SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número1Nuclear magnetic resonance on LaFeAsO0.4H0.6 at 3.7 GPaStructural correlations in Cs2CuCl4: Pressure dependence of electronicstructures índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Papers in physics

versión On-line ISSN 1852-4249

Pap. Phys. vol.11 no.1 La Plata jun. 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.110003 

 

Pressure-induced Lifshitz transition in FeSe0.88S0.12 probed via 77Se-NMR

 

T. Kuwayama,12 K. Matsuura,3 Y. Mizukami,3 S. Kasahara,4 Y. Matsuda,4 T. Shibauchi,3 Y. Uwatoko,5 N. Fujiwara2*

1* Email: naoki@fujiwara.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp
2Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan.
3Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, 277-8581 Kashiwa, Japan.
4Division of Physics and Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto 606-8502 Kyoto, Japan.
5Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, 277-8581 Kashiwa, Japan.

Received: 29 October 2018, Accepted: 30 April 2019 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.110003


Abstract

Recently, FeSe1-xSx systems have received much attention because of the unique pressure-temperature phase diagram. We performed 77Se-NMR measurements on a single crystal of FeSe0.88S0.12 to investigate its microscopic properties. The shift of 77Se spectra exhibits anomalous enhancement at 1.0 GPa, suggesting a topological change in the Fermi surfaces, the socalled Lifshitz transition, occurs at 1.0 GPa. The magnetic fluctuation simultaneously changes its properties, which implies a change in the dominant nesting vector.

Keywords: NMR, Superconductor, Strongly correlated electron system, Iron superconductor


 

I. Introduction

In contrast to most iron pnictides, FeSe undergoes nematic and superconducting (SC) transitions without any magnetism: in iron pnictides, such as the BaFe2As2 family, a SC phase emerges near an antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase, which accompanies a tetragonal-to-orthorhombic transition so called a nematic transition 1. The electronic state of FeSe dramatically changes under pres-sure 2. The nematic transition temperature Ts is suppressed with increasing pressure and the AFM order is induced instead. These phases overlap each other in the pressure range of 1.2 GPa < P < 2.0 GPa. The SC transition temperature Tc exhibits double-dome structure and it reaches ~ 37 K at 6.0 GPa. Such complicated pressure-temperature (P — T) phase diagram makes it diffi-cult to understand the origin of the high Tc.

Recently, the detailed P — T phase diagram for S-substituted FeSe, FeSe1-xSx (0 < x < 0.17), has been obtained from the resistivity measurements

3. Intriguingly, the nematic and AFM phases are completely separated in the intermediate S concentration (0.04 < x < 0.12). In these compositions, the SC dome appears in a moderate pressure region. Therefore, a bare SC phase is more easily attainable than pure FeSe. To understand the pairing mechanism of FeSe systems, the 12%-S doped sample is preffered over the pure sample, because a high Tover 25 K is attainable at low pressures (~ 3 GPa), and it is free from complicated overlapping of the nematic, SC, and AFM states.

II. Experimental Methods

We performed 77Se-NMR measurements on a 12%-S doped single crystal, FeSe0.88S0.12, up to 3.0 GPa with a fixed field of 6.02 T applied parallel to the a axis. A single crystal with dimensions of about 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.5 mm4 was used for the measurements. We used a NiCrAl pressure cell 4 and Daphne oil as pressure transmitting médium. The pressure was determined by Ruby fluorescence measurements 4. We placed the crystal in the pressure cell so that the FeSe plane was parallel to the applied field.

 

 

III. Experimental Results

i. Determination of Tc

Figure 1 shows the T dependence of the AC susceptibility at several pressures measured by the tank circuit of a NMR probe. To clarify the influence of the magnetic field on Tc, we measured the suscep-tibilities not only at zero field, but also at 6.02 T. A resonant frequency of the circuit f is expressed as follows:

2n /L(1 + 4nx)C where L, C, and x are the coil inductance, the capacitance of the variable capacitor, and the AC susceptibility, respectively. When a sample undergoes a SC transition, f diverges due to the Meissner effect (x = — 1/4n). We determined Tc from the intersection point of linear fittings (Fig.1). Tc increases up to ^ 27 K at 3.0 GPa from Tc ^ 9 K at ambient pressure. We found that Tc at 1.0 GPa was anomalously suppressed at 6.02 T, and the system has not undergone the SC transition above 4.2 K. In contrast, Tcs at 2.0 and 3.0 GPa are slightly decreased by the field, as shown in Fig. 1.

ii. 77Se-NMR spectra and 77Se shift

We measured 77Se-NMR (I = 1/2, y/2n = 8.118 MHz/T) spectra on FeSeo.ssSo.12 with a fixed field of 6.02 T. Figure 2(a) shows the T evolution of the spectra at ambient pressure. A single 77Se signal in a tetragonal state (T > 60 K) becomes a double-peak structure below Ts ^ 60 K, which is in good agreement with the structural transition temperature observed by the resistivity measurements 3. Figures 2(b) and 3 show the T dependence of the 77 Se shift at ambient pressure and the shift at several pressures, respectively. The average of the peaks below Ts is plotted for the data at ambient pressure in Fig. 3. The shift K is proportional to the density of states (DOS). In general, the DOS changes monotonically with increasing pressure due to a change in the bandwidth. In our sample, how-ever, the DOS is enhanced at 1.0 GPa, and then it reduces with increasing pressure. As discussed below, the origin of this anomalous P dependence of the DOS could be interpreted as a topological change in the Fermi surfaces, the socalled Lifshitz transition.

