SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número1Non dimensional analysis of cassava transient drying in packing beds índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Bookmark


Latin American applied research

versión impresa ISSN 0327-0793

Lat. Am. appl. res. vol.41 no.1 Bahía Blanca ene. 2011

 

ARTICLES

Polarographic determination of chondroitin sulfate based on its interaction with crystal violet

 

N. Hui†, W.L. Zhang†, X.L. Niu†,Y. Wang† and W. Sun†

† College of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Qingdao Agriculture University, Qingdao 266109, P. R. China;
† College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, P. R. China; sunwei@qust.edu.cn

 


Abstract - Electrochemical determination of chondroitin sulfate (CS) was established with crystal violet. Under the optimal conditions, the decrease of the current was proportional to CS concentration in the range from 1.5 to 20.0 mg/L. The method was successfully applied to determine the CS content in synthetic samples.

Keywords - Chondroitin Sulfate; Crystal Violet; Linear Sweep Polarography; Interaction.


 

I. INTRODUCTION

Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is one important member of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) family with alternating D-glucuronic acid and N-acetylated D-galactosamine residues (Maruyama et al., 1998). In recent years, CS has attracted much attention as it shows many important biological and pharmacological activities (Mourano et al., 1996). For example, CS had been used as an effective medicine for the treatment of rheumatism, arthritis, nephritis, lumbago, gastric ulcer and AIDS (Zhu et al., 2000). So it is important to establish a sensitive method for CS determination. At present, some methods had been proposed to detect CS such as spectrophotometry (Chen et al., 2006), HPLC (Kaoshiishi et al., 1998), ion chromatography (Plaas et al., 1996) and electrophoretic methods (Payan et al., 1998). But there are seldom reports about the electrochemical methods for CS detection.

Electrochemical methods have been successfully utilized to the determination of different kinds of biomolecules such as DNA, proteins, enzymes and heparin with the advantages such as higher sensitivity, wider linear range, faster response and cheaper instruments. For example, Hu et al. (2006) investigated the electrochemical behavior of malachite green with dsDNA and detected the content of DNA. Kobayashi et al. (2004) reported the interaction of Hoechst 33258 with DNA in solution by linear sweep voltammetry and further used for electrochemical DNA quantification. Peng et al. (2007) studied the interaction of toluidine blue with heparin by cyclic voltammetry. Sun et al. (2006, 2007) proposed electrochemical probes for the determination of biomolecules such as DNA (Sun et al., 2006) and protein (Sun et al., 2007). Based on the changes of electrochemical response, the proposed method was sensitive, reliable and successfully applied to the samples determination.

In this work, crystal violet (CV) was selected as the electrochemical probe to investigate the binding reaction with CS and further used to the detection of CS. CV is a cationic dye and had been used as color reagent in the determination of DNA (Huang et al., 2001) and heparin (Xu et al., 2002). Under the selected conditions, CS was in negatively charged and could easily interact with the cationic dye of CV. The interaction was monitored by linear sweep polarography and the electrochemical response of CV was decreased with the increase of CS concentration. The proposed method was further used for CS determination in synthetic samples.

II. METHODS

A. Apparatus and reagents

The second order derivative linear sweep polarographly was performed on a JP-303 polarographic analyzer (Chengdu Apparatus Factory, China) with a traditional three-electrode system composed of a dropping mercury working electrode (DME), a saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE) and a platinum wire auxiliary electrode. A Cary 50 probe spectrophotometer (Varian Company, Australia) was used to record the UV-Vis absorption spectra. All the experiments were carried out at 25±1ºC.

Chondroitin sulfate (CS, 99%, Shandong Linyitianli Biochemical Company, China) was used as received. A 1.0 mg/mL CS stock solution was prepared by directly dissolving 0.1000 g of CS into water, then diluted in a 100 mL calibration flask and stored at 4 ºC. The working solutions were obtained by diluting the stock solution with water. A 1.0×10-3 mol/L of crystal violet (CV, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Company, China) solution was prepared by dissolving 0.04080 g CV in water and diluted to 100 mL. 0.2 mol/L Britton-Robinson (B-R) buffer solution was used to control the acidity of reaction solution. All of other reagents used were of analytical reagent grade and doubly distilled water was used throughout.

