SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 número2Efectividad del Programa Nacional de Control de Calidad en Micología de Argentina y evaluación del desempeño de los laboratorios participantesOptimization and application of a high-resolution melting protocol in the characterization of avian infectious laryngotracheitis virus índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista argentina de microbiología

versión impresa ISSN 0325-7541versión On-line ISSN 1851-7617

Rev. argent. microbiol. vol.53 no.2 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires jun. 2021

 

Articulo ORIGINAL

Morphology and molecular taxonomy of the tongue worm, genus Raillietiella (Pentastomida) from the “ lungs of berber skinks Eumeces schneideri (Scincidae): First report

Morfología y taxonomía molecular de un pentastómido del género Raillietiella obtenido del pulmón del eslizón bereber Eumeces schneideri: Primer informe

Saad Bin Dajem1 

Kareem Morsy1 

Mohammed Alshehri1 

Attalla El kott1 

Essam Ibrahim1 

Haitham El Mekkawy1 

Rewaida Abdel Gaber1 

1 Biology Department, College of Science, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia b Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, 12613, Cairo, Egypt c Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt. d Blood Products Quality Control and Research Department, National Organization for Research and Control of Biologicals, Cairo, Egypt. e Research center for Advanced Materials Science (ECAMS), King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia f Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

In the present study, pentastomids belonging to the order Cephalobaenida were isolated from the lungs of Berber skinks Eumeces schneideri (Famiy: Scincidae), which were morphologically described by light and scanning electron microscopy and taxonomically justi- fied by 18s rDNA molecular analyses of the parasites. Seventeen host specimens were collected from well-vegetated wadis at high altitudes, Jizan, Saudi Arabia as new type locality; twelve specimens (70.59%) were infected. All of the recovered parasites were adults, possessed small broadly triangular cephalothorax flattened on the ventral surface and merged smoothly with a uniformly thick and squat abdomen and terminated in a pair of divergent lobes. The results obtained indicated that the parasites belong to the sharp-tipped posterior-hook Raillietiella spp. distinguished from other raillietiedids of the same group some important characteristic fea- tures including annulus number, shape and dimensions of the buccal cadre, copulatory spicules, and anterior and posterior hooks. The anterior hook of the female specimens (n = 5) had a blade length (AB) of 135±5 (110-146) ^m and shank length (BC) 158±5 (150-169) ^m while the posterior hook was much larger with AB measuring 221 ±5 (200-236) m and BC 286 ±6 (280-289) |o.m. For the male specimens (n = 5), the anterior hook had an AB of 73 ±3 (72-75) |j.m and a BC 102±5 (100-103) ^m. The posterior hook was much larger with AB 190.6±5 (190-191).

KEYWORDS: Pentastomida; Raillietiella aegypti; Cephalobaenida; Eumeces schneideri; Light and scanning electron microscopy; Molecular study

Resumen

En el presente estudio se aisló un pentastómido perteneciente al orden Cephalobaenida del pulmón de un eslizón bereber (Eumeces schneideri, Familia: Scincidae). Se efectuó su descripción morfológica basada en observación por microscopía óptica y de bar rido y se justificó su ubicación taxonómica mediante análisis molecular del gen 18S del ADNr. Se recolectaron 17 especímenes del citado huésped en valles ubicados a elevadas altitudes, en la región de Jizan (Arabia Saudí); 12 de ellos (70,59%) estaban infectados. Todos los parásitos recuperados eran adultos y poseían un pequeño cefalotórax triangular, aplanado en la super ficie ventral, que se fusionaba con un abdomen abultado y terminado en un par de lóbulos divergentes. Los resultados indicaron que este parásito pertenece a Raillietiella spp., que agrupa especies con gancho posterior puntiagudo; estas se distinguen de otros miembros de la Familia Raillietiella por algunos rasgos característicos, como el número de anillos y la forma y dimensiones del cuadro bucal, las espículas copulatorias y los ganchos anterior y posterior. La caracterización morfológica demostró que el parásito recuperado era muy similar a R. aegypti, previamente aislada del mismo huésped. El alineamiento de secuencias mediante el método de probabilidad máxima basado en el análisis del gen 18s del ADNr detectó identidades del 88-95% con los géneros de pentastómidos disponibles en GenBank. Dentro del árbol filogenético se pudo incluir este parásito dentro del clado monofilético pentastómido con máxima identidad con las especies de Raillietiella. Las secuencias obtenidas fueron depositadas en GenBank, con número de acceso MK970649.1. El presente análisis molecular confirma por primera vez la posición taxonómica de Raillietiella aegypti, anteriormente aislado del mismo huésped.

