## Servicios Personalizados

## Articulo

## Indicadores

- Citado por SciELO

## Links relacionados

- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google

## Bookmark

## Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina

*versión On-line* ISSN 1669-9637

### Rev. Unión Mat. Argent. v.48 n.2 Bahía Blanca jul./dic. 2007

**Lectures on algebras**

**Sverre O. Smalø**

*Mar del Plata, Argentina, March 2006*

**Abstract:** The purpose of this note is to give a fast introduction to some problems of homological and geometrical nature related to finitely dimensional representations of finitely generated, and especially, finitely dimensional algebras over a field. Some of these results can also be extended to the situation where the field is not algebraically closed, and some of the results can even be extended to the situation where one is considering algebras over a commutative artin ring. For the results which hold true in the most general situation the proofs become most elegant since they depend on using length arguments only and thereby forgetting about the nature of a field altogether.

**2000 Mathematics Subject Classification** 16D10, 16E30, 16G10, 16G20

**1. Introduction and notation**

Let be an algebraically closed field and let a finitely generated associative -algebra with 1.

Examples:

1. , the field itself which is the simplest example of a -algebra.

2. , the polynomial algebra in one variable over the field .

3. , the free algebra in two non-commuting variables over the field .

4. , the polynomial algebra in commuting variables over the field .

5. , the algebra of -matrices over the field .

6. For a -vector space , is the algebra of -linear endomorphisms of where addition is the usual addition of -linear homomorphisms and the multiplication is given by composition of -linear homomorphisms.

7. For a -vector space and elements of , one lets be the subalgebra of generated by the elements .

8. For a -vector space V and a subspace , one can look at the algebra . By choosing a complement to in and decomposing as as a -vector space, one can identify this algebra with the matrix algebra

9. Now, this last example can be extended to more than one subspace. So let be a -vector space and subspaces for ; then is defined as the subalgebra for of . However, it is not so easy in general to describe this algebra as an algebra of matrices.

10. If one in example 9 has a -vector space and subspaces and the dimension of the -vector spaces are given by , then this algebra can be identified with the algebra of lower triangular matrices over . This identification can be obtained by choosing a basis for by starting with a basis for and then successively extending a basis from to until one has a basis for the whole space .

Finitely generated -algebras can also be given by generators and relations over the ground field . This way one obtains the algebra as a quotient of a finitely generated free algebra over the ground field by an ideal .

11. which is isomorphic to , the polynomial algebra in two variables over the field .

12. which is isomorphic to , the exterior algebra in two variables over the field .

13. which is called the first Weil algebra over the field . This -algebra is isomorphic to the -subalgebra of the endomorphism algebra of the -vector space generated by the two -linear endomorphisms where one is given as multiplication by , and the other one is derivation with respect to .

Another way of giving an algebra is to start with a vector space over with a basis , and then give a multiplication table for the base elements, and then extend the multiplication by bilinearity to all elements of the -vector space . Let be a -vector space with a basis. A multiplication table is then given as with the elements where for each pair of indices the set is finite. For this to become an associative -algebra with 1, severe restrictions on the , the structure constants, have to be imposed.

14. Let be a -vector space with where runs through the nonnegative integers, as a basis. Define a multiplication on the base elements by and extend this multiplication by bilinearity to all elements of . This makes into an associative -algebra with as the identity element. By identifying with one gets an isomorphism between the -algebra and , the polynomial algebra in one variable over the field .

15. Another source of this form of -algebras is the group algebras. Let be a group written multiplicatively. Let be the -vector space of all maps from to such that is finite. Then for each in one has the map given by for and zero for . The collection of all these maps as runs through becomes a basis for . One can then form the multiplication table which makes into a -algebra with as the unit element, where is the identity element of the group . Usually one writes an element of as where are elements of and each is substituted with g, and only a finite number of the elements as runs through are nonzero. The notation used for the group algebra is often or .

16. Another important source of examples of algebras where the multiplication is given by a multiplication table for a basis, is the path algebra of a quiver.

A quiver is an oriented graph. Here one lets denote the set of vertices, and one lets denote the set of oriented edges. The oriented edges are also often called arrows as the name indicates and one usually represents a quiver by a collection of vertices and arrows drawn in the plain.