 

 

iii. The relaxation rate divided by temperature, 1/Ti T

Figure 4 shows the relaxation rate divided by temperature, 1/TiT. We measured the relaxation time Ti with the inversion-recovery method for 77Se. The relaxation rate provides a measure for the low-energy spin fluctuations. In general, an AFM fluctuation is enhanced when a system comes near an AFM phase. By contrast, the AFM fluctuation of FeSeo.ssS0.12 is strongly suppressed at 1.0 GPa and is slightly enhanced above 2.0 GPa, although the AFM phase is induced above 3.0GPa.

IV. Discussion

From the results mentioned above, we suggest that the Lifshitz transition at around 1.0 GPa is crucial to understand the anomalies of FeSe0.88S0.12. Firstly, the DOS suggested from the 77Se shift shows that some kind of anomaly occurs at 1.0 GPa as mentioned above (see the inset of Fig. 3). Ac-cording to a recent theoretical investigation in FeSe, a Lifshitz transition may occur with reducing the lattice constants 5. S-substitution is isovalent and S-substituted FeSe has smaller lattice constants than pure FeSe 6. Furthermore, applying pressure also causes the lattice compression. In our sample, FeSe0.88S0.12, therefore, the Lifshitz transition may account for the anomaly in the DOS.

Assuming that the Lifshitz transition occurs at around 1.0 GPa, the Fermi surfaces are reconstructed, and the reconstruction of the Fermi surfaces could induce a change in the dominant nesting vector. When the dominant nesting vector changes, it is possible that the AFM fluctuation at 3.0 GPa become weaker than that at ambient pressure, even though the AFM phase appears in a high pressure region. To clarify this scenario, it is necessary to determine the spin configuration of the pressure-induced AFM phase from the measurements in the higher pressure region.

V. Conclusions

We carried out 77 Se-NMR measurements on FeSe0.88S0.12, and the 77Se shift suggests that the DOS exhibits an anomalous enhancement at 1.0 GPa. The Lifshitz transition, the change in topology of Fermi surface, could account for this anomaly. The Fermi surfaces are reconstructed due to the Lifshitz transition, resulting in a change of the dominant nesting vector. This is the reason why the AFM fluctuation at ambient pressure is stronger than that at 3.0 GPa despite the AFM order being induced above 3.0 GPa.

Acknowledgements - The NMR work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18H01181 and a grant from Mitsubishi Foundation. We thank H. Kontani and P. Toulemonde for discussion.

 

1    R M Fernandes, A V Chubukov, J Schmalian, What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductor?, Nat. Phys. 10, 97 (2014).         [ Links ]

2    J P Sun, K Matsuura, G Z Ye, Y Mizukami, M Shimozawa, K Matsubayashi, M Yamashita, T Watashige, S Kasahara, Y Matsuda, J Q Yan, B C Sales, Y Uwatoko, J G Cheng, T Shibauchi, Dome-shaped magnetic order com-peting with high-temperature superconductivity at high pressures in FeSe, Nat. Commun. 7, 12146 (2016).         [ Links ]

3    K Matsuura, Y Mizukami, Y Arai, Y Sug-imura, N Maejima, A Machida, T Watanuki, T Fukuda, T Yajima, Z Hiroi, K Y Yip, Y C Chan, Q Niu, S Hosoi, K Ishida, K Mukasa,         [ Links ]

S Kasahara, J G Cheng, S K Goh, Y Mat-suda, Y Uwatoko, T Shibauchi, Maximizing Tc by tuning nematicity and magnetism in FeSei-xSx superconductors, Nat. Commun. 8, 1143 (2017).         [ Links ]

4    N Fujiwara, T Matsumoto, K Nakazawa, A Hisada, Y Uwatoko, Fabrication and efficiency evaluation of a hybrid NiCrAl pressure cell up to 4 GPa, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 073905 (2007).         [ Links ]

5    S L Skornyakov, V I Anisimov, D Vollhardt, I Leonov, Correlation strength, Lifshitz transi-tion, and the emergence of a two-dimensional to three-dimensional crossover in FeSe under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115165 (2018).         [ Links ]

6    J N Millican, D Phelan, E L Thomas, J B Leao, E Carpenter, Pressure-induced effects on the structure of the FeSe superconductor, Solid State Commun. 149, 707 (2009).         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons