SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.14 número1Sobrevida y potencial reproductivo en diferentes cohortes de Calomys venustusAnatomía y desarrollo de los huesos del oído interno de Caluromys philander (Didelphimorphia, Marsupialia) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados




  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados


Mastozoología neotropical

versión impresa ISSN 0327-9383versión On-line ISSN 1666-0536

Mastozool. neotrop. v.14 n.1 Mendoza ene./jun. 2007


Feeding habits of the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) in the Brazilian cerrado

Flávio H.G. Rodrigues1,2, Adriani Hass3, Ana C.R. Lacerda4, Raquel L.S.C. Grando5, Marcelo A. Bagno6†, Alexandra M.R. Bezerra7 and Wesley R. Silva8

1 Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Av. Antônio Carlos 6627. CP 486. CEP 31270-901. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. <>. 2 Instituto Pró-Carnívoros <>. 3 Bolsista PRODOC, PG Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais <>. 4 PPG em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil. 5 Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília. 6 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília. 7 PPG em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília. <>. 8 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. CP 6109 CEP 13083-970, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil <>.

ABSTRACT: The maned wolf feeds mainly on fruits and small vertebrates. The diet of maned wolf was studied at Águas Emendadas Ecological Station (AEES) through 328 faecal samples collected from November 1996 to August 1999. To evaluate the seasonal variation in food availability, the fruit phenology of the wolf's fruit, the main food item in maned wolf's diet, was monitored counting the fruits produced in 20 marked plants. Fructification phenology of fleshy fruit plants in the cerrado habitat of AEES was recorded monitoring five plots of 100 x 20 m, where the number of fruit producing species and individuals were recorded. The diet composition was 60% vegetal items and 40% animal ones. The wolf's fruit, other fruits and small mammals were the most frequent consumed categories, but armadillos, wolf's fruit, medium size mammals, and small mammals were the most important categories considering biomass. Maned wolves are generalist, with a broad diet, and consume most of the food items according to their availability. However, wolves are selective with regard to some food items, particularly the wolf's fruit during the dry season.

RESUMEN: Hábitos alimentarios del aguará guazú (Chrysocyon brachyurus) en el dominio del Cerrado, Brasil. El aguará guazú se alimenta principalmente de frutos y vertebrados pequeños. Si bien se ha obtenido mucha información acerca de la dieta del aguará guazú, datos sobre la ecología trófica de esta especie en reservas pequeñas del Cerrado son importantes para establecer estrategias de conservación. Se estudió la dieta del aguará guazú en la Estación Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (EEAE) a través de 328 muestras de heces colectadas entre noviembre de 1996 y agosto de 1999. Para evaluar la variación estacional en la disponibilidad de alimentos se analizó la fenología frutal de Solanum lycocarpum, el principal componente de la dieta de este cánido, contando los frutos producidos en 20 plantas marcadas. Se estudió la fenología de fructificación de plantas con frutos carnosos en el ambiente de Cerrado de la EEAE en cinco parcelas de 100 x 20 m, registrándose el número de especies productoras de frutos y sus individuos. La composición de la dieta fue de 60% de ítems vegetales y de 40% de ítems animales. Solanum lycocarpum, otros frutos y los micromamíferos fueron las categorías consumidas con mayor frecuencia, pero considerando la biomasa las categorías más importantes fueron los armadillos, el Solanum lycocarpum y los mamíferos medianos y pequeños. El aguará guazú es generalista, con una dieta amplia, consumiendo la mayor parte del alimento de acuerdo a su disponibilidad. Sin embargo, estos cánidos son selectivos al considerar algunos alimentos, particularmente el Solanum lycocarpum durante la estación seca.

Key words. Cerrado domain, diet composition, food availability, Solanum lycocarpum, trophic ecology.

Palabras clave. Dominio del Cerrado, ecología trófica, composición de dieta, disponibilidad de alimentos, Solanum lycocarpum.


