treated between June 2012 and December 2019 in an institution specialized in bone diseases, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The frequency of PDB (180/10 714) was 1.68%. Median age was 67 (range 39-97) years and 59.5% were women. Most patients were asymptomatic (58.6%) and had monostotic disease (54.3%). Favorable responses were obtained in all patients who were treated with zoledronate (n = 36), in 10 out of 14 treated with pamidronate, in 9 out of 10 who received intravenous ibandronate and in 12 out of 13 who received oral bisphosphonates. The response rates were not significantly different when we compared monostotic vs. polyostotic disease. Among the biochemical parameters, mean values of bone specific and total alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly after treatment with bisphosphonates. It seems that our results reflect the change in PDB epidemiology towards a more indolent disease. In the future, this would probably allow physicians to use lower doses of bisphosphonates than the ones historically recommended for these patients.

Key words: Paget’s disease of bone; Bisphosphonates; Epidemiology; Clinical features; Diagnosis

Resumen

La epidemiología de la en fermedad de Paget ósea (EPO) ha cambiado en los últimos años. Son necesarios datos actualizados sobre su forma de presentación clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento en nuestra región. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características clínicas, evaluación diagnóstica y respuestas al tratamiento de un grupo de pacientes con EPO en un centro especializado en salud ósea de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se evaluaron todos los pacientes que fueron atendidos en nuestra institución por enfermedades óseas entre junio de 2012 y diciembre de 2019. La frecuencia de EPO (180/10 714) fue de 1.68%. La mediana de edad fue de 67 (rango 39-97) años. El 59.5% eran mujeres. La mayoría se encontraba asintomático (58.6%) y tenían enfermedad monostótica (54.3%). Se objetivaron respuestas favorables en todos los que recibieron zoledronato (n = 36), en 10 de 14 pacientes que recibieron pamidronato, en 9 de 10 que utilizaron ibandronato endovenoso y en 12 de 13 con bifosfonatos orales. Los porcentajes de respuesta no variaron significativamente entre pacientes con formas monostóticas y poliostóticas. Entre los parámetros bioquímicos, los valores de fosfatasa alcalina total y ósea y de β cross-laps disminuyeron significativamente luego del tratamiento con bifosfonatos. Nuestros resultados reflejarían un cambio en la epidemiología de la EPO hacia una forma de presentación más indolente. Esto permitiría probablemente el uso de dosis más bajas de bifosfonatos que las históricamente recomendadas para estos pacientes.

Palabras clave: Enfermedad de Paget ósea; Bifosfonatos; Características clínicas; Diagnóstico

KEY POINTS

Current knowledge

• Paget’s disease of bone is a localized benign process characterized by excessive osteoclastic resorption, fol lowed by exaggerated poor bone formation. Its global incidence and neurological and orthopedic complications have decreased in the last 25 years. Updated informa tion regarding the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management in Latin America is scarce.

Contribution of the article to current knowledge

• Our cohort of PDB patients was mostly asymptom atic with a discreet monostotic presentation and female predominance. These results show a change in PDB epidemiology towards a more indolent presentation, with a lower frequency of orthopedic and neurologic complica tions compared to previous cohorts.

Paget’s Disease of Bone (PDB), described by James Paget as deforming osteitis, is a chronic disease that can affect one or several bones, but never the entire skeleton1. The cause of the disease remains unknown, but currently, the most accepted hypothesis is that it is triggered by a viral infection in individuals genetically pre disposed2. It is a localized benign process characterized by excessive osteoclastic resorption, followed by exag gerated poor bone formation. This process eventually leads to an architectonically altered, painful, deformed and fragile bone3-6.

PDB’s global incidence has decreased in the last 25 years due to the decline in viral infections; its neurologi cal and orthopedic complications have also diminished after the introduction of potent bisphosphonates for its treatment7. In the year 2002, PDB was the second most common metabolic bone disease in the UK, with a preva lence of 6% in ≥ 75 year-old patients8. In most countries of Latin America, the prevalence of PDB is low9-11. However, Brazil and Argentina are the countries presenting the largest cohorts in the region, probably due to the higher prevalence of European immigration9-11. In an osteoporosis center in Brazil, the prevalence of PDB was 0.68%12, which is similar to the epidemiological data reported in Italy and Spain13,14. In 2001, Gómez Acotto and Mautalen described 145 patients with PDB in Argentina, 95% being European descendants11. Unfortunately, updated information regard ing the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of patients with PDB in Latin America is scarce.

