ORIGINAL ARTICLE

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2016.08.006

Presence of environmental coagulase-positive staphylococci, their clonal relationship, resistance factors and ability to form biofilm

Presencia de estafilococos coagulasa positiva ambientales, su relación clonal, factores de resistencia y habilidad para formar biopelícula

 

Norma Velázquez-Guadarrama^a,*, Alma L. Olivares-Cervantes^a, Eva Salinas^b, Leticia Martínez^b, Magdalena Escorcia^c, Ricardo Oropeza^d, Irma Rosas^b,*

a. Laboratorio de Infectología, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, México, DF 06720, Mexico
b. Centro de Ciencias de la Atmosfera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF 04510, Mexico
c. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF 04510, Mexico
d. Instituto de Biotecnología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca Mor, Mexico

Received 11 December 2015; accepted 30 August 2016
Available online 23 December 2016

* Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: normave@himfg.edu.mx (N. Velázquez-Guadarrama), iarp@atmosfera.unam.mx (I. Rosas).

0325-7541/© 2016 Asociación Argentina de Microbiología. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 

---

Abstract

Coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) are opportunistic pathogens carrying various mechanisms of resistance that have a large number of virulence factors, and whose ability to induce illness is associated with the host. This study aimed to investigate the presence of environmental coagulase-positive staphylococci, their susceptibility profile, clonal relationship and ability to form biofilm. The 16S rRNA genes from CoPS isolates were analyzed, and their antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated using the agar dilution method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The clonal profile was obtained by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and biofilm formation was measured by a crystal violet retention assay. A total of 72 Staphylococcus spp. strains were isolated from air, metal surfaces, and nostrils from humans, dogs, cats, and birds. Three species were identified: Staphylococcus aureus (17%), Staphylococcus intermedius (63%), and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (21%). Ninety three percent (93%) of the strains were resistant to at least one of 13 tested antibiotics. S. pseudintermedius strains were the only resistant ones to methicillin while most of these isolates were multidrug-resistant, had significantly higher ability to form biofilm and PFGE grouped into seven different patterns, without showing clonal dispersion among animals and environmental isolates. This study suggests that dogs, cat, and air are environmental sources potentially carrying multidrug-resistant S. pseudintermedius, which survives in different environments through biofilm formation and multidrug resistance, characteristics that can be transmitted horizontally to other bacteria and exacerbate the problem of antibiotic resistance in humans.

Keywords

Multidrug-resistant; Biofilm; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; Coagulase-positive Staphylococci; Environmental.

Resumen

Los estafilococos coagulasa-positiva (CoPS) son patógenos oportunistas, portan varios mecanismos de resistencia, tienen un gran número de factores de virulencia y su capacidad para inducir la enfermedad está asociada con el hospedero. El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar la presencia de CoPS en el medio ambiente, su perfil de sensibilidad a los antibióticos, su relación clonal y su capacidad para formar biopelícula. De los aislamientos de CoPS se analizaron los genes 16S ARNr y se evaluó la sensibilidad a los antibióticos mediante el método de dilución en agar según el CLSI. El perfil clonal se obtuvo por electroforesis en gel de campo pulsado (PFGE) y la formación de biopelícula se analizó por retención de cristal violeta. Se aislaron 72 cepas de Staphylococcus spp. a partir de aire, superficies metálicas y narinas de humanos, perros, gatos y aves. Se identificaron tres especies: Staphylococcus aureus (17%), Staphylococcus intermedius (62%) y Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (21%). El 93% de las cepas fueron resistentes al menos a uno de 13 antibióticos probados. Los aislamientos de S. pseudintermedius fueron los únicos resistentes a meticilina y la mayoría fueron resistentes a múltiples fármcos, tuvieron una capacidad significativamente mayor para producir biopelícula y la PFGE los agrupó en 7 diferentes patrones, sin mostrar dispersión clonal entre los aislamientos de animales y de medio ambiente. Este estudio sugiere que los perros, los gatos y el aire son fuentes ambientales potencialmente portadoras de S. pseudintermedius resistente a múltiples antibióticos. Este agente sobrevive en diferentes entornos en virtud de la formación de biopelículas y la resistencia a múltiples antibióticos, características que pueden transmitirse horizontalmente a otras bacterias y, por ende, exacerbar el problema de la resistencia a los antibióticos en humanos.