   The maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus, Illiger), or aguará guazú, is the largest South American canid, weighting between 20 and 30 kg (Rodden et al., 2004). It is broadly distributed in the open vegetation of South America, mainly in the Cerrados of Central Brazil (Rodden et al., 2004). The maned wolf is listed as "Near Threatened" by IUCN (Sillero-Zubiri and Hoffmann, 2004), but is classified as "Vulnerable" by the Brazilian Red List of Threatened Species, manly due to habitat fragmentation, the highest risk to the species conservation. In Brazil, most of its original habitat has been replaced by farms and ranches remaining only 20% of the Cerrado's original area preserved (Myers et al., 2000), generally as small reserves. Knowing the ecology of the maned wolf in these small and fragmented habitats is fundamental for the species conservation.
   The diet of the maned wolf has been studied since the 1970's in Brazil (Carvalho, 1976), but the first detailed study quantifying the frequency of food items was Dietz's (1984) monograph, which alongside more recent studies revealed that the diet of the maned wolf is composed mainly by small vertebrates and fruits (Dietz, 1984; Carvalho and Vasconcellos, 1995; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Azevedo and Gastal, 1997; Motta-Junior, 1997; Motta-Junior, 2000; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Queirolo, 2001; Bueno et al., 2002; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Motta-Junior and Martins 2002; Silva and Talamoni, 2003; Santos et al., 2003; Jácomo et al., 2004). However, most of these studies present only a description of the consumed items and just a few have a more focused ecological approach, as comparisons with other canids (Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Jácomo et al., 2004), seed dispersal (Motta-Junior and Martins, 2002) and relationship between food availability and consumption (Motta-Junior, 2000; Queirolo, 2001). In spite of the apparent homogeneity among the studies in relation to the main consumed items, the frequency of these items can change among localities. Yet, most studies agree that the "wolf's fruit" (Solanum lycocarpum, Solanaceae) is the main consumed item (e. g., Dietz, 1984; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Santos et al., 2003; Silva and Talamoni, 2003; Jácomo et al., 2004). The methods employed to evaluate the importance of the different food items in the diet vary also among the studies. Some studies use only the occurrence frequency of the item to describe the maned wolf's diet (e. g., Carvalho and Vasconcellos, 1995; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Santos et al., 2003; Jácomo et al., 2004), while others seek to verify its importance as expressed by volume (Dietz, 1984) or dry weight of the faeces remains (Azevedo and Gastal, 1997), as well as by biomass estimate (Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Santos et al., 2003). Few studies attempt to compare the diet with available resources (Motta-Junior, 2000; Queirolo, 2001). The objective of this study was to quantify the frequency and importance in biomass of different food items in the maned wolf's diet, evaluating the relationship between food availability and consumption by these carnivores.


Study area

   The study was carried out at Águas Emendadas Ecological Station (AEES), located in the northeast of Distrito Federal (15 o 32' S and 47 o 33'W), 40 km from Brasília, Central Brazil. AEES is located in the center of Cerrado biome, the second largest biome of South America, with about 2 million km2. The Cerrado is characterized by a mosaic of vegetation types ranging from open grasslands to forests (Oliveira-Filho and Ratter, 2002). The reserve contains representative samples of the main vegetation types of the Cerrado biome, with prominence of cerrado stricto sensu (a semideciduous, xeromorphic tree/shrubs, woodland with an open canopy and a ground cover of forbs and grasses) and vereda (marsh grassland habitat associated with forest boundaries and with the occurrence of the palm tree ‘buriti'). The dry season occurs from April to September, with an average monthly precipitation of 24.3 mm, and the wet season from October to March, with an average monthly precipitation of 212.4 mm.
   In the edges of AEES predominates pastures, farms and the city of Planaltina. In some areas of the limits, the houses reach the AEES fences. The urban area has been growing substantially, causing high pressure on the protected area, with hunt, invasion of domestic dogs and isolation of the reserve from other natural areas.


   We collected faecal samples of maned wolves from November 1996 to August 1999 in the internal trails of AEES. Rodrigues (2002) estimated the population of wolves in ESECAE in five couples. Therefore, the collected faecal samples are assumed to belong to these couples and their young up to one and a half year of age. The number of faecal samples varied along the months (range 7 to 49), with 148 faeces analysed in the dry season and 180 in the wet season. We washed the samples through a 2 mm mesh screen, separating seeds, feathers, scales, bone, fruit fragments and arthropods, and grouping the identified food items into nine classes: wolf's fruit, other fruits, arthropods, reptiles, birds, eggs, small mammals (Rodentia and Didelphimorphia), armadillos and medium sized mammals. Seeds were identified by comparison to a reference collection made for the study area. For Small Mammals and Birds we identified the consumed species comparing to the reference collection of Universidade de Brasília and Museu Nacional (UFRJ). We analysed the maned wolf's diet through frequency of occurrence and consumed biomass, because both methods reflect distinct aspects of the importance of food types in the diet. For animal items, we estimated the biomass consumed multiplying the average weight of each species by its minimum number found in faeces. The minimum number was obtained counting teeth, jaws, beaks and other parts of the animal. We estimated the consumed biomass of each fruit species based in the number of seeds found in faeces and the relation between the number of seeds and the pulp weight of previously analysed fruits. We obtained fruit weights from fruits collected in AEES or from literature (Lorenzi, 1992; Almeida et al., 1998) and the animal weight from the literature (Emmons and Feer, 1997; Marinho-Filho et al., 1998; Eisenberg and Redford, 1999) or own data.
   To assess the seasonal variation in food availability we monitored the fruit phenology of the wolf's fruit from May 1998 to April 1999. We tagged 20 plants and all their fruits produced in the period, counting the fruits in the plants and on the ground twice a week. We also recorded the fructification phenology of fleshy fruit plants in the cerrado habitats of AEES, monitoring five plots of 100 x 20 m, totalling 1 ha. We monthly recorded the number of species and individuals with fruits in these plots from February 1997 to January 1998. The availability of small mammals in the area was assessed through published data (Anciães et al., 1997).
   We tested the monthly variation in the fruit production of S. lycocarpum by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), having the individuals as the random factor and the months as the fixed factor. Orthogonal contrasts were used as a posteriori tests when the monthly differences were significant to evaluate seasonal variation: dry season (April to September) and rainy season (October to March). The distributions of relative frequency of food items consumed during the dry and rainy seasons, as well as seasonal comparisons in the frequency of consumption of animal and vegetal items, were analysed through G test. The amount of consumption of animal and vegetal items were analysed through t-test. The hypothesis that the amount of wolf's fruits consumed depended on its availability was tested through linear regression, using the number of seeds found in the faeces as an indicator of the consumed biomass. For this analysis we used only faecal samples collected in the same period of the fruit production samples. The data were transformed in neperian logarithm when necessary to obtain normality. The residues were checked graphically to verify if there was some tendency in the estimates. The statistical analyses followed Sokal and Rohlf (1995).


