versión impresa ISSN 0325-0075
Arch. argent. pediatr. vol.110 no.5 Buenos Aires oct. 2012
Variability of physical activity in Chilean children aged 4-10: a study by accelerometry
Claude Godard, MDa, Melissa Román, BSb, María del Pilar Rodríguez BSb, Bárbara Leyton, Mga and Gabriela Salazar, MDa
a. Institute of
Universidad de Chile.
b. School of Nutrition and Dietetics. Universidad Santo Tomás. Viña del Mar, Chile.
E-mail: Claude Godard, MD: firstname.lastname@example.org
Conflict of interests: None.
Introduction. When compared to popular questionnaires, accelerometry provides more reliable
information regarding physical activity. Thus, the
objective has been to document the variability of
physical activity in Chilean children in relation
to age, gender, nutritional status and days of the
week, and to determine how many of them meet
the recommendation for moderate to vigorous
physical activity for more than an hour a day.
Population and methods. One hundred and nine (109) school children aged 4-10 (67 boys, 42 girls) wore an accelerometer for 2, 3 or 4 consecutive days. Of them, 30 were obese (BMI>95th percentile by age and gender). In each subject, levels of physical activity were expressed in counts per minute (cpm) and means (SD) of cpm/hour. Moderate to vigorous physical activity was defined by the daily sum of cpm>900.
Results. Daytime physical activity had a mean of 21,697 (662) cpm/hour with considerable variation from one child to another, and from one time of the day to another in the same child. Individual cpm/hour was significantly associated to moderate to vigorous physical activity (R = 0.954). Differences were found between girls and boys (p < 0.01) and between obese and non-obese children (p < 0.01). There were no differences between children <6 years and>9 years (p = 0.12). There was a slight difference between weekdays and weekends. Fifty-six (56) of 67 boys (83.6%) and 24 of 42 girls (57.1%) met the recommendation for moderate to vigorous physical activity for more than 60 minutes a day.
Conclusion. There is a physical activity defcit in Chilean school children under 10 years, particularly in girls and obese kids.
Key words: School children; Physical activity; Accelerometry; Obesity.
The amount of physical activity
is extremely variable from one child
to another. It depends on genetic factors, age, gender, weather conditions,
existing advocacy actions, as well as
the child's family social, cultural and
economic status, among other factors.
In the context of the increasing global
sedentary lifestyle of our time, children are less active than in past decades under normal living conditions.
This is important since childhood obesity has become a major health issue
among Chilean children and because
physical inactivity is a determinant of
In recent years, essentially in the US and Europe, studies analyzing children's physical activity have multiplied, whether conducted using:
a) indirect calorimetry or doubly labeled water measurement (considered as a standard, but less suitable for field studies, i.e., epidemiological studies); b) questionnaires and reminders; and, above all, c) motion sensors, specifically, accelerometers.3 All publications agree that men are more active than women and that obese people are less active than nonobese individuals.
In Chile, data were obtained essentially by questionnaires.4-6 In 2006, a simple questionnaire of habitual physical activity associated with a 0-10 score was validated in children aged 8-13, and it showed good concordance with the accelerometry.7 Another study, by Vasquez et al.,8 reported the accelerometric physical activity of obese children aged 3-5.
An accelerometer, an objective and non-reactive method that is relatively easy to use, allows quantifying movement at any time and detects different levels of physical activity, from sedentary to vigorous. Faced with a large number of international publications on physical activity in children using accelerometers, and the recommendation that children should spend at least an hour a day doing moderate to vigorous activities,9-11 we think it appropriate to continue measuring the physical activity of Chilean children with this practical technique well-tolerated by school children. A pilot project of the Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de Alimentos, INTA) of Chile on prevention of obesity in school children12 gave us the opportunity to study the physical activity of children aged 4-10 by accelerometry, with the objective of documenting its variability and the fulfillment of recommendations in this area.
POPULATION AND METHODS
Subjects of this study were chosen by convenience due to material limitations, as a subsample of 586 school children aged 4-10 who
participated in a pilot project of INTA. The latter,
published by Kain et al.12 and titled "Prevention
of obesity in preschoolers and school children of
public schools of a district in Santiago de Chile:
pilot project 2006," consisted of implementing a
long-term educational intervention for students
This study was approved by the INTA Ethics Committee and developed between April and July of 2006. The protocol was explained to the children's parents, who were asked to sign an informed consent.
Anthropometry: Weight and height were measured using a SECA 0.1 kg-0.1 cm precision scale to assess the body mass index (BMI). Obesity was defined by a BMI =95th percentile for age and gender, according to the reference of CDCNCHS 2002.