Palabras clave

Resistente a múltiples antibióticos; Biopelícula; Electroforesis en gel de campo pulsado; Estafilococos coagulasa-positiva; Ambiental.

---

 

Introduction

Staphylococci are catalase-positive Gram-positive cocci. The different species can be distinguished by their ability to ferment sugars and produce coagulase. Seven species of coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) have been identified: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus intermedius, Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans, Staphylococcus hyicus, Staphylococcus lutrae, Staphylococcus delphini and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius⁷. CoPS commonly colonize the skin and mucous membranes; furthermore, staphylococci have the ability to survive in almost any environment. CoPS are opportunistic pathogens; they have a large number of virulence factors, and their ability to induce illness is usually associated with the host. CoPS carry various mechanisms of resistance. Particularly, S. aureus became methicillin-resistant by acquiring a genomic island of resistance known as chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec I-VII), and is a variable genetic element. The island is present constitutively in the orfX gene, and depending on the type, has a specific recombinase ccr, which allows to carry other resistance genes harbored in small plasmids or transposons¹².

The epidemiology of staphylococci has changed in recent years, as they can cause nosocomial and community infections, and the importance of S. aureus has increased because it can cause many pathological conditions ranging from simple skin infections to invasive processes such as pneumonia and osteomyelitis. Moreover, Staphylococcus epidermidis is considered a harmless commensal bacterium of the human skin, even an accidental pathogen¹⁶. However, at present, this bacterium is recognized as an important human pathogen and is one of the main causes associated with medical devices such as peripheral or central intravenous catheter-related infections. It also causes keratitis and endophthalmitis, contamination of contact lenses, urinary catheter infections, bacteremia, mediastinitis and other infections. Both species are reported to have high rates of resistance to methicillin, and there is an increasing number of reports on their reduced susceptibility to vancomycin^5,20,21.

It is known that staphylococcal species exhibit host specificity, and the species of clinical CoPS specimens differ from those isolated from animals, which also differ among host species. For example, the predominant species in ruminants, pigs, dogs and pigeons are S. aureus, S. hyicus, S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius respectively^6,23. However, recent studies consider S. pseudintermedius as an emerging zoonotic agent^17,29.

Although there is great clonal variability among staphylococci, it is not understood why some Staphylococcus clones have greater dissemination or why some species are more prevalent than others. In addition, many of these disseminated species that are distributed throughout the world may even replace native clones, although only some of the disseminated species have been reported to cause infection. In the U.S.A., it has been observed that the USA300 and USA400 clones belonging to sequences ST8 and ST1, respectively, cause most community-acquired S. aureus infections, and the USA100 clone of S. aureus is disseminated in hospital environments²⁶. In addition, pseudintermedius can be spread in humans and their pets. In 2006, the first case of infection by this microorganism in humans was reported²⁷, and from 2010 to 2012, S. pseudintermedius was responsible for causing an outbreak in a veterinary hospital for dogs and cats of difficult control^28,29. Furthermore, the spread of clones ST71 in Europe and ST68 in America has been observed among pets^8,24.

This study aimed to investigate the presence of environmental coagulase-positive staphylococci as carriers of resistance factors, their clonal relationship and ability to form biofilm.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

Airborne bacteria were collected from 10 different areas of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital (Mexico city, D.F. Mexico) using a two-stage Andersen sampler (Graseby Andersen, Atlanta, GA), with a constant air flow rate of 28 l/min for 15 min. Samplers were loaded onto Petri dishes containing blood agar and trypticase soy agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). A total of 10 surface samples from stainless steel tables within 5 cm² areas were collected using a swab technique. The animal samples were taken from the nostrils (from 20 dogs, 13 cats and 16 birds), were collected using a swab technique and cultured on the same media; 10 human nasal exudate samples were also collected. All the agar plates were incubated for 24-48 h at 37 °C. Typical colonies of staphylococci were transferred onto mannitol salt agar selective medium (Difco Laboratories). The coagulase test was performed with rabbit plasma on mannitol-positive organisms. Bacterial strains (coagulase- and mannitol-positive) were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing.