B. Procedures

Into a dry 10 mL calibrated tube 1.5 mL of pH 2.5 B-R buffer solution, 0.2 mL of 1.0×10-4 mol/L CV and different amounts of CS were added in sequences. The mixtures were diluted to the mark with water, mixed homogeneously and allowed to react at 25 ºC for 15 min. Then the solution was transferred to a 10 mL electrochemical cell and the second order derivative linear sweep polarographic curve was recorded in the potential range from -0.4 to -1.0 V (vs. SCE). The reductive peak current (ip″) of CV at -0.70 V (vs. SCE) was measured. Under the same condition, the peak current (ip0″) of CV solution without the addition of CS was also recorded and the difference of peak current (Δip″= ip0″- ip″) was used to determine the concentration of CS.

C. Results and Discussion

UV-Vis absorption spectra

Figure 1 showed the UV-Vis absorption spectra of CV in the absence and presence of different concentrations of CS in pH 2.5 B-R buffer. In the wavelength range from 300 to 800 nm no absorption peak appeared for CS solution (curve 1) and CV had a maximum absorption peak at 590 nm (curve 2). After the addition of CS into CV solution, the absorbance at 590 nm decreased without new absorption peak appeared (curves 3 and 4). The more the CS added into the solution, the greater the absorbance at 590 nm decreased, which indicated the interaction of CV and CS in the acidic solution.


Figure 1-UV-Vis absorption spectra of CV-CS system.
Condition: 1.pH 2.5 B-R buffer + 20.0 mg/L CS; 2. pH 2.5 B-R buffer + 2.0×10-5 mol/L CV; 3. 2 + 5.0 mg/L CS; 4. 2 + 10.0 mg/L CS

Second order derivative linear sweep polarogram

The second order derivative linear sweep polarograms of B-R, CV and their mixture with CS were shown in Fig. 2. Curve 1 was the polarogram of B-R buffer and no polarographic peak appeared, which indicated that no electroactive substances existed. Curve 2 was the polarogram of the CV solution, a well-defined polarographic reductive peak appeared at -0.70 V (vs. SCE), which was due to the reduction of CV molecules on the mercury electrode. Curve 3, 4 and 5 were the polarograms of the mixture of different concentration of CS with CV. Owing to the interaction of CS with CV, the concentration of free CV in the mixture solution decreased, so the reductive peak current decreased correspondingly. The decrease of peak current was proportional to the concentration of CS, which could be further used for the CS determination.


Figure 2-Second order derivative linear sweep polarogramof CV-CS reaction system.
Condition: 1. pH 2.5 B-R; 2.1+2.0×10-5 mol/L CV; 3. 2+ 6.0 mg/L CS; 4.2+10.0 mg/L CS; 5.2+20.0 mg/L CS.

The electrochemical behaviors of CV had been investigated on different working electrodes including glassy carbon electrode (Perekotii et al., 2002) and dropping mercury electrode (DME) (Li and Jiang, 2005). CV exhibited an irreversible adsorptive reductive wave with two protons and two electrons transferred on the DME. Based on the sensitive response of CV on the DME, it was selected as the electrochemical indicator for CS determination in this paper.

Optimal of the reaction conditions

The influences of the reaction conditions such as the acidity of buffer solution, the CV concentration, reaction time, the instrumental conditions and the ion strength etc. were carefully investigated.

The effect of pH on the difference of peak current (Δip″) was investigated by keeping CS and CV concentration constant and changing the pH in the range from 1.0 to 6.0. The result showed that the value of Δip″ reached its maximum at pH 2.5, so pH 2.5 was selected for this assay. In the acidic buffer solution, the positively charged CV can easily interact with negatively charged CS to form a supramolecular biocomplex. The volume of B-R buffer added in the final solution was investigated in the range of 1.0~5.0 mL and 1.5 mL was suitable for the following procedures.

The effect of CV concentration on the value of Δip″ was studied with 20.0 mg/L CS. The results showed that the value of Δip″ reached the maximum at the CV concentration of 2.0×10-5 mol/L and then remained constant, which indicated the binding reaction reached its equilibrium. So 2.0×10-5 mol/L CV was recommended.

After mixing CV with CS, the value of Δip″ reached maximum within 15 min and remained constant for about 2 hours. So the system gave enough time for routine determination.

The effect of the reaction temperature on the interaction was tested in the range of 10~40ºC. There were no obviously differences of Δip″ in the selected temperature range. So the reaction temperature had little influences on the interaction and 25ºC was used throughout.

The effect of instrumental conditions, such as the scan rate and the dropping mercury standing time (the lifetime of the mercury drop), was also tested. The results indicated that the value of Δip″ reached the maximum when the scan rate was at 700 mV/s. The difference of peak current increased with the increase of the dropping mercury standing time from 4 to 15 s, but the mercury drop would fall down naturally when the dropping mercury standing time exceeded 15 s. So the scan rate and the mercury drop standing time were selected as 700 mV/s and 14 s, respectively.

The effect of NaCl concentration was examined to show the influence of ionic strength. The presence of NaCl had significant influences on the interaction and the value of Δip″ decreased with the increase of salt concentration in the range of 0.01~0.2 mol/L. The result proved that the interaction of CV with CS was mainly caused by electrostatic attraction. The electrostatic shielding effect of the charges on binding reaction with the increase of Na+ concentration was unbeneficial to the formation of CS-CV complex.

Influences of coexisting substances

The influences of commonly coexisting substances on the determination of 20.0 mg/mL CS were also tested with the results listed in Table 1. It can be seen that different substances such as metal ions, amino acids and glucose had little effects on the determination. So this method could be directly applied to the biological sample determination.

Table 1 Effect of foreign substances on the determination of 20.0 mg/L CS.

Working curve

Under the optimal conditions, a calibration curve was obtained in the CS concentration range of 1.5~20.0 mg/L with the linear regression equation as Δip″(nA)=258.54 C (mg/L)-58.79 (n=9, γ=0.991). The relative standard deviation (RSD) for eleven parallel determinations of 10.0 mg/L CS was 2.21 % and the detection limit was calculated as 0.30 mg/L (3σ).

Sample determinations

Three synthetic samples were analyzed by the proposed method with the results listed in Table 2. It can be seen that this new method was practical and reliable to determine CS in synthetic samples with the recovery in the range of 91.1 %~94.0 %.

Table 2 Determination results of CS in synthetic samples (n=5).

Stoichiometry of CS-CV complex

The composition of the supramolecular complex and the equilibrium constant was determined based on a reported method (Li and Min, 1989). It was presumed that interaction of CV with CS only formed a single complex of CS-mCV. The binding number (m) and the equilibrium constant (βs) of the binding reaction could be calculated from the following equations:

CS+mCV→CS-mCV (1)

The equilibrium constant was deduced as follows:

(2)

Since

Δimax=kCCS, (3)
Δi=k[CS-mCV] , (4)
[CS]+[CS-mCV]=CCS . (5)

Therefore:

Δimax-Δi=k(CCS-[CS-mCV])=[CS]. (6)

Introducing equations (2), (4) and (6) gave:

log[Δi/(Δimax-Δi)]=logβs+mlog[CV]. (7)

Where Δi is the difference of peak current in the presence and absence of CS and Δimax corresponds to the obtained value when the concentration of CV is extremely higher than that of CS. CCS, [CS], [CS-mCV] are corresponding to the total, free and bound concentration of CS in the solution, respectively.

Figure 3 showed the relationship between ip″, Δip″ with the concentration of CV. By using the Eq. (7) the relationship of log[Δi/(Δimax-Δi)] with log[CV] was calculated. From the intercept and the slope the values of m≈1 and βs=2.75×104 were deduced, which indicated that a 1:1 complex of CS-CV was formed in the selected conditions.


Figure 3-Relationship between ip″ and CCV (1, 2), Δip″ and CCV (3).
Condition: 1.CCS=0; 2.CCS=10.0 mg/L; 3.Δip″=ip1″-ip2

III. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper an electroanalytical method for the determination of CS was described by using CV as an electrochemical probe. The addition of CS into CV solution caused the decrease of reductive peak current, which was due to the formation of a new supramolecular complex by electrostatic interaction of negatively charged CS with positively charged CV in the solution. The binding parameters of CS with CV were calculated by the electrochemical data and the established method could be further applied to determine microamount of CS with satisfactory results.