PALABRAS CLAVE: Pentastómido;Raillietiella aegypti;Cephalobaenida;Eumeces schneideri;Microscopía óptica ymicroscopíaelectrónica debarrido

Introduction

Pentastomida is a subclass of wormlike crustacean endoparasites with five anterior appendages one mouth, and two pairs of hooks for their attachment to the host. They have approximately 131 species distributed in two orders; Cephalobaenida and Porocephalida and seven families: Cephalobaenidae, Linguatulidae, Porocephalidae, Ralli- etiellidae, Reighardiidae, Sebekidae and Subtriquetridae, in addition to three Middle Cambrian fossil groups. The two orders can be distinguished mainly by differences in the disposition of the hooks relative to the mouth and by the form of the reproductive tract. All of the species of these groups attain sexual maturity in the respiratory tract of vertebrates.

Parasites of the order Cephalobaenida are characterized by the presence of a subterminal or ventral mouth situated anterior to the hooks disposed in a trapezium. Three enera of the order Cephalobaenida were recorded: (a) Cephalobaena, infecting the lung of American tree snakes; (b) Reighardia Ward, 1899 infecting the lung of marine birds as definitive hosts; (c) Raillietiella, the largest pen- tastome, worm-like, blood sucking parasites inhabiting the upper respiratory tract of insectivorous small lizards, which have piercing mouthparts surrounded by two pairs of compound hooks that embed into the lung to facilitate feeding on the host blood.

The life cycle of pentastomids includes two hosts; the eggs are either coughed out by the host or leave the host body through the digestive system. The eggs are then ingested by an intermediate host, which is commonly either a fish or a small herbivorous mammal. The definitive host becomes infected by pentastomids after eating the inter- mediate host, the parasite crawls within the host body into the respiratory tract from the esophagus2 . Humans can serve as an accidental definitive host after ingesting raw or poorly cooked viscera (i.e., liver, lungs, and trachea) of the intermediate hosts

The pathologic effect of pentastomid infection may be very serious and/or lethal, causing lesions in lung tissues and obstruction of the trachea that can result in interstitial subacute pneumonia with congestion In Egypt, rallietiellids were first recorded by Ali et al., who described two pentastomids, R. affinis and R. aegypti as a new species from Egyptian desert lizards, with much focus on R. affinis. Scant information with incomplete morphology and phylogeny is available worldwide for R. aegypti. The nuclear18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) has proved to be a potential marker during the characteriza- tion of eukaryotes. Its highly conserved nature and slow rate of evolutionary mutation make 18S rDNA suitable for interspecies distinction at higher taxonomic levels.

In the present study, a morphological description of a pentastomid infecting the lungs of Berber skinks Eumeces schneideri (Scincidae) captured in Jizan, Saudi Arabia was carried out by light and scanning electron microscopy. Fur- thermore, the 18S rDNA molecular analysis of the parasite was conducted to determine the exact phylogenetic position of these parasites.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and parasitological study

Seventeen specimens of the berber skink Eumeces schnei deri (Reptilia: Scincidae), 10 males and 7 females, were collected by hand or noose from well -vegetated wadis at high altitudes, in Jizan, Saudi Arabia (17.6548° N, 42.8871°E) during the year 2017. Specimens were collected seasonally, during summer (5 males, 4 females) and winter (5 males, 3 females). Animals were kept alive in glass cages with sand and alluvium in the animal room at 25-30 °C and fed insect larvae. Identification of the examined species was carried out according to Arnold11and Al -Sadoon. When examined, a cotton ball soaked with isoflurane was placed inside a plastic bag containing the animals and left inside to allow sufficient time for the anaesthetic gas to cause euthanasia. Alternatively, the animals were left in the sealed bag for suf- ficient time to achieve anaesthesia, at which time they were removed from the bag and injected intraperitoneally with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital. These were in agreement with the regulatory laws regarding experimental ethics of animal use and collecting permits, Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number BSU/FS/2015/10).