Human, animal, air and surface samples were collected at the same time and from the same space. (Site: hospital for dogs, cats and birds.)

PCR amplification of 16S rDNA genes

Partial 16S rDNA gene sequences were amplified by PCR using universal primers 27F and 1492R. Primer 27F was 5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′, and primer 1429R was 5′-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′. The PCR reaction mixture included 2 µl of bacterial DNA, 35.4 µl of ddH₂O, 5 µl of 10× buffer, 1.5 µl of MgCl₂ (1.5 mM), 1 µl of dNTPs (10 mM), 0.1 µl of Taq (20 µl), and 2.5 µl each primer (10 µmol) in a final reaction volume of 50 µl. Amplifications were performed as follows: 94 °C for 1 min; 94 °C for 1 min, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min 30 s (35 cycles); 72 °C for 5 min; and then a hold at 4 °C. PCR products were examined for size and yield using 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels in TAE buffer. After successful amplification, the obtained products were sequenced using a PRISM 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystem Inc.).

Sequence analysis

DNA sequences were edited and assembled using the SeqMan and Edit Seq programs (DNA Star, Laser Gene 6, USA). Sequence similarity analysis was performed using the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated Staphylococcus strains was tested using Vitek I GPS-119 cards (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC). Resistance was verified by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), employing the agar dilution method as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI 2014)⁴. The antibiotics used were: penicillin-G (MP Biomedicals), oxacillin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), Ampicillin (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH), clindamycin (Sigma-Aldrich), erythromycin (MP Biomedical), gentamicin (MP Biomedicals), levofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich), moxifloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich), tetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich), trimethropim (MP Biomedicals), sulfametoxazole (MP Biomedicals), and vancomycin (MP biomedical). S. aureus reference strain ATCC® 29213 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was used. Isolates exhibiting oxacillin resistance were also confirmed by the presence of the mecA gene using previously described primers and terms³⁰.

Assay for biofilm formation

Quantification of biofilm formation was performed using 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (Costar flat-bottom plates with lids) in accordance with Stepanovic's method with slight modification²⁵. Briefly, bacterial cells were grown overnight in TSB, either from a single colony grown on TSB agar or from a glycerol stock kept at −70 °C. Cells were diluted 1:100 in 200 µl of TSB or TSB + glucose (1%). Each bacterial strain was assayed in four replicate wells. Microtiter plates were incubated at 37 °C. After 24 h of incubation, total cell growth was measured based on optical density (OD) at 570 nm using a Bio-Tek Elx808 microplate reader with the Kc4 software. Planktonic cells were discarded, and the plate was treated with 200 µl volumes of the following reagents: after rinsing three times with PBS 1×, the remaining biofilm was fixed with methanol (100%), stained with crystal violet (2%), and rinsed with water three times. The dye was then solubilized with acetic acid (33%). Finally, the OD_570nm was determined using a microplate reader. The amount of biofilm formed is reported as the ratio of OD_570nm/OD_620nm values, which corresponds to a simplified expression of the ratio used in previous studies¹⁵.

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE analysis was performed for the S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius isolates. The procedures and buffers used for the preparation of chromosomal DNA, macro-restriction of DNA, and PFGE were modified from an earlier report¹⁴. Briefly: digestion was performed in a volume of 200 µl with 1× enzyme buffer and 25 U SmaI were incubated at 25 °C overnight. A 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel was prepared in 0.5× TBE buffer (AMRESCO, Solon, OH). PFGE was performed using a multistate program and a CHEF Mapper system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The running parameters were as follows: 200 V (6 V/cm); temperature 14 °C; block one: initial switch 2 s, final switch 7 s, 10 h duration; block two: initial switch 8 s, final switch 45 s for 14 h. After the electrophoresis run was completed, the gel was stained in a 1.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide solution (AMRESCO X328, 10 mg/ml; Amresco, Inc., Solon, OH) for 20 min in a covered container and destained in fresh distilled water for 45 min. A Lambda DNA (New England Biolabs) was used as a molecular size standard.