In our study, the primary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics, diagnostic evaluation, choice of treatment, responses to treatment and clinical evolution in a group of patients with PDB from a specialized center in Argentina. We also aimed to determine the frequency of the diagnosis of PDB in our institution in relation to other bone diseases.

Materials and methods

We assessed all patients attending our institution for bone diseases from June 2012 to December 2019. We reviewed the clinical records and laboratory findings of all the patients diagnosed with PDB3 followed up for more than a year after diagnosis. We gathered these data: reason for consultation, pattern of bone compromise and diagnostic methodology used. Patients with at least one first-degree relative affected by PDB were defined as familial cases. The remaining patients were considered sporadic cases.

We evaluated the response to different treatments. We defined favorable response as levels of total alkaline phos phatase (ALP) and bone phosphatase (BAP) below 50% of the maximum level of the method. Finally, we reported the complications presented by our patients during follow-up.

The relative frequency of Paget’s disease of bone in our population was estimated after analyzing the diagnosis of other phosphorus and calcium metabolism disorders: osteoporosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, Südeck and hypoparathyroidism over the aforementioned period.

The following laboratory parameters were assessed: cal cium [normal values (NV): 8.8-10.5 mg/dl], phosphorus (NV: 2.5-4.5 mg/dl), vitamin D 25 OH (NV: > 30 ng/ml), alka line phosphatase APL (NV: 30-120 IU/L), bone specific ALP (NV: < 21.3 μg/l), parathyroid hormone (PTHi, NV:10-65 pg/ ml), C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX, NV: women: 556 ± 226 pg/ml, men: 304± 200) and osteocalcin (BGP, NV: 11-43 ng/ml). PTHi, CTX, and BGP values were measured by the Elecsys Roche (Cobas e-411) with a electrochemiluminescence assay (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Calcium and phosphorus were measured using Cobas Integra/Cobas c systems (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Bone specific ALP and 25-hydroxivitamin D were measured using Liaison XL Assay (Diasorin Inc, Stillwater, MN, USA). ALP was measured by Beckman Coulter AU chemistry analysers, Brea, CA, USA.

Continuous variables with normal distribution were pre sented as mean (standard deviation [SD]); non-normal vari ables were reported as median (range). Categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages (%). The normal distribution of continuous data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk test when appropri ate. The comparison of proportions between the groups of monostotic and polyostotic patients was made with the Fisher Exact test. To compare pre and post treatment analytes, the Student’s t test of paired samples was used. Box plots were used to describe the results graphically. Data were analyzed by means of IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.

The study was reviewed and approved by the research committee of our institution who decided that informed consent was not necessary due to the observational and retrospective design of the study and that it did not represent any risk for the participants. The study was conducted in accordance with the National Law 25.326 of Personal Data Protection, and the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

A total of 10 714 patients were assessed, of whom 180 (1.68%) had been diagnosed with PDB. This disease represented the third pathology in terms of frequency after osteoporosis (90.95%) and primary hyperparathyroidism (5.67%). It was more frequent than Südeck’s disease (0.97%) and hypoparathyroidism (0.73%). Of the 180 PDB patients, 116 were followed up for more than a year and were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). The 59.5% were women. Median age at the time of consultation was 67 (range 39-97) years, 98% were sporadic cases.

Fig. 1 Flowchart of patient selection 

The 41% of patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis, with the most common symptom being bone pain (83%). Other less common symptoms were patho logic fractures (4.2%), headache (2.1%), radiculopathy (2.1%), secondary osteoarthritis (2.1%), hearing loss (2.1%), hypercalciuria and nephrolithiasis (2.1%). In asymptomatic patients, the diagnosis was based on ac cidental x-ray findings (5.9%) and on persistent elevated ALP levels found in routine laboratory tests in the rest.

The 54.3% of the patients had monostotic disease whereas 45.7% were polyostotic. The affected bones are shown in Table 1, the pelvis being the most reported site. The diagnosis of certainty of PDB was based on both x-rays and bone scintigraphy in (53/116) 46.5%, on bone scintigraphy alone in (31/116) 26.7% and only on x-rays in (29/116) 25%. CT scans were used in (17/116) 14.6% and MRI in (11/116) 9.5%. Both methods were helpful in clarifying anatomic details of the disease, but they were not confirmatory. A bone biopsy was performed in 9 patients, in 7 because they had doubtful monostotic lesions and in two who had a concomitant neoplastic disease, with the purpose of differentiating PDB from metastases.