Following dissection, pentastomids were recovered from lungs using a ZEISS Compact Greenough stereomicroscope (Model Stemi 305), heat fixed in 10% neutral buffered for- malin for 15 min and then preserved in 70% ethanol in 5% glycerol solution to avoid sudden drying. Finally, sam- ples were transferred to lactophenol for clearance. The prepared samples were examined using differential inter- ference contrast (DIC) light microscopy with digital image analysis system (analysis auto 5.0) and photographed by an Olympus research photomicroscope supplied with a built -in camera (Model BX53F, Tokyo, Japan). Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube.

For scanning electron microscopy, samples were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, washed in the same buffer, and dehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Samples were then processed in a critical point drier ''Bomer-900’’ with freon 13, sputter-coated with gold-palladium in a Technics Hummer V, and finally examined with a Jeol scanning electron microscope (Model JSM7610F, Jeol Ltd, Japan). Identification of the recovered pentastomids was based on the key published by Rego and Ali et al.

Molecular analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from the ethanol preserved samples of the isolated parasites using QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and further stored at -20°C until used. PCR reactions were carried out using the following primers (28Sa F: 5'-TGCTTGTCTCAAAGATTAAGCC-3', 28Sb R: 5'- TGCTTGTCTCAAAGATTAAGCC-3'). To target the 18S rRNA gene in a final reaction, a total volume of 50 was prepared containing 1 ^l of DNA templates (100 ng), 0.5 ^l (50pmol) of each primer, 2 of dNTPs (Advanced Bioenzymes, UK), 1 ^l DNA polymerase (2 U) (Advanced Bioenzymes, UK), 5 ^l of 10 x buffer (500mM KCl, 100mMTris HCl pH 9.0, 1.5mM MgCl2), and 40^l of dH2O. The temperature profile was as follows: Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5min, followed by a denaturation step of 35 cycles at 94 °C for 45sec, anneal- ing at 49 °C for 45sec, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The amplification reac- tions were carried out in a PCR Thermocycler (PTC 100, MJR Research, USA). Two microliters of bromophenol blue were added to the aliquots of PCR products and the corre- sponding amplicons were electrophoresed on 2.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized using a UV transilluminator.

Sequencing and phylogeny

The PCR product was purified using a kit (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), and sequencing templates were prepared using a plasmid preparation kit (Machery-Nagel) and aBIO Dye Ter- minator v 3.1 Ready Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and 310 Automated DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA) using the same primers. To identify related sequences, a BLAST search was carried out on the NCBI database. A BLAST rectangular tree was created from genetic distances calculated using the Jukes-Cantor model for nucleotide comparisons between the query sequence and arthropod sequences. The tree was built from the distance metrics using Fast Minimum Evolution (FastME) according to Des per and Gascuel. Moreover, data of DNA sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL-X multiple sequence alignment and compared with previously deposited sequences of pentas- tomids recovered from GenBank to analyze intra-specific differences. The alignment was corrected manually using the alignment editor on BIOEDIT software 4.8.9. A phyloge- netic tree was constructed using the MEGA program version 7.

Results

Among the 17 specimens of E. schneideri examined, twelve animals (prevalence 70.59%), eight males and four females, had their lungs infected by adult pentastomids. The infec- tion increased during summer (4 males, 4 females) with a percentage of 89% and decreased during winter (4 males, 0 males) with a percentage of 57%. Adults were identi- fied by the presence of tapered hooks devoid of chitinous accessories. The examined male hosts were generally more heavily infected (mean intensity of 4.3) than females (2.2).

Morphology

Raillietiella aegypti Ali et al.3Fig. 1 (A-G), Fig. 2 (A-H), Fig. 3 (A-H)

Measurements and description based on the holotype female and male and paratype females.

Figure 1: (A - G). Photomicrographs of R. aegypti showing: A Whole mount preparation of adult female with a broad cephalothoraxthat consists of a terminal mouth (M) at the apex supported by buccal cadre (BC), a pair of anterior hooks (AH), and a pair of sharptipped posterior hooks (PH), abdomen terminated in divergent terminal lobes (TL), bar 50 m. B Abdominal annuli, bar 100 m. C,D Anterior (AH) and posterior (PH) hooks, bars 100 m. E Posterior part of a female abdomen with terminal lobes (TL), note thepresence of eggs (EG), bar 50 m. F Eggs (EG), bar 10 m. G Copulatory spicule of male (CS), bar 10 m. 

