ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES

Polymer-based encapsulation of Bacillus subtilis and its effect on Meloidogyne incognita in tomato

Encapsulación polimérica de Bacillus subtilis y su efecto en Meloidogyne incognita en tomate

 

Pacheco-Aguirre J, E Ruiz-Sánchez, A Reyes-Ramírez, J Cristóbal-Alejo, J Tun-Suárez, L Borges-Gómez

División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Km. 16.3 antigua carretera Mérida-Motul, Conkal, Yucatán, México. C.P. 97345.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, Phone 01 52 999 912 4135 Ext. 135, e-mail: esau_ruiz@hotmail.com

Received 2.II.2015.
Accepted 26.II.2015.

 

---

Abstract. Antagonistic bacteria used as biological control agent may loss effectiveness at the field due to environmental factors such as UV radiation, dryness and high temperature. An inexpensive alternative to protect antagonistic bacteria against such factors is the use of microencapsulating agents. In this work, the effect of microencapsulation of Bacillus subtilis with commercial gums on their antagonistic capacity against Meloidogyne incognita was evaluated. The eficiency of the microencapsulation was verified by the difference between the initial and final concentrations of protein release. The effectiveness as antagonist was evaluated against M. incognita in tomato under greenhouse conditions. The microcapsules based on carboxymethylcellulose (MBC) and xanthan (MBX) were morphologically different. The MBX showed a higher bacterial release eficiency (90.2%) compared to that of MBC (76.6%). Plants inoculated with MBX showed a significant decrease in galls and M. incognita eggs in comparison to control plants, but this decrease did not occur on those inoculated with non-microencapsulated B. subtilis. The application of MBX to tomato plants at transplanting time provided good protection against M. incognita under greenhouse conditions.

Keywords: Rhizobacteria; Plant pathogenic nematode; Ionic gelation; Microencapsulation.

Resumen. Las bacterias antagonistas usadas como agentes de control biológico pueden perder eficacia debido a diversos factores ambientales, tales como la radiación UV, sequedad y alta temperatura. Una alternativa de bajo costo para protegerlas contra estos factores es el uso de agentes microencapsulantes. En este trabajo se evaluó el efecto de la microencapsulación de Bacillus subtilis con gomas comerciales sobre la capacidad antagónica contra Meloidogyne incognita en plantas de tomate. La eficiencia de la microencapsulación se verificó por la diferencia de las concentraciones inicial y final de la proteína liberada. La efectividad de las microcápsulas como antagonista se evaluó contra M. incognita en tomate bajo condiciones de invernadero. Las microcápsulas a base de carboximetilcelulosa (MBC) y xantana (MBX) fueron diferentes morfológicamente. Las MBX tuvieron una eficacia de liberación bacteriana más alta (90,2%) en comparación con las MBC (76,6%). Las raíces de las plantas inoculadas con MBX tuvieron menor número de agallas y huevos de M. incognita en comparación con el control y las plantas inoculadas con B. subtilis no encapsulado. La aplicación de MBX al momento del transplante proporcionó una buena protección contra M. incognita bajo condiciones de invernadero.

Palabras clave: Rizobacteria; Nematodo fitopatógeno; Gelación iónica; Microencapsulación.

---

 