Protocol: On Thursday morning, after children had started their school day and together with an anthropometry, Actiwatch AW64 accelerometers were placed on children, who wore them with a semi-elastic belt on the right hip. The belts were removed the following Monday when children returned to class.
Accelerometry: The Actiwatch AW64 measures 27 x 25 x 9 mm and weighs 16.3 g. This miniaturized device consists of a piezoelectric translator and a microprocessor that transforms multidirectional accelerations into quantitative signals, which are recorded in the memory. The results are expressed in counts per minute (cpm). In order to consider a daytime activity log as valid, at least 7.5 h of data were required. Following the international recommendation,13 cpm periods equal to zero for more than 20 minutes were excluded, since the student could have taken off the belt. For the total days and for each separate day, the sum of cpm was divided by the number of hours recorded; this is how we obtained a mean "cpm/hour" value. A similar reduction of data has been employed by Page et al.14 and by Pate et al.15 to standardize very dissimilar accelerometer values in days and hours/day.
For each subject, the time used in different levels of intensity of physical activity was also estimated. The number of minutes a day with cpm>900 was rated as moderate to vigorous physical activity as classified by Puyau et al.,16 thus determining the number of subjects who had moderate to vigorous physical activity for 60 minutes or more a day.
For physical activity at night, we selected all the records that showed activity (cpm>25), for more than 60 minutes after 9.00 pm.
Statistics: Data were processed using the software Stata 11. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. We performed a Shapiro-Wilk test to verify data normality, and the differences were determined by the Student's t test and ANOVA using the post hoc test by Scheffe. For the association of quantitative data, we used Pearson's correlation and the ?2 test for qualitative data.
One hundred and twenty-eight boys and girls
aged 4-10 entered the study. Of them, 19 were excluded for having incomplete daily records (less
than 7.5 h), Actiwatch technical failures or dropout after one day. The remaining 109 cases were
analyzed, 38 had four days of recordings (from
Thursday to Sunday) and 26 had three days (from
Thursday to Saturday). There were 45 who had
only two valid days of accelerometry (different
days); however, their incorporation was accepted for analysis because the average daily hours
recorded and cpm/hour were not significantly
different from the cases with three or four days
The results of these 109 cases are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3 and in Figure 1. We found that the individual cpm/hour was closely associated to moderate to vigorous physical activity/day: R= 0.954 (Pearson).
Table 1. Accelerometric values of physical activity for 109 participants (mean, SD)
Table 2. Accelerometric values of physical activity: variation according to age (mean, SD)
Table 3. Accelerometric values of physical activity according to nutritional status (mean, SD)
Figure 1. Comparison of cpm/hour for weekdays (Thursday and Friday) with week-end days (Saturday and Sunday) in 15 girls and 23 boys (averages for two days)
Table 1 shows the mean cpm/hour values,
moderate to vigorous physical activity (minutes/day) and the number of subjects with =60 minutes/day of moderate to vigorous physical activity, with significant difference between boys and
girls. Individual daytime physical activities varied
considerably from one subject to another: the difference between the highest and the lowest value
obtained was of 42,017 cpm/hour.
As described in Table 2, age had no influence on physical activity, but a slight downward trend between the extreme categories "<6 years" and">9 years" was detected.
In Table 3, physical activity is classified according to nutritional status, with a significant difference in cpm/hour and moderate to vigorous physical activity (minutes/day) between children with a normal nutritional status and obese children. The 30 obese children were less active than the 63 with normal nutritional state.
In Figure 1 physical activity (cpm/hour) of Thursdays and Fridays is compared with that of Saturdays and Sundays, for the 38 children who recorded data on four consecutive days. We note that there is a great individual variability, with many girls and boys who decreased their physical activity over the weekend, while others increased it.
On average, physical activity decreased slightly, but significantly (p < 0.001) over the weekend: cpm/hour= 16,210 (8694) versus 22,249 (7743) during the week. However, there was certain correlation between weekdays and weekends, both in the total group (R= 0.64) as in the boys (R= 0.66), but much less in girls (R= 0.26).
For one to four days, 88 students (53 boys, 35 girls) went to bed after 10.00 pm; 52 of them did so after 11 pm, and 23, after midnight. Among them, we added a total of 184 "night" hours, for which physical activity was 17,072 (12,071) cpm/hour. Fridays and Saturdays were a little less active, but the difference with Thursdays and Sundays was not significant.
This study (one of the first in our subcontinent) showed that physical activity of school
children under 10 years has important variability
from one subject to another. The information obtained, which was objective and non-reactive, has
allowed us to appropriately determine whether
the children assessed met the recommendation for moderate to vigorous physical activity for more
than one hour a day. Additionally, contrary to the
questionnaires, accelerometry provided informa-tion on physical activity almost during the entire
The results of this study should be interpreted with caution, given the relatively small size of the sample. In recent years, studies on physical activity by accelerometry have been published with many more subjects, up to over a thousand children, such as in the study by Nyberg et al.17 However, other relevant studies have reported a number of cases similar to ours.14,18,19
Furthermore, we analyzed daily logs of physical activity for only two to four days, having established three days as initial pattern; however, cpm/hour values in two-day records were not significantly different from those collected for a larger number of days. According to Trost et al., at least seven days would be needed to appropriately estimate children's routine physical activity, but for children under 10, four days could be enough.13 Future studies of physical activity in our country will be possible with the use of motion sensors for 7 or more days, and exercising caution for the selection of subjects and families, while taking into account the difficulties presented by low-income families.
Of the initial sample of 128 participants, 19 were excluded, which represents 14.8%, a similar value to our previous study (17.2%).7 With prolonged accelerometry periods, these figures could be considerably higher, such as in the Van Coevering et al. publication, in the US,20 where dropouts up to 55% have been reported, and even with notable loss of sensors.
As expected, our results show that boys are more active than girls, and obese school children are less active than non-obese ones, confirming the numerous data of literature from around the world. Physical activity did not decline between ages 5 to 10, as has been recently reported in Swedish boys and girls, both during school days and on weekends.17 The difference between Chilean children and Swedish children of the same age (if confirmed by future studies) could be explained by different educational and cultural habits and traditions: in Chile there is more free outdoor play, less scheduled activities, perhaps even fewer school hours. Janssens11 has described how, from preschool age (as of 2 years) to adolescence (up to 16-18 years), the essentials of physical activity go progressively from free spontaneous activity, based on games and command of motor skills, to directed activity, scheduled by sports and studies.
This transition seems to take place later in Chilean children than in Swedish children. Furthermore, global levels of physical activity may rise between ages 3-8, as suggested by another report from Sweden,21 even though it may seem contrary to the above.
In the sample studied, there is globally little difference in physical activity between the week (school days as Thursday and Friday) and the weekend, but with great individual variations, both in girls and boys. In children under 10 years, studies have reported more physical activity over the weekend,18,22 less activity,17 or similar physical activity.19,23 These differences could be attributed to the special circumstances of recording (season, family customs, etc.). Tendency towards less physical activity on weekends actually becomes general after ages 10-11.17,22
Moreover, in these school children, we evidenced considerable physical activity in hours of the night, after 10 pm, although data is not conclusive since the details of the occupation of these night hours are unknown. However, it is possible to point out that the waking pattern of these school children differs from that of Northern European children, whose bedtime is stricter (around 9 pm).
Finally, accelerometry has allowed us to determine, with greater precision than questionnaires, the amount of children who spend, on average, more than 60 minutes a day doing moderate to vigorous physical activity.9-11 A significant number of school children achieved this goal: 73.4% in total, and even 83% in boys, percentages that are higher than those of older Chilean boys, which was only 62%.7 However, in comparison, 93% of Hispanic children of Texas and 85% of girls aged 4-8 spend more than 60 minutes a day doing moderate to vigorous physical activity, per the Anglo-Saxon recommendation for children and teenagers between ages 6 and 18.24
A study conducted in three European countries (Denmark, Estonia and Portugal) concluded that children who spend an average of 90 minutes a day doing moderate to vigorous physical activity have a lower cardiovascular risk (measured by a set of seven factors) and better health.25 Sixty minutes would not be enough according to these authors. However, the 90-minute goal may seem utopian and discouraging from a behavioral perspective, and the 60-minute goal seems more realistic and achievable in the current conditions.11
Currently, questionnaires are less reliable for assessing physical activity in children and adolescents, whatever the model or instrument. Several meta-analyses of studies on questionnaires, especially self-reports and approximate reports, have been published recently to seriously question their reliability.26-28 In our country, new studies are required for an objective assessment of physical activity, in children and adolescents of all ages, with accelerometry recordings over more days (that we believe feasible), with greater number of participants, including variables such as social-economic level, season and climate, and considering possible ongoing models of intervention. Such a study will allow appropriate comparisons with international data and recommendations for Chilean childhood.