Statistical analysis

The Statistics Package for the Social Sciences program (SPSS, version 10) was used for the parametric Student's t-test. Categorical variables were described as percentages, and median, minimum and maximum values were used for continuous quantitative variables.

PFGE data analysis was performed by considering the presence or absence of specific bands to obtain an estimate of similarity for each pair of isolates. Gel fingerprint patterns were analyzed using BioNumerics version 6.0 (Applied Maths). After background subtraction and gel normalization, fingerprint patterns were subjected to typing based on banding similarity and dissimilarity using the Dice similarity coefficient and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering. The relationship was supported by the cophenetic correlation coefficient using Mantel and a bootstrap test with 10 000 randomizations²². Multivariate statistical methods were performed using the NTSYS-PC program (version 2.0; Exeter Software).¹³

Results

Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus spp.

A total of 72 CoPS strains were isolated and identified. All isolates were confirmed by sequencing the ITS identification 16S gene. Fifty (50) CoPS strains were isolated from 10 of 20 dogs; 3 CoPS were isolated from one cat; 6 CoPS were isolated from two birds; two CoPS were isolated from one human, and 8 and 3 CoPS were isolated from the air and surfaces, respectively. Table 1 shows the frequencies of the observed species; the predominant species were S. intermedius (45/72), S. pseudintermedius (15/72) and S. aureus (12/72). The obtained S. aureus strains were not isolated from dogs or cats, and there were no differences between isolates of S. aureus and S. pseudintermedius (12 and 15, respectively). Three different species of CoPS (S. pseudintermedius, S. aureus and S. intermedius) were isolated from the air. Only S. aureus was isolated from the human patient and from the surfaces.

Table 1 Frequency of coagulase-positive Staphylococci isolated from various sources in a veterinary school hospital in México

Antimicrobial susceptibility

The observed antimicrobial susceptibility patterns are presented in Table 2. A total of 92% (66/72) of the strains of staphylococci showed resistance to at least one antibiotic, and 30% were Staphylococcus resistant to three or more different antibiotic families (MDR). Resistance was observed to penicillin, erythromycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, tetracycline and levofloxacin (86, 47, 40, 40 and 39%, respectively). Only 14% (14/72) were resistant to oxacillin and they carried the mecA gene. S. intermedius was the most commonly isolated species and exhibited multidrug resistance in 16 cases, followed by S. pseudintermedius with 14 cases. None of the S. aureus isolates showed multidrug resistance, and it was the only species that was sensitive to all tested antibiotics in 4 of the 12 isolates. Figure 1 shows that the S. pseudintermedius species was resistant to most of the tested antibiotics, and all isolates showed resistance to ampicillin.

Table 2 Antibiotic resistance patterns among coagulase-positive Staphylococci isolated from various sources in a veterinary school hospital in México

Ampicillin (AMP), clindamycin (CLI), erythromycin (ERI), gentamicin (GEN), levofloxacin (LEV), moxifloxacin (MOX), oxacillin (OXA), penicillin-G (PEN), quinolone (QUI), tetracycline (TET), trimethroprim-sulfametoxazole (TMS).

Figure 1 Antibiotic resistance percentages among coagulase-positive Staphylococci isolated from various sources in a veterinary school hospital in México.

Assay for biofilm formation

Biofilm formation was assessed after a 24 h incubation period, and average OD_570nm values were obtained (Figure 2). All of the strains in this study (CoPS) formed a biofilm (OD_570nm <0.120 is considered not adherent, >0.240 is considered strongly adherent, and >0.120 to <0.2340 is considered adherent). E. coli strain BW25113 was used as a negative control. The S. pseudintermedius strains formed the greatest amount of biofilm and showed a statistically significant difference in biofilm-forming abilities compared with the other CoPS (S. intermedius and S. aureus). There was no statistically significant difference in biofilm-forming abilities among the S. intermedius and S. aureus isolates.