Example:

Now one can look at the set of all oriented paths in this oriented graph including the paths of length zero at each vertex, and use them as a basis for an algebra. By concatenating paths one makes a multiplication table for these base elements and in this way one obtains the path algebra.

For the example of the quiver above, this will be a six dimensional algebra, with basis , and . Here , and represent the paths of length zero at the vertices 1, 2 and 3 respectively. One has to make a convention about how to represent a path and here one is using the convention that an oriented path is ordered from right to left. The multiplication table for this algebra is rather long, but for the convenience of the reader the complete table is included.

For this simple example, the path algebra is isomorphic to the -algebra of lower three by three matrices over . To see this let be the matrix with 1 in place and zero otherwise. Then an isomorphism can be given by sending in the path algebra to the matrix , in the path algebra to the matrix , in the path algebra to the matrix , in the path algebra to the matrix , in the path algebra to the matrix and in the path algebra to the matrix . An easy calculation now shows that this is a -algebra isomorphism from the path algebra of this quiver to the algebra of lower three by three matrices over .

An important problem which often appears in representation theory is to determine whether two algebras are isomorphic or not isomorphic. This can sometimes be decided by giving an explicit algebra isomorphism between them, but sometimes one can still prove that two algebras have to be isomorphic without ever in principle being able to give such an isomorphism explicitly.

Example. The algebra is isomorphic to the algebra . However, finding an explicit isomorphism requires that one can find the zeros of the polynomial . However, this is one of the degree five complex polynomials where the zeros cannot be expressed with the help of radicals of the coefficients. By calculating the difference between this polynomial and its derivative one obtains the following: . Therefore the polynomial and its derivative have no common factors. This implies that the polynomial has no multiple roots, and therefore by the Chinese remainder theorem there is an isomorphism between the algebra and the algebra , as claimed.

If an algebra is given, one way or another, one wants to get as much information about the algebra as possible. Some of this information can be obtained by considering the algebra homomorphisms from to other better understood algebras. For example knowing all algebra homomorphisms from to , the ring of -matrices over , gives a lot of information.

Examples: 1. . There is only one -algebra homomorphism for each , and that is given by where is the -identity matrix.

2. . A -algebra homomorphism from to is completely determined by the image of , and any matrix in can be the image of . And hence, a K-algebra homomorphism can be identified with .

3. . A -algebra homomorphism is completely determined by its value at and , and any two matrices and in can be such an image. Hence the set of -algebra homomorphisms can be identified with .

4. . Now a -algebra homomorphism is completely determined by the images and of and respectively, and in addition these two matrices and have to commute. Hence the set of -algebra homomorphism from to can be identified with the set .

For this gives all ordered pairs of matrices since any pair of -matrices commutes. And for this gives the set of ordered pairs of -matrices

These four polynomial equations in the 8 unknowns and , are expressing exactly that the two matrices and are commuting.

Here the first and the fourth equation becomes the same, so the system consisting of these four equations is redundant.

For a general for this example one gets quadratic equations in unknowns, and one obtains a bijection between the set of -algebra homomorphisms from to and the set of zeros of these polynomial equations, i.e. the set of -algebra homomorphisms is in a bijection with a subvariety of the set of pairs of matrices defined as the set of common zeros of all these quadratic polynomials.

5. . Let be an invertible -matrix and define by . Then is a -algebra homomorphism, and by Skolem-Noether's theorem all -algebra homomorphisms from to are given in this way. Since they are all isomorphisms.

Letting denote the group of invertible -matrices, one gets a group homomorphism from , the group of invertible -matrices, onto the group of -algebra automorphisms of . The kernel of this group homomorphism is the set of invertible matrices commuting with all invertible matrices. This is the set of nonzero scalar matrices. Hence the group of -algebra automorphisms of is naturally isomorphic to .

13. . A -algebra homomorphism from to is completely determined by the values and of and respectively, and in addition these two matrices and have to satisfy the equation

In this section the action of the group on the varieties of representations will be introduced, and some facts about this action will be given.

For a finitely generated -algebra and a fixed natural number , let a -algebra homomorphism .

Examples:

1. . One has that consists of one element, the -algebra homomorphism sending to where is the -identity matrix.

2. . One has that where the map from the right to the left is given by evaluation, i.e. a matrix is sent to the -algebra homomorphism which takes the value on a given polynomial .

3. . One has that where the map from the right to the left takes a pair of matrices to the -algebra homomorphism sending a given polynomial in two non commuting variables to the matrix .

4. . One has that , where again the map from right to left is given by sending a polynomial to the matrix obtained by evaluating the polynomial in two commuting variables in the pair of matrices obtaining .

13. . If then is empty. In general one has that is nonempty if and only the characteristic of the field divides the number .

5. . One has that where the map from right to left is given by sending a coset of an invertible matrix to the -algebra homomorphism given by sending a matrix to the matric .

Since composition of two -algebra homomorphisms is again a -algebra homomorphism, one can let act on just by composition with the corresponding automorphism on . is given by where where is any representative from the coset .

Often one suppresses and one is speaking about an action of on .

Now let be a finitely generated -algebra. Then one has that is isomorphic to for an ideal in the free algebra . Using such an isomorphism as an identification, an element of is completely determined by the values on the elements where one denotes the residues of the variables also with the symbol respectively. Therefore the -tuple can be identified with . In the Examples 2, 3, 4 and 13, has been 1, 2, 2 and 2 respectively. In Examples 2 and 3, one obtained the whole space of matrices and the whole space of ordered pairs of matrices as possible values respectively, while in example 4 one obtained that the set of possible ordered pairs of matrices were given as the common zeros of quadratic polynomials in variables. While in Example 13 with one obtained the empty set, which is also the common zeros of a set of polynomials.

In general, the possible -tuples in which represent -algebra homomorphisms are given by polynomial equations. These can be described in the following way: For each , gives a set of polynomial equations on the entries in the matrices . Next taking all these equations as runs through the ideal , gives (usually) an infinite collection of polynomial equations on the entries in the matrices , and these equations determine an affine variety which is in bijection with . Hence

For each there is associated a -dimensional -module . This module is as a -vector space, and for each and the multiplication of with is given as where the multiplication on the right side is regular matrix multiplication when each element of is considered as a -matrix.

Two elements and in represent isomorphic -modules and if and only if and belong to the same orbit under the action of on . Hence, one obtains a bijection between the set of isomorphism classes of -modules of dimension as -vector spaces and the set of -orbits in .

Here are some facts about the set of orbits in for a -algebra generated by elements.

1. For each in the orbit is open in its Zariski closure whenever is a polynomial in variables such that .

2. For each in the closure of the orbit of , , is a union of orbits.

3. The dimension of the complement of an orbit in its closure is less than the dimension of the orbit, i.e. . The following formula for the dimension hold: . Here dimension is referring to the Krull-dimension of the varieties.

Now one looks at isomorphism classes of -modules having dimension as -vector spaces, and denotes each of them also by a simple letter . For two isomorphism classes and , one says that M degenerates to if the orbit in corresponding to is contained in the closure of the orbit of the isomorphism class corresponding to . One writes this by . Because of statement 3 above, this becomes a partial order on the set of isomorphism classes of -modules having dimension as -vector spaces.

Example:

2. and . Then consists of all 2 by 2 matrices over . The orbits under the -action are basically determined by the eigenvalues of the matrices. Most of the orbits can be parameterized by where the correspondence is given in a one-to-two fashion by taking the orbit of the matrix which has dimension according to the above formula. These orbits are closed.

Then to each in there are two orbits, the orbit of the matrix , which consists of a single element and is hence of dimension , and the orbit of the matrix . This orbit is of dimension , and its closure contains in addition to the orbit itself, the orbit (one single element) of .

If one wants to look at higher dimensions than two for this example, one can list the eigenvalues of the matrix, and since conjugate matrices have the same eigenvalues, all matrices in an orbit have the same eigenvalues counted with multiplicities. The eigenvalues together with their multiplicity will therefore parameterize the orbits in a certain combinatorial way.

To do this, one first has to look at the situation where there is only one eigenvalue. Letting , one then has the set which is the subset of consisting of matrices having as the sole eigenvalue. Then the orbits in will correspond to partitions of , where . Each corresponds to a Jordan normal form of a matrix of size with eigenvalue , and the partition then corresponds to the representation of dimension with Jordan blocks of size with eigenvalue along the diagonal. Or equivalently, this corresponds to the direct sum of representations of dimension given by a Jordan normal form of size with eigenvalue . Then a -module corresponding to the partition degenerates to the -module corresponding to the partition if and only if for all .

