SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.82 número6La intensidad de la captación intraprostática del PSMA como predictor de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativoEstudio clínico y genético de encefalopatía epiléptica y del desarrollo en pacientes pediátricos argentinos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Medicina (Buenos Aires)

versão impressa ISSN 0025-7680versão On-line ISSN 1669-9106

Medicina (B. Aires) vol.82 no.6 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires dez. 2022

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Incidence of endophthalmitis post cataract surgery in a tertiary hospital of Buenos Aires

Incidencia de endoftalmitis post cirugía de catarata en un hospital de tercer nivel en Buenos Aires

Eliana F. E. Segretín Gutiérrez1  * 

María M. García1 

Marcelo Bursztyn1 

María M. Benavente Defferrari1 

Tomás Ortiz-Basso1 

1 Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract

Objective: Acknowledging the rates of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery is very important to understand the seriousness of the disease. Until now, there is no data of this situation in Argentina. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery at a tertiary hospital, a medical facility which provides a high degree of subspecialty expertise, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Method: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent cataract phacoemulsification sur gery between 2006 and 2020 at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, was performed. Patients with endophthalmitis diagnosis within the first 6 weeks after surgery were included. Those who underwent extracapsular surgery or combined surgeries were excluded. Results: A total of 29 326 cataract surgeries were performed in ten years. The annual incidence of acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery was 0.102% (95% CI 0.069-0.146). Thirty cases of endophthalmitis were diagnosed. The main microorganism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45.4%). Final visual acuity was higher than 0.3 (LogMAR) in 46.6% of the patients. Conclusion: The incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in this hospital is within the range reported globally. Knowing the regional incidence contributes to decide if new prophylaxis measures are necessary.

Key words: Endophthalmitis; Cataract; Incidence; Phacoemulsification; Eye infections

Resumen

Objetivo: Conocer las tasas de endoftalmitis después de la cirugía de cataratas es muy importante para comprender la gravedad de la enfermedad. Hasta el momento, no hay datos de su situación en Argentina. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la incidencia de endoftalmitis postoperatoria tras cirugía de catarata en un hospital de tercer nivel o alta complejidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Método: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes adultos operados de facoemulsificación de cataratas entre 2006 y 2020 en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de endoftalmitis dentro de las prime ras 6 semanas posteriores a la cirugía. Se excluyeron los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía extracapsular o cirugías combinadas. Resultados: En diez años se realizaron un total de 29.326 operaciones de cataratas. La incidencia anual de endoftalmitis postoperatoria aguda después de la cirugía de cataratas fue del 0.102% (IC del 95%: 0.069-0.146). Treinta casos de endoftalmitis fueron identificados. El principal microorganismo fue Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45.4%). La agudeza visual final fue superior a 0.3 (LogMAR) en el 46.6% de los pacientes. Conclusión: La incidencia de endoftalmitis después de la cirugía de cataratas en este hospital está dentro del rango reportado a nivel mundial. Conocer la incidencia regional contribuye a decidir si son necesarias nuevas medidas de profilaxis.

Palabras clave: Endoftalmitis; Catarata; Incidencia; Facoemulsificación; Infecciones oculares

KEY POINTS

Actual knowledge

• The global rates of endophthalmitis ranges between 0.021% and 0.32% worldwhile.

Contribution of the article to current knowledge

• The incidence rate (0.102%) in the study population was within the incidence rate range reported globally.

• The endophthalmitis diagnosis was confirmed through culture and/or PCR in 80% of the cases.

• In 93.3% of the cases, signs and symptoms developed within the first 14 postoperative days.

• To prevent endophthalmitis, it is essential implementing basic standardized prophylactic measures.

Cataract surgery is one of the most frequent ophthal mological surgical procedures in the world. Although it is usually a procedure with high success rate and low postoperative comorbidity, in some cases there may be complications, such as infection.

Endophthalmitis is the most dreaded infectious com plication. The patients may need one or more procedures (injection of therapeutic substances, vitrectomy), or even hospitalization for the intravenous administration of antibi otics. This might negatively impact on the patient’s quality of life and on the healthcare system.

The global rates of endophthalmitis ranges between 0.021% and 0.32%1,2. It is estimated that, annually, the total number of cataract surgeries performed worldwide is above 30 million. With that number in mind, and assuming one case of endophthalmitis out of a thousand surgeries, 30 000 postoperative endophthalmitis cases after cataract surgery occur annually, leading to blindness in the oper ated eye in around 10 000 patients3.

Perioperative antibiotic protocols have demonstrated efficacy to prevent this disease but are associated with more toxicity and resistance generation. So, the decision to use them should be based on clinical evidence.

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.

Material and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients who underwent phacoemulsification for cataract at the Hos pital Italiano de Buenos Aires from January 1st, 2006, and December 31, 2020. Is a medical facility which provides a high degree of subspecialty expertise.

This includes patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis within the first 6 weeks after surgery. Patients who underwent extracapsular surgery or combined trabeculectomy and vitreo retinal surgery were excluded.

The study obtained the Institutional Review Board (Proto col N° 2727) approval and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki standards.

The database was built from the endophthalmitis record of the Section of Infectious Diseases and Ocular Surface, double checking data with the electronic medical records (EMR).

The following data were collected: sex, age, presence of diabetes, immunocompromised conditions (hematologic malignancy or immunosuppressive medication), preoperative prophylactic measures. Best Correct Visual Acuity (BCVA) prior to the infectious event was collected as well as presented on the LogMAR scale.

In those patients where (ocular) media opacity did not allow assessing the posterior segment of the eye, an ocular ultra sound was performed to evaluate the vitreous humor and rule out complications such as retinal or choroidal detachments. An ultrasound showing echoes within the vitreous cavity and/ or the presence of vitreous membranes not associated with other causes was deemed positive.

In endophthalmitis cases, ocular fluids samples (aqueous humor, vitreous humor, or both) were obtained for analysis. Direct examination, culture (in solid culture medium of blood agar, chocolate agar and Sabouraud agar), antibiogram, and in most cases, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were requested. Patients with signs and symptoms of endophthalmitis, and at least one of these tests positive were classified as proven endophthalmitis. In patients with signs and symptoms of en dophthalmitis but with negative results in the aforementioned tests, other possible causes (such as toxic anterior segment syndrome [TASS], non-infectious uveitis) were ruled out, and they were classified as suspected endophthalmitis cases.

According to the clinical presentation, an intravitreal in jection of vancomycin 1 milligram (mg) (0.1 milliliter [ml]), ceftazidime 2 mg (0.1 ml), and dexamethasone 0.4 mg (0.1 ml) (the latter in cases of suspected bacterial etiology) and/ or pars plana vitrectomy were performed.

Prior to surgery, all patients underwent prophylaxis with antibiotic eye drops with fourth-generation quinolones (moxi floxacin 5 mg/ml or gatifloxacin 3 mg/ml) two hours before surgery, povidone iodine 10% was applied to the periocular skin, and povidone iodine 5% to the cornea and conjunctival sac for a minimum of three minutes prior to the surgery. In the postoperative recovery, (topic) fourth-generation quinolone was administered every 6 hours associated with anti-inflamma tory corticosteroid (dexamethasone 1 mg/ml or prednisolone acetate 10mg/ml) at the surgeon’s discretion.

As outcomes, incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis, time to clinical presentation and clinical presentation type, iso lation rate of the causative microorganism, and post-treatment final visual acuity were recorded.

For the statistical descriptive analysis, mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for quantitative variables, and propor tions with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used for categorical variables. STATA 13.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, Texas 77845, USA) was used for the statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 29 326 cataract phacoemulsification surgery performed between 2006 and 2020 were included. Thirty endophthalmitis cases diagnosed within 6 weeks after surgery were identified. The annual incidence of acute en dophthalmitis was 0.102% (95%IC 0.069-0.146). Tables 1 and 2 summarize baseline characteristics, risk factors and clinical presentations.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included population and risk factors (n: 30) 

Table 2 Endophthalmitis clinical presentation in 30 cases 

In some cases, it was not possible to collect data regarding incision type or duration of surgical procedure due to lack of surgical protocols.

An ocular ultrasound was performed on twenty-two (73.3%) patients. It was positive in fourteen (63.6%) and negative in eight (36.3%) patients.

The mean time of symptoms onset was seven days (SD 8.5). There were fourteen (46.6%) cases of early onset between the 1st and the 3rd day, six (20%) cases between the 4th and the 7th day, eight (26.6%) cases between the 8th and the 14th day, and two (6.6%) case of late onset after 14 days.

The endophthalmitis diagnosis was confirmed in twenty-four patients (80% of the cases) through culture and/or PCR.

Cultures were performed in twenty-eight (93.3%) patients, and microorganism isolation was achieved in eleven (39.2%) cultures (Table 3).

Table 3 Microorganisms isolated in cultures (n:12) 

Two cases of mixed infection were recorded, one due to Candida along with Streptococcus, and the other had a positive PCR for Propionibacterium acnes, with positive cultures for Aspergillus sp.

PCR was performed in seventeen (56.6%) patients; microorganisms’ genome was identified in sixteen (94.1%) of those patients’ samples (Table 4). In two patients, only PCR was performed since samples were not enough for cultures.

Table 4 Results of the polymerase chain reaction in 16 cases 

Regarding treatment options (n: 30 patients), intra vitreal injection of antibiotics was administered only to seventeen (56.6%) patients; initial vitrectomy was per formed in thirteen (43.3%) patients, vitrectomy after one intravitreal injection of antibiotics in five patients (16.6%) and one (3.3%) patient required evisceration. Vitrectomy was performed in patients showing best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) equal to or lower than 1.0 LogMAR (loga rithm of the minimum angle of resolution).

Regarding systemic treatment, oral medication was administered to twenty-one (70%) patients depending on the clinical presentation with moxifloxacin 400 mg per day, ciprofloxacin 500 mg every 12 hours, or voriconazole 200 mg every 12 hours; nine (30%) patients received in travenous treatment with vancomycin 1 gram (g) every 12 hours and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours or only imipenem 1 g every 6 hours.

Final BCVA mean was 0.5 (SD 0.5) and median 0.2 (IQR 0.0-1.0). Final BCVA was higher than 0.3 LogMAR in fourteen (46.6%) patients, between 0.4 and 1.0 LogMAR in three (10%) patients, and lower than or equal to 1.0 LogMAR (legal blindness) in twelve (40%) patients, one patient results (33%) could not be recorded because he passed away.

Discussion

The incidence rate (0.102%) in the study population was within the incidence rate range reported globally. Dur ing a systematic review, the endophthalmitis incidence rates in different parts of the world are 0.14% (6935/5 133 623) in North America, 0.07% (1253/1 777 045) in Europe, 0.14% (723/504 471) in Australia, 0.15% (1108/763 690) in Asia, 0.32% (26/8190) in Africa, and 0.27% (74/27 264) in South America2. Most of these patients received intracameral antibiotics as a prophy lactic measure. In a recent large meta-analysis, since the year 2000, the incidence of endophthalmitis has ranged from 0.012%-1.3%4. And in another systematic review from 1963 to March 2003 out of a total of 3 140 650 cataract extractions resulted in an overall endo phthalmitis rate of 0.128%5.

In the studied cohort, hypopyon (50%) and red eye (43.3%) findings were lower than those found in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) (75 to 85% of hypopyon, 82% of red eye). The report of pain was not frequent (26.6%) compared to others (74% EVS, and 79% European Society of Cataract & Refractive Sur geons [ESCRS])6. This leads to increase the diagnostic suspicion of a potentially severe condition, even when these frequent clinical attributes found in other series, are not present.

The endophthalmitis diagnosis was confirmed through culture and/or PCR in twenty-four (80%) patients. This global rate of positive results has been slightly higher than those obtained in the EVS and ESCRS studies (69%)7,8.

In 93.3% (n:28) of the cases, signs and symptoms de veloped within the first 14 postoperative days, compared to 78% in EVS and 86% in ESCRS. Two cases (6.6%), one due to Aspergillus sp and the other with none germ recovered, presented after 14 days, compared with 22% EVS and 14% ESCRS.

The studied population presented a high isolation pro portion of gram-negative microorganisms (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). These cases were documented as part of two hospital outbreaks in 2011 (n:5) and 2015 (n:3). In order to face these events, an action plan for isolation of microorganisms in the surgical equipment was agreed with the HIBA Infection Control Committee; however, the causative source of peri or intraoperative contamina tion could not finally be identified. Therefore, different measures of asepsis and prophylaxis were implemented in operating rooms and surgical instruments (review of filters in air conditioning systems, individual use of drops per patient, frequent disposal of povidone iodine, increase in phacoemulsification hand parts, sterilization protocols review, among others).

The second most frequent isolated microorganism in our study was Staphylococcus epidermidis and Strep tococcus, the first being the prevalent microorganism in most of the publications8,9-13.

All patients received oral or intravenous treatment. The use of fourth-generation quinolones (gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin) is a treatment option accepted by several authors, since these antibiotics show good tolerability and intraocular penetration14.

Patients with an acute virulent presentation received intravenous treatment according to the recommendation ESCRS guidelines6.

