SPECIAL ARTICLE

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2018.09.004

Yeast diversity in Vitis non-vinifera ecosystems

Diversidad de levaduras en ecosistemas de Vitis no-vinifera

 

María Laura Raymond Eder^a, Alberto Luis Rosa^a,*

^a Laboratorio de Genética y Biología Molecular, IRNASUS-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

Received 19 January 2018; accepted 19 September 2018
Available online 9 January 2019

*Corresponding author.

E-mail address: alrosa@ucc.edu.ar (A.L. Rosa).

0325-7541/© 2018 Asociación Argentina de Microbiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 

---

Abstract The surface of grapes lodges a complex community of yeast species responsible for spontaneous alcoholic fermentation. The study of indigenous Saccharomyces and "non-Saccharomyces" yeasts during grape must fermentation constitutes a major research area in microbial enology. Although there are detailed studies on the microbiota of Vitis vinifera grapes, little is known about the diversity of yeast communities present in non-vinifera Vitis ecosystems (i.e., grapes and spontaneously fermenting grape musts). Potentially scientific and/or enological valuable yeast strains from these non-vinifera Vitis ecosystems might never be isolated from V. vinifera L. In this updated review, we summarize relevant aspects of the microbial studies conducted on V. non-vinifera grapes and spontaneously fermenting grape musts.

KEYWORDS

Yeast; Sdcchammyces; Grapes; Must; L. V. vinifera L.; V. labrusca L.

Resumen La superficie de las uvas aloja una comunidad compleja de especies de levaduras responsables de la fermentación alcohólica espontánea. El estudio de estas levaduras Saccharomyces y «no-Saccharomyces» durante la fermentación del mosto de uvas constituye un área relevante de investigación microbiológica en enología. Si bien existen estudios detallados de la microbiota de uvas de Vitis vinifera L., poco se sabe sobre la diversidad de comunidades de levaduras presentes en ecosistemas de Vitis no-vinifera (i.e., uvas y mostos en fermentación espontánea). Cepas de levaduras presentes en ecosistemas de Vitis no-vinífera, con valor potencial científico y/o enológico, podrían no estar presentes en V. vinifera L. En esta revisión actualizada, resumimos los aspectos relevantes de los estudios microbiológicos efectuados en mostos en fermentación espontánea de uvas de V. no-vinifera.

PALABRAS CLAVE

Levaduras; Sdcchammyces; Uvas; Mostos; V. vinifera L.; V. labmsca L.

---

 

Introduction

Microbial communities present during grape must fermentation largely contribute to the sensory and organoleptic characteristics of wines⁴¹⁶. Even in regular sulfur dioxide-treated must (i.e., used to limit and/or kill the endogenous microbiota and as a protective antioxidant agent), the inoculated yeast starters coexist during fermentation with surviving indigenous non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeast, fungi and bacteria species¹⁹, shaping the final sensory and organoleptic profile of the produced beverages. In the case of spontaneous fermentation (i.e., non-sulfited or mild sulfited musts), a challenging and risky winemaking process with potentially unpredictable outputs, the entire indigenous microbial community present in the must conducts the alcoholic fermentation^11,19,29. Due to its scientific and industrial importance, the study of indigenous microbial communities in grapes and spontaneously fermenting musts is a major research area in enology^19,29,42,43. Thus, different culture-dependent and/or metagenomic approaches, as well as DNA-based strategies, have been used to isolate and identify the complexity and population dynamics of microorganisms in enological ecosystems^5,26,27.