Now this information can be put together by first sorting by eigenvalues and their multiplicities, and then using the order given by partitions for each eigenvalue individually, to get a complete picture of the degeneration order in for any as the example with illustrates.

**4. Degeneration and exact sequences**

As one shall see in this section, there is a close relationship between exact sequences and degenerations. The starting point for this relationship is the following old result which is included in order to illustrate some of the techniques used to obtain degenerations.

**Proposition 4.1.** *Given a finitely generated* *-algebra* *and an* *exact sequence* *of* *-modules which are* *finitely dimensional as* *-vector spaces, then* *.*

*Proof.* Let be a presentation of the finitely generated -algebra. Assume the dimension of as a -vector space is which is then the same as the dimension of as a -vector space. Produce a basis for by first choosing a basis for , and then extend this basis to a basis for the whole of . This produces a complement of in such that as a -vector space. Then identify the part of the basis for coming from with a basis for through the map from to given in the exact sequence. Since is closed with respect to multiplication with each elements from one gets that for each in . Further, induces a -module structure on which by the identification of the basis in with a basis of makes equal to as a -module. Hence so the matrix representing multiplication with each in is with respect to this basis given as for some -linear homomorphism . Therefore the -tuple of matrices representing the module is

This result was the starting point for the degeneration theory of modules and goes back to M. Artin in the 60'ties.

As a corollary of this result one obtains the following.

**Corollary 4.2.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra and* *a* *-module in* *. Then the module* *is semisimple if the orbit* *of* *in* *is closed.*

*Proof.* Assume that the orbit of in is closed. Then for each -submodule of , the module is in the closure of the orbit of by Artin's result. By assumption the orbit of is its own closure. Therefore has to be isomorphic to . However, this forces to be a direct summand of and hence is semisimple since each submodule of is then a direct summand.

Later on, one will see that the result of this corollary can be extended to give a complete characterization of the closed orbits in for a finitely generated -algebra since the closed orbits in are exactly the orbits of semisimple -modules which has dimension as -vector spaces.

However, not all degenerations can be obtained in this way since there are examples where an indecomposable -module degenerates properly into another indecomposable -module, while each degeneration coming from a short exact sequence with all terms being non-zero as above, have the property that have to be a decomposable -module.

**Proposition 4.3.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra. If there* *exists an exact sequence* *of* *-modules* *with* *and* *finitely dimensional as* *-modules, then* *and* *.*

This result was obtained by Chr. Riedtmann and could be used directly to give examples where an indecomposable -module was degenerating properly into some other indecomposable -module.

An outline of the proof of this proposition will be postponed. Instead a couple of examples are given in order to show how this result can be applied to obtain degenerations.

The first application is an example originally coming from representations of algebra given by a quiver which is illustrating that an indecomposable -module can degenerate properly into another indecomposable -module.

Example: Consider the -subalgebra of the -algebra of lower -matrices over the field given as the set of matrices

Here is another example where one can use the result of Riedtmann to prove that any finitely dimensional -module degenerates to a semisimple -module.

Let be a finitely generated -algebra, and let be a -module which is finitely dimensional as a -vector space. Let where denotes the -th power of the radical of the -module and . Consider now the exact sequence

One could also have seen this last result by an inductive argument using just exact sequences as in the result of M. Artin.

*Proof.* Here is an indication of a proof of Riedtmann's result in Proposition 4.3

Consider an exact sequence

The converse of Riedtmann's result also holds as has been proved by G. Zwara. For a proof of this statement given in the next proposition, the reader is referred to the paper [Z2].

**Proposition 4.4.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra and* *and* *in* *with* *. Then there exists an exact* *sequence* *of* *-modules where* *is* *finitely dimensional as a* *-module.*

These two results give a complete algebraical description of degeneration, and hence one can take these as the starting point generalizing the notion of degeneration also to the situations where one is not working over an algebraically closed field, or even to the situations considering just a finitely generated -algebra over a commutative artin ring , and where one is using lengths instead of dimensions. So from now on, unless otherwise stated, will be a commutative artin ring, will be a finitely generated algebra over , and the dimension as a -vector space will be substituted by the length as a -module and denoted by or just if there can be no confusion. One can also loosely introduce the set as the set of -modules of length considered as -modules.