Individual physical activity of Chilean school children under 10 years of age is extremely variable. Girls are less active than boys and obese children are less active than non-obese. Eightythree per cent of the students (but only 57% of girls) meet the recommendation for moderate to vigorous physical activity -the healthiest kind- for more than one hour a day.
To the children, their parents and school authorities for their valuable collaboration, to Medical Technologist Alyerina Anziani and Secretary Jacqueline Marchant for their technical help and to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for their logistic support. n
1. Burrows R, Díaz E, Sciaraffa V, Gattas V, et al. Hábitos de ingesta y actividad física en escolares, según tipo de establecimiento al que asisten. Rev Med Chile 2008;136:53-63.
2. Burrows R, Burgueño M, Gattas V, Barrera G, et al. Características biológicas, familiares y metabólicas de la obesidad infantojuvenil. Rev Med Chile 2001;129:1155-62.
3. Sirard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med 2001;31:439-54.
4. Kain J, Vio F, Leyton B, Cerda R, et al. Estrategia de promoción de la salud en escolares de educación básica municipalizada de la comuna de Casablanca, Chile. Rev Chil Nutr 2005;32:126-32.
5. Olivares S, Kain J, Lera L, Pizarro F, et al. Nutritional status, food consumption and physical activity among Chilean school children: a descriptive study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004;58:1278-85.
6. Olivares S, Bustos N, Lera L, Zelada ME. Estado nutricional, consumo de alimentos y actividad física en escolares mujeres de diferente nivel socioeconómico de Santiago de Chile. Rev Med Chile 2007;135:71-8.
7. Godard C, Rodríguez MP, Díaz N, Lera L, et al. Valor de un test clínico para evaluar actividad física en niños. Rev Med Chile 2008;136:1155-62.
8. Vásquez F, Salazar G, Andrade M, Vásquez L, et al. Energy balance and physical activity in obese children attending day-care centers. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:1115-21.
9. Biddle S, Sallis J, Cavill N. Health Education Authority. London: 1998.Pg.3-16.
10. Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, et al. Evidence-based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr 2005;146:732-7.
11. Janssen I. Physical activity guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007;32:S109-S121.
12. Kain J, Concha F, Salazar G, Leyton B, et al. Prevención de obesidad en preescolares y escolares de escuelas municipales de una comuna de Santiago de Chile: proyecto piloto 2006. Arch Latinoam Nutr 2009;59:139-146.
13. Trost SG, Mciver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometerbased activity assessment in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37:S531-S543.
14. Page A, Cooper AR, Stamatakis E, Foster LJ, et al. Physical activity patterns in nonobese and obese children assessed using minute-by-minute accelerometry. Int J Obes 2005;29:1070-6.
15. Pate RR, Pfeiffer KA, Trost SG, Ziegler P, et al. Physical activity among children attending preschools. Pediatrics 2004;114:1258-63.
16. Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res 2002;10:150-7.
17. Nyberg G, Nordenfelt AM, Ekelund U, Marcus C. Physical activity patterns measured by accelerometry in 6- to 10-year-old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:1842-8.
18. Metcalf BS, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ. Accelerometers identify inactive and potentially obese children (EarlyBird 3). Arch Dis Child 2002;87:166-7.
19. Trayers T, Cooper AR, Riddoch CJ, Ness AR, et al. Do children from an inner city British school meet the recommended levels of physical activity? Results from a crosssectional survey using objective measurements of physical activity. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:175-6.
20. Van Coevering P, Harnack L, Schmitz K, Fulton JE, et al. Feasability of using accelerometers to measure physical activity in young adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37:867-71.
21. Dencker M, Andersen NB. Health-related aspects of objectively measured daily physical activity in children. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2008;28:133-44.
22. Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF. Using objective physical activity measure with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:426-31.
23. Treuth MS, Hou N, Young Dr, Maynard LM. Accelerometry-measured activity or sedentary time and overweight in rural boys and girls. Obes Res 2005;13:1606-14.
24. Butte NF, Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA et al. Physical activity in nonoverweight and overweight Hispanic children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1257-66.
25. Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, Froberg K, et al. Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Lancet 2006;368:299-304.
26. Ekelund U, Tomkinson G, Amstrong N. What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurements issues, levels and recent time trends. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:859-65.
27. Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, Van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, et al. Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med 2010;40:539-63.
28. Farias Junior JC, Lopes Ada S, Florindo AA, Hallal PC. Validity and reliability of self-report instruments for measuring physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review. Cad Saude Publica 2010;26:1669-91
1. Lai CK, Beasley R, Crane J, Foliaki S, et al. Global variation in the prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms: phase three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Thorax 2009;64(6):476-83. [ Links ]
2. NAEPP3 Science base committee. Expert panel report 3 (EPR-3): guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma-summary report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;120(suppl):S94-S138. [ Links ]
3. Comité Nacional de Neumonología Pediátrica. Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría. Consenso Nacional Asma Bronquial en la Infancia: Criterios de diagnóstico y tratamiento 2007. (2ª parte). Arch Argent Pediatr 2008;106(2):162-175. [ Links ]
4. British Guidelines on the Management of Asthma. British Thoracic Society. [Acceso: 28 de mayo de 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/published/numlist.html. [ Links ]
5. De Benedictis F, Bush A. Corticosteroids in Respiratory Diseases in Children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185:12-23. [ Links ]
6. Rabe K, Adachi M, Lai C. Worldwide severity and control of asthma in children and adults: The global asthma insights and reality surveys. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004,114:40-7. [ Links ]
7. Neffen H, Fritscher C, Schacht F, Levy G, et al and the AIRLA Survey Group: Asthma control in Latin America: the asthma insights and reality in Latin America (AIRLA) survey. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2005;17:191-197. [ Links ]
8. The ENFUMOSA cross sectional European Multicenter Study of the Clinical Phenotype of Chronic Severe Asthma. European Network for Understanding Mechanisms of Severe Asthma. Eur Respir J 2003;22:470-7. [ Links ]
9. Brandão HV, Cruz CS, Guimarães A, Camargos PAM, Cruz AA. Predictors of hospital admission due to asthma in children and adolescents enrolled in an asthma control program. J Bras Pneumol 2010;36(6):700-6. [ Links ]
10. Brandão HV, Cruz CMS, Santos Junior IS, Ponte EV, et al. Hospitalizations for asthma: impact of a program for the control of asthma and allergic rhinitis in Feira de Santana, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol 2009;35(8):723-9. [ Links ]
11. Coffman J, Cabana MD, Halpin HA, Yelin EH. Effects of asthma education on children's use of acute care services: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2008;121:575. [ Links ]
12. Global Initiative for Asthma, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. [Acceso: 28 de mayo de 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.ginasthma.org. [ Links ]
13. Smith DH, Malone DC, Lawson KA, Okamoto LJ, et al. A national estimate of the economic costs of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156(3 Pt 1):787-93. [ Links ]
14. Adams RJ, Smith BJ, Ruffn RE. Factors associated with hospital admissions and repeat emergency department visits for adults with asthma. Thorax 2000;55(7):566-73. [ Links ]
15. Bousquet J, Gaugris S, Kocevar VS, Zhang Q, et al. Increased risk of asthma attacks and emergency visits among asthma patients with allergic rhinitis: a subgroup analysis of the improving asthma control trial. Clin Exp Allergy 2006;36(2):249. [ Links ]
16. Louis R, Lau LC, Bron AO, Roldaan AC, et al. The relationship between airways infammation and asthma severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161(1):9-16. [ Links ]
17. Brandão HV, Cruz CS, Pinheiro MC, Costa EA, et al. Risk factors for ER visits due to asthma exacerbations in patients enrolled in a program for the control of asthma and allergic rhinitis in Feira de Santana, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol 2009;35(12):1168-73. [ Links ]
18. Ponte E, Franco RA, Souza-Machado A, Souza-Machado C, Cruz AA. Impact that a program to control severe asthma has on the use of Unifed Health System resources in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol 2007;33(1):15-19. [ Links ]
19. Sin DD, Tu JV. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy reduces the risk of rehospitalization and all-cause mortality in elderly asthmatics. Eur Respir J 2001;17(3):380-5. [ Links ]
20. Cabral AL, Carvalho WA, Chinen M, Barbiroto RM, et al. Are International asthma guidelines effective for low-income Brazilian children with asthma? Eur Respir J 1998;12(1):35-40. [ Links ]
21. Chandler M, Grammer LC, Patterson R. Noncompliance and prevarication in life threatening adolescent asthma. N Engl Reg Allergy Proc 1986;7:367-70. [ Links ]
22. Teach SJ, Crain EF, Quint DM, Hylan ML, Joseph JG. Improved asthma outcomes in a high-morbidity pediatric population: results of an emergency departmentbased randomized clinical trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160(5):535-41. [ Links ]
23. Franco R, Santos AC, do Nascimento HF, Souza-Machado C, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a state funded program for control of severe asthma. BMC Public Health 2007;7:82. [ Links ]