Figure 2: (A - H). Scanning electron micrographs of R. aegypti showing: A The adult parasite with an anterior cephalothoraxand abdomen terminated in divergent terminal lobes, bar 500 B Abdominal annuli, bar 100 m. C Cephalothorax consists of aterminal mouth (M), two pairs of hooks, anterior (AH) and sharp posterior (PH), each with prominent cephalic papillae beside (PA),bar 100 m. D, E The terminal mouth surrounded by a buccal cadre (BC), bars 100 m; 10 m. F Lateral view, posterior hook (PS)and papillae (PA), bar 100 m. G Anterior hook (AH) and its papillae (PA), bar 50 m. H Abdomen terminated in divergent lobessurrounding anal opening, bar 100 m. 

Figure 3: (A - H). Line diagrams showing: A Paratype female of R. aegypti with annuli, there are lobes and hooks in the area ofcephalothorax, bar 50 m. B. Anterior hook with supporting fulcrum; C. Posterior hook with supporting fulcrum, bar 10 m. D, E, F.Hook measurement conventions. Anterior (D) and posterior (E) hooks and fulcrum (F) of an adult female, AC, Blade length; AD, Hooklength; BC, Base length; CD, Plateau length; AB, Hook gape; DE Hook rest length; Fl, fulcrum length, measured from mid---pointbetween anterior most lateral projections and posterior end, bar 10 m. G. Buccal cadre, bar 10 m. H. Copulatory spicule, bar10. 

Figure 4: A rectangular tree drawn through the BLAST analysis. The terminal nodes are labeled by blast name to highlight taxonomictrends. The R. aegypti query sequence clusters with the arthropod sequences generated from the database sequences obtainedfrom BLAST. The different blast names in the map distinguished by colors for crustaceans, centipedes, sun spider, insects and thequery sequences. 

Female (based on 5 specimens): body pyriform, annu- lated 25 ±2 (24-28), widened anteriorly between 3-14 annuli and tapered posteriorly to a bilobed terminal seg- ment. Body was 16.22 ±4 (15.25-18.31) mm long and 4.16 ±0.21 (3.6-5.9) mmwide. Cephalothorax trapezoidal, slightly wider and indistinct from abdomen, rostrum not prominent, with a sclerotized U- shaped buccal cadre and a thick-framed terminal mouth. Two pairs of hooks, a pair of sharp anterior hooks with AB 135 ±5 (110-146) ^m and BC 158 ±5 (150-169) ^m and a pair of sharp poste rior hooks with AB 221 ±5 (200-236) ^m and BC 286 ±6 (280-289) ^m. Four dorsal and prominent apical papillae present, one adjacent to each hook. Abdomen with dis- tinct annuli, parapodial lobes present, anus ventral; caudal papillae indistinct; uterus straight, tube-like, and opened anteriorly.

Male (based on 5 specimens): body morphology was sim ilar to that of the female; with a pyriform body, annulated 19±2 (16-21), widest anteriorly, 12.7±3 (10.5-13.3) mm long and 3.45 ±0.13 (3.2-5.8) mm wide, anterior hook with AB 73 ±3 (72-75) ^m and BC 102 ±5 (100-103) ^m; pos terior hook larger with AB 190.6 ±5 (190-191) ^m and BC 221 ±5 (280-289) ^m. Dorsal papillae present; cephalotho rax trapezoidal, widest at annuli 3-12, indistinct from abdomen. Two copulatory spicules curved with absolute uni- form width; anus ventral; testis single, rounded, opened anteriorly.