Indigenous yeast diversity in V. non-vinifera ecosystems

Most of the studies on the microbiota of grapes and fermenting grape musts involve Vitis vinifera ecosystems^3,12,29,39. Some of these studies suggest that the grape varieties themselves condition the microbial population structure during spontaneous fermentation^{8,13,24,36,39}. Supporting this idea, vineyards cultivating different grape varieties appear to harbor more diverse Saccharomyces cerevisiae and nonSaccharomyces strains than vineyards cultivating only one grape variety^13,36. In addition, it has been observed that particular yeast species show preferences for certain grape varieties (e.g., red or reddish basidiomycetes predominate in white grapes, while equal amounts of ascomycetes and basidiomycetes were observed on red grapes)³². Thus, specific structural and/or general physicochemical grape varietal factors appear to influence the structure and fitness of certain yeast microbiota²⁴. Apparent specific associations between different Vitis and yeast species have recently been recognized³⁴ (see below).

Non-Saccharomyces are the predominant yeasts isolated at the early stages of the spontaneous fermentation of V. vinifera grape musts^12,19,29, with the most important genera being Hanseniaspora, Candida, Pichia and Metschnikowia^19,42. By mid-fermentation, the population of non-Saccharomyces species decreases and the wine yeast S. cerevisiae completes the fermentation process¹. A similar pattern of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeast species succession was evidenced during the fermentation of V. non-vinifera grapes^4,6,34. Baffi et al.⁴ identified Hanseniaspora uvarum as the most frequent nonSaccharomyces yeast species in the Isabel and Bordeaux varietals of Vitis labrusca grapes and must. Additionally, Issatchenkia occidentalis was the second and Issatchenkia orientalis the third most frequent yeast species isolated from Bordeaux grapes and Bordeaux/Isabel grapes and musts at all stages, respectively⁴. In a later study using Isabel and Bordeaux grapes from the same region⁶, H. uvarum was also a dominant yeast species, both on V. non-vinifera grape surfaces and at the initial stages of spontaneous fermentation. Pichia kluyveri was found at the beginning of fermentation while I. orientalis was isolated at the final stages of fermentation⁶. In both studies, S. cerevisiae was the most frequent yeast species during the middle and final phases of spontaneous fermentation^4,6.

Important differences have been identified in the diversity and identity of non-Saccharomyces species isolated in V. vinifera and V. non-vinifera ecosystems. For example, two independent studies on the V. non-vinifera grape varieties Isabel and Bordeaux (V. labrusca), found a higher yeast diversity in the Bordeaux grapes than the Isabel grapes, suggesting that yeast diversity might be characteristic of each grape variety^4,6. Similar yeast diversity was evidenced in the study of Danish grape varieties²². The hybrid variety 'Leon Millot' (V. vinifera and V. riparia x Vitis rupestris) reveals the same, or even higher, yeast diversity compared to the interspecific varieties (back crossings to V. vinifera) Rondo and Zalas Perle²².

Using a standard culture-dependent strategy, the population of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeast species was recently studied on Isabella (V. labrusca L.) fermenting grape must in Argentina (i.e., vintage of year 201 5)³⁴. The dynamics of the yeast population during spontaneous fermentation of Isabella proved to be similar to that described for V. vinifera. Starmerella bacillaris, however, was the main yeast species at the early stages of spontaneous fermentation of Isabella must, dramatically decreasing its contribution in the middle and late stages of the process³⁴. This dominance of S. bacillaris in the same ecosystem, however, was not observed in fermenting Isabella grapes from vintage of year 2017³³. Additionally, rare non-Saccharomyces yeast species were also recognized in Isabella must at the and V. labrusca vineyards from the Azores islands (Portugal) and C. Caroya (Córdoba, Argentina). (A, B, C) Relative contribution of non-Saccharomyces yeast species representing more than 1% of the isolates from spontaneously fermenting V. labrusca grape must from C. Caroya³⁴ (A) and grapes from V. labrusca (B) and V. vinifera (C) from the Azores islands^14,15. Numbers in parentheses indicate percentages. (D) Total number of non-Saccharomyces species identified on V. vinifera (blue bars) and V. labrusca (brown bars) grapes from the Azores islands (1710 and 3150 isolates, respectively) (data obtained from Refs. 14 and 15 and spontaneously fermenting grape musts from C. Caroya (40 and 100 isolates, respectively) (data obtained from Refs. 34 and 33). Non-Saccharomyces species are: Ca (Candida azymoides), Cap (Candida apicola), Cb (Candida bentonensis), Cc (Candida californica), Ccar (Candida carpophila), Cd (Candida diversa), Ho (Hanseniaspora opuntiae), Hu (Hanseniaspora uvarum), Hv (Hanseniaspora vineae), Ih (Issatchenkia hanoiensis), Lt (Lachancea thermotolerans), Mp (Metschnikowia pulcherrima), Pc (Pichia cecembensis), Pk (Pichia kluyveri), Pt (Pichia terricola), Sb (Starmerella bacillaris), Sv (Saccharomycopsis vini), Td (Torulaspora delbrueckii) and Zm (Zygoascus meyereae).

