Although tuberculosis (TB) incidence is decreasing worldwide15, Uruguay has been reporting an increase in the number of cases since 2006. Despite the efforts made by the National Program Against Tuberculosis, the incidence rate in 2019 was 30 cases per 100000 inhabitants, placing Uruguay above the average of the region15. Based on this scenario, more cases with severe TB were diagnosed and admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during the last years.
TB in critical care is associated with respiratory and other organ failures and requires ICU admission for advanced vital support. Despite the availability of effective therapies, mor-tality rates remain between 15.5 and 65.9% in critical care patients10,11. In Uruguay, a high mortality rate (>50%) was observed in TB cases that required ICU admission.
Information from classical and molecular epidemiology, along with patient clinical data represent key elements to achieve better control of the disease3.
The genotypic variations, especially bacterial lineages, are associated with changes in transmission capacity and also in the ability to acquire drug resistance2,7"9. Thus, changes in the prevalence of specific lineages or sub-lineages could have important consequences for the observed epidemiology and outcome of TB disease12,14.
We hypothesized that critically ill TB patients could be associated with strain virulence. This study aimed to describe the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using classical genotyping methods of clinical isolates obtained from TB patients in the critical care setting, and to analyze them with the genetic background structure observed in community TB. In addition, we aimed to determine the possible association of comorbidities and organ dysfunctions observed in these patients according to the TB genotype causing the disease.
The research protocol used in this work was presented and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Español, and has been performed follow-ing the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Sixty M. tuberculosis isolates obtained from critically ill patients from a general public hospital (Hospital Español -ASSE, Montevideo, Uruguay) were genotyped and compared to ninety-five randomly selected community isolates within the same period (Suppl. Table 1 and Suppl. Fig. 1).
All the community sample isolates correspond to patients treated with the standard drug protocol (daily HREZ for the first two months, four months HR 3 days a week). The cultures became negative after 3 months of treatment (Suppl.Table 1 and Suppl. Fig. 1). All the community samples were obtained from TB patients that did not require ICU admission at any time during treatment.
Patients with TB admitted to the ICU were classified according to a TB clinical severity score as having low, mod-erate, and high risk TB disease1. Comorbidities and organ dysfunctions were documented upon admission, along with common clinical and laboratory studies.
Isolate characteristics were summarized for each group (Community and Critically ill patient isolates) in Supple-mentary Table 1. In addition, the analysis pipeline was shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Microbiological cultures and DNA extractions were performed and stored, as previ-ously described4. Molecular typing using spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR were performed as described in SupplementaryFigure 1.
Lineage assignment was carried out based on similarity search and UPGMA tree when comparing reference strains located in the server with our isolates with a distance less than 0.3 using www.miru-vntr.org tool. Comparative analysis between strain distribution of critical and non-critically ill patients was performed with the Chi-squared contingency tables for categorical data (p-value < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference). Minimum spanning trees were constructed for all isolates using the MST tool (miru-vntr.org).
Based on the documented risk factors, forty-five of our initial set of sixty-five patients (69%) could be classified according to TB severity at the moment of ICU admission into three groups (low, moderate and high severity). Most ICU admissions correspond to moderate to high severity TB (86.6%): low (13.4%), moderate (40.0%), and high risk (46.6%) (Suppl. Fig. 1)1.
Supplementary Figure 1 shows the main characteristics of TB patients admitted to an ICU including demographic data, bilateral pulmonary compromise, comorbidities, organ dysfunctions, relevant laboratory findings, classification according to a tuberculosis severity score1, and ICU mortality. In brief, patients were relatively young with male predominance. Bilateral pulmonary involvement was present in 44%, and HIV coinfection in 22% of the cases. Poor nutritional status was present in 76%. Respiratory and cardiovascular failure were the most frequent organ fail-ures, and mechanical ventilation was implemented in 74% of the patients. Only 13.3% had a low tuberculosis risk severity score, while a moderate to high score was observed in 86.6% of these patients. Global mortality in ICU was 62% consider-ing all patients (n = 60) and reached 71.8% considering only high-to-moderate severity TB patients (n = 39).
