Serviços Personalizados
Artigo
Indicadores
 Citado por SciELO
Links relacionados
 Citado por Google
 Similares em SciELO
 Similares em Google
Bookmark
Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina
versão Online ISSN 16699637
Rev. Unión Mat. Argent. v.49 n.2 Bahía Blanca jul./dez. 2008
A Model for the Thermoelastic Behavior of a JointLegBeam System for Space Applications
E.M. Cliff, Z. Liu and R. D. Spies*
Abstract. RigidizableInflatable (RI) materials offer the possibility of deployable large space structures (C.H.M. Jenkins (ed.), Gossamer Spacecraft: Membrane and Inflatable Structures Technology for Space Applications, Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics, 191, AIAA Pubs., 2001) and so are of interest in applications where large optical or RF apertures are needed. In particular, in recent years there has been renewed interest in inflatablerigidizable trussstructures because of the efficiency they offer in packaging during boosttoorbit. However, much research is still needed to better understand dynamic response characteristics, including inherent damping, of truss structures fabricated with these advanced material systems. One of the most important characteristics of such space systems is their response to changing thermal loads, as they move in and out of the Earth's shadow. We study a model for the thermoelastic behavior of a basic truss componentconsisting of two RI beams connected through a joint subject to solar heating. Axial and transverse motions as well as thermal response of the beams with thermoelastic damping are taking into account. The model results in a couple PDEODE system. Wellposedness and stability results are shown and analyzed.
Key words and phrases. Truss structures, EulerBernoulli beams, thermoelastic system.
* Corresponding author
In recent years there has been renewed interest in RigidizableInflatable (RI) space structures because of the efficiency they offer in packaging during boosttoorbit. RI materials offer the possibility of deploying large space structures ([7]) and so are of interest in applications where large optical or RF apertures are needed. Several proposed space antenna systems will require ultralight trusses to provide the "backbone" of the structure (see Figure 1(a)). It has been widely recognized that practical precision requirements can only be achieved through the development of new highfidelity mathematical models and corresponding numerical tools.
(a) RigidizableInflatable truss structure 
(b) Basic structure of the jointlegsbeams system 
Figure 1.1: Truss (a) and basic structure of the jointlegsbeams system (b). 
In this paper we study the dynamics of a basic truss component consisting of two RI beams connected through a joint (see Figure 1(b)). One of the more important characteristics of such space systems is their response to changing thermal loads, as they move in and out of the Earth's shadow. In this paper we study the thermoelastic behavior of a twobeam truss element subject to solar heating. The beams are fabricated as thinwalled circular cylinders.
The equations of motion for the JointLegBeam system depicted in Figure 1(b) are the following (see [1] for details):


for time and spatial variable , where and are and matrices give by


and the other functions and parameters are as follows (here the supra or subindex , will always refer to beam or leg ): longitudinal and transversal displacement of the beam; horizontal and vertical displacement of the joint's tip; rotation angle of the leg; mass density, cross section area, length, Young's modulus, moment of inertia of the beam; mass, center of mass, length, moment of inertia of the leg; mass of the joint, ; initial angle of leg with positive axis; initial angle of leg with negative axis; extensional force of beam at the end ; shear force of beam at the end ; bending moment of beam at the end .
Each beam is clamped at the end . Thus the boundary conditions at are

At the other end of each beam several obvious geometric compatibility conditions must be imposed. These conditions can be written in the form:

In [1], system (2.1)(2.6) was recast as an abstract secondorder ODE in an appropriate Hilbert space. Semigroup theory was then used to prove that the system is wellposed. Moreover, it was shown that if KelvinVoigt damping to both transverse and longitudinal motions is added, then the corresponding semigroup is analytic and exponentially stable. The spectrum of the infinitesimal generator of this semigroup was also characterized. The case of local damping was analyzed in [4] where it was shown that if only one of the beams is damped, then only polynomial stability is obtained even if additional rotational damping is assumed in the joint. Numerical approximations and several numerical results are shown in [2].
The external heat flux in the space normal to the beam's surface is given by (see [10])

where denotes the solar flux and the angle of orientation of the solar vector with respect to the beam. In this equation we shall neglect the contribution of since we are assuming it is small. We denote by the deviation of the temperature of the thinwalled circular beam with respect to a reference temperature at time at the point on the beam corresponding to axial coordinate and circumferential coordinate (here corresponds to the top of the beam while corresponds to the bottom). Conservation of energy for a small segment of circular cylinder including longitudinal and circumferential conduction in the cylinder wall and radiation from the cylinder's surface yields the following equation for :

where and are the axial and circumferential thermal conductivity coefficients, respectively, is the specific heat, the radius of the cylinder, is the thickness of the wall, is the surface emissivity and is the surface absorptivity, is the StefanBoltzmann constant, is a function defined on by for , and for . The heat flux distribution on the RHS of equation (3.2) can be written as

where (here denotes the characteristic function). Clearly is continuous and it has zero average in .
For each beam, the temperature distribution is separated into two parts, namely:

where is independent of and corresponds to the uniform part of the flux, , in (3.3), and amounts for the circumferential variation of the flux in (3.3). Note that for every and one has that for any . Hence, can be thought of as the thermal gradient between the top and the bottom of the beam at the axial location .
Also, we approximate the thermal radiation term in (3.2) by linearizing around (where , to be determined later, is the steadystate constant temperature increment produced on the undeformed beam by the solar flux ), i.e., we approximate by . Hence equation (3.2) is replaced by
Since has zero average, integration of equation (3.5) over the cylinder's cross sectional area yields
Since is discontinuous at the integration of above must be performed in the distributional sense. The value of is now determined by setting the RHS, , equals to zero. By doing so we obtain

Note that with this value of corresponds to the steadystate for the case of homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions and, since usually is small compared to , the linearization of the thermal radiation term performed above, is justified near the steady state solution.
Now multiplying (3.5) by and integrating over the cylinder's cross sectional area, we obtain for the following equation:

Thermally induced vibrations in the system is taken into account by considering Hooke's law for the stressstrain relation in the form where is the thermal expansion coefficient, and is, as before, the deviation from the reference temperature . Note that at thermal strain vanishes, so that is interpreted as the (uniform) temperature of beam in the unstressed, reststate. By the standard derivation of EulerBernoulli beam equation, we modify the JointLegBeam system (2.1) as follows:
The above beam equations are coupled to the heat equations modified from equations (3.6) and (3.8) and with chosen as in equation (3.7) (so that in (3.6) ), that is:

and
We impose Robin type boundary conditions for the temperature at both ends of each beam, i.e.
, where is the temperature of the surrounding medium and , , , are nonnegative constants. By writing in terms of the decomposition given in (3.4) these equations take the form:
Since these equations must hold for all it follows that
and
for all , . So, in the same way that the dynamics for the temperature distribution (3.5) decouples into equations (3.11) and (3.12) for and , respectively, we observe that the boundary conditions also decouple. Note however in equation (3.13) that the boundary conditions for the axial component of the temperature, , are nonhomogeneous. By defining , equation (3.11) can be written in the form

while the boundary conditions (3.13) now take the form
Observe now that these boundary conditions are exactly the same as those in (3.14) for the circumferential component of the temperature. Finally, note also that in equation (3.9), can be replaced by without any changes.
System (3.9)(3.12) (or equivalently (3.9), (3.10), (3.12), (3.15)), together with the jointleg dynamics described by equation (2.2) constitute the thermoelastic JointLegBeam equations with the external solar heat source. The extensional forces, shear forces and bending moments of the beams at are now given by:
In this section, we consider the wellposedness of the JointLegBeam system with solar heat flux, i.e., equations (3.9), (3.10), (3.12), (3.15) subject to the geometric beamleg interface compatibility conditions (2.6), the dynamic boundary conditions (3.17), (3.18), (3.19) and the boundary conditions (2.5), (3.14), (3.16). We first rewrite the system as a first order evolution equation in an appropriate Hilbert space. Wellposedness is then obtained by using semigroup theory. Since the corresponding system without thermal effects has been studied in [1], we will follow the notation used there as much as possible for consistency. Numerical results for that case are reported in [2].
First, we define the following Hilbert spaces with their corresponding inner products:
where , and denotes the MoorePenrose generalized inverse of . We also define the operators and by
where and for , denotes the space of functions in that vanish, together with all derivatives up to the order , at the left boundary. With this notation, equations (3.9)(3.10) can now be written as the following abstract second order ODE in :

Next we define the operators and by




where denotes the space of functions in satisfying the Robin boundary conditions (3.14) or equivalently (3.16). With this notation, equations (3.12), (3.15), can now be written as the following abstract first order ODE in :

where

We also define three boundary projection operators , from into and from into by

where , and . Next we define the Hilbert space with the usual inner product inherited from those in and . In this Hilbert space we define the elastic operator by