initial stages of fermentation, including Candida azymoides, Pichia cecembensis, Candida californica, Candida bentonensis, Issatchenkia hanoiensis and Candida apicola (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, some yeast genera commonly isolated from V vinifera L. grapes and musts¹⁹ (e.g., Hanseniaspora, Torulaspora and Metschnikowia) were rarely identified and almost never dominated the yeast flora in the V. labrusca L. must analyzed³⁴. These observations reinforce the research interest in biodiversity and extraordinary wine yeasts in ecological niches alternative to traditional V. vinifera ecosystems³⁴.

Figure 1 Diversity of non-Saccharomyces species isolated from grapes and spontaneously fermenting grape must from V. vinifera

In the Azores Archipelago, different yeast microbiotas were identified on grapes harvested during vintages of years 2009 and 2010 from active versus abandoned V. labrusca vineyards¹⁴ (Fig. 1B) as well as on grapes from V. vinifera vineyards¹⁵ (Fig. 1C). In these studies, no apparent associations between grapevine and yeast species were found. Climatic conditions and geographic location seemed to be the underlying causes for the distribution of the predominant yeast species¹⁴. Interestingly, P. cecembensis and C. azymoides found on these V. labrusca grapes, two yeast species not previously recognized in either V. vinifera grapes or musts, were also found in the study on V. labrusca L. grapes in Argentina³⁴ (Fig. 1A). These observations strongly suggest that at least these two yeast species are associated with V labrusca L. grapes, regardless of their geographic origin and/or the associated human interventions. Moreover, in both locations I. hanoiensis, a yeast species rarely isolated in V. vinifera grapes, was also identified in V. labrusca grapes^14,34. These results suggest that C. azymoides and P cecembensis are preferentially associated with V. labrusca L. grapes and that specific Vitis-microbial interactions may underlie the assembly of specific grapevine yeast communities³⁴. The great diversity of nonSaccharomyces species recognized in the V. labrusca and V. vinifera ecosystems studied by Drumonde-Neves et al.^14,15 and Raymond Eder et al.³⁴ is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Microbial contributions to the sensory profiles of V. non-vinifera fermented beverages

V. non-vinifera species and their hybrids are popular in geographic areas where V. vinifera cannot develop properly^10,18,23,45. Among these, V. aestivalis, V. labrusca, V. riparia and V. rotundifolia are widely used to produce wine,

grape juice, table grapes and/or jam^{2,7,18,22,23,31} . Remarkable sensory differences have been observed between wines obtained using V. vinifera and V. non-vinifera grapes^7,41. Some V. non-vinifera fermented beverages are recognized as having disadvantages, including lower aroma complexity, high malic acid levels and/or increased amounts of some grape-derived vegetative odorants^7,23. Five grape-derived "vegetal, earthy, minty" families of compounds are uniquely linked to some V. non-vinifera (i.e., V. riparia and V. cinerea) wines: eugenol ("clove"-like aroma), 1,8-cineole (also known as eucalyptol), cis-3-hexenol ("leafy-grassy" aroma), IBMP and IPMP ("herbaceous" and "earthy" aromas)⁴¹. Grapes from several American grape cultivars from V. labrusca (e.g., Catawba, Concord, Delaware, Isabella, Niagara, as well as some hybrids such as Agawam, Alexander and Onaka) are referred to as "foxy grapes" due to their intense fruity and/or artificial grape aroma/flavor notes in their wines^30,41. The term "foxy" is used to describe a "unique, earthy and sweet muskiness" that can be perceived in these grapes. The presence of 2-aminoacetophenone and methyl anthranilate (Fig. 2A and B, respectively) is related to the perception of foxiness in V. labrusca grapes^2,7,41,43.