In this note the version of the exact sequence

In this section the notion of degeneration is generalized. Since the Krull-Remark-Schmidt-theorem holds for finite length modules, one has uniqueness in decompositions of such a module into indecomposable summands up to isomorphism. However, as one will soon see, this decomposition does not behave nicely with respect to degenerations. This is because one cannot cancel common direct summands from modules and when , and obtain a degeneration of the remaining complements. Here is an interesting example that demonstrates this.

Consider where is an algebraically closed field and a non-zero element of . is then a self injective local -algebra of dimension four. Then look at . The regular representation itself belongs to and the dimension of its orbit under the action of is given as . Next consider, for each , the 2-dimensional -module where also the residue of and in are denoted by and respectively. Now is isomorphic to if and only if the determinant of the matrix is zero. Further, if the determinant of the matrix is non-zero, the dimension of the endomorphism ring of is 6. Hence, the orbit of each of these -modules when the determinant of the matrix is nonzero, has dimension . This together with the two parameters and shows that all these orbits make up a geometric object of dimension 12. Therefore not all orbits of these -modules can be in the closure of the orbit corresponding to since this orbit is also, as calculated above, of dimension 12. However, for each there is an exact sequence

This example was first considered for this purpose by J. Carlson where he used the case .

Let again be a finitely generated -algebra with an algebraically closed field. One says that a -module in virtually degenerates to a -module in if there exists a finitely dimensional -module such that degenerates to .

By Zwara's result, this is the same as saying that there exact an sequence of -modules where and are finitely dimensional as -vector spaces.

Again, using the characterization of virtual degenerations given by short exact sequences, one can extend the notion of virtual degeneration to situations where one is working over a finitely generated algebra over a commutative artin ring instead of working with finitely generated algebras over an algebraically closed field.

**Proposition 5.1.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra. If the* *-module* *virtually degenerates to the* *-module* *, i.e. there* *is an exact sequence of* *-modules*

*which are of finite length as*

*-modules, then*

*for each*

*-module*

*which*

*has finite length as a*

*-module.*

*Proof.* Consider an exact sequence

One can also obtain this result from geometric considerations in the case one is working over an algebraically closed field.

In light of this result one introduces another relation on , called the order, which also turns out to be a partial order on the set by a result of M. Auslander.

For two -modules and in one says that if for all -modules of finite length as -modules.

As already mentioned, this order is called the hom order. This order is also symmetric in the sense that for all -modules of finite length as -modules if and only if for all -module of finite length as -modules.

¿From the propositions above one then has the following implications: . By the example of J. Carlson one knows that the first implication is not an equivalence in general. So far no one has come up with an example showing that the last implication is not an equivalence, and hence it is an open problem if the second implication is in fact an equivalence.

Recall that a finitely generated -algebra with a commutative artin ring is called an artin algebra if as a -module has finite length. Such an artin algebra is said to be of finite representation type if there are only a finite number of isomorphism classes of indecomposable -modules. The algebra in the example of J. Carlson is artinian, but it is not of finite representation type. One can see that directly. However, that the s above are not of finite representation type can also be deduced from the next result stating that for artin algebras of finite representation type the degeneration order, the virtual degeneration order and the hom order all agree. This was first proved by G. Zwara. For general background on representation theory of artin algebras see [ARS].

**Theorem 5.2.** *If* *is an artin* *-algebra of finite representation* *type, and* *and* *are two* *-modules of the same length as* *-modules, then the three following statements are equivalent:*

*1.*

*2.*

*3.*

*Proof.* A complete proof of this is based on the study of the finitely presented functors on the category of finitely generated -modules and hence belongs to the Auslander-Reiten theory for artin algebras. Here only a sketch will be given. That statement *1* implies statement *2* is obvious, and that statement *2* implies statement *3* has already been proven, so the only part left which has to be proved is that statement *3* implies statement *1* when is an artin -algebra of finite representation type.