Molecular study

Sequence alignment by the maximum likelihood analysis for the data obtained from 18S rDNA analysis of the parasite iso- lated from the host examined yielded 1405 bp, which exhibit identities ranging between 88-95% with pentastomid gen era recovered from GenBank. BLAST computed a pairwise alignment between a query and the database sequences searched; a tree was constructed and constituted differ- ent clades from arthropod species (Figs. 4 and 5). It was observed that a separate monophyletic clade of Pentas- tomida was constructed including the present sequences and pentastomid species. Moreover, the results obtained strongly support that pentastomes are included within crus- taceans and most closely related to branchiurans. The constructed phylogenetic tree by the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura 3-parameter model among different species of the class Pentastomida arranged the aligned sequences and the present one into two main clades; the first clade (clade I) included species of the order Porocephalida while the second clade (clade II) included species of the order Cephalobaenida which was subdivided into two subclades: the first subclade (subclade A) arranged the species of family Reighardiida7: Hispania vulturis and Reighardiasternae exhibited 94.90% and 94.76 identities respectively with the query sequences. The second subclade (subclade B) arranged the species of family Raillietiellida7 to which the present sequences were included, the subclade B species and their identities being: R. orientalis, 95.33% and Raillietiella sp. , 95.89% showed maximum identi ties with the query sequences. Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence between Sequences were shown in Table 1. The recovered sequences from the present study were deposited in GenBank under Accession number MK970649.1.

DISCUSSION

Studying parasite diversity worldwide is important for at least two major reasons. First, parasites are now recog- nized as playing important roles in ecosystem fractions by influencing the populations and communities of their hosts. Second, many parasite species are agriculturally and medically important. Therefore, the identification of parasitic worms based on microscopic observations and PCR amplification/sequencing of 18S rDNA from isolated para sites is highly recommended for successful investigations and taxonomy. There are many parasitic crustaceans, such as pentastomes, whose adult morphology is devoid of crus- tacean features.

Family Raillietiellidae represented by the single pen- tastomid genus Raillietiella is characterized by a quite wide diversity of hosts. The taxonomy and systemat- ics of the pentastomid genus Raillietiella were reviewed by Ali et al. in the description of R. cartagenensis and in the redescription of R. amphiboluri, R. kochR. shipleyi, and R. indica. Ali et al. reorganized the known and valid species of Raillietiella into five groups (Table 2): small lizards, varanid lizards, amphisbaenians, snakes, and amphibians, which are mainly based on host characteristics (host type, ecology, and zoogeography). Two of these groups (groups I and II; after Ali et al.) include species infecting small insectivorous lizards and are easily differentiated by the initial ideas of Self into species with sharp-tipped posterior hooks (group I) and blunt-tip posterior hooks (group II). Species differentia- tion in these two groups is mainly based on a combination of characteristics, including body size, annulus number, posterior-hook dimensions, and size and shape of the male copulatory spicule. The sharp-tipped posterior-hook of Raillietiella spp. includes six well-characterized species: R. amphiboluriinfecting the Australian bearded lizard Amphibolurus barbatus; R. chamaeleonis 28 in Chamaeleo oustaleti and Chamaeleo verrucosus from Madagascar; R. mottae from Tropidurus hispidus from Northeastern Brazil; R. morenoi 1 from Gallotia atlantica in the Canary Islands, R. aegyptiin different small lizards from Egypt; and R. cartagenensis in Hemidactylus sp. and Gonatodes sp. from Colombia. The reported presence of R. affinis in Lepidactylus lugutris from the British Salomon Island still awaits confirmation and also that in Lioheterodon modestus from Madagascar due to the inclusion of R. chamaeleonis as a host. The present Raillietiella sp. could be dis- tinguished from Raillietilla sharp-hooked species of small lizards through different combinations of characteristics (Table 3), such as measurements of body length, annu- lus number, anterior-hook and posterior-hook size, and dimensions of the male copulatory spicule. Furthermore, it can be differentiated from similar species in group I. The taxonomic and systematic morphological characteristics stated by Ali et al. and others referring to male hooks are reliable in distinguishing and separating the present Raillietiella sp. from the rest. Based on light and scan- ning electron microscopy, the present parasite should be classified morphologically as R. aegypti according to the following criteria: the same host with a new type locality; it is a group I type of Raillietiella spp. and the dimen- sions of anterior and posterior hook. This is the first report of a pentastomid in a reptile species from Saudi Arabia. The congruence between molecular and morphological data in the taxonomic justification of pentastomids was demon- strated by Mohanta and Itagaki.

Our analysis corroborates the monophyly of Pentastomida and the results thus provide strong support for Wingstrand’s proposal that pentastomes are highly modified crustaceans most closely related to branchiurans. Data derived from the DNA analysis coincide with those from morphological studies in accordance with Wagele and Nielsen; the maximum identity obtained for the present sequences was 95.89% with Raillietiella sp. recovered from different hosts and localities with some morphological differences that exclude the suggestion to classify the present species as being the same. Moreover, since the present parasite is morpholog- ically the same as R. aegypti described previously with no molecular confirmation, the present study represents the first one to confirm the taxonomy of R. aegypti. The results of molecular analyses vary according to the selected species, sample size, and particular methods of analysis used, where the sequences of 18S rRNA may contain consis- tent phylogenetic information for cladogenetic events as old as the Median Cambrian. This morphology-based taxon omy is consistent with present molecular phylogenies, which are supported by previous observations. Consequently, revi- sion on the morphology-based taxonomy or inclusion of molecular data from an extensive range of taxa should be necessary to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of the Pentastomida.

Animal Rights Statement

Authors declare that the experiments on animals were con- ducted in accordance with local Ethical Committee laws and regulations as regards care and use of laboratory animals.

Financial Disclosure Statement

The Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid Univer- sity through Research group Project under grant number (R.G.P.1-112 -40).

Conflict of Interests Statement

No conflict of interests for the publication of this article was reported.

Acknowledgment

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Research group Project under grant number (R.G.P.1-112 -40).

References

1. Abreu-Acosta N, Foronda Rodriguez P, Valladares B, Casanova JC. Raillietiella morenoi sp. n (Pentastomida) from Gallotia atlantica (Peters and Doria, 1882) (Lacertidae) in the Canary Islands. Parasitol Res. 2006;98:425-9. [ Links ]

2. Ali JH, Riley J. Experimental life-cycle studies of Raillietiella gehyrae Bovien 1927 and Raillietiella frenatus Ali, Riley and Self 1981: pentastomid parasites of geckos utilizing insects as intermediate hosts. Parasitology. 1983;86:147-60. [ Links ]

3. Ali JH, Riley J, Self JT. A description of a new species of Railli- etiella (Pentastomida: Cephalobaenida) from Egyptian lizards with a reassessment of the taxonomic status of Raillietiella geckonis (Diesing, 1850) Sambon, 1910 and Raillietiella affinis Bovien, 1927. Sys Parasitol. 1982;4:169-80. [ Links ]

4. Ali JH, Riley J, Self JT. A revision of the taxonomy of pentasto¬mid parasites (Genus Raillietiella Sambon, 1910) from American snakes and amphisbaenians. Sys Parasitol. 1984;6:87-97. [ Links ]

5. Ali JH, Riley J, Self JT. Furtherobservationsofblunthookedrail- lietiellids (Pentastomida: Cephalobaneida) from lizards, with descriptions ofthree new species. Sys Parasitol. 1984;6:147-60. [ Links ]

6. Ali JH, Riley J, Self JT. A review of the taxonomy and system- atics of the pentastomid genus Raillietiella Sambon, 1910 with a description of a new species. Sys Parasitol. 1985;7:111-23. [ Links ]

7. Almeida WO, Christoffersen ML. A cladistic approach to rela- tionships in Pentastomida. J Parasitol. 1999;85:695 -704. [ Links ]

8. Almeida WO, Christoffersen ML. Pentastomida. In: Morrone J, Llorente -Bousquets J, editors. Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Bio- geografía de Artrópodos de México: hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma deMéx- ico; 2002. p. 690. [ Links ]

9. Almeida WO, Christoffersen ML, Amorim DS, Eloy ECC. Morpho- logical support for the phylogenetic positioning of Pentastomida and related fossils. Biotemas. 2008;21:81 -90. [ Links ]

10. Al-Sadoon MK. Survey of the reptilian fauna of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia II. The lizard and amphibian fauna of Riyadh province. Bull Md Herpeto lSoc. 1988;24:85-98. [ Links ]

11. Arnold EM. A key and annotated checklist to the lizards and amphibians of Saudi Arabia. Fauna Saud Arabia. 1986;8:335-435. [ Links ]

12. Bockler W, Bockler W. Der Entwicklungszyklus von Reighardia sternae (Pentastomida) nach Untersuchungen an natrlich und experimenten infestierten Mowen. Zool Anz. 1984:374-95. [ Links ]

13. Bovien P. Ueber einige Pentastomen aus Java Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 1927;84:1-9. [ Links ]

14. Bush AO, Fernanéz JC, Esch GW, Seed JR. Pentastomida: the tongue worms - In: Parasitism - The diversity and ecology of animal parasites. Cambridge UK: Cambride University Press; 2001. p. 214-24. [ Links ]

15. Christoffersen ML, De Assis JE. A systematic monograph of the Recent Pentastomida, with a compilation of their hosts. Zool Med. 2013;87:1-206. [ Links ]

16. Desper R, Gascuel O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruc- tion algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J Comput Biol. 2002;9:687-705. [ Links ]

17. Diesing KM. Versuch einer Monographie der Gattung Pentas- toma. Ann Nat HistMus Wien. 1835:1-32. [ Links ]

18. Diesing KM. Systema helminthum Vol. 1 Wilhelmum Braumuller. Vindobonae. 1850:679. [ Links ]

19. Diesing KM. Revision der Cephalocotyleen. Abteilung Parameco- cotyleen. Sitzungsber. Kaiserl Akad. Wiss. Math. -Naturwiss. Cl. 1864:200-345. [ Links ]

20. Dyck J. Reighardia lomviae sp. nov., a new pentastomid from guillemot. Norw J Geol. 1975;23:97-109. [ Links ]

21. Fain A. Les Pentastomides de l’AfriqueCentrale. Annales Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale in Sciences Zoologiques. 1961;92:1-115. [ Links ]

22. Fain A. The Pentastomida parasitic in man. Ann SocBelg Med Trop. 1975;55:59-64. [ Links ]

23. Fonseca VG, Carvalho GR, Nichols B, Quince C, Johnson HF, Neill SP, Lambshed JD, Thomas WK, Power DM, Creer S. Metagenetic analysis of patterns of distribution and diver- sity of marine meiobenthic eukaryotes. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2014;23:1293-302. [ Links ]

24. Gedoelst L. Unlinguatulide nouveau parasite d’un batracien. Rec Indian Mus. 1921;22:25-6. [ Links ]

25. Giribet G, Richter S, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC. The posi- tion o crustaceans within the Arthropoda: evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA, editors. Crustacean Issues 16: Crustacea and Arthropod Rela- tionships. Festschrift for Frederick R. Schram. Boca Raton. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 307-52. [ Links ]

26. Gjerde B. Phylogenetic position of Linguatula arctica and Lin- guatula serrata (Pentastomida) as inferred from the nuclear 18S rRNA gene and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3517-4125. [ Links ]

27. Gretillat S, Brygoo ER. Les "dilatateurs de copulation’’ chez Raillietiella (Heimonsia) hemidactyli et valeur taxonomique possible de ces organes chez les Pentastomida. Arch Inst Pasteur Madagascar. 1961;29:71-4. [ Links ]

28. Gretillat S, Brygoo ER. Raillietiella chamaeleonis n. sp. pre- miere espece de Cephalobaenidae (Pentastomida) signalée a Madagascar. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1959;34:112-20. [ Links ]

29. Hatcher MJ, Dunn AM. Parasites in Ecological Communities. From Interactions to Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 2011:464. [ Links ]

30. Hett ML. On a collection of linguatulids (Pentastomida) from Burma, with description of a new subgenus. Proc Zool Soc Lon- don. 1934;2:425-31. [ Links ]

31. Hett ML. On some new pentastomids from the Zoological Soci- ety’s gardens London. Proc Zool Soc London. 1915:115-21. [ Links ]

32. Hett ML. On the family Linguatulidae. Proc Zool Soc London. 1924:107-59. [ Links ]

33. Heymons R. Beitr ge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Raillietiella Samb (Pentatstomida). Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1926;67:45-56. [ Links ]

34. Heymons R. Pentastomida. In: Dr H. G. Bronns Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. 5. Band: Arthropoda. IV. Abteilung: Arachnoidea. 1. Buch. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H.: Leipzig, pp 1-268. [ Links ]

35. Jukes T,Cantor C. in Mammalian Protein Metabolism, H.N. Munro, J. Allison, Eds. Academic Press, NewYork1969; 3, 21-32. [ Links ]

36. Kelehear C, Spratt DM, O’Meally D, Shine R. Pentastomids of wild snakes in the Australian tropics. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013;3:20-31. [ Links ]

37. Kelehear C, Spratt DM, Dubey S, Brown GP, Shine R. Using com- bined morphological, allometric and molecular approaches to identify species of the genus Raillietiella (Pentastomida). PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24936. [ Links ]

38. Koehsler M, Walochnik J, Georgopoulos M, Pruente C, Boeck- eler W, Auer H, Barisani-Asenbauer T. Linguatula serrata tongue worm in human eye, Austria Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:870e872. [ Links ]

39. Korallo NP, Vinarski MV, Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Mouillot D, Poulin R. Are there general rules governing parasite diversity? Small mammalian hosts and gamasid mite assemblages. Divers Distrib. 2007;13:353-60. [ Links ]

40. Krishnasamy M, Jeffery J, Singh KI, Oothuman P. Raillietiella rileyi, a new species of pentastomid from the lung of toad, Bufo melanosticum from Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 1995;12:31-8. [ Links ]

41. Lie AAY, Liu Z, Hu SK, Jones AC, Kim DY, Countway PD, Amaral-Zettler AL, Cary SC, Sherr EB, Sherr BF, Gast RJ, Caron DA. Investigating microbial eukaryotic diversity from a global census: insights from a comparison of pyrotag and full- length sequences of 18S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:4363-73. [ Links ]

42. Mahon J. A new species of Raillietiella, a pentastomid from the beared lizard, Amphiboluris barbatus (Cuv). Proc Zool Soc London. 1954;124:509-16. [ Links ]

43. Marcogliese DJ. Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theater. Eco health. 2004;1:151-64. [ Links ]

44. Mohanta UK, Itagaki T. Molecular characterization and phy- logeny of Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae) based on the nuclear 18S rDNA and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene. J Vet Med Sci. 2017;79:398-402. [ Links ]

45. Nielsen C. Animal evolution Interrelationships of the living phyla. 2nded. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 563. [ Links ]

46. Paré JA. An overview of pentastomiasis in reptiles and other vertebrates. J Exot Pet Med 2008;17:285-94. [ Links ]

47. Philippe H, Chenuil A, Adoutte A. Can the Cambrian explosion be inferred through molecular phylogeny? Development, Sup- plement. 1994;120:15-25. [ Links ]

48. Rego AA. Pentastomídeos de répteis do Brasil: Revisao dos Cephalobaenidae. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1983;78:399-411. [ Links ]

49. Rego AA. Sinopse dos pentastomídeos da regiao neotropical. Garcia de Orta, Série Zoologia Lisboa. 1984;11:45-6. [ Links ]

50. Riley J, Heideman NJL. A new blunt-hooked pentastomid belonging to the genus Raillietiella Sambon, 1910, from two species of agamid lizards in Namibia. Parasitol Res. 1998;85:373-86. [ Links ]

51. Riley J. The biology of pentastomids. Adv Parasitol. 1986;25:45-128. [ Links ]

52. Roberts PP. Parasitic infections of the pleural space. Semin Respir Infect. 1988;3:362-82. [ Links ]

53. Sambon LW. Preliminary notes on three new species of Tongue-worms (Linguaiulidae) in the collection of the Museum d’Histoire Naturelle Paris. London Trans Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1910;3:129-54. [ Links ]

54. Self JT, Kuntz RE. Pentastomids from African reptiles and mam- mals and from reptiles of Florida Island British Solomon Islands (South Pacific). J Parasitol. 1957;43:194-200. [ Links ]

55. Self JT. Biological relationships of Pentastomida: a bibliography on the Pentastomida. Exp Parasitol. 1969;24:63-119. [ Links ]

56. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolu- tionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 7.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596-9. [ Links ]

57. Tang CQ, Leasi F, Obertegger U, Kieneke A, Barraclough TG, Fontaneto D. The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule- greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:16208-12. [ Links ]

58. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Hig- gins DG. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 4876-82. [ Links ]

59. Tubangui MA, Masiluñgan VA. Notes on Philippine Linguat- ulids (Arthropoda: Pentastomida). Philipp J Sci. 1936;60: 399-405. [ Links ]

60. Vaney MC, Sambon LW. Preliminary notes on three new species of tongue-worms. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1910;3:128-54. [ Links ]

61. Wagele JW. Identification of apomorphies and the role of ground patterns in molecular systematics. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 1996;34:31-9. [ Links ]

Received: November 22, 2019; Revised: June 17, 2020; Accepted: October 03, 2020

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License