Final BCVA was higher than 0.3 LogMAR in 46.6% (n:14) patients, slightly lower compared to 53% of the EVS. In another study where early vitrectomy was performed on a consecutive series of 47 eyes, 91% achieved final BCVA higher than 0.3 LogMAR15-17.

Of the patients who presented at baseline with a BCVA lower than or equal to 1.0 LogMAR (83.3%), final acuity lower than or equal to 1.0 LogMAR was achieved in 44%. This is consistent with the EVS, which showed the patient's visual outcome was the VA at the moment of the initial presentation, regardless of the identified microorganism17.

The two cases with the worst clinical progress, were one patient who developed a phthisis bulbi, and a second one who underwent an evisceration, and corresponded to two virulent pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus sp, respectively.

The limitations of this study are related to the retro spective nature of the design, and to data of the surgical procedure not recorded and analyzed (duration of the surgical procedure, size and type of incision, intraoperative complications). On the other hand, it only represents the results of a single hospital in the region.

The incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract sur gery in a tertiary hospital of Buenos Aires is within those reported worldwide.

Regional data of endophthalmitis incidence helps to decide if the introduction of new antibiotic prophylaxis measures should be implemented.

References

1. Miller JJ, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WE, Newton J, Miller D. Acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract sur gery (2000-2004): incidence, clinical settings, and visual acuity outcomes after treatment. Am J Opthalmol 2005; 139, 983-7. [ Links ]

2. Kessel L, Flesner P, Andresen J, Erngaard D, Tendal B, Hjortdal J. Antibiotic prevention of postcataract endo phthalmitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmologica 2015; 93, 303-17. [ Links ]

3. Gower EW, Lindsley K, Nanji AA, Leyngold I, McDon nell PJ. Perioperave antibiotics for prevention of acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013; 7, CD006364. [ Links ]

4. Cao H, Zhang L, Li L, Lo S. Risk factors for acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one 2013; 8, e71731. [ Links ]

5. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, et al. Acute endo phthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Archives of ophthalmology 2005;123, 613-20. [ Links ]

6. Barry P, Cordovés L, Gardner S. ESCRS guidelines for prevention and treatment of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: data, dilemmas and conclusions. Euro pean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons, 2013. [ Links ]

7. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endo phthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. American J Ophthalmol 1996; 122: 1-17. [ Links ]

8. Forster R.K. The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Ar chives of ophthalmology 1995; 113: 1555-7. [ Links ]

9. Mollan SP, Gao A, Lockwood A, Durrani OM, Butler L. Postcataract endophthalmitis: incidence and microbial isolates in a United Kingdom region from 1996 through 2004. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2007; 33: 265-8. [ Links ]

10. Pijl BJ, Theelen T, Tilanus MA, Rentenaar R, Crama N. Acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: 250 con secutive cases treated at a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. American journal of ophthalmology 2010; 149: 482-7. [ Links ]

11. Jambulingam M, Parameswaran SK, Lysa S, Selvaraj M, Madhavan HN. A study on the incidence, microbiological analysis and investigations on the source of infection of postoperative infectious endophthalmitis in a tertiary care ophthalmic hospital: an 8-year study. Indian journal of ophthalmology 2010; 58: 297-302. [ Links ]

12. Kunimot DY, Das T, Sharma S, et al. Microbiologic spec trum and susceptibility of isolates: part II. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis Research Group. Amer ican journal of ophthalmology 1999;128: 242-44. [ Links ]

13. Sheng Y, Sun W, Gu Y, Lou J, Liu W. Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in China, 1995-2009. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2011; 37: 1715-22 [ Links ]

14. Hooper CY, Lightman SL, Pacheco P, Tam PM, Khan A, Taylor SR. Adjunctive antibiotics in the treatment of acute bacterial endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. Acta ophthalmologica 2012; 90: e572-3. [ Links ]

15. Kuhn F, Gini G. Ten years after... are findings of the Endo phthalmitis Vitrectomy Study still relevant today? Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 1197-99. [ Links ]

16. Kuhn F, Gini G. Vitrectomy for endophthalmitis. Ophthal mology 2006; 113: 714. [ Links ]

Received: April 22, 2022; Accepted: July 04, 2022

*Postal address: Eliana F. E. Segretin Gutiérrez, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Tte. Gral. Juan Dr. Perón 4190, 1199 Buenos Aires, Argentina e-mail: eliana.segretin@hospitalitaliano.org.ar

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License