So, assume there are two -modules and of the same length as -modules such that . If is isomorphic to there is nothing to prove. Hence one can assume that and are not isomorphic modules. Then one can consider the contravariant functors and on the category of finitely generated -modules. Since is of finite representation type, these functors are of finite length and hence artinian. Next consider the category of finitely presented contravariant functors on the category of finitely generated -modules. For each in one lets denote the element associated with the functor in the Grothendieck group of . Since is of finite representation type, there is a finitely presented functor such that . Now a fact which will be proven in the next lemma is that for a pair of nonzero -modules and of the same length as -modules, with no common nonzero direct summand and with , there is always a direct summand of such that . Using this fact and that the functor is artinian, one can now prove that the functor has a subfunctor with the same composition factors as counted with multiplicity, i.e. . To see this, consider all subfunctors of such that for all -modules of finite length as -module. This set is nonempty since is a member, and hence this set has a minimal element. Let be one of these minimal elements. Choose a minimal projective presentation of the functor which has projective dimension one since it is a submodule of a projective functor, . If , one obtains that with . But then, by first cancelling common direct summands one gets from the fact which is proved in the next lemma, that there exists an indecomposable summand of where one has that . Hence, since is contained in the radical of the functor , the image of the subfunctor of in when , also have the property that for all -modules of finite length as an -module. This contradicts the minimality of and completes the proof of the claim that has a subfunctor such that .

Now since the global dimension of the category of finitely presented functors is at most two, one takes a minimal projective resolution of and obtains an exact sequence

Here is the statement, including a proof, of the proper inequality in the length of homomorphism spaces which was used in the proof of the theorem above. This result is due to K. Bongatz.

**Lemma 5.3.** *Let* *be an finitely generated* *-algebra and* *and* *two nonzero* *-modules in* *such that* *and* *such that* *and* *have no nonzero common direct summand.* *Then there exist an indecomposable summand* *of* *such that* *.*

*Proof.* Let be a generating set for the finite length -module and consider the exact sequence

If one analysis the proof of the theorem above, one also get that if and is satisfied for all but a finite number of indecomposable -modules which are of finite length as -modules, then .

Also for the algebra , the degeneration order and the hom order coincides on . This can be seen from the description on the degeneration order given earlier in this note and a simple calculation of the hom order.

One also has that the hom order descends to all extension groups for an artin -algebra as the next result shows.

**Proposition 5.4.** *Let* *be an artin* *-algebra and* *and* *two* *-modules of the same length as* *-modules.* *Then* *implies that* *and* *for all* *-modules* *and* *of* *finite length and for all* *.*

*Proof.* Since is assumed to be an artin -algebra, one can consider an exact sequence

This result is also due to K. Bongartz.

The following consequences on the projective and injective dimensions of -modules are immediate:

**Corollary 5.5.** *Let* *be an artin* *-algebra and* *and* *two* *finitely generated* *-modules of the same length as* *-modules. If* *, then the projective dimension of* *is less than or equal* *to the projective dimension of* *, and the injective dimension of* *is less than or equal to the injective dimension of* *.*

For those who want to work with tensor products and torsion groups instead of groups of homomorphisms and extensions, the following translation may be of interest.

**Proposition 5.6.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra and* *and* *two nonzero* *-modules of the same length as* *-modules.* *Then* *if and only if* *for all* *right* *-modules* *of finite length as* *-modules.*

*Proof.* Let be a right -module which has finite length as a -module. Then one has the following equality for all left -modules which have finite length as -modules. where is a duality on the category of finitely generated -modules over the commutative artin ring . Using the isomorphisms and one then gets and . The statement in the proposition is then an immediate consequence of this.

Restricting to artin -algebras this inequality also descends to all torsion groups which is now stated without a proof.

**Proposition 5.7.** *Let* *be an artin* *-algebra and* *and* *two* *-modules of the same length as* *-modules such that* *, then* *for all finitely* *generated right* *-modules* *and all* *.*

**6. Degenerations, hom order and discrete invariants**

The degeneration order and the hom order has also some impact on discrete invariants associated with modules. One has already observed that projective dimension and injective dimension behaves nicely with respect to these orders as a corollary of Bongatz' result. These numerical invariants are rather coarse, and some interesting cases of degenerations occur between modules which cannot be separated by these invariants. Therefore it is interesting to look at the induced degeneration order, the induced virtual degeneration order and the induced hom orders on sets of modules where these discrete invariants stay the same.