Table 1 Sites of bone involvement in the monostotic and polyostotic groups in Paget´s disease of bone 

Of the 76 patients who required treatment for active disease, 36 (49.3%) received zolendronate 5 mg/year, 14 (19.2%) pamidronate 180-270 mg/year, 10 (13.7%) intravenous ibandronate 12 mg/year and 13 (17.8%) oral bisphophonates (6 were treated with risendronate 150 mg/ month, 5 with ibandronate 150 mg/month and 2 with alen dronate 70 mg/week). There were no differences in the election of treatment between monostotic or polyostotic forms (Table 2).

Table 2 Drug treatment in Paget´s disease of bone and responses of treated patients 

The percentages of favorable response were 100% for zolendronate, 71.4% for pamidronate, 90% for ibandro nate and 92.3% for oral bisphophonates. Of the 6 patients who did not respond (4 to pamidronate, 1 to ibandronate and 1 to oral bisphonates), 5 received zolendronate with good clinical and biochemical response. The remaining patient refused to receive zolendronate. The percentages of response were not different between monostotic or polyostotic forms (Table 2).

Basal biochemical parameters were evaluated in 76 patients with active disease who required treatment and were compared to measurements made at a median of 6 (range 3-12) months post-treatment (Table 3). ALP, bone specific ALP and CTX decreased significantly after treatment (Fig. 2).

Table 3 Pre and post-treatment cycle blood parameters in 76 Paget’s disease of bone patients 

Fig. 2 Boxplots showing a significantly decrease in total and bone specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and beta-C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) serum levels in PDB patients after treatment with bisphosphonates (n = 76). Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test for paired samples 

The following complications were reported: bone de formities, 2.58%; fractures, 3.44%; nerve root compres sion, 3.44%; arthrosis, 25.8%. Some patients with skull compromise (33.44%) developed hearing deficit.

As regards basal laboratory results, 13 patients (11.2%) had elevated PTHi values with normal vitamin D levels. After receiving bisphophonates, the number of patients with PTHi increased to 15 (12.93%). In the group with elevated PTHi, 5 (4.31%) developed hypercalcemic hyperparathyroidism and a parathyroid adenoma was removed. Eleven patients (9.47%) had nephrolithiasis, the most common metabolic diagnosis being hyperuricusoria and hypercalciuria.

Discussion

Our cohort of PDB patients was mostly asymptomatic, with a discreet predominance of monostotic presentation and female gender. It seems that these results show a change in PDB epidemiology towards a more indolent presenta tion, with a lower frequency of orthopedic and neurologic complications compared to previous cohorts8-10,15-17.

The incidence of Piaget’s disease of bone has de creased significantly in the last 25 years all over the world7, which is probably due to an overall improvement in worldwide public health. Racial differences are known to have an impact on the possibility of developing this benign bone disorder which is particularly frequent among over 50-year-old Caucasians from the United Kingdom, Italy and Spain, whereas it seems to be infrequent among Scandinavians and Asian and Middle East immigrants in European countries15-18. In Argentina, it seems to be a rare condition among American natives and relatively frequent in cities with high rates of European immigration11,19. In our center, it was an infrequent reason for consultation be tween 2012-2019, as only 1.68% of all patients consulted for PDB. This is probably due to two main reasons: this pathology is not so prevalent in our country, and on the other hand, it might reflect the decreasing global trend of its incidence.

The median age in our cohort was 67 years, which coincides with data reported in the literature, where most diagnoses are made as of the fifth decade8-10,16-18. There is a discrepancy, though, with data reported in the world8-10,16-18, as regards the discreet female predominance, for the PDB is classically described as a male-predominant pathol ogy. This is probably a referral bias, as our institution is a referral center for the study and treatment of osteoporosis, a pathology with a clearly higher incidence in women20.

Monostotic, asymptomatic and mild presentations surpassed the frequency of polyostotic, symptomatic and severe disease. This coincides with the world pattern of emergence of a less severe disease, early diagnosis and use of potent bisphosphonates for its treatment7.

As it has been described in all the international series, the affected bones were, in order of frequency, the pelvic, vertebrae, femurs, tibias and skull8-10,16-18. Other bones were less frequently affected such as the ribs and in an ex ceptional case, a kneecap, as part of polyostotic disease.

