COMUNICACIONES BREVES

Spatial relationships between Ananas ananassoides (Bromeliaceae) and Tachigali vulgaris (Fabaceae) influencing the structure of the Amazon/Cerrado transition in Brazil

 

Fernando Elias^1,*; Nayara D. A. Teixeira² & Ben Hur Marimon Junior³

¹Universidade Federal do Pará/Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
² Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (UNEMAT), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Campus de Cáceres, Brasil.
³ UNEMAT, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Biológicas e Sociais Aplicadas, Campus de Nova Xavantina, Brasil.

* fernandoeliasbio@gmail.com

Editora asociada: Marina Omacini

Recibido: 30 de septiembre de 2016
Aceptado: 19 de marzo de 2017

 

---

ABSTRACT

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that: a) bromeliad Ananas ananassoides individuals and Tachigali vulgaris tree individual have an aggregate distribution pattern, and b) are spatially dissociated. To this effect, we quantified all A. ananassoides and T. vulgaris individuals (DBH of at least 30 cm) in large plot (1 ha) composed by 100 subplots measuring 10×10 m in a savanna woodland in the Bacaba Municipal Park, Nova Xavantina, Mato Grosso. The spatial pattern of A. ananassoides and T. vulgaris, and their spatial relationships, were measured using the aggregation and the association index, respectively. Both species had an aggregate distribution pattern and were spatially dissociated, which corroborates the hypotheses of this study. In this case, the preferred occupation in gaps by both species and the growth of the bromeliad in clumps may be conditioning the populations' spatial dependence. On the other hand, the bromeliad's clump formation and the tree species shading may be mutually exclusive factors, which intensify their competition for space and light and reveal spatial incompatibility by these populations. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the interactions between the herbaceous and tree layer, incorporating the temporal dynamics of natural regeneration and habitat conditions.

Keywords: Interspecific competition; Spatial dynamics; Gaps; Environmental heterogeneity

Relações espaciais entre Ananas ananassoides (Bromeliaceae) e Tachigali vulgaris (Fabaceae) influenciando a estrutura forestal na transição Amazônia/Cerrado no Brasil.

RESUMO

No presente estudo testamos as hipóteses de que: a) os indivíduos da bromélia Ananas ananassoides e da árvore Tachigali vulgaris distribuem-se de forma agregada, e b) dissociados no espaço. Para tanto, quantificamos todos os indivíduos de A. ananassoides e de T. vulgaris (DAP mínimo de 30 cm) em uma grande parcela (1 ha) composta por 100 subparcelas de 10x10 m em um cerradão no Parque Municipal do Bacaba, Nova Xavantina, Mato Grosso. O padrão espacial de A. ananassoides e T. vulgaris, e suas relações no espaço, foram mensurados pelo índice de agregação e associação, respectivamente. As duas espécies distribuíram-se de forma agregada e apresentaram-se dissociadas no espaço, corroborando as hipóteses do presente estudo. Neste caso, a ocupação preferencial em clareiras de ambas as espécies e o crescimento em touceiras da bromélia, pode estar condicionando a dependência espacial das populações. Por outro lado, a formação de touceiras da bromélia e o sombreamento da espécie arbórea podem ser fatores mutuamente excludentes, os quais intensificam a competição por espaço e luz entre essas espécies e revelam incompatibilidade espacial das duas populações. Novos estudos devem ser realizados para melhor compreender as interações entre os estratos herbáceo e arbóreo, incorporando a dinâmica temporal da regeneração natural e as condições do hábitat.

Palabras clave: Competição interespecífica; Dinâmica espacial; Clareiras; Heterogeneidade ambiental

---

 

Introducción

The intraspecific spatial distribution of plants can be an important factor driving the interspecific spatial arrangement in the community (Bulleri et al. 2016) and, consequently, the structure of the vegetation (Budke et al. 2010). For example, the intraspecific spatial patterns of bromeliads can be connected with different mechanisms (biotic and abiotic) governing the occupation of natural communities by plant species, such as facilitation (Beduschi and Castellani 2008; Tsuda et al. 2016), competition (Oliveira et al. 2007; Beduschi and Castellani 2013), clump formation (Cogliatti-Carvalho and Rocha 2001), microclimatic conditions (Cogliatti-Carvalho et al. 2010), soil characteristics and litter composition (Barberis et al. 1998). Most of these factors promote the spatial dependence of bromeliad individuals and can account for spatial repulsion with other species, including trees (Oliveira et al. 2007; Brancalion et al. 2009).
Ananas ananassoides (Baker) LB Sm., also known as wild pineapple, is a terrestrial bromeliad, perennial, and pollinated by animals (e.g., birds and tortoises), with an annual or intermediate flowering period (Jerozolimski et al. 2009; Silveira et al. 2010; Stahl et al. 2012). This species is considered a pioneer once it presents small and photoblastic seeds and higher germination rates in areas with high luminosity (Silveira et al. 2010). However, A. ananassoides does not show differences in photosynthetic rates in different light conditions, indicating shade tolerance (Keller and Lüttge 2005). Thus, the factors responsible for establishment and growth (sexual and asexual) of A. ananassoides are complex, and may be related to the germination conditions determined by the dynamics of gaps (Silveira et al. 2010). The species grow individually or in clumps, being generally found in areas of Cerrado ‘sensu stricto', but occurs in forests (Proença and Sajo 2007; Silveira et al. 2010). The plasticity in the establishment and colonization in different environments can condition changes in the patterns of spatial distribution of this species, in view of the direct competition for space and light with tree species (Oliveira et al. 2007).
The savanna woodland (“cerradão”) is a rare, transitional phytophysiognomy between savanna and forest at Amazonia-Cerrado transition, and Tachigali vulgaris L. G. Silva and R. Lima is a typical tree species of such formations (Ratter et al. 1973; Marimon-Junior and Haridasan 2005; Araújo et al. 2011; Solórzano et al. 2012). This species controls the structural dynamics of the savanna woodland due to its pioneer characteristic, high dispersal capacity (anemochoric), quick germination, short life cycle and high annual recruitment and mortality rates (Felfili et al. 1999; Franczak et al. 2011; Morandi et al. 2015; Reis et al. 2015). Gaps caused by T. vulgaris in the savanna woodland can provide feedback to its own establishment (Franczak et al. 2011).
In this study we describe the intraspecific distribution pattern and the spatial relationships between A. ananassoides and T. vulgaris in a savanna woodland area in the Cerrado/Amazon transition in Brazil. We hypothesize that: a) the populations are aggregately distributed as a consequence of the pioneer characteristic of both species and as a result of clump formation by the bromeliad (Benzing 1980; Felfili et al. 1999; Cogliatti-Carvalho and Rocha 2001), which limits recruitment and conditions the spatial dependence of individuals in the site, as observed for tree species (Dalling et al. 2002), and b) both populations are negatively associated in the site due to mutually exclusive factors such as shading by the tree species and the bromeliad's clump formation strategy, which inhibits other plants from establishing themselves within the limits of bromeliads (Oliveira et al. 2007; Barberis et al. 2014).

Materials and Methods

Area of study and data collection
The present study was conducted within a savanna woodland (14°42'02.3'' S - 52°21'02.6'' W) in the Bacaba Municipal Park. The park has approximately 500 ha and is situated in eastern Mato Grosso, an Amazon/Cerrado biome transition region (Marimon-Junior and Haridasan 2005). This particular type of forest is very rare and has a peculiar floristic composition, usually displaying greater alpha diversity when compared with other savanna woodlands of Central Brazil (Ratter et al. 1973; Solórzano et al. 2012).
According to Köppen's classification, the climate of the region is Aw, with a rainy season between October and April and a dry season from May to September (Alvares et al. 2013). Annual precipitation is ~1500 mm, and average annual temperature is 25°C (Ministry of Agriculture, Meteorology Institute - INMET, 9th Meteorology District). The soil under the savanna studied is alic and acid dystrophic Yellow Oxisol, with a clay content ranging between 28 and 40% (Marimon-Junior and Haridasan 2005). These soils are associated with flat relief and soft-wavy relief, with an average elevation of 300 m (Marimon-Junior and Haridasan 2005).
Sampling was conducted in 100 contiguous plots measuring 10x10 m, in February 2015. At the time, all Tachigali vulgaris individuals with a minimum DBH of 30 cm and all genets of Ananas ananassoides larger than 10 cm were duly counted. The stolons of individual plants were identified through superficial excavations. Samples of both species were collected and compared with vouchers from the NX Herbarium (Nova Xavantina campus).

Data analysis
We assessed the spatial pattern of Tachigali vulgaris and Ananas ananassoides abundance using the aggregation index (AI) (Perry 1995). This index tells the spatial aggregation, regularity and randomness when values are significantly higher, lower and equal to 1, respectively. Calculation of the AI is based on the two-dimensional coordinates (in this case, the centroid of each sample unit). Its significance is assessed by Monte Carlo permutations (Perry 1998). To complement the spatial assessment and to better visualize the layout of groupings and gaps in the distribution of individuals of both species, we constructed a contour map using program SURFER.
The spatial relationships between the two populations were determined with the help of statistical program SADIE (Spatial Analysis by Distance Indices) through the association index (χ) (Perry 1998; Perry and Dixon 2002). The null hypothesis of χ is the lack of associations (i.e., the gaps and groupings of the number of A. ananassoides and T. vulgaris individuals do not coincide spatially). The values of χ vary from +1 (positive association, P<0.025) and -1 (negative association, P>0.975), and zero indicates total spatial independence. Positive associations occur when there is an overlap of groupings or gaps in two sets of data. On the other hand, negative associations are indicated by the coincidence of groupings in a dataset with the gaps in another (i.e., when there is spatial repulsion [Perry and Dixon 2002]). The aggregation and association indices were calculated utilizing SADIE Shell 1.2 (Perry et al. 1996).

Results and Discussion

We recorded 649 A. ananassoides and 58 T. vulgaris individuals in the assessed plots. The high abundance and frequency of A. ananassoides in the studied savanna woodland areas was consistent with the density of dominant bromeliads (terrestrial/epiphytic) in the resting forests and floodplain forests of Rio de Janeiro and Pará states (Cogliatti-Carvalho et al. 2001; Nunes-Freitas et al. 2006; Quaresma and Jardim 2012). In this case, the morphophysiological adaptations of species, such as leaf stiffness and CAM (Medina et al. 1993; Crayn et al. 2015), ensure mechanical support and resistance to water stress and high temperatures, favoring their occupation in savannic and forest areas (Proença and Sajo 2007) and contributing to the high abundance found in the present study. On the other hand, the abundance values found for T. vulgaris are lower than in other studies conducted in savanna woodlands with inclusion limits lower than those used in the present study (≥5 cm DBH) (Marimon-Junior and Haridasan 2005; Araújo et al. 2011; Bueno et al. 2013).
The spatial distributions of A. ananassoides (AI=1.29, P=0.025; Figures 1A and 1C) and T. vulgaris (AI=1.46; P=0.013; Figures 1B and 1C) were aggregated. The species were negatively associated with one another (χ=-0.311, P=0.997; Figure 1D), with small groupings of up to 15 m and large groupings measuring between 30 and 60 m (Figures 1A and 1B). The aggregate pattern of both species may be connected with their pioneer characteristic and preferential occupation of places with greater availability of light or forest gaps (Proença and Sajo 2007; Silveira et al. 2010). This explains the formation of groups of varying sizes along the habitat, which may be related to the size of the forest gaps. On the other hand, the aggregation of bromeliad individuals may also be enhanced by the formation of clumps, which limits recruitment of tree species (potential competitors) and increases the spatial dependence of the individuals (Cogliatti-Carvalho and Rocha 2001; Benot et al. 2013). This strategy monopolizes resources along the habitat and has been observed in other herbaceous species, such as ferns (Walker and Sharpe 2010).

Figure 1. Kriging of spatial distribution of Ananas ananassoides (Baker) L. B. Sm. (Figure 1A) and Tachigali vulgaris L. G. Silva and H. C. (Figure 1B), values of association index (Figure 1C, χ) and aggregation index (AI, ●=A. ananassoides; □=T. vulgaris, Figure 1D) in different scales in a savanna woodland area in the Bacaba City Park, Nova Xavantina-MT. The critical interval of the values of spatial association and aggregation indexes were constructed from 100 permutations of Monte Carlo, and are represented by dashed lines.
Figura 1. Krigagem da distribuição espacial Ananas ananassoides (Baker) L. B. Sm. (Figura 1A) e Tachigali vulgaris L. G. Silva and H. C. (Figura 1B), valores dos índices de associação (Figura 1C, χ) e agregação espacial (IA, ●=A. ananassoides; □=T. vulgaris, Figura 1D) em diferentes escalas em um cerradão no Parque Municipal do Bacaba, Nova Xavantina-MT. O intervalo crítico dos valores dos índices de agregação e associação espacial foram construídos a partir de 100 permutações de Monte Carlo, e estão representados por linhas tracejadas.

Spatial repulsion between the species can also be explained by the similar occupation of forest gaps, since the bromeliad clumps may be inhibiting the establishment of the tree species within its boundaries and causing the spatial dissociation between the two species. Elias et al. (2015) found similar results when assessing the influence of Actinocladum verticillatum bamboo shrubs on the natural regeneration of a savanna woodland area and a typical cerrado area. The authors revealed that the bamboo densification inhibited the grow than destablishment of tree species as a result of competition for resources such as space and light. However, the spatial dissociation between the assessed species may be linked with inhibition of the bromeliad growth caused by shading by the tree species. Similar results were found by Oliveira et al. (2007) between the populations of Bromelia balansae and Dimorphandra mollis in a typical cerrado. The authors connected this result with the direct competition for light by the plant species.
Therefore, the formation of clumps by A. ananassoides and the shading by T. vulgaris may be mutually exclusive factors, which intensify the competition for space and light among these species and reveal spatial incompatibility by the two populations. We suggest that on a micro-scale, the bromeliad's spatial distribution is driven by clump formation and on a large scale by the dynamics of forest gaps and the interspecific competition with tree populations such as T. vulgaris. We can conclude that the intraspecific spatial distribution can be an important factor driving the interspecific spatial arrangement in the community (i.e., mutual repulsion), influencing the structure and possible the dynamics of the vegetation. Further studies must be conducted to verify whether this pattern is repeated with other tree and herbaceous populations, incorporating the temporal dynamics of natural regeneration and evaluating the effects of strata interaction due to habitat conditions.

Acknowledgements. The authors wish to thank CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for the graduate scholarship granted to the first two authors. To project PELD (stage 2; file N° 403725/2012-7) for the logistical support.

References

1. Alvares, C. A., J. Stape, P. C. Sentelhas, G. de Moraes, J. Leonardo, and G. Spavorek. 2013. Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22(6):711-72.         [ Links ]

2. Araujo, G. M., A. R. T Nascimento, S. F. Lopes, R. F. Rodrigues, and J. A. Ratter. 2011. Structure and floristics of the arboreal component of the dystrophic Cerradão and comparison with other savanna woodland in Central Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 68(3):401-418.         [ Links ]

3. Barberis, I., M. Pire, and J. P. Lewis. 1998. Spatial heterogeneity and woody species distribution in the Schinopsis balansae (Anacardiaceae) forest of the Southern Chaco, Argentina. Journal of Tropical Biology 46:515-524.         [ Links ]

4. Barberis, I. M., P. S. Torres, W. B. Batista, G. Magra, L. Galetti, and J. P. Lewis. 2014. Two bromeliad species with contrasting functional traits partition the understory space in a South American xerophytic forest: correlative evidence of environmental control and limited dispersal. Plant Ecology 215(2):143-153.         [ Links ]

5. Beduschi, T., and T. T. Castellani. 2008. Population structure of Clusiacriuva Cambess. (Clusiaceae) and spatial relationship as species of bromeliads in the Municipal Park of the Dunes of Lagoa da Conceicao, Florianopolis, SC. Biotemas 21(2):41-50.         [ Links ]

6. Beduschi, T., and T. T. Castellani. 2013. Friends or Foes? Interplay of facilitation and competition depends on the interaction between abiotic stress and ontogenetic stage. Plant Ecology 214(12):1485-1492.         [ Links ]

7. Benot, M. L., A. K. Bittebiere, A. Ernoult, B. Clement, and C. Mony. 2013. Fine-scale spatial patterns in grassland communities depend on clonal species dispersal ability and interactions with neighbors. Journal of Ecology 101(3): 626-636.         [ Links ]

8. Benzing, D. H. 1980. The biology of the bromeliads. California, Mad River Press.         [ Links ]

9. Brancalion, P. H., V. D. A. Gabriel, and J. M. Gómez. 2009. Do terrestrial tank bromeliads in Brazil create safe sites for palm establishment or act as natural traps for its dispersed seeds? Biotropica 41(1):3-6.         [ Links ]

10. Budke, J. C., M. S. Alberti, C. Zanardi, C. Baratto, and E. M. Zanin. 2010. Bamboo dieback and tree regeneration responses in a subtropical forest of South America. Forest Ecology and management 260(8):1345-1349.         [ Links ]

11. Bueno, M. L., D. R. Neves, A. T. Oliveira-Filho, C. R. Lehn, and J. A. Ratter. 2013. The study in an area of transition between seasonally dry tropical forest and mesotrophic cerradão, in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 70(3):469-486.         [ Links ]

12. Bulleri, F., J. F. Bruno, B. R. Silliman, and J. J. Stachowicz. 2016. Facilitation and the niche: implications for coexistence, range shifts and ecosystem functioning. Functional Ecology 30(1):70-78.         [ Links ]

13. Cogliatti-Carvalho, L., T. C. Rocha-Pessôa, A. F. Nunes-Freitas, and C. F. D. Rocha. 2010. Volume de água armazenado no tanque de bromélias, em restingas da costa brasileira. Acta Botanica Brasilica 24(1):84-95.         [ Links ]

14. Cogliatti-Carvalho, L., and C. F. Rocha. 2001. Spatial distribution and preferential substrate of Neoregelia johannis (Carriére) LB Smith (Bromeliaceae) in the disturbed area of Atlantic Rainforest at Ilha Grande, RJ, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 24(4):389-394.         [ Links ]

15. Cogliatti-Carvalho, L., A. D. Freitas, C. D. Rocha, and M. Van Sluys. 2001. Variação na estrutura e na composição de Bromeliaceae em cinco zonas de restinga no Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba, Macaé, RJ. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 24(1):1-9.         [ Links ]

16. Crayn, D. M., K. Winter, K. Schulte, and J. A. C. Smith. 2015. Photosynthetic pathways in Bromeliaceae: phylogenetic and ecological significance of CAM and C3 based on carbon isotope ratios for 1893 species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 178(2): 169-221.         [ Links ]

17. Dalling, J. W., H. C. Muller-Landau, S. J. Wright, and S. Hubbell. 2002. Role of dispersal in the recruitment limitation of neotropical pioneer species. Journal of Ecology 90(4):714-727.         [ Links ]

18. Elias, F., B. S. Marimon, E. C. Neves, P. S. Morandi, S. M. Reis, H. A. Mews, and B. H. Marimon-Junior. 2015. Regeneration of woody species under the influence of bamboo Actinocladum verticillatum (Nees) McClure ex Soderstr. (Poaceae) in the cerradão and typical cerrado in the transition was Cerrado-Amazônia. Brazilian Journal of Biosciences 13(2):25.         [ Links ]

19. Felfili, J. M., L. C. Hilgbert, A. C. Franco, J. C. Souza-Silva, A. V. Resende, and M. V. P. Nogueira. 1999. Behavior of Sclerolobium paniculatum Vog. var. rubiginosum (Tul.) Benth. under different shading levels in salmon. Brazilian Journal of Botany 22(2):297-301.         [ Links ]

20. Franczak, D. D., B. S. Marimon, B. H. Marimon-Junior, H. A. Mews, L. Maracahipes, and E. A. Oliveira. 2011. Changes in the structure of the savanna forest over a six-year period in the Amazon-Cerrado transition, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Rodriguésia 62(2):425-436.         [ Links ]

21. Jerozolimski, A., M. B. N. Ribeiro, and M. Martins. 2009. Are tortoises important seed dispersers in Amazonian forests? Oecologia 161(3):517-528.         [ Links ]

22. Keller, P., and U. Lüttge. 2005. Photosynthetic light-use by three bromeliads originating from shaded sites (Ananas ananassoides, Ananas comosus cv. Panare) and exposed sites (Pitcairnia pruinosa) in the medium Orinoco basin, Venezuela. Biologia Plantarum 49(1):73-79.         [ Links ]

23. Marimon-Junior, B. H., and M. Haridasan. 2005. Comparison of arboreal vegetation and soil characteristics of a cerradão and a cerrado sensu stricto in adjacent areas on soil latosol in eastern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 19(1):915-928.         [ Links ]

24. Medina, E., M. Popp, E. Olivares, H. P. Janett, and U. Lüttge. 1993. Daily fluctuations of titratable acidity, content of organic acids (malate and citrate) and soluble sugars of varieties and wild relatives of Ananas comosus L. growing under natural tropical conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment 16(1):55-63.         [ Links ]

25. Morandi, P. S., B. H. Marimon-Junior, E. A. Oliveira, S. M. Reis, M. B. X. Xavier, M. Forsthofer, F. B. Passos, and B. S. Marimon. 2015. Vegetation succession in the Cerrado-Amazonian forest transition zone of Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 73(1):83-93.         [ Links ]

26. Nunes-Freitas, A. F., T. C. Rocha-Pessôa, L. Cogliatti-Carvalho, and C. F. D. Rocha. 2006. Bromeliaceae da restinga da Reserva Biológica Estadual da Praia do Sul: composição, abundância e similaridade da comunidade. Acta Botanica Brasilica 20(3):709-717.         [ Links ]

27. Oliveira, J. A., O. Daniel, and M. Carmo-Vieira. 2007. Spatial distribution pattern and inter-specific association of eight medicinal species in the Brazilian Savanna. Heart 13(1):111-116.         [ Links ]

28. Perry, J. N. 1995. Spatial analysis by distance indices. Journal of Animal Ecology 64(3):303-315.         [ Links ]

29. Perry, J. N. 1998. Measures of spatial pattern for counts. Ecology 79:1008-1017.         [ Links ]

30. Perry, J. N., and P. M. Dixon. 2002. A new method to measure spatial association for ecological count data. Ecoscience 9:133-141.         [ Links ]

31. Perry, J. N., M. D. Bell, H. R. Smith, and I. P. Woiwod. 1996. SADIE: software to measure and model spatial pattern. Aspects of Applied Biology 46:95-102.         [ Links ]

32. Proença, S. L., and M. D. G. Sajo. 2007. Anatomia foliar de bromélias ocorrentes em áreas de cerrado do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 21(3):657-673.         [ Links ]

33. Quaresma, A. C., and M. A. G. Jardim. 2012. Diversity of epiphytic bromeliads in the environmental protection area of Combu Island, Belém, Pará, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26(2):290-294.         [ Links ]

34. Ratter, J. A., P. N. Richards, G. E. Argent, and D. R. G. Gifford. 1973. Observations on the vegetation of Northeastern Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 226(880):449-492.         [ Links ]

35. Reis, S. M., B. S. Marimon, B. H. Marimon-Junior, L. Gomes, P. S. Morandi, E. G. Freire, and E. Lenza. 2015. Resilience of cerradão after clear-cutting of vegetation in the transition was Cerrado-Amazonian. Bioscience Journal 31(5): 1519-1529.         [ Links ]

36. Silveira, F. A. O., J. C. Santos, and G. W. Fernandes. 2010. Seed germination ecophysiology of the wild pineapple, Ananas ananassoides (Baker) LB Sm (Bromeliaceae). Acta Botanica Brasilica 24(4):1100-1103.         [ Links ]

37. Solórzano, A., J. R. R. Pinto, J. M. Felfli, and J. D. V. Hay. 2012. Perfil florístico e estrutural do componente lenhoso em seis áreas de cerradão ao longo do bioma Cerrado. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26(2):328-341.         [ Links ]

38. Stahl, J. M., M. Nepi, L. Galetto, E. Guimarães, and S. R. Machado. 2012. Functional aspects of floral nectar secretion of Ananas ananassoides, ornithophilous bromeliad from the Brazilian savanna. Annals of Botany 109(7):1243-1252.         [ Links ]

39. Tsuda, É. T., and T. T. Castellani. 2016. Vriesea friburgensis: A natural trap or a nurse plant in coastal sand dunes? Austral Ecology 41:273-281        [ Links ]