Figure 2 Chemical compounds in Vitis spp.2-aminoacetophenone (A) and methyl anthranilate (B) arerelated to the perception of foxiness in V. labrusca L. wines. Malvidin 3,5-diglucoside (C) is exclusive to wines from V. non-vinifera. The glucoside in position 5 is indicated with acircle.

In addition to these grape-derived compounds, specific yeast fermentation-derived products, such as volatile phenols, furans and esters, are responsible for some flavor differences between V. non-vinifera and V. vinifera wines^35,44. Some disadvantages of V. non-vinifera wines have partially been remedied using alternative yeast and/or bacterial starters^17,18,37,46. For example, an acidophilic I. orientalis strain, isolated from Korean Campbell Early grape pomace, has been shown to use malic acid efficiently as the sole carbon source³⁷. In mixed fermentations with S. cerevisiae W-3 (industrial wine yeast), this

I. orientalis strain efficiently degraded malic acid of Campbell Early grape must, without significantly influencing alcohol fermentation²⁰. Additionally, an improvement in wine color was observed in these fermented mixed cultures compared to grape musts fermented with S. cerevisiae alone²⁰ When the same I. orientalis yeast cells were immobilized on oriental oak charcoal and alginate, a 91.6% reduction of malic acid content was observed after 30 h treatment of Campbell Early wine¹⁷. In these treatments, however, a decrease in the color of the wine was observed¹⁷. Interestingly, the use of an indigenous H. uvarum strain starter, isolated from spontaneously fermenting Campbell Early grape musts, also improved the sensory profile of Campbell Early wine¹⁸. It has been shown that grapes from V. non-vinifera cultivars normally do not reach high total reducing sugar levels, leading to fermented beverages with lower levels of alcohol^18,35 than V. vinifera L. wines. Lower levels of ethanol (~1% v/v) observed at the end of fermentation of Isabella (V. labrusca) grape musts, compared to the expected values based on the initial concentrations of total reducing sugars, have repeatedly been observed^33,34.

In addition to alternative yeasts, dual starters of S. cerevisiae and Oenococcus oeni have been used to attempt to reduce the V. non-vinifera wine acidity of Campbell Early musts⁴⁷. Although the use of commercial O. oeni starters for malolactic fermentation did not result in a significant change of the organic acid profiles, improvements were found in the sensory characteristics of the wines (i.e., higher levels of volatile compounds and an increased synthesis of esters and higher alcohols)⁴⁷.

In a remarkable study, Son et al.³⁸ studied wines obtained with grapes from four different V. non-vinifera cultivars in Korea (i.e., Muscat Bailey A -V. labrusca-, Campbell Early -V. labrusca B.-, Kyoho -. labrusca L.- and Merou -V. coignetiae-). As the same starter (i.e., S. bayanus) and fermentation conditions were used, this study highlighted the specific characteristics of each of the V. non-vinifera grape varieties analyzed. L-proline was noticed as an important metabolite for grape variety differentiation³⁸, as it is relatively non-assimilable by yeast under anaerobic conditions⁴⁰. Anthocyanin profiles, among polyphenols, have also been used for grape varietal differentiation^9,21,25,35. In V. vinifera red cultivars, only cyanidin, delphinidin, petu-nidin, peonidin and malvidin 3-monoglucosides (Fig. 2C) occur along with the corresponding acetyl, β-coumaroyl and caffeoyl derivatives. In V. non-vinifera (i.e. V. labrusca, V. rotundifolia and their hybrid grapes), on the other hand, glycosylation of these compounds at both positions 3 and 5 is common²⁵ and the presence of malvidin diglucoside (malvidin-3,5-diglucoside) (Fig. 2C) allows recognition of V. non-vinifera-derived wines. Wines produced with grapes from some V. non-vinifera species may contain high levels of this diglucoside, with 15 mg/l being the maximum acceptable limit according to the international code of enological practices of the OIV (International Organization of Vine and Wine)²⁸.