It is worth noting the prevalence of asymptomatic cases, which in most cases were diagnosed as a result of a persistently raised alkaline phosphatase level found in routine laboratory tests. In a Dutch population study of 4406 people, Paget´s disease was radiographically confirmed in 20.5% of subjects who had raised alkaline phosphatase, whereas only 2.3 % of PDB patients had normal biochemical values21. This proves the importance of this isolated laboratory finding in the search for Paget’s disease among men and women over 50 years of age.

As regards diagnostic imaging, plain x-rays and bone scintigraphies were the most useful methods, both in dependently or combined. The international guidelines recommend making a full body bone scan to detect all the active sites of the disease and full skeleton x-rays so as not to omit inactive sites or those in final stages of fibrosis3-6. Our team prefers to start the imaging diagnosis by performing a bone scan and afterwards an x-ray of all the sites where Paget´s disease is suspected, so as to reduce the patient´s exposure to radiation. We only needed to use more sophisticated imaging methods to evaluate complications of this disease and we performed bone biopsy in cases of diagnostic doubt in monostotic lesions or in patients with concomitant malignant diseases as suggested by international guidelines5.

In the laboratory, the levels of ALP, bone specific ALP and CTX decreased significantly after treatment. BGP, a marker of bone turnover which is very useful in other pathologies, was not helpful in PDB. Our findings coincide with those reported in the literature22-24. Apparently, deter mination of urinary NYX is the test that best correlates with the degree of activity of the disease22,23. It is evaluated by bone scan and it is considered the best method, but this test is not frequent in our country.

Aminobisphophonates are the first line of treatment for PBD3-5,25-27 and the introduction of zolendronate has allowed long-term remissions of the disease25-28. In the analyzed time period, 2012- 2019, we changed progres sively from pamindronate to zolendronate, achieving very good results. A distinctive feature of our population is that we achieved good results with less potent drugs such as intravenous ibandronate and risendronate and oral alendronate, in doses and schemes similar to those for treating osteoporosis.

The orthopedic and neurologic complications of our patients were fewer than those reported in the historical series8-10,16-18, although ours is a cut-off research and not a real follow-up study and we covered a period of just eight years. Conversely, metabolic complications such as hyper calcemia due to parathyroid adenoma and nephrolithiasis associated with hypercalciuria and hyperuricosuria were as frequent as those reported in the Mayo Clinic series17 that evaluated complications in a data base that covered patients with diagnosis of PDB between 1950 and 2008. We have already reported our experience with the associa tion between hyperparathyroidism and PDB29.

Our study has several limitations: it is an observational, retrospective study and reflects a single-institute experi ence in the management of the disease. This work does not allow us to endorse changes in the epidemiology of PBD because our computerized registry of diagnoses began in 2012 and we were unable to compare our data with what happened in previous years. On the other hand, our institution is a referral center for the diagnosis and treatment of PBD and it could be necessary to carry out a multicenter study of the entire country to support a change in the epidemiology of this disease.

As a conclusion, we can point out that PBD was not a frequent cause of consultation in our center. Mild, oligo symptomatic and monostotic forms were predominant, with low frequency of orthopedic and neurologic complica tions. In the future, this change in the epidemiology of PDB would probably allow a decrease in the doses of bispho phonates historically recommended for these patients.

Acknowledgements:

We are sincerely grateful to Susana Carballo for proofreading the manuscript.

References

1. Paget J. On a form of chronic inflammation of bones (os teitis deformans). Med Chir Trans 1877; 60: 37-64. [ Links ]

2. Layfield R. The molecular pathogenesis of Paget disease of bone. Expert Rev Mol Med 2007; 9: 1-13. [ Links ]

3. Singer FR, Bone HG 3rd, Hosking DJ, et al. Paget’s dis ease of bone: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99: 4408-22. [ Links ]

4. Tuck S, Walke J. Adult Paget’s disease of bone. Clin Med (Lond) 2020; 20: 568-71. [ Links ]

5. Ralston SH, Corral-Gudino L, Cooper C, et al. Diagnosis and management of Paget’s Disease of bone in adults: A clinical guideline. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34: 579-604. [ Links ]

6. Bolland MJ, Cundy T. Paget’s disease of bone: Clinical review and update. J Clin Pathol 2013; 66: 924-7. [ Links ]

7. Corral Gaudino L, Borao Cengotita Bengoa M, Del Pino Montes J, Ralston S. Epidemiology of Paget`s disease of bone: A systematic review and meta-analysis of secular changes. Bone 2013; 55: 347-52. [ Links ]