Some consequences of the hom order, and which are therefore also consequences of the degeneration and the virtual degeneration orders, are the following.

**Proposition 6.1.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra and* *and* *two* *-modules of finite length as* *-modules such that* *Then the following holds true:*

*1. The annihilator of* *is contained in the annihilator of* *.*

*2.* *for all* *.*

*3.* *for all* *. Here* *denotes the* *'th* *socle of the* *-module.*

*Proof.* From both general considerations and the assumption of the proposition one has the following equalities and inequalities:

*1*.

For the -module , one can by evaluating a -homomorphism in in the residue of the identity, identify with for all -modules annihilated by . Applying this to and using *1*, one gets that part *3* is satisfied.

Part *2* is proven in a similar way. Let and consider the -module . Then from Proposition 5.6 one obtains that

This shows that when one wants to consider the hom order, one can always cut down to an artin algebra since will always be an artin algebra when is a -module of finite length as a -module.

Let

One can now give the characterization of closed orbits in for a finitely generated algebra over an algebraically closed field .

**Corollary 6.2.** *Let* *be a finitely generated* *-algebra where* *is an algebraically closed field and* *a natural number. Then the* *orbit of a* *-module* *in* *is closed if and only if* *is* *semisimple.*

*Proof.* That the orbit of is closed in forces to be semisimple is already established as a corollary of Artin's result. One has that if is a semisimple module, then is a semisimple ring. Therefore if is semisimple and degenerates into , then is annihilated by and is hence itself semisimple. From the comments above one then has that degenerates into as a -module. Hence, there is an exact sequence as -modules, which have to split since is semisimple. This forces to be isomorphic to , and therefore the orbit of is closed in .

For modules and in one has the following list of partial orders on subsets of :

1. if and is isomorphic to , i.e the -modules and have isomorphic tops and degenerates to .

2. if and is isomorphic to for all , i.e. the -modules and have isomorphic radical layers and degenerates to .

The notation and is defined in a similar way using the virtual degeneration order and hom order instead of degeneration order respectively.

This list is not exhaustive since one could also add socle layers or even use the subsets of having the same lengths for the extension groups with a fixed set of -modules on one or the other side, or both sides. Here the semisimple -module is the most obvious one to be used. This will be giving subsets of -modules of a fixed length as -modules where the terms in the projective and the injective resolutions are the same respectively, but where the -homomorphisms in these resolutions may be different. These are generalizations of the requirement that the tops and the socles being isomorphic for the two -modules being compared, respectively.

There is the following result obtained by B. Huisgen-Zimmermann regarding degenerations between two -modules and which have simple tops and where the radical layers of the two modules are isomorphic. [H-Z]

**Proposition 6.3.** *If* *is a* *-module of finite length as a* *-module with* *simple and* *, then* *is* *isomorphic to* *.*

This result can be deduced as a corollary of the following more general result using the hom order instead of the degeneration order.

**Proposition 6.4.** *If* *is a* *-module with* *simple and* *, then* *is isomorphic to* *.*

*Proof.* The proof of this proposition goes by induction on the Loewy length of .

If the Loewy length of is one, then is simple and hence also has to be simple. Further since , there is at least one nonzero -homomorphism from to . This is then showing that is isomorphic to .

So, let the Loewy length of be and assume by induction that the statement hold for each with Loewy length less than or equal to . Now assume with having simple top. As has already been observed, so one can reduce to the artin -algebra .

Now consider the two -modules and of Loewy length . Then from the assumption in the proposition one has that is isomorphic to for all . One also has that for each -module of finite length as a -module that the following equalities and inequalities hold:

Next, since the top of is simple the following equalities and inequalities hold:

This result about the hom order was obtained in a joint paper with Anita Valenta [SV].

**7. Modules determined by their tops and first syzygies**

One has seen in the previous section that sometimes some invariants are completely determining a module up to isomorphism. In this section one will look at a result of this type for artin algebras obtained by R. Bautista and E. Perez and also present a generalization of their result discovered by C. M. Ringel at this conference.