Conclusions

Extensive research has been conducted on the microbiological communities present in V. vinifera L. enological ecosystems as well as the sensory and organoleptic properties of V. vinifera L. wines. The few studies conducted on non-vinifera Vitis ecosystems, however, have identified several chemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of these fermented beverages with potential interest in enology. Among these characteristics are a great diversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts which may carry fermentation assets of winemaking importance. The apparent specific associations observed between different yeasts and Vitis species suggest that some yeast strains may be exclusive to non-vinifera Vitis ecosystems. Physical and chemical determinants may favor specific biological interactions between different species of grapes and yeasts, allowing the assembly of specific grapevine microbiotas. In addition to the biological interest of the spontaneous assembly of microbial communities on fruits and plants, the enologi-cal microbial ecosystems of V non-vinifera may allow to recognize strains of yeasts or bacteria of interest in enology.

Funding

This work was supported by PICT-2014-313 from the FONCYT (Argentina) and SIV-2015 from the Catholic University of Córdoba. MLRE is supported by a fellowship from the Argentine National Research Council (CONICET) and ALR is a Principal Investigator of CONICET (Argentina).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Bravetti for help with Fig. 2 and J. Heywood for English editing.

References

1. Albergaría H, Arneborg N. Dominance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in alcoholic fermentation processes; role of physiological fitness and microbial interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:2035-46.         [ Links ]

2. Almanza-Merchán PJ, Reyes-M AJ, Ayala ML, Serrano-Cely PA, Balaguera LW. Sensory evaluation of the wine grape Isabella (Vitis labrusca L.) hand crafted. Rev Cien Agric. 2015;12:71 -81.         [ Links ]

3. Aponte M, Blaiotta G. Potential role of yeast strains isolated from grapes in the production of Taurasi DOCG. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:809.         [ Links ]

4. Baffi MA, dos Santos Bezerra C, Arévalo-Villena M, Briones-Pérez AI, Gomes E, Da Silva R. Isolation and molecular identification of wine yeasts from a Brazilian vineyard. Ann Microbiol. 2011;61:75-8.         [ Links ]

5. Barata A, Malfeito-Ferreira M, Loureiro V. The microbial ecology of wine grape berries. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;153:243-59.         [ Links ]

6. Bezerra-Bussoli C, Alves Baffi M, Gomes E, Da-Silva R. Yeast diversity isolated from grape musts during spontaneous fermentation from a Brazilian winery. Curr Microbiol. 2013;67:356-61.         [ Links ]

7. Biasoto ACT, Netto FM, Marques EJN, Azevedo Pereira da Silva MA. Acceptability and preference drivers of red wines produced from Vitis labrusca an hybrid grapes. Food Res Int. 2014;62:456-66.         [ Links ]

8. Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, Mills DA. Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:139-48.         [ Links ]

9. Burin BM, Ferreira-Lima NE, Panceri CP, Bordignon-Luiz MT. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Vitis vinifera and Vitis labrusca grapes: evaluation of different extraction methods. Microchem J. 2014;114:155-63.         [ Links ]

10. Camargo UA, Ritschel PS. New table and wine grape cultivars: world scenario with emphasis on Brazil. In: Proc IS Grape Prod Proce. 2008. p. 785.         [ Links ]

11. CapeceA, Granchi L, Guerrini S,Mangani S, Romaniello R, Vicen-zini M, Romano P. Diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from two Italian wine-producing regions. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1018.         [ Links ]

12. Combina M, Elia A, Mercado L, Catania C, Ganga A, Martinez C. Dynamics of indigenous yeast populations during spontaneous fermentation of wines from Mendoza, Argentina. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;99:237-43.         [ Links ]

13. Cordero-Bueso G, Arroyo T, Serrano A, Tello J, Aporta I, Velez MD, Valero E. Influence of the farming system and vine variety on yeast communities associated with grape berries. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;31:132-9.         [ Links ]

14. Drumonde-Neves J, Franco-Duarte R, Lima T, Schuller D, Pais C. Yeast biodiversity in vineyard environments is increased by human intervention. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160579.         [ Links ]

15. Drumonde-Neves J, Franco-Duarte R, Lima T, Schuller D, Pais C. Association between grape yeast communities and the vineyard ecosystems. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169883.         [ Links ]

16. Fleet GH. Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;86:11-22.         [ Links ]

17. Hong SK, Lee HJ, Park HJ, Hong YA, Rhee IK, Lee WH, Choi SW, Lee OS, Park HD. Degradation of malic acid in wine by immobilized Issatchenkia orientalis cells with oriental oak charcoal and alginate. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50:522-9.         [ Links ]

18. Hong YA, Park HD. Role of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Korean wines produced from Campbell Early grapes: potential use of Hanseniaspora uvarum as a starter culture. Food Microbiol. 2013;34:207-14.         [ Links ]

19. Jolly NP, Varela C, Pretorius IS. Not your ordinary yeast: nonSaccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered. FEMSYeast Res. 2013;14:215-37.         [ Links ]

20. Kim DH, Hong YA, Park HD. Co-fermentation of grape must by Issatchenkia orientalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduces the malic acid content in wine. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30:1633-8.         [ Links ]

21. Kosir IJ, Kidric J. Use of modern nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in wine analysis: determination of minor compounds. Anal Chem Acta. 2002;458:77-84.         [ Links ]

22. Lederer MA, Nielsen DS, Toldam-Andersen TB, Herrmann JV, Arneborg N. Yeast species associated with different wine grape varieties in Denmark. Acta Agric Scand. 2013;63:89-96.         [ Links ]

23. Lee SJ, Lee JE, Kim HW, Kim SS, Koh KH. Development of Korean red wines using Vitis labrusca varieties: instrumental and sensory characterization. Food Chem. 2006;94:385-93.         [ Links ]

24. Li SS, Cheng C, Li Z, Chen JY, Yan B, Han BZ, Reeves M. Yeast species associated with wine grapes in China. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;138:85-90.         [ Links ]

25. Li Y.Ma R, Xu Z, Wang J, Chen T, Chen F, Wang Z. Identification and quantification of anthocyanins in Kyoho grape juice-making pomace, Cabernet Sauvignon grape winemaking pomace and their fresh skin. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93: 1404-11.         [ Links ]

26. Masneuf-Pomarede I, Bely M, Marullo P, Albertin W. The genetics of non-conventional wine yeasts: current knowledge and future challenges. Front Microbiol. 2016;6:1563.         [ Links ]

27. Morgan HH, du Toit M, Setati ME. The grapevine and wine microbiome: insights from high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:820.         [ Links ]

28. OIV - The International Organisation of Vine and Wine. International Code of Oenological Practices; 2015. http://www.oiv. int/public/medias/3741/e-code-annex-maximum-acceptable-limits.pdf/ [accessed 19.08.17].