Figure 2 Biofilm assays of the S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius isolates when cultured from the post-exponential growth phase. Interestingly, significant greater (p = 0.0001) biofilm formation was observed in S. pseudintermedius compared with S. intermedius. Student's t-test.

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

Figure 3 shows: (A) the clonal profile of S. pseudintermedius strains and (B) the clonal profile S. intermedius, the Dice similarity coefficient ranges were from 97.1 to 60.4% and 40.9 to 96.9% respectively. The banding patterns produced in S. pseudintermedius isolates from dogs and cats differed in four bands, meaning that there is a relationship between them. We observed that the antimicrobial susceptibility was also shared and only differed with respect to aminoglycoside (gentamicin). Two clusters with the same pattern of susceptibility were observed in S. intermedius isolates from the dog sample number 13. Finally, the PFGE patterns analyzed were grouped into 7 and 12 different patterns for S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius strains, respectively.

Figure 3 Dendrogram analysis of PFGE patterns of S. pseudintermedius (A) and S. intermedius (B). Clonal profile analysis was conducted using the Dice similarity coefficient in association with the UPGMA algorithm as the grouping method. Dendrogram was evaluated by obtaining the cophenetic correlation coefficient with the Mantel test, which yielded an r-value (CCCr). Bootstrap values are given at the node.

Discussion

Several studies have reported the circulation of CoPS between pets and their owners^9,27. S. aureus is the species having the greatest impact on human health; however, other CoPS species may have major impact, such as the S. intermedius group, including S. intermedius, S. pseudintermedius, and S. delphini, which are closely related⁷. Generally, S. intermedius was considered to be the predominant staphylococci in dogs; however, recent evidence has shown that all or most isolates from dogs and cats previously identified as S. intermedius are actually S. pseudintermedius¹. In this study, 16S rDNA gene sequencing was performed to identify and differentiate between species due to the problems arising from the use of conventional biochemical tests that have led to incorrectly reporting all isolates as S. aureus. Similar results were observed in a study in humans with dog bites, where S. pseudintermedius infections were incorrectly diagnosed as S. aureus³.

S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius are opportunistic pathogens reported in the skin of dogs and have also been occasionally reported in serious zoonotic infections in humans¹¹. Generally, pyoderma or skin infections are common elements in the medical practice in dogs and cats. In this work, S. pseudintermedius and S. intermedius were isolated from dogs, cats, birds and the air but not from humans. This demonstrates that S. intermedius and S. pseudintermedius are members of the normal flora of cats and dogs, which is the reason why these bacteria are commonly reported in a large number of clinical conditions in animals².

Throughout the world, there have been increasing reports of the emergence of bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics. In medical practice in humans, regulatory bodies have been set up regarding the use of antibiotics to control or reduce this problem. However, in agriculture and livestock, there are no regulations. The lack of regulation of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the veterinary clinic adds selection pressure on the normal flora bacteria, and allows them to become resistant to multiple antibiotics. The results obtained in this study confirmed the aforementioned findings: it was observed that different strains identified as S. pseudintermedius were resistant to multiple antibiotics in 90% of the study population. By contrast, S. aureus isolates were sensitive to multiple antibiotics in more than 90% of the study population. Surprisingly, strains of S. pseudintermedius showed 100% sensitivity to tetracycline, and S. aureus was 58% resistant to penicillin. In one study, S. pseudintermedius isolated from various diseases in cats showed greater than 90% resistance to the tested antibiotics, including tetracycline¹⁰. Additionally, the clonal profile analysis by PFGE is discriminative and very sensitive to the existing microvariation in a collection of strains; meanwhile, the type sequences are designed for tracking clones or clonal lines of bacterial populations. Data reported by Vigo et al., 2015²⁸, showed the great variability of a collection of strains of S. pseudintermedius isolated from infectious processes in dogs. They observed 27 different clonal types from 28 isolates. For our part, we noted that each animal or surface analyzed has its own clone of S. pseudintermedius or S. intermedius, and the same animal could be colonized by different clones. We also observed similarity coefficients over 80%, between cat and dog or cat and surface, presupposing a relationship between them. However, a limitation of this work is not knowing the type sequence of our strains, which would compare with those reported in other parts of the world. An example of this, is the work by Perreten et al., 2010^10,18, who reported two geographically distant scattered clones of S. pseudintermedius: clone ST71-J-t02-II-III in Europe and clone ST68-C-t06-V in North America. Both clones were isolated from various clinical conditions, including healthy animals. The ST71 clone was reported as a high biofilm producer and multidrug-resistant^9,17, features also shown by our S. pseudintemedius strains.

These characteristics are relevant and not present in the S. intermedius strains in this work. Biofilm formation is a very important virulence factor and it is a highly variable feature among Staphylococcus species. However, biofilm formation ability has not been fully characterized in S. pseudintermedius. Studies performed by Zhou et al., 2013³¹ and Pinheiro et al., 2014¹⁹ showed an association between biofilm and the presence of the mecA gene and the icaADBC operon and our strains of S. pseudintemedius were the only ones where the mecA gene was identified. In addition, multidrug resistance is also associated with biofilm, because it has been recognized that antibiotics have limited diffusion in it, acting only on the bacterial surface, and further, antibiotics can react with other components of the biofilm matrix.

The main objective of this study was to identify possible sources of environmental contamination by opportunistic pathogenic bacteria in humans or their pets. It is also necessary to consider that multidrug-resistant microorganisms, such as S. pseudintermedius, survive in different environments through biofilm formation and multidrug resistance, characteristics that can be transmitted horizontally to other bacteria and exacerbate the problem of antibiotic resistance in humans.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Authors' contributions

ES, LM, ME participated in the study design, conducted the processing and analysis of samples in the laboratory, analyzed the data, and helped to draft the manuscript. ALO, RO contributed to manuscript writing. NVG and IR contributed to the conceptualization of the study and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Juan Carlos Vigueras Galindo for review of the manuscript. This work was supported by Federal Resources (HIM/2013/009 SSA 1081) from SSA.

References

1. Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA, van den Broek AH, Thoday KL, Fitzgerald JR. Comparative genomics of the Staphylococcus intermedius group of animal pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:1-15.         [ Links ]

2. Biberstein EL, Jang SS, Hirsh DC. Species distribution of coagulase-positive staphylococci in animals. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19:610-5.         [ Links ]

3. Börjesson S, Gómez-Sanz E, Ekström K, Torres C, Grönlund U. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius can be misdiagnosed as Staphylococcus aureus in humans with dog bite wounds. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:839-44.         [ Links ]

4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for susceptibility testing, 24th informational supplement, vol. 34(1). Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2014.         [ Links ]

5. Errecalde L, Cerjana P, Gagetti P, Erbin M, Duarte A, Rolon M, Cuatz D, Corso A, Kaufman S. First isolation in Argentina of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin and non-susceptibility to daptomycin. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2013;45:99-103.         [ Links ]

6. Fitzgerald JR, Penades JR. Staphylococci of animals. In: Lindsay JA, editor. Staphylococcus: molecular genetics. Norfolk, United Kingdom: Caister Academic Press; 2008. p. 255-69.         [ Links ]

7. Freney J, Kloos WE, Hajek V, Webster JA. Recommended minimal standards for description of new Staphylococcal species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49:489-502.         [ Links ]

8. Grönthal T, Moodley A, Nykäsenoja S, Junnila J, Guardabassi L, Thomson K, Rantala M. Large outbreak caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71 in a Finnish Veterinary Teaching Hospital - from outbreak control to outbreak prevention. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e110084.         [ Links ]

9. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS. Coagulase positive staphylococcal colonization of humans and their household pets. Can Vet J. 2009;50:954-8.         [ Links ]

10. Kadlec K, Schwarz S, Perreten V, Andersson UG, Finn M, Greko C, Moodley A, Kania SA, Frank LA, Bemis DA, Franco A, Iurescia M, Battisti A, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, van Duijkeren E, Weese JS, Fitzgerald JR, Rossano A, Guardabassi LL. Molecular analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius of feline origin from different European countries and North America. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1826-8.         [ Links ]

11. Kelesidis T, Tsiodras S. Staphylococcus intermedius is not only a zoonotic pathogen, but may also cause skin abscesses in humans after exposure to saliva. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14: 838-41.         [ Links ]

12. Lindsay JA. Genomic variation and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:98-103.         [ Links ]

13. Manly BFJ. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. 2nd ed. CRC Press, LLC; 1997.         [ Links ]

14. McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5113-20.         [ Links ]

15. Niba ET, Naka Y, Nagase M, Mori H, Kitakawa M. Genome-wide approach to identify the genes involved in biofilm formation in E. coli. DNA Res. 2007;14:237-46.         [ Links ]

16. Otto M. Staphylococcus epidermidis the 'accidental' pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:555-67.         [ Links ]

17. Paul NC, Moodley A, Ghibaudo G, Guardabassi L. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus in small animal veterinarians: indirect evidence of zoonotic transmission. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:533-9.         [ Links ]

18. Perreten V, Kadlec K, Schwarz S, Grönlund U, Finn M, Greko C, Moodley A, Kania SA, Frank LA, Bemis DA, Franco A, Iurescia M, Battisti A, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, van Duijkeren E, Weese JS, Fitzgerald JR, Rossano A, Guardabassi L. Clonal spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Europe and North America: an international multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1145-54.         [ Links ]

19. Pinheiro L, Brito CI, Pereira VC, Oliveira AD, Camargo CH, Cunha MD. Reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and biofilm formation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from blood cultures. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109: 871-8.         [ Links ]

20. Quitoco IM, Ramundo MS, Silva-Carvalho MC, Souza RR, Beltrame CO, de Oliveira TF, Araújo R, Del Peloso PF, Coelho LR, Figueiredo AM. First report in South America of companion animal colonization by the USA1100 clone of communityacquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ST30) and by the European clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (ST71). BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:1-7.         [ Links ]

21. Richter SS, Satola SW, Crispell EK, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Riahi F, Costello AJ, Diekema DJ, Doern GV. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus isolates with heterogeneous intermediate-level resistance to vancomycin in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:4203-7.         [ Links ]

22. Rohlf JF. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Appl Biostat. 2004. Exenter, New York.

23. Ruscher C, Lübke-Becker A, Semmler T, Wleklinski CG, Paasch A, Soba A, Stamm I, Kopp P, Wieler LH, Walther B. Widespread rapid emergence of a distinct methicillin- and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) genetic lineage in Europe. Vet Microbiol. 2010;144:340-6.         [ Links ]

24. Stegmann R, Burnens A, Maranta CA, Perreten V. Human infection associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;9:2047-8.         [ Links ]

25. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;40: 175-9.         [ Links ]

26. Tenover FC, Tickler IA, Goering RV, Kreiswirth BN, Mediavilla JR, Persing DH, MRSA Consortium. Characterization of nasal and blood culture isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients in United States Hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1324-30.         [ Links ]

27. Van Hoovels L, Van Hoovels L, Van keerberghen A, Boel A, Van Vaerenbergh K, De Beenhouwer H. First case of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius infection in a human. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:4609-12.         [ Links ]

28. Vigo GB, Giacoboni GI, Gagetti PS, Pasterán FG, Corso AC. Resistencia antimicrobiana y epidemiología molecular de aislamientos de Staphylococcus pseudintemedius de muestras clínicas de caninos. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2015;47: 206-11.         [ Links ]

29. Walther B, Hermes J, Cuny C, Wieler LH, Vincze S, Abou Elnaga Y, Stamm I, Kopp PA, Kohn B, Witte W, Jansen A, Conraths FJ, Semmler T, Eckmanns T, Lübke-Becker A. Sharing more than friendship--nasal colonization with coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) and co-habitation aspects of dogs and their owners. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35197.         [ Links ]

30. Zang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of Staphylococcal Cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5026-33.         [ Links ]

31. Zhou S, Chao X, Fei M, Dai Y, Liu B. Analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis icaA and icaA genes by polymerase chain reaction and slime production: a case control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:242.         [ Links ]