   We recorded 71 species with fleshy fruits at AEES and a total of 1626 records of individuals with fruits (the sum of all records, during one year). There was seasonal variation in the fruit production at AEES, with less fruiting species and individuals found in the dry season (Fig. 1A, Table 1). The fruiting pattern of the wolf's fruit is distinct from most of the other cerrado plant species: fruit is available during the whole year, but large fruit crops are concentrated in some months (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1. Seasonal variation on fleshy fruit production at Águas Emendadas Ecological Station. A) Average number of species and individuals
in five plots sampled, from February 1997 to January 1998. B) Average number of fruits of Solanum lycocarpum per plant, from May 1998 to April 1999.

   We analysed 328 faecal samples of maned wolves and recorded 901 items consumed, being 40% animal and 60% vegetal (Table 2). The ratio of animal/vegetal items changed seasonally, but we found monthly significant differences only during the dry season, which were related to the higher consumption of animal items in August and September (Table 3, Fig. 2). The most frequent food categories represented in the maned wolf's faeces at AEES were respectively: Wolf's Fruit, Other Fruits (mainly Annona crassiflora, Salacia crassiflora and Mangifera indica), Small Mammals (mainly Calomys spp. and Didelphis albiventris), Birds and Armadillos (mainly Dasypus septemcinctus). We identified 20 fruit species consumed by maned wolves, being the wolf's fruit the most frequent, present in 74.4% of the samples and totalising 27.1% of the records (Table 2). We found at least 28 vertebrate species, mainly small mammals (Rodentia + Didelphimorphia, 16.7% of the records) (Table 2). Considering biomass, Armadillos, Wolf's Fruit, Medium Sized Mammals and Small Mammals accounted for the most important categories (Table 4). Arthropods and Eggs were less frequent and responsible for only a small fraction of the consumed biomass (Tables 2 and 4).

Table 2
Food items and frequency of consumption in the diet of maned wolves in Águas Emendadas Ecological Station, Brazil.

Fig. 2. Proportion of animal and vegetal items consumed by maned wolves at Águas Emendadas Ecological Station.

Table 4
Biomass consumed estimated by the maned wolf in Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas, Brazil.

   As a whole, fruit as a food item occurred in the faecal samples of both rainy (87%) and dry (92%) seasons. The wolf's fruit alone was found in 66% of rainy and 84% of dry season samples, with significant differences between the two seasons (G = 15.7; df = 1; p < 0.001). However, we did not find seasonal differences in the number of seeds per sample (t = -1.145; df = 19.5; p = 0.266) and there was no relationship between fruit production and consumption by maned wolves (y = 27.2 + 75.3x, r2 = 0.078, p = 0.5).
   We found Other Fruits in 54% and 40% of the rainy and dry season samples, respectively. Animal items were present in similar proportions along the year: 65% in rainy season and 67% in dry season. We did not find differences in consumption between rainy and dry season with regard to vegetal (t = 0.441; df = 20; p = 0.664), nor to animal items (total: t = -0.900; df = 20; p = 0.379; Small Mammals: t = -0.103; df = 20; p = 0.918; Armadillos: t = -0.239; df = 20; p = 0.814).


   The maned wolf has a varied diet composed basically of 60% vegetal and the remaining by animal items. Other studies also demonstrate a balance between vegetal (ranging from 44.6 to 57.5%) and animal items (Dietz, 1984; Carvalho and Vasconcellos, 1995; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Azevedo and Gastal, 1997; Motta-Junior, 1997; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Santos et al., 2003; Jácomo et al., 2004). The most frequent categories in the faeces of the maned wolf in AEES were: Wolf's Fruit, Other Fruits, Small Mammals, Birds and Armadillos. Among several other studies, the wolf's fruit appears as the most common food item in the wolf's diet (Dietz, 1984; Carvalho and Vasconcellos, 1995; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Azevedo and Gastal, 1997; Motta-Junior, 1997; Santos et al., 2003), whereas small mammals (two localities in Motta-Junior, 1997; Bueno et al., 2002; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002) and other fruit species (Jácomo et al., 2004) are reported as the top food items.
   Except by Queirolo and Motta-Junior (2000) and Queirolo (2001), all the studies conducted in Cerrado report the wolf's fruit as the most consumed fruit species (Dietz, 1984; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Lilienfeld, 2000; Aragona, 2001; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Silva and Talamoni, 2003; Jácomo et al., 2004). Queirolo and Motta-Junior (2000) found a low frequency of the wolf's fruit in the maned wolf faecal samples at Serra da Canastra National Park, the same locality where Dietz (1984) found a high frequency of this fruit in faeces, and suggests that the abundance of S. lycocarpum declined after cattle have been removed from the Park. This contrast, however, could just reflect an annual variation in fruit consumption, since in other localities where the wolf's fruit is rare, as in the Emas National Park (FHGR, pers. obs.), the consumption of this fruit by wolves was high (Jácomo et al., 2004).
   In the present study the wolf's fruit proved to be very important in the diet of maned wolves, being the most frequent food item and the second in biomass. It is available during the whole year, although somewhat reduced during the dry season. Nonetheless, in the dry season this fruit is more frequently consumed and the amount ingested does not vary, indicating that the maned wolf actively searches for the wolf's fruit during this time. The wolf's fruit was also more consumed during the dry season in Emas National Park (Jácomo et al., 2004) and Ibitipoca State Park (Aragona and Setz, 2001), although the consumption was higher in the wet season at São Luís Farm, a human altered area where cultivated fruits were more important in the wolf's diet than wild fruits (Santos et al., 2003). The consumption of S. lycocarpum was also high during the dry season in the Jataí Ecological Station, where the production is higher during the dry season, although consumption and fruit availability were not correlated (Motta-Junior, 2000).
   In general, fruits of other plant species (Dietz, 1984; Motta-Junior et al., 1996) and arthropods (Dietz, 1984; Santos et al., 2003) are more consumed in the rainy season and small mammals in the dry season (Dietz, 1984; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Motta-Junior, 2000; Santos et al., 2003; Bueno and Motta-Junior, 2006). In the AEES other fruits were less available in the dry season, with a few plant species and individuals producing fruits, and the maned wolf seemed to consume them according to their availability, in agreement with Motta-Junior (2000), who found a strong relation between consumption and availability of other fruit species. These fruits appear more frequently in the faeces during short periods of availability, like A. crassiflora, S. crassiflora and the introduced mango (M. indica), although poorly represented in the biomass fraction.
   Among the fruits other than S. lycocarpum, the family Annonaceae (Annona spp. and others) was the most frequent in this study (3.6% of the records), and the second most consumed fruit in other studies (Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Jácomo et al., 2004). Small mammals were the most common animal item in the wolf's diet, in agreement with all other studies, except by Azevedo and Gastal (1997).
   The dry season is generally a stressing period for most of the Cerrado plant species, due to the low availability of water and a consequently low primary production (Franco, 2002). To maned wolves, this represents a period of fruit scarcity, but small rodents and marsupials are more available in this period. Evaluating the variation on small mammals abundance at AEES, Anciães et al. (1997) found that in forested habitats higher densities were recorded during the whole dry season, whereas in open areas (cerrado and wet fields) the higher densities occurred in the end of the dry season and beginning of the rainy season, the same period when we found an increase in the consumption of animal items. Studies at other areas in Distrito Federal also found higher densities of small mammals in dry season (Alho and Pereira, 1985; Alho et al., 1986), even though, we did not find significant differences in the rate of small mammals consumed both in dry and wet season s in AEES. This pattern can indicate an active search for small mammals in the wet season or that the abundance of small mammals is very high, and the decrease in abundance during the wet season does not affect the behaviour of maned wolves. Another possible explanation is that the higher abundance of small mammals during the dry season reflects only changes in the behaviour of these mammals and not an actual increase in abundance. As food availability is usually low in the dry season (Oliveira, 1998; Pinheiro et al., 2002), small rodents and marsupials could increase their movements in search of food, making these animals prone to be attracted to baited traps. Furthermore, some rodent species reproduce well in dry season (Alho and Pereira, 1985; Vieira, 1997) and the possible change in the movement pattern makes these animals more vulnerable to predation, resulting in higher food availability to wolves, even if their density does not change.
   Frequency of occurrence is a good method to describe the food habits of vertebrates, although it can overestimate the importance of small items, like insects. To compensate this bias, some authors have used the volume of each item in the faeces (Dietz, 1984) or the dry weight of the remains (Azevedo and Gastal, 1997). However, these methods do not reflect the importance of the food items, because the digestibility varies among different food items. Biomass calculations through counts of minimum number of each category multiplied by their weight can be a more accurate estimate of the importance of food categories in the diet. Some authors are in disagreement with the method for calculating the preys' weight. According to them, the medium weight should consider juveniles and adults, because the use of adults' weights alone results in an overestimation of their importance regarding biomass. Likewise, considering the consumption of whole preys also leads to an overestimation regarding biomass. However, juveniles are available just in a restricted time of the year and probably the possible overestimate was not significant. Besides, the several times that we observed wolves eating small mammals they consumed the whole prey. Therefore, overestimates can just be happening in the case of larger animals. The biomass estimating method was used in this study and in at least other six related studies (Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Motta-Junior, 2000; Queirolo, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Santos et al. 2003; Silva and Talamoni, 2003), allowing data comparison.
   In the AEES, armadillos were the principal category in the biomass calculation, followed by the wolf's fruit, medium sized mammals and small mammals (rodents and Didelphidae marsupials). Santos et al. (2003) obtained similar results, with 45.0% of the biomass represented by armadillos, 42.3% by wolf's fruit and 9% by small mammals, whereas Motta-Junior (2000) found armadillos (27.1%), small mammals (26.9%) and wolf's fruit (23.2%) as the main categories consumed. Motta-Junior et al. (1996) and Juarez and Marinho-Filho (2002) found that the wolf's fruit was the category with greater consumption regarding biomass (respectively 53.5 and 34.0%) and Queirolo (2001) found that fruits (except wolf's fruit) and small mammals represent most of the biomass consumed (30.9 and 16.8%, respectively). Silva and Talamoni (2003) reported an unusual situation where 96% of the biomass consumed where animal items, mainly small mammals (44.9%). According to these studies, other items well represented in biomass were the small mammals and the armadillos (respectively 22.2 and 13.3%, Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002), and the armadillos, the small mammals and the medium sized mammals (respectively 29.7, 8.4 and 7.9%, Motta-Junior et al., 1996). The biomass of the wolf's fruit was probably overestimated by Juarez and Marinho-Filho (2002), because these authors assigned one whole fruit consumed to each faecal sample containing S. lycocarpum seeds. The relation between the average number of seeds and the average fruit weight (this study, Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Motta-Junior, 2000; Queirolo, 2001; Silva and Talamoni, 2003) is a more adequate measure to estimate the fruit biomass consumed, specially in the case of the wolf's fruit, because wolves can consume just a bite or up to four or more fruits in few minutes (FHGR, pers. obs.). The biomass of other fruit species was low in AEES and other studies, except for another area in the Distrito Federal (Motta-Junior et al., 1996) and in Serra da Canastra National Park (Queirolo, 2001). The low importance of other fruit species in the diet of the maned wolf is related to the fact that their consumption is restricted mainly to the rainy season.
   The animal prey items eaten by maned wolves were mainly of small size, as observed in previous studies (Carvalho, 1976; Dietz, 1984; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Jácomo et al., 2004), although larger species can be occasionally included in the diet, like peccaries (this study), deer (this study, Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Jácomo et al., 2004), and the giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla (Dietz, 1984). Remains of large vertebrates in faeces are not necessarily a proof of predation on these animals, since maned wolves are known to scavenge (e.g., snakes, FHGR pers. obs.) and rheas, Rhea americana (Silveira, 1999). In addition, predation on pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) has been recorded (Bestelmeyer and Westbrook, 1998) and is quite common to observe wolves pursuing pampas deer at night (FHGR pers. obs.). Also, the alarm behaviour of pampas deer in the presence of wolves indicates that deer perceives the wolf as a potential predator (Rodrigues, 1996), although the opposite is observed for giant anteaters, which are found walking close to maned wolves without any alarm behaviour (Dietz, 1984; FHGR pers. obs.).
   The hunting success of this pursuit behaviour on deer and other large sized mammals is probably low, but it may be important for the wolf since the biomass represented by these prey items is high, probably yielding food for many days. Three cervid species occur in AEES (Marinho-Filho et al., 1998), of which the grey brocket deer (Mazama gouazoupira) is the most common, and was probably the species consumed by maned wolves in this study. On the other hand, peccaries are extremely rare in the region (Marinho-Filho et al., 1998) and both species, Tayassu pecari and Pecari tajacu, were spotted just once during the study. As a prey, peccaries can be more dangerous than deer and the consumption of these pigs has not been recorded before, even where peccaries are common (e. g., Emas National Park; Jácomo et al., 2004), suggesting that the record of this study could be a scavenging event.
   At least six rodent and two marsupial species were eaten by maned wolves in AEES. All identified rodents were open areas inhabitants (as found in cerrado of Itirapina, São Paulo State, by Bueno and Motta-Junior, 2006) and the white-eared opossum Didelphis albiventris, which can be found in both forest and open areas. The most frequent non-volant small mammals sampled with live-traps in AEES (from a total of 16 captured species from November 1993 to October 1994) were Oryzomys gr. subflavus, Necromys lasiurus, and Calomys spp. in cerrado sensu stricto, Oxymycterus delator and N. lasiurus in wet field, and Oecomys bicolor and Didelphis albiventris in gallery forest (Anciães et al., 1997). From these species, Calomys spp., D. albiventris, and N. lasiurus were the most frequent in the wolf's faeces. Although the maned wolf feeds mainly upon common cerrado species, the high consumption of Calomys indicates certain selectivity in relation to the species and/or the habitat used for foraging. Similar results were obtained by Motta-Junior (2000), who found that Calomys tener and Necromys lasiurus were consumed more than expected, whereas Oryzomys gr. subflavus was consumed much less than expected by their respective abundances.
   The birds identified in the wolf's faeces are grasslands and open cerrado inhabitants (Silva, 1995), except for the owl Tyto alba that also inhabits forest edges but hunts only in open areas (Motta-Junior, 1996). The frequency of birds in the maned wolf's diet was around 10%, in accordance with other studies (Dietz, 1984; Carvalho and Vasconcellos, 1995; Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Azevedo and Gastal, 1997; Motta-Junior, 1997; Aragona and Setz, 2001; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002; Santos et al., 2003; Jácomo et al., 2004), but their importance in terms of biomass is more variable, ranging from 3.5 to 9.4% (Motta-Junior et al., 1996; Juarez and Marinho-Filho, 2002). Egg consumption is rare, but it is possibly underestimated, as wolves do not ingest shell fragments. Verzenhassi and Setz (1996) observed that maned wolves, in captivity, consume whole quail eggs, which cannot be true for larger eggs. Many species of cerrado ground birds, like tinamous and rhea, nest on the ground level (Sick, 1997), making the eggs an easily obtainable resource. In Emas National Park a female maned wolf was observed carrying a rhea egg on the mouth up to 3 km and feeding it to its three puppies (FHGR, pers. obs.).
   The animal biomass consumed by maned wolves in AEES was much higher than vegetal biomass (respectively 68 and 32%). The values found by Motta-Junior et al. (1996) and Santos et al. (2003) are less contrasting (respectively 43.5 and 43.1% vegetal and 56.5 and 54.0% animal), while Juarez and Marinho-Filho (2002) found more vegetal (54.5%) than animal (41.5%) biomass (but see discussion above on overestimated fruit biomass). Although there is an increase in the availability of small prey during the dry season, the low fruit production in the cerrado at this time can limit the access of the maned wolf to a richer fruit diet, including the wolf's fruit.
   Sometimes maned wolves feed upon domestic animals, especially poultry (Dietz, 1984; 1987), leading farmers to kill them. The AEES is limited by Planaltina city in its southwestern boundary, and by small rural properties in the north and northeast. All the seven wolves monitored by Rodrigues (2002) had part of their home ranges outside AEES, making their contact with humans almost inevitable around AEES (Machado et al., 1998). As the majority of landowners in that region raise poultry in their properties, the predation by wolves and other carnivores can be high. We found chicken remains in only two faecal samples, indicating that its importance in the diet of maned wolves is very small. Low chicken predation by wolves was also reported by Dietz (1984) and Motta-Junior et al. (1996), confirming that the consumption of this food item is occasional.
   Maned wolves are generalist canids, with a broad diet, and consume most of the food items according to its availability in the habitat. This diet flexibility allows maned wolves to adapt well to some human altered habitats, where they consume large amounts of cultivated fruits (Santos et al., 2003; Jácomo, et al., 2004; this study). Nonetheless, wolves can be selective with regard to some food items, mainly the wolf's fruit in the dry season, probably a key plant species in the maintenance of their populations in the Cerrado domain in Brazil.


   This work was part of the Ph.D thesis of Flávio Rodrigues (Graduate Program in Ecology at Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil), and was supported by Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza / MacArthur Foundation. CAPES/MEC provided a PhD grant to FHGR. We thank Emerson Vieira, Emygdio Monteiro-Filho, Eleonore Setz, José Roberto Moreira, Mauro Galetti, and José Carlos Motta-Junior for suggestions to the early version of the manuscript. Pablo Ortiz translated the Spanish abstract. Marcelo X. Bizerril, Rogério de Paula, Cláudia Campos, and other friends helped during fieldwork. Luciano Teixeira, former administrator of AEES, Miguel and other park rangers helped with fieldwork and provided logistical support. João A. Oliveira (MN-UFRJ) permitted access to the specimens. We dedicate this paper to Marcelo Bagno, who sadly died while doing fieldwork in early 2002.


ALHO CJR and LA PEREIRA. 1985. Population ecology of Cerrado rodent community in Central Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 45:597-607.         [ Links ]

ALHO CRJ, LA PEREIRA, and AC PAULA. 1986. Patterns of habitat utilization by small mammal populations in Cerrado biome of Central Brazil. Mammalia 50:447-460.         [ Links ]

ALMEIDA SP, CEB PROENÇA, SM SANO, and JF RIBEIRO. 1998. Cerrado: espécies vegetais úteis. EMBRAPA-CPAC, Planaltina, DF, Brasil.         [ Links ]

ANCIÃES M, MM GUIMARÃES, A GUIMARÃES, ML REIS, and J MARINHO-FILHO. 1997. Diversidade e parâmetros populacionais em comunidades de pequenos mamíferos do Brasil Central. Pp. 153-156, in: Contribuição ao conhecimento ecológico do Cerrado (LL Leite and CH Saito, org.). Dept. Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília. Brasília, DF.         [ Links ]

ARAGONA M. 2001. Ecologia alimentar do lobo-guará (Chrysocyon brachyurus, Illiger, 1811) no Parque nacional de Chapada dos Guimarães, MT. Tese de Mestrado em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, MT.         [ Links ]

ARAGONA M and EZF SETZ. 2001. Diet of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Mammalia: Canidae), during wet and dry seasons at Ibitipoca State Park, Brazil. Journal of Zoology 254:131-136.         [ Links ]

AZEVEDO FCC and MLA GASTAL. 1997. Hábito alimentar do lobo-guará (Chrysocyon brachyurus) na APA Gama/Cabeça do Veado, DF. Pp. 238-240, in: Contribuição ao conhecimento ecológico do Cerrado (LL Leite and CH Saito, org.). Dept. Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília. Brasília, DF.         [ Links ]

BESTELMEYER SV and C WESTBROOK. 1998. Maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) predation on pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) in Central Brazil. Mammalia 62:591-595.         [ Links ]

BUENO AA and JC MOTTA-JUNIOR. 2006. Small mammal selection and functional response in the diet of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon Brachyurus (Mammalia: Canidae), in Southeast Brazil. Mastozoología Neotropical 13:11-19.         [ Links ]

BUENO AA, SCS BELENTANI, and JC MOTTA-JUNIOR. 2002. Feeding ecology of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815) (Mammalia: Canidae), in the Ecological Station of Itirapina, São Paulo State, Brazil. Revista Biota Neotropica 2., access in August 2006.         [ Links ]

CARVALHO CT. 1976. Aspectos faunísticos do cerrado - o lobo-guará (Mammalia, Canidae). Instituto Florestal, São Paulo, SP. Boletim Técnico 21:1-16.         [ Links ]

CARVALHO CT and LEM VASCONCELLOS. 1995. Disease, food and reproduction of the maned wolf - Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger) (Carnivora, Canidae) in southeast Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 12:627-640.         [ Links ]

DIETZ JM 1984. Ecology and social organization of the maned wolf. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 392:1-51.         [ Links ]

DIETZ, JM. 1987. Grass Roots of the Maned Wolf. Natural History 3:52-58.         [ Links ]

EISENBERG JF and KH REDFORD. 1999. Mammals of the Neotropics. Vol. 3. The Central Neotropics: Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Brazil. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.         [ Links ]

EMMONS LH and F FEER. 1997. Neotropical rainforest mammals. A field guide. Second edition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.         [ Links ]

FRANCO AC. 2002. Ecophysiology of Woody Plants. Pp. 178-198, in: The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna (PS Oliveira and RJ Marquis, eds.). Columbia University Press.         [ Links ]

JÁCOMO ATA, L SILVEIRA, and JAF DINIZ-FILHO. 2004. Niche Separation between the Maned-Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), Crab-Eating Fox (Dusicyon thous) and the Hoary-Fox (Dusicyon vetulus) in the Cerrado of Central Brazil. Journal of Zoology 262:99-106         [ Links ]

JUAREZ KM and JS MARINHO-FILHO. 2002. Diet, habitat use, and home ranges of sympatric canids in Central Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy 83:925-933.         [ Links ]

LILIENFELD MD. 2000. Determinación de los hábitos alimenticios del Aguara guazu (Chrysocyon brachyurus) en dos zonas del Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado. Tesis de licenciatura en Biología, UAGRM, Santa Cruz.         [ Links ]

LORENZI H. 1992. Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas do Brasil. Ed. Plantarum, São Paulo.         [ Links ]

MACHADO RB, LMS AGUIAR, CA BIANCHI, RL VIANNA, AJB SANTOS, CH SAITO, and JF TIMMERS. 1998. Áreas de risco no entorno de Unidades de Conservação: estudo de caso da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas, Planaltina, DF. Pp. 64-75, in: Vertebrados da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (J Marinho-Filho, FHG Rodrigues, and MM Guimarães, eds.). SEMATEC/IEMA, Brasília, DF.         [ Links ]

MARINHO-FILHO J, FHG RODRIGUES, and MM GUIMARÃES. 1998. Mamíferos da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas. Pp. 34-63, in: Vertebrados da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas (J Marinho-Filho, FHG Rodrigues, and MM Guimarães, eds.). SEMATEC/IEMA, Brasília, DF.         [ Links ]

MOTTA-JUNIOR JC. 1996. Ecologia alimentar de corujas (Aves, Strigiformes) na região central do estado de São Paulo: biomassa, sazonalidade e seletividade de suas presas. Tese de doutorado em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP.         [ Links ]

MOTTA-JUNIOR JC. 1997. Ecologia alimentar do lobo-guará, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Mammalia: Canidae). Pp.197-209, in: Anais de XV Encontro Anual de Etologia (C Ades, org.         [ Links ]).