29. Padilla B, Gil JV, Manzanares P. Past and future of nonSaccharomyces yeasts: from spoilage microorganisms to biotechnological tools for improving wine aroma complexity. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:411.         [ Links ]

30. Panighel A, Dalla Vedova A, De Rosso M, Gardiman M, Flamini R. A solid-phase microextraction gas chromatog-raphy/ion trap tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of 'foxy smelling compounds' and 3-alkyl-2-methoxypyrazines in grape juice. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2010;24:2023-9.         [ Links ]

31. Ramirez-Castrillon M, Camargo Mendes SD, Valente P. South Brazilian wines: culturable yeasts associated to bottled wines produced in Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33:77.         [ Links ]

32. Raspor P, Mikli D, Polanc J, Smole S. Yeasts isolated from three varieties of grapes cultivated in different locations of the Dolenjska vine-growing region, Slovenia. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;109:97-102.         [ Links ]

33. Raymond Eder ML, Conti F, Rosa AL. Differences between indigenous yeast populations in spontaneously fermenting musts from V. vinifera L. and V. labrusca L. grapes harvested in the same geographic location. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1320.         [ Links ]

34. Raymond Eder ML, Reynoso C, Lauret SC, Rosa AL. Isolation and identification of the indigenous yeast population during spontaneous fermentation of Isabella (Vitis labrusca L.) grape must. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:532.         [ Links ]

35. Rockenbach II, Rodrigues E, Gonzaga LV, Caliari V, Genovese MI, de Souza Schmidt Goncalves AE, Fett R. Phenolic compounds content and antioxidant activity i pomac from selected red grapes (Vitis vinifera L. and Vitis labrusca L.) widely produced in Brazil. Food Chem. 2011;127:174-9.         [ Links ]

36. Schuller D, Cardoso F, Sousa S, Gomes P, Gomes AC, Santos MA, Casal M. Genetic diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from different grape varieties and winemaking regions. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e32507.         [ Links ]

37. Seo SH, Rhee CH, Park HD. Degradation of malic acid by Issatchenkia orientalis KMBL 5774, an acidophilic yeast strain isolated from Korean grape wine pomace. J Microbiol. 2007;45:521-7.         [ Links ]

38. Son HS, Hwang GS, Ahn HJ, Park WM, Lee CH, Hong YS. Characterization of wines from grape varieties through multivariate statistical analysis of 1H NMR spectroscopic data. Food Res Int. 2009;42:1483-91.         [ Links ]

39. Stefanini I, Albanese D, Cavazza A, Franciosi E, De Filippo C, Donati C, Cavalieri D. Dynamic changes in microbiota and myco-biota during spontaneous 'Vino Santo Trentino' fermentation. Microb Biotechnol. 2016;9:195-208.         [ Links ]

40. Stines AP, Grubb J, Gockowiak H, Henscheke PA, H0J PB, van Heeswijck R. Proline and arginine accumulation in developing berries of Vitis vinifera L. in Australian vineyards: influence of vine cultivar, berry maturity and tissue type. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2000;6:150-8.         [ Links ]

41. Sun Q, Gates MJ, Lavin EH, Acree TE, Sacks GL. Comparison of odor-active compounds in grapes and wines from Vitis vinifera and non-foxy American grape species. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:10657-64.         [ Links ]

42. Varela C, Borneman AR. Yeast found in vineyards and wineries. Yeast. 2016;34:111-28.         [ Links ]

43. Varela C. The impact of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in the production of alcoholic beverages. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:9861-74.         [ Links ]

44. Wang J, De Luca V. The biosynthesis and regulation of biosynthesis of Concord grape fruit esters, including 'foxy' methylanthranilate. Plant J. 2005;44:606-19.         [ Links ]

45. Welke JE, Manfroi V, Zanus M, Lazzarotto M, Alcaraz Zini C. Differentiation of wines according to grape variety using multivariate analysis of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection data. Food Chem. 2013;141:3897-905.         [ Links ]

46. Winkler AJ, Cook JA, Kliewer WM, Lider LA. General viticulture. University of California: California Press; 1974. p. 58-76.         [ Links ]

47. Yoc KS, Kim JE, Seo EY, Kim YJ, Choi HY, Yoon HS, Kim MD, Han NS. Improvement in sensory characteristics of Campbell early wine by adding dual starters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Oenococcus oeni. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;20:1121-7.         [ Links ]