Furthermore, we define by and Thus, equations (4.1) and (4.3) can be combined as

where . It has been proved in [1] that the operator is selfadjoint and strictly positive. Thus, we can define the state space with the inner product Finally, we define operator on by , Then, equations (4.2) and (4.4) can be rewritten as a first order nonhomogeneous evolution equation

where .
Theorem 4.1. (Wellposedness): Let be as defined above. Then is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions on and hence, for any initial condition , system (4.5) has a unique global solution given by
Proof: It can be shown that is dissipative and , the resolvent set of . Since is dense in , it then follows from Theorem 1.2.4 in [8] that generates a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions on . The existence and uniqueness of solutions for system (4.5) for any initial condition finally follows from Corollary 2.10 in [9]. For more details see [3]. _
We now turn our attention to the stability of system (4.5). It is well known that the semigroup associated with longitudinal and transversal motion of a thermoelastic Euler beam is exponentially stable ([5], [8]). System (4.5) consists of two thermoelastic beam equations plus the equations for the jointleg dynamics. This type of system is often referred to as "hybrid system". It is certainly an interesting problem to determine whether the thermal damping is strong enough by itself to induce exponential stability of this kind of system. We shall prove this in the affirmative.
The following result by Huang [6] will be used:
Theorem 5.1. Let be a Hilbert space, a closed, densely defined linear operator. Assume that generates a semigroup of contractions on . Then is exponentially stable if and only if
Theorem 5.2. The semigroup of contractions generated by (see Theorem 4.1) is exponentially stable.
Proof: If (5.2) is false then there exists a sequence with and a sequence with such that

Using the components related to the thermoelastic beam equations it can be show that (5.3) yields the contradiction as . Similarly, if the condition (5.1) is false, then there exist and a sequence with , such that

By repeating the same arguments we get the contradiction . For complete details on these proofs, we refer the reader to [3]. Hence satisfies conditions (5.1) and (5.2) and therefore, the semigroup of contractions generated by is exponentially stable. __
In this article we considered a system of two thermoelastic EulerBernoulli beams coupled to a joint through two legs. By means of semigroup theory the well posedness of the system was proved and its exponential stability was derived. It is certainly of much interest to develop numerical approximations for our statespace model (4.5). Such numerical schemes will be useful in simulation and identification studies to predict and better understand the structural and thermal responses of spaceborne observation systems. Efforts in this direction are already under way.
This work was supported by DARPA/SPO, NASA LaRC and the National Institute of Aerospace under grant VT031, 2535, and in part by AFOSR Grants F496200310243 and FA95500710273. Acknowledgement is also given to CONICET and Universidad Nacional del Litoral of Argentina.
[1] J.A. Burns, E.M. Cliff, Z. Liu and R. D. Spies, On Coupled Transversal and Axial Motions of Two Beams with a Joint, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 339, 2008, pp 182196. [ Links ]
[2] J.A. Burns, E.M. Cliff, Z. Liu and R. D. Spies, Results on Transversal and Axial Motions of a System of Two Beams coupled to a Joint through Two Legs, submitted, 2008. ICAM Report 200702131. [ Links ]
[3] E.M. Cliff, B. Fulton, T. Herdman, Z. Liu and R. D. Spies, Well posedness and exponential stability of a thermoelastic jointlegbeam system with Robin boundary conditions, Mathematical and Computer Modelling (2008), en prensa, DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.03.018. [ Links ]
[4] J.A. Burns, E.M. Cliff, Z. Liu and R. D. Spies, Polynomial stability of a jointlegbeam system with local damping, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 46, 2007, pp 12361246. [ Links ]
[5] J.A. Burns, Z. Liu and S. Zheng, On the Energy Decay of a Linear Thermoelastic Bar. J. of Math. Anal. Appl., Vol. 179, No. 2, 1993, pp 574591. [ Links ]
[6] F. L. Huang, Characteristic Condition for Exponential Stability of Linear Dynamical Systems in Hilbert Spaces, Ann. of Diff. Eqs., 1(1), 1985, pp 4356. [ Links ]
[7] C. H. M. Jenkins (ed.), Gossamer Spacecraft: Membrane and Inflatable Technology for Space Applications, AIAA Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics, (191), 2001. [ Links ]
[8] Z. Liu and S. Zheng, Semigroups Associated with Dissipative Systems, 398 Research Notes in Mathematics, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1999. [ Links ]
[9] A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Second Edition, Springer Verlag, 1983. [ Links ]
[10] E. A. Thornton and R. S. Foster, Dynamic Response of Rapidly Heated Space Structures. In: Computational Nonlinear Mechanics in Aerospace Engineering, edited by Atluri, S.N., Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 146, AIAA, Washington D.C., 1992, p. 451477. [ Links ]
E. M. Cliff
Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Mathematics
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Blacksburg, VA, 240610531, USA.
Z. Liu
Department of Mathematics
University of Minnesota
Duluth, MN 558123000, USA.
R. D. Spies
Instituto de Matemática Aplicada del Litoral
IMAL, CONICETUNL, Güemes 3450, and
Departamento de Matemática,
Facultad de Ingeniería Química, UNL,
Santa Fe, Argentina
rspies@imalpde.santafeconicet.gov.ar
Recibido: 11 de mayo de 2008
Aceptado: 20 de mayo de 2008