Let be an artin -algebra, and let denote the radical of . For a -module , let denote its first syzygy, i.e. there is an exact sequence

**Theorem 7.1.** *Let* *be an artin* *-algebra,* *and* *two finitely generated* *-modules such that* *and* *. Then* *is isomorphic to* *if and only if* *is isomorphic to* *and* *is isomorphic to* *.*

The proof of this fact presented here is based on elementary homological algebra and length considerations over the commutative artin ring .

The next lemma is a consequence of Nakayama's lemma and is well known.

**Lemma 7.2.** *Let* *be a non-zero finitely generated* *-module and* *a* *-epimorphism. Then* *there is an indecomposable* *-module* *and* *-homomorphisms* *and* *such that* *, the identity on* *.*

This lemma can be applied to give the result after the following proposition has been proven.

**Proposition 7.3.** *Let* *and* *be finitely generated* *-modules* *such that* *,* *,* *is* *isomorphic to* *and* *is isomorphic to* *. Then there* *is a* *-epimorphism* *for some natural number* *.*

*Proof.* Let and satisfy the assumption in the proposition. Without loss of generality one can assume that (and hence ) is non-zero. One has exact sequences and of -modules with a projective -module. Then for each finitely generated -module one obtains exact sequences

Next, let be the trace of in which is the sum of all images of all -homomorphisms from to . Then there is an such that there is an exact sequence

Next, apply the functor to the sequence (2) and one obtains the exact sequence

One can now give the promised proof of the theorem of R. Bautista and E. Perez.

*Proof.* So let and be two -modules such that and . If is isomorphic to then clearly is isomorphic to and is isomorphic to .

For the converse, assume that is isomorphic to and that is isomorphic to . One can without loss of generality assume that (and hence also ) is non-zero. From Proposition 7.3 one then has an -epimorphism for some natural number and also an -epimorphism for some natural number . Hence, there is a composition of -epimorphisms . Then Lemma 7.2 ensures that there is an indecomposable -module and -homomorphisms and such that the composition

During the meeting in Mar del Plata, C. M. Ringel observed that the following more general statement is valid.

**Theorem 7.4.** *Let* *be an artin* *-algebra and* *a finitely* *generated* *-module such that* *. If* *is a* *finitely generated* *-module such that there exists finitely generated* *-modules* *and* *, and exact sequences* *and* *, then there exists a finitely generated* *-module* *and an exact sequence* *,* *i.e.* *.*

[ARS] Auslander, M., Reiten, I. and Smalø, S. O., *Representation Theory of* *Artin Algebras*. Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics, 36, 1995. [ Links ]

[BP] Bautista, Raymundo; Pérez, Efrén *On modules and complexes without* *self-extensions.* Comm. Algebra 34 (2006), no. 9, 3139-3152. [ Links ]

[H-Z] Huisgen-Zimmermann, B., *Top-stable and layer-stable degenerations by* *way of Grassmannians*. Preprint [ Links ]

[R] Riedtmann, Chr., *Degenerations for representations of quivers with* *relations*. Ann. Sci. Ecole Nomale Sup. 4, 275-301, 1986. [ Links ]

[S] Smalø, S. O. *Modules determined by their tops and first syzygies* Comm. Algebra 35 (2007) no.4, 1223-1225. [ Links ]

[SV] Smalø, S. O.; Valenta, A. *Top-stable and layer-stable degenerations and* *hom-order.* Colloq. Math. 108 (2007), no. 1, 63-71. [ Links ]

[V] Voigt, D., *Induzierte Darstellungen in der Theorie der endlichen* *algebraischen Gruppen*, LNM 592, Springer Berlin 1977, MR 58:5949. [ Links ]

[Z1] Zwara, G., *A degeneration-like order for modules*. Arch. Math 71 437-444 1998. [ Links ]

[Z2] Zwara, G., *Degenerations of finite-dimensional modules are given by* *extensions* Composito Math. 121, 205-218, 2000. [ Links ]

*Sverre O. Smalø*

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Department of mathematical sciences

N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.

sverresm@math.ntnu.no

*Recibido: 7 de noviembre de 2006 Aceptado: 3 de junio de 2007*