INTRODUCTION

Several hundred species of nematodes are known to nourish themselves from living plants and cause a variety of diseases. These soil-borne pathogens damage a broad range of crops causing a dramatic loss of yield, especially in tropical and sub-tropical regions. Crop losses by nematodes have been estimated to exceed US$ 100 billion globally per year (Mohammed et al., 2008; Raaijmakers et al., 2009).
The nematode Meloidogyne incognita attacks the roots of a wide variety of plants. Meloidogyne incognita deforms the normal root cells, establishes giant cells, and roots become nodulated. These nodules obstruct absorbent vessels and lead to a deficiency in minerals causing wilting, stunting and chlorosis. Damage can also facilitate the entry of pathogens, such as bacteria and fungi (Agrios, 1999). Meloidogyne incognita is extremely polyphagous, having a host range of up to 3000 plant species on Fabaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Rubiaceae, Brascicaceae, Myrtaceae and Solanaceae (Castagnone, 2002).
The increase on costs and collateral damage caused by chemical pesticides highlights the need for using biological control agents (Killani et al., 2011). Among these agents, the bacterium Bacillus subtilis has been widely used as an antagonistic microorganism for soil-borne pathogens. This bacterium produces hydrolytic enzymes (e.g., glucanases, proteases) and antibiotic lipopeptides (e.g., surfactin, fengycin, and/or iturin A) capable of acting against nematodes (Cazorla et al., 2007; Knaak et al., 2007; Snook et al., 2009). Previous works have documented the effects of B. subtillis on M. incognita. In this context, Siddiqui & Mahmood (1993) showed that B. subtilis reduced the multiplication of larvae of M. incognita and the number of root galls in chickpea. Similarly, Rahman et al. (2005) observed that the application of B. subtilis suppressed the pathogenicity of M. incognita on ornamental crops. Munshid et al. (2013) and Khalil et al. (2012) found that Bacillus subtilis suppressed M. incognita infection by decreasing the nematode population and root galls on green onion and tomato plants.
Antagonistic bacteria may loss effectiveness due to environmental factors such as UV radiation, dryness and high temperature (Myasnik et al., 2001). Several protective methods have been developed to improve the eficiency and performance of antagonistic microorganisms (Saxena et al., 2002). Despite some of them have been successfully tested, their application is still pending because they increment both costs and risks of environmental contamination. An inexpensive method to protect antagonistic bacteria from such factors may include the use of polymeric gums either as carriers or microencapsulating agents (Hernández et al., 2011). This technique not only provides protection from unfavorable environments, but also improves their stability (Bregni et al., 2000; Hernández et al., 2011). Chen et al. (2013) microencapsulated Bacillus cereus C1L with natural polymers (maltodextrin and gum arabic), and found that the microencapsulation enhances the activity of this bacterium due to the protection from adverse conditions. Hernández et al. (2011) found that microencapsulated B. subtilis strains enhance biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of microencapsulation of Bacillus subtilis with commercial gums on their antagonistic capacity against Meloidogyne incognita in tomato plants under greenhouse conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strain. Spores of Bacillus subtilis strain cbrf24 were obtained from a collection kept at the Plant Pathology Laboratory of the Conkal Technological Institute, in Yucatan, México. This strain has been previously selected for its nematicidal activity against Meloidogyne incognita (Ruiz et al., 2014). Bacterial culture was carried out on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and kept in an oven TERLAB (Model TE-E80DM) at 37 °C, until use.

Preparation of microcapsules. For microencapsulation, two diferent types of commercial gums were evaluated: carboxymethycellulose and xanthan. A basal encapsulation protocol was employed to prepare microcapsules by ionic gelation (Betancur et al., 2011). Briefy, 2% (w/v) gum solution (carboxymethycellulose or xanthan) was prepared by dissolving the polymer in 200 mL of B. subtilis spore solution (1x10⁸ spores/mL), under low stirring at room temperature for 1h. Subsequently, the gum mixture containing B. subtilis was added to 250 mL of 0.15 M FeCl₃ (Sigma Chemical) and allowed to harden for 30 min. Hardened microcapsules were recovered by decanting, washed with distilled water and dried in a convection oven (FELISA FE-143, Serial Number: 941002) for 36 h at 40 °C.

Characterization of microcapsules. The shape and particle size of microcapsules were measured using a light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Axiostar plus Model 1169-151). Measurements were taken by placing microcapsules individually on the edge of a coverslip to record shape and diameter (Betancur et al., 2011). Ten microcapsules were measured per treatment.
The flow capacity (FC) of microcapsules was calculated by measuring the angle of repose. The microcapsules were passed through a funnel (4 mm internal diameter, 60 mm long) onto a horizontal surface to form a pile. Pile height (h) and cone base radius (r) were measured with a digital caliper, and the angle of repose (j) was calculated from the following equation (Betancur et al., 2011):

Eficiency of microencapsulation. The eficiency of the microencapsulating process (E, %) was determined as described by García et al. (2011). Briefy, protein concentration was calculated from the diference between the initial protein concentration (IPC) in the microencapsulating process and the final protein concentration (FPC) released from the microcapsules with 55 mM sodium citrate during a 6 h period. The initial and released concentration of protein was analyzed as described by Bradford (1976). The eficiency of the SPA microencapsulating process was calculated from the following equation:

Antagonistic bioassays. Tomato seeds were sown in polystyrene trays of 200 wells using Cosmopeat^® as substrate. Seedlings were transplanted in 4-L capacity polystyrene pots when they reached 10 cm height. Substrate for pots was compounded by the autoclaved mixture (%v/v) of 50% soil, 30% commercial substrate (Cosmopeat^®) and 20% fine grave. Suspensions of nematode eggs were added to all pots at transplanting (860 eggs/pot) as described by Cristóbal et al. (2006). After nematode inoculation, B. subtilis (1x10⁸ spore/mL) suspensions were applied. Bacterial suspensions were applied as either free cells or non-microencapsulated (NMB: 5 mL), microencapsulated with carboxymethycellulose (MBC: 250 mg) or microencapsulated with xhantan (MBX: 250 mg) bacteria. Control plants had no bacterial inoculation. Treatments were set with twenty replicates (plants). Pots were arranged in a completely randomized design, and maintained in a greenhouse at 35-42 °C. Tirty and sixty days after transplanting, plant growth (plant height, stem width, number of leaves, foliar area, root volume, foliar biomass) and nematode infection (number of galls and number of eggs in the root system) were evaluated (Mohammed et al., 2008).

Statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey mean comparisons were performed using Statgraphics Centurion (Version 15.2.06). Data were expressed as means and standard errors. Means were considered significantly different at P<0.05.

RESULTS

Characterization of microcapsules. Carboxymethylcellulose-based microcapsules (MBC) showed a spherical shape, while xanthan gum-based microcapsules (MBX) showed an amorphous shape (Fig. 1). MBX showed an ovoid form with a smooth surface, which became amorphous after drying it. The angle of repose by MBC and MBX was 33.69° and 35.31°, respectively. No significant difference (P>0.05) was observed in size between both types of microcapsules (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Morphology and size of Bacillus subtilis microcapsules: carboxymethylcellulose-based microcapsules (MBC) and xanthanbased microcapsules (MBX).
Fig. 1. Morfología y tamaño de las microcapsulas de Bacillus subtilis: Microcápsulas a base de carboximetilcelulosa (MBC) y a base de xantana (MBX).

The eficiency of release of B. subtilis was 76.6 ± 0.7% (13 µg/mL) for microcapsules formed with MBC, and 90.2 ± 1% (15.2 µg/mL) with those formed with MBX (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Release efficiency of Bacillus subtilis from microcapsules formed with either carboxymethylcellulose (MBC) or xanthan (MBX).
Fig. 2. Eficiencia de liberación de Bacillus subtilis de las microcápsulas formadas con goma carboximetilcelulosa (MBC) y xantana (MBX).

Plant growth. To evaluate the effects of B. subtillis containing microcapsules on suppression of M. incognita in tomato, stem diameter, plant height, leaf number and area, and dry biomass were determined. In this context, stem diameter, plant height, number of leaves and leaf area showed no significant differences (P>0.05) among treatments (Table 1). Effect of inoculation on plant growth was only significant (P<0.05) between plants inoculated with non-microencapsulated B. subtilis (NMB) and those microcapsulated with MBX, where root volume at 60 days after transplanting was 26.5% higher in plants treated with NMB (Table 1).

Table 1. Growth characteristics of tomato plants inoculated with B. subtilis at 30 and 60 days after transplanting.
Tabla 1. Características de crecimiento de las plantas de tomate inoculadas con B. subtilis a los 30 y 60 días después del transplante.

Means with different letters in the same column after either 30 or 60 days from transplanting are significantly different (P<0.05). MBC: Microencapsulated B. subtilis with carboxymethylcellulose gum; MBX: Microencapsulated B. subtilis with xanthan gum; NMB: Non-microencapsulated B. subtilis.
Las medias con letras diferentes dentro de una misma columna después de 30 ó 60 días del transplante son significativamente differentes (P<0,05). MBC: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma carboximetilcelulosa; MBX: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma xantana; NMB: B. subtilis no microencapsulado.

Microencapsulation of B. subtilis showed no efect (P>0.05) on dry biomass of root, stem and leaves (Table 2).

Table 2. Dry biomass (g) production in tomato plants inoculated with B. subtilis at 30 and 60 days after transplanting.
Tabla 2. Producción de biomasa seca (g) de las plantas de tomate inoculadas con B. subtilis a los 30 y 60 días después del transplante.

Means with diferent letters within the same column after either 30 or 60 days from transplanting are significantly different (P<0.05). MBC: Microencapsulated B. subtilis with carboxymethylcellulose gum; MBX: Microencapsulated B. subtilis with xanthan gum; NMB: Non-microencapsulated B. subtilis.
Las medias con letras diferentes dentro de una misma columna después de 30 ó 60 días desde el transplante son significativamente differentes (P<0,05). MBC: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma carboximetilcelulosa; MBX: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma xantana; NMB: B. subtilis no microencapsulado.

Severity of damage by Meloidogyne incognita. Evaluation of the severity of M. incognita damage to tomato root (Fig. 3) showed a significant decrease (P<0.05) in the number of galls per gram of root in plants inoculated with B. subtillis relative to that on the control plants. Plants treated with either NMB or MBX, but not those with MBC, showed a lower number of galls per gram of root relative to control plants after 30 days from transplanting (Fig. 3). At 60 days from transplanting, the order in the number of galls (g/root) was control > MBC> MBX (P<0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Effects of Bacilus subtilis inoculation on gall formation by M. incognita in tomato plants at 30 and 60 days after transplanting. Values followed by the same letters are not statistically different (Tukey, P<0.01). MBC: carboxymethylcellulose-based microcapsules of B. subtilis; MBX: xanthan-based microcapsules of B. subtilis; NMB: Non-microencapsulated B. subtilis.
Fig. 3. Efectos de la inoculación con B. subtilis sobre la formación de agallas de M. incognita en plantas de tomate a los 30 y 60 días después del transplante. Valores con letras iguales no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, P<0,01). MBC: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma carboximetilcelulosa; MBX: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma xantana; NMB: B. subtilis no microencapsulado.

After 60 days from transplanting, the number of M. incognita eggs per gram of root showed a significant decrease (P<0.05) in plants inoculated with microencapsulated or non-microencapsulated B. subtilis relative to that on control plants (Fig. 4). The effect of MBX was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of MBC and the control on the number of eggs per gram of root.

Fig. 4. Effects of inoculation of B. subtilis on M. incognita eggs in tomato root at 60 days after transplanting. Values followed by the same letters are not statistically different (Tukey, P<0.01). MBC: carboxymethylcellulose-based microcapsules of B. subtilis; MBX: xanthan-based microcapsules of B. subtilis; NMB: Non-microencapsulated B. subtilis.
Fig. 4. Efectos de la inoculación con B. subtilis sobre el número de huevos de M. incognita en raíz de tomate a los 60 días después del transplante. Valores con letras iguales no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, P<0.01). MBC: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma carboximetilcelulosa; MBX: B. subtilis microencapsulado con goma xantana; NMB: B. subtilis no microencapsulado.

DISCUSSION

In the present work, polymer-based microencapsulation of B. subtillis was carried out in an attempt to protect the bacterial spores and increase efectiveness on suppression of M. incognita infection in tomato. Data showed that carboxymethylcellulose-based microcapsules and xanthan-based microcapsules had similar particle diameter, but different particle shape; MBC had spherical form, while MBX was amorphous. The difference in particle shape may be attributed to the type of polymer used (Burkersroda et al., 2002; Kumar et al., 2002). Particle shape is critical for delivering the active ingredient. A previous study showed that irregularly shaped microcapsules have more porous in internal structure, which enhances the microorganism delivery (Jaya et al., 2010). This might have contributed to the higher eficiency in protein release by MBX (90.2%). In this sense, our data agree with those of García et al. (2011), who showed a similar protein release (89%) from sodium alginate-based microcapsules of Bacillus thuringiensis.
We observed that inoculation with microencapsulated Bacillus subtilis showed no significant effect on most of the plant growth variables. Also, these plants showed slight damage by M. incognita (Fig. 3). The slight root damage by nematodes might have caused a compensatory root growth as response to nematode invasion. This response has been well documented in tomato and cotton by Ma et al. (2013). Likewise, Haase et al. (2007) reported that low levels of M. incognita infection cause elongation of lateral roots, mainly as a response to wounding and stress by the host plant. The physiological reaction to nematode attack may involve an increase in the production of phytohormones and ethylene, which are critical in the formation and elongation of root hairs (Nagata et al., 2004; Overvoorde et al., 2010).
The severity of root damage by M. incognita was reduced when plants were inoculated with MBX. Our results showed that the number of galls per root as well as the number of eggs per gram of root decreased significantly in plants inoculated with MBX. The reduction in numbers of galls and eggs reached a maximum of 96.7% and 84.6%, respectively. The effect of MBX was higher than that reported by other authors that have previously evaluated the effects of Bacillus spp on M. incognita in tomato. For example, Almaghrabi et al. (2013) found a decrease of 32% in the number of galls, and 52% in that of eggs per gram of root after application of B. subtilis. Likewise, Mohammed et al. (2008) reported a reduction of 52% in the number of galls, and 84% in the number of eggs per gram of root after applying B. thuringiensis strain Bt7N.
We showed that polymer-based microencapsulation of B. subtilis, particularly with xanthan gum, increased the antagonistic effect against M. incognita in tomato under greenhouse conditions. The application of this technology may have enormous potential to enhance the effectiveness of B. subtilis as a biological control agent for soil-borne pathogens.

REFERENCES

1. Agrios, G. (1999). Fitopatología. Editorial Limusa, Noriega. 756 p.         [ Links ]

2. Almaghrabi, O.A., S.I. Massoud & T.S. Abdelmoneim (2013). Influence of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on tomato plant growth and nematode reproduction under greenhouse conditions. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 20: 57-61.         [ Links ]

3. Betancur, A.D., A.J. Pacheco, R.A. Castellanos & G.L. Chel (2011). Microencapsulation of papain using carboxymethylated famboyant (Delonixregia) seed gum. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 12: 67-72.         [ Links ]

4. Bradford, M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.         [ Links ]

5. Bregni, C., J. Degrossi, R. García, M.C. Lamas, R. Firenstein & M. D’aquino (2000). Alginate microspheres of Bacillus subtilis. Ars Pharmaceutica 41: 245-248.

6. Burkersroda, F.V., L. Schedl & A. Gopferich (2002). Why Degradable Polymers Undergo Surface Erosion or Bulk Erosion. Biomaterials 23: 4221-4231.         [ Links ]

7. Castagnone, S.P. (2002). Genetic variability of nematodes: a threat to the durability of plant resistance genes. Euphytica 124: 193-199.         [ Links ]

8. Cazorla, F.M., D. Romero, G.A. Pérez, B.J.J. Lugtenberg, A. De Vicente & G. Bloemberg (2007). Isolation and characterization of antagonistic Bacillus subtilis strains from the avocado rhizoplane displaying biocontrol activity. Journal of Applied Microbiology 103: 1950-1959.         [ Links ]

9. Chen, K.N., C.Y. Chen, Y.C. Lin & M.J.Chen (2013). Formulation of a novel antagonistic bacterium based biopesticide for fungal disease control using microencapsulation techniques. Journal of Agricultural Science 5: 153-163.         [ Links ]

10. Cristóbal, A.J., S.J.M. Tun, C.S. Moguel, M.N. Marbán, B.L. Medina, P.P. Simá, S.S.R. Peraza & A.M.M. Gamboa (2006). In vitro sensitivity of Meloidogyne incognita to extracts from native Yucatecan plants. Nematropica 36: 89-97.         [ Links ]

11. García, G.K., V.H. Poggy, G.F. Esparza, R.J. Ibarra & C.J. Barrera (2011). Small microcapsules of crystal proteins and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis by an emulsification/internal gelation method. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 34: 701-708.         [ Links ]

12. Haase, S., L. Ruess, G. Neumann, S. Marhan & E. Kandeler (2007). Low-level herbivory by root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) modifies root hair morphology and rhizodeposition in host plants (Hordeumvulgare). Plant and Soil 301: 151-164.         [ Links ]

13. Hernández, S.M., C.F. Hernández, M.G. Gallegos, S.H. Lira, H.R. Rodríguez & N.A. Cristóbal (2011). Biocontrol of Soil Fungi in Tomato with Microencapsulates Containing Bacillus subtilis. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6: 189-195.         [ Links ]

14. Jaya, S., T.D. Durance & R. Wang (2010). Physical Characterization of Drug Loaded Microcapsules and Controlled In Vitro Release Study. The Open Biomaterials Journal 2: 9-17.         [ Links ]

15. Khalil, M.S., A. Kenawy, M.A. Gohrab & E.E. Mohammed (2012). Impact of microbial agents on Meloidogyne incognita management and morphogenesis of tomato. Journal of Biopesticides 5: 28-35.         [ Links ]

16. Killani, A.S., R.C. Abaidoo, A.K. Akintokun & M.A. Abiala (2011). Antagonistic Effect of Indigenous Bacillus subtilis on Root-/Soilborne Fungal Pathogens of Cowpea. Researcher 3: 11-18.         [ Links ]

17. Knaak, N., A.A. Rohr & L.M. Fiuza (2007). In vitro effect of Bacillus thuringiensis strains and cry proteins in phytopathogenic fungi of paddy rice-feld. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 38: 526-530.         [ Links ]

18. Kumar, N.L., S. Robert & A.J. Domb (2002). Polyanhydrides: an overview. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54: 889-910.         [ Links ]

19. Ma, J., T.L. Kirkpatrick, C.S. Rothrock, & K. Brye (2013). Effects of Soil Compaction and Meloidogyne incognita on Cotton Root Architecture and Plant Growth. The Journal of Nematology 45: 112-121.         [ Links ]

20. Mohammed, S.H., M.A. El Saedy, M.R. Enan, N.E. Ibrahim, A. Ghareeb & S.A. Moustafa (2008). Biocontrol eficiency of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology 7: 57-66.         [ Links ]

21. Munshid, H., S. Simon & A.A. Lal (2013). Antagonistic potential of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens on Meloidogyne incognita of green onion (Allium fistulosum). International Journal of Botany and Research 3: 15-22.         [ Links ]

22. Myasnik, M., R. Manasherob, E. Ben-Dov, A. Zaritsky, Y. Margalith & Z. Barak (2001). Comparative sensitivity to UV-B radiation of two Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies and other Bacillus sp. Current Microbiology 43: 140-143.         [ Links ]

23. Nagata, T., S. Todoriki & S. Kikuchi (2004). Radial expansion of root cells and elongation of root hairs of Arabidopsis thaliana Induced by massive doses of gamma irradiation. Plant and Cell Physiology 45: 1557-1565.         [ Links ]

24. Overvoorde, P., H. Fukaki & T. Beeckman (2010). Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2: 1-16.         [ Links ]

25. Raaijmakers, J.M., T.C. Paulitz, C. Steinberg, C Alabouvette & L.Y. Moënne (2009). The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 321: 341-361.         [ Links ]

26. Rahman, K.M., S.M. Khan & F. Mohide (2005). Root-knot Nematode Problem of Some Winter Ornamental Plants and its Biomanagement. Journal of Nematology 37: 198-206.         [ Links ]

27. Ruiz, S.E., A.J. Cristóbal, R.A. Reyes, S.J. Tun, R.A. García & A.J. Pacheco (2014). In vitro antagonistic activity of Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from soils of the Yucatan Peninsula against Macrophomina phaseolina and Meloidogyne incognita. Phyton International Journal of Experimental Botany 84: 45-47.         [ Links ]

28. Saxena, D., E. Ben-Dov, R. Manasherob, Z. Barak, S. Boussiba & A. Zaritski (2002). A UV tolerant mutant of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp Kurstaki producing melanin. Current Microbiology 44: 25-30.         [ Links ]

29. Siddiqui, Z.A. & I. Mahmood (1993), Biological control of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 and Macrophomina phaseolina by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Bacillus subtilis alone and in combination on chickpea. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 16: 215-218.         [ Links ]

30. Snook, M.E., T. Mitchell, D.M. Hinton & C.W. Bacon (2009). Isolation and characterization of leu7-surfactin from the endophytic bacterium Bacillus mojavensis RRC101, a biocontrol agent for Fusarium verticillioides. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 57: 4287-4292.         [ Links ]