REFERENCES
1. Chen, Y.Y., Z.L. Jiang, Z.Z. Li, S.M. Zhou and S.J. Sun, "Spectrophotometric determination of chondroitin sulfate with victory blue b," Spectroscopy Spectral Anal., 26, 1148-1150 (2006).         [ Links ]
2. Hu, X., K. Jiao, W. Sun and J.Y. You, "Electrochemical and spectroscopic malachite green with dna and its application," Electroanalysis, 18, 613-620 (2006).         [ Links ]
3. Huang, C.Z., Y.F. Li and P. Teng, "A spectrophotometric study on the interaction of neutral red with double-stranded dna in large excess," Talanta, 55, 321-328 (2001).         [ Links ]
4. Kaoshiishi, I., M. Takenouchi and T. Hasegawa, "Enzymatic method for the simultaneous determination of hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfates using high-performance liquid chromatography," Anal. Biochem.,265, 49-54 (1998).         [ Links ]
5. Kobayashi, M., T. Kusakawa, M. Saito, S. Kaji, M. Oomura, S. Iwabuchi, Y. Morita, Q. Hasan and E. Tamiya, "Electrochemical DNA quantification based on aggregation induced by hoechst 33258," Electrochem. Commun., 4, 337-343 (2004).         [ Links ]
6. Li, H.Y. and Q.M. Jiang, "Study on the polarographic behavior of crystal violet," Chinese Phys. Test. Chem. Anal. (B), 41, 923-925 (2005).         [ Links ]
7. Li, N.Q. and J. Min, "Polarographic study on the non-electroactive complex of scandium-carminic acid," Chinese J. Anal. Chem., 17, 346-348 (1989).         [ Links ]
8. Maruyama T., T. Toida and T. Imanari, "Conformational changes and anticoagulant activity of chondroitin sulfate following its o-sulfonation," Carbohydrate Res., 306, 35-43 (1998).         [ Links ]
9. Mourano, P.A.S., M.S. Pereira and M.S.G. Pavao, "Structure and anticoagulant activity of a fucosylated chondroitin sulfate from echinoderm. Sulfated fucose branches on the polysaccharide account for its high anticoagulant action," J. Biol. Chem., 271, 23973-23984 (1996).         [ Links ]
10. Payan, E., N. Presle and F. Lapicque, "Separation and quantification by ion-association capillary zone electrophoresis of unsaturated disaccharide units of chondroitin sulfates and oligosaccharides derived from hyaluronan," Anal. Chem., 70, 4780-4786 (1998).         [ Links ]
11. Peng, X. Y., H.Q. Luo and N.B. Li, "Voltammetric study on the interaction of heparin with toluidine blue and its analytical application," Microchim. Acta, 156, 297-302 (2007).         [ Links ]
12. Perekotii, V.V., Z.A. Temerdashev, T.G. Tsyupko and E.A. Palenaya, "Electrochemical behavior of crystal violet on glassy carbon electrodes," J. Anal. Chem., 57, 448-451 (2002).         [ Links ]
13. Plaas, A.H., V.C. Hascall and R.J. Midura, "Ion exchange hplc microanalysis of chondroitin sulfate: quantitative derivatization of chondroitin lyase digestion products with 2-aminopyridine," Glycobiology, 6, 823-829 (1996).         [ Links ]
14. Sun, W., J.Y. You, Q.X. Wang and K. Jiao, "Voltammetric determination of DNA based on its interaction with neutral red," Indian J. Chem. A, 45, 1173-1177 (2006).         [ Links ]
15. Sun, W., H. Jiang, J.H. Zhong and K. Jiao, "Application of ο-tolidine as subdtrate for the electrochemical determenation of hemoglobin or hydrogen peroxide," Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop., 21, 179-188 (2007).         [ Links ]
16. Xu, H., P. Liu and H.Q. Luo, "Spectrophotometric determination of heparin with crystal violet," J. Southwest China Normal Univ., 27, 735-738 (2002).         [ Links ]
17. Zhu, R.F., X.L. Tong and Y. Li, "Preparation of chondroitin sulfate," Chinese J. Pharmaceu., 31, 255-258 (2000).         [ Links ]

Received: June 14, 2009.
Accepted: March 17, 2010.
Recommended by Subject Editor Ana Lea Cukierman.