8. van Staa TP, Selby P, Leufkens HG, Lyles K, Sprafka JM, Cooper C. Incidence and natural history of Paget’s disease of bone in England and Wales. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 465-71. [ Links ]

9. Bandeira F, Assunção V, Diniz ET, Lucena CS, Griz L. Characteristics of Paget’s disease of bone in the city of Recife, Brazil. Rheumatol Int 2010; 30: 1055-61. [ Links ]

10. Rojas-Villarraga A, Patarroyo PA, Contreras AS, Restrepo JF, Iglesias-Gamarra A. Paget disease of bone in Colom bia and Latin America. J Clin Rheumatol 2006; 12: 57-60. [ Links ]

11. Gómez Acotto C, Mautalen CA. European origin of patients with Paget’s disease of bone in the Buenos Aires area. Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17: 409-11. [ Links ]

12. Reis RL, Poncell MF, Diniz ET, Bandeira F. Epidemiology of Paget’s disease of bone in the city of Recife, Brazil. Rheumatol Int 2012; 32: 3087-91. [ Links ]

13. Gennari L, Di Stefano M, Merlotti D, et al. Prevalence of Paget’s disease of bone in Italy. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 1845-50. [ Links ]

14. Guañabens N, Garrido J, Gobbo M, et al. Prevalence of Paget’s disease of bone in Spain. Bone 2008; 43: 1006-9. [ Links ]

15. Merashli M, Jawad A. Paget’s disease of bone among various ethnic groups. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2015; 15: e22-6. [ Links ]

16. Siris ES. Epidemiological aspects of Paget’s disease: Fam ily history and relationship to other medical conditions. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1994; 23: 222-5. [ Links ]

17. Wermers R, Tiegs R, Atkinsos E, Achenbach S, Melton III J. Morbidity and mortality associated with Paget´s disease of bone: A population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 2008; 23: 819-25. [ Links ]

18. Davie M, Davies M, Francis R, Fraser W, Hoskin D, Trans ley R. Paget´s disease of bone: A review of 889 patients. Bone 1999; 24: S11-2. [ Links ]

19. Mautalen C, Pumarino H, Blanco MC, González D, Ghiring helli G, Fromm G. Paget’s disease: The South American experience. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1994; 23: 226-7. [ Links ]

20. Spivacow FR, Sánchez A. Epidemiology, costs, and bur den of osteoporosis in Argentina, 2009. Arch Osteoporos 2010; 5: 1-6. [ Links ]

21. Eekhoff M, van der Klift M, Kroon H, et al. Paget’s disease of bone in The Netherlands: A population-based radiologi cal and biochemical survey-The Rotterdam Study. Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 566-70. [ Links ]

22. Al Nofal AA, Altayar O, BenKhadra K, et al. Bone turnover markers in Paget’s disease of the bone: A Systematic re view and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26: 1875-91. [ Links ]

23. Vlot MC, den Heijer M, de Jongh RT, et al. Clinical utility of bone markers in various diseases. Bone 2018; 114: 215-25. [ Links ]

24. Glendenning P, Paul Chubb S, Valsikaran S. Clinical utility of bone turnover markers in the management of common metabolic bone diseases in adults. Clin Chim Acta 2018; 481: 161-70. [ Links ]

25. Langston AL, Campbell MK, Fraser WD, MacLennan GS, Selby PL, Ralston SH. Randomized trial of intensive bisphosphonate treatment versus symptomatic manage ment in Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 20-31. [ Links ]

26. Michou L, Brown J. Emerging strategies and therapies for treatment of Paget’s disease of bone. Drug Des Devel Ther 2011; 5: 225-239. [ Links ]

27. Zee W, Wat M. Current perspectives on bisphosphonate treatment in Paget´s disease of bone. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2014, 10: 977-83. [ Links ]

28. Abelson A. A review of Paget’s disease of bone with a focus on the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid 5 mg. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 695-705. [ Links ]

29. Sarli MA, Spivacow R, Morillo S, Zanchetta JR. Asociación entre enfermedad de Paget e hiperparatiroidismo prima rio. Medicina (B Aires) 1997; 57: 685-92. [ Links ]

Received: September 21, 2021; Accepted: December 22, 2021

*Postal address: María Belén Zanchetta, Instituto de Investigaciones Metabólicas, Libertad 836, 1012 Buenos Aires, Argentina e-mail: mbzanchetta@idim.com.ar

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License