Among the ICU M. tuberculosis isolates, strains clus-tered into five main sub-lineages (Table 1A). Except for one particular case, all sub-lineages belong to Lineage 4 of M. tuberculosis. Typing of critical care patients reveals the Haarlem family as the most prominent in these sam-ples (53.3%), followed by the LAM family (45.0%). On the contrary, LAM strains are more represented among commu-nity TB isolates (60.0%), followed by the Haarlem strains (34.7%), a significant statistical difference being observed when comparing these two populations (p < 0.05).
It is interesting to observe that the Haarlem family was more frequent in patients with bilateral TB (51.3%) versus unilateral TB (32.6%) in community patients (Table 1B). Although the observed difference was not statistically significant, it could indicate a more aggressive form of the disease caused by the Haarlem lineage. This hypothesis needs to be corroborated and could explain the high representation of the Haarlem genotype among critically ill patients.
More detailed analyses of typing results were performed analyzing the minimum spanning tree generated with the online tool MST (miru-vntrplus.org). Fourteen clonal com-plexes were obtained, community and critical isolates could be detected in each cluster (Fig. 1A and SupplementaryTable 2). The biggest cluster comprises 44 isolates (22 of them - 9 ICU and 13 community samples - with the same MIRU pattern belonging to the Haarlem genotype (Fig. 1B)). Finally, 24 community samples and 10 ICU samples remain unclustered.
When analyzing the clonal complexes with more than six isolates (n = 8), we could observe strains isolated during the whole studied period (Suppl. Table 2). This phenomenon also occurs when analyzing at group level. No clonal complexes were associated with a particular isolation year that could be due to a particular outbreak.
We investigated the possible association of observed TB genotypes with ICU patient’s comorbidities.
A closer look into critically ill patients is shown in Table 2, comparing demographic data and some comorbidities such as drug abuse, HIV, COPD, and malnutrition, between the main represented strains (Haarlem and LAM families). We did not find any significant differences among comorbidities between the genotype groups.
Comparing organ dysfunctions observed among ICU patients (with a low to high severity score) between the different genotypes, we found that patients with the Haar-lem genotypes showed hepatic dysfunction more frequently than patients with LAM (p = 0.04) (Table 2). The mortality observed in these patients was not statistically related to the M. tuberculosis genotype (Table 2), and no significant association between the outcome of patients with different lineages was found. As far as we know, this is the first communication relating clinical and molecular epidemiol-ogy in critically ill patients with severe TB. Furthermore, we were able to compare the main TB lineages that circulate both in the community and critical care setting, studying the association between these genotypes with clinical out-comes.
Table 2: Demographic data, comorbidities, and overall outcomes comparing the Haarlem and LAM families in ICU patients with moderate to high severity score.
The principal finding showed that lineages belong to the Haarlem and LAM families in both studied populations, but observing a statistically significant difference between the proportions of each family among these two populations. In addition, we were able to perform a lineage comparison considering the clinical outcome in community patients.
Although, the genotype information obtained with MIRU and spoligotyping is partial (and WGS analysis could shed light about genome implications in clinical outcome), the data presented in this work suggest a more significant contri-bution of host factors related to the severity of the disease.
In terms of ICU mortality, neither the LAM nor the Haar-lem families showed higher virulence. Factors contributing to death in the present study were more likely related to host comorbidities (in particular, drug abuse, poor nutri-tional status, and lack of access to health care facilities).
Although the presented series in our study is one of the largest reported5,6,13, the limited number of patients enrolled warrants a more robust statistical analysis. The study of cases should continue to add more information lead-ing to improve the understanding of the correlation between TB lineages and virulence.
The results presented in this work represent a starting point, an in-depth study based on genomes could contribute to better understand the virulence observed in these strains and could help to improve the prognosis of these critically ill patients.
Financial support
This work was supported by grant FSS_2_2011_1_6850 (Fondo Sectorial de Salud, Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación [ANII)]. FOCEM - Fondo para la Convergencia Estructural del Mercosur (COF 03/11).
G.G., N.N., J.H. and C.R. are researchers from the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (ANII), Montevideo, Uruguay.