MOTTA-JUNIOR JC. 2000. Variação temporal e seleção de presas na dieta do lobo-guará, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Mammalia: Canidae), na Estação Ecológica de Jataí, Luiz Antônio, SP. Pp. 331-346, in: Estação Ecológica de Jataí (JE Santos and JSR Pires, eds.). Vol I. São Carlos, RIMA Editora.         [ Links ]

MOTTA-JUNIOR, JC and K MARTINS. 2002. The frugivorous diet of Maned Wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus, in Brazil: Ecology and Conservation. Pp. 291-303, in: Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation (D Levey, WR Silva, and M Galetti, eds). CABi Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.         [ Links ]

MOTTA-JUNIOR JC, SA TALAMONI, JA LOMBARDI, and K SIMOKOMAKI. 1996. Diet of the maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus, in Central Brazil. Journal of Zoology 240:277-284.         [ Links ]

MYERS N, RA MITTERMEIER, CG MITTERMEIER, GAB FONSECA, and J KENT. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858.         [ Links ]

OLIVEIRA PE. 1998. Fenologia e biologia reprodutiva das espécies de Cerrado. Pp. 169-192, in: Cerrado: ambiente e flora (SM Sano and SP Almeida, eds.). EMBRAPA - CPAC.         [ Links ]

OLIVEIRA-FILHO AT and JA Ratter. 2002. Vegetation Physiognomies and Woody Flora of the Cerrado Biome. Pp. 91-120, in: The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna (PS Oliveira and RJ Marquis, eds.). Columbia University Press.         [ Links ]

PINHEIRO F, IR DINIZ, D COELHO, and MPS BANDEIRA. 2002. Seasonal pattern of insect abundance in the Brazilian cerrado. Austral Ecology 27:132-136,         [ Links ]

QUEIROLO D. 2001. Seletividade e sazonalidade de presas consumidas pelo lobo-guará (Chrysocyon brachyurus) no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, Minas Gerais. Tese de Mestrado, em Ecologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.         [ Links ]

QUEIROLO D and JC MOTTA-JUNIOR. 2000. Possível influência das mudanças da paisagem no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, MG, na dieta do Lobo-Guará (Chrysocyon brachyurus). Pp. 706-714, in: Anais do II Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservação. Vol. 2. Campo Grande, MS.         [ Links ]

RODDEN M, F RODRIGUES, and S BESTELMEYER. 2004. Maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus). Pp. 38-44, in: Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (C Sillero-Zubiri, M Hoffmann and DW Macdonald, eds). IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.         [ Links ]

RODRIGUES FHG. 1996. História natural e biologia comportamental do veado campeiro (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) em Cerrado do Brasil Central. Tese de mestrado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, SP.         [ Links ]

RODRIGUES, FHG. 2002. Biologia e conservação do lobo-guará na Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas, DF. Tese de doutorado. Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, SP.         [ Links ]

SANTOS EF, EZ SETZ, and N GOBBI. 2003. Diet of Maned Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) and its role in seed dispersal on a cattle ranch in Brazil. Journal of Zoology 260:203-208.         [ Links ]

SICK H. 1997. Ornitologia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Nova Fronteira. 912 pp.         [ Links ]

SILLERO-ZUBIRI C and M HOFFMANN. 2004. Chrysocyon brachyurus. In: IUCN 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. <>. Access in 08 August 2006.         [ Links ]

SILVA JA and SA TALAMONI. 2003. Diet adjustments of maned wolves, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger) (Mammalia, Canidae), subjected to supplemental feeding in a private natural reserve, Southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 20:339-345.         [ Links ]

SILVA JMC. 1995. Birds of the Cerrado region, South America. Steenstrupia 21:69-92.         [ Links ]

SILVEIRA L. 1999. Ecologia e conservação dos mamíferos carnívoros do Parque Nacional das Emas, Goiás. Tese de mestrado. Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiás.         [ Links ]

SOKAL RR and FJ ROHLF. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed, Freeman, New York.         [ Links ]

VERZENHASSI J and E SETZ. 1996. Predação de ninhos artificiais: análise dos restos de experimentos em cativeiro. Resumos do 3º Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil. Brasília, DF.         [ Links ]

VIEIRA MV. 1997. Dynamics of a rodent assemblage in a cerrado of southeast Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 57:99-107.         [ Links ]

Recibido 24 septiembre 2005.
Aceptación final 21